Valorant
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 298 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 199 | 209 | 220 | 333 |
| 1440p QHD | 249 | 262 | 275 | 417 |
| 1080p Full HD | 292 | 307 | 322 | 489 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Valorant with Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070, In-Depth Analysis
Valorant is a competitive FPS where frame rates often matter more than absolute visual fidelity, and the data for the Intel Core i7-14700F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 reveals a configuration that is heavily skewed towards CPU performance. The measured results show a system that delivers exceptionally high frame rates even at 4K, but the scaling patterns between resolutions and settings expose the GTX 1070 as the primary bottleneck in this specific pairing. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS data to understand where the limits of this combo lie and what the numbers imply for gameplay.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS data across the three tested resolutions tells a clear story about which component is driving performance in Valorant. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 489 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 on Low settings, the average drops to 417 FPS, a decrease of approximately 14.7%. The jump to 3840x2160 on Low settings further reduces the average to 333 FPS, another 20.1% drop from the 1440p figure. This scaling pattern is far from linear with pixel count, which suggests that even at lower graphical presets, the GPU is beginning to feel the load of increased resolution.
However, the more telling comparison comes from the High settings preset. At 1080p High, the average is 307 FPS. At 1440p High, it falls to 262 FPS, a 14.7% reduction. At 4K High, the average is 209 FPS, a 20.2% drop from 1440p. This near-identical percentage drop between Low and High settings across resolutions indicates that the GTX 1070's rendering workload is scaling consistently with pixel count, regardless of the preset. The data shows that the CPU is so powerful that it is not the limiting factor in these scenarios; the GPU's fill rate and shading capacity are what dictate the frame rate ceiling as resolution increases.
The implications are significant for competitive play. The drop from 1080p to 4K represents a loss of 180 FPS on Low settings (from 489 to 333) and 98 FPS on High settings (from 307 to 209). While 209 FPS at 4K is still exceptionally smooth, the data suggests that players seeking the absolute highest refresh rates will be constrained by the GPU at higher resolutions. The scaling pattern indicates that the GTX 1070 is the limiting component, as a CPU-bound scenario would typically show much smaller FPS deltas when pixel count increases. The benchmark results point to a system where the i7-14700F has ample headroom, but the GTX 1070 must work progressively harder to fill the larger frames.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is a Pascal-era GPU with 8 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 256.3 GB/s. Its base clock is 1506 MHz with a boost clock of 1683 MHz. In the context of Valorant, a game that is not known for demanding high VRAM capacities, the 8 GB frame buffer is more than sufficient. The data confirms this, as the game runs at high frame rates even at 4K Ultra, which suggests that VRAM capacity is not a limiting factor in these tests.
The GPU's role as the bottleneck is more about its raw compute throughput than its memory. With 1920 shading units and a pixel rate of 107.7 GPixel/s, the GTX 1070 has to process a significant amount of geometry and pixels at 4K resolution. The measured FPS at 4K Ultra is 199, which is only 4.8% lower than the 209 FPS at 4K High. This small difference between High and Ultra presets suggests that the additional graphical features in Ultra are not heavily taxing the GPU, but the resolution itself is the primary load.
The benchmark data indicates that the GPU's clocks and architecture are well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it delivers 292-489 FPS depending on settings. However, the scaling to 4K shows a more pronounced performance hit, confirming that the GPU is the component that determines the FPS ceiling as resolution climbs. The GTX 1070's performance percentile of 47 places it in the middle of all GPUs, which aligns with its role as a capable but not top-tier card for modern titles. In Valorant, this translates to a GPU that can handle high refresh rates at mainstream resolutions but will hold back the CPU's full potential at 4K.
FAQ
Q: Why does the FPS drop so much from 1080p to 4K, even on Low settings?
A: The data shows a drop from 489 FPS at 1080p Low to 333 FPS at 4K Low, a 31.9% reduction. This is because the GTX 1070 must render four times the pixels at 4K, and its shading units and pixel rate become the limiting factor, even when the graphical preset is set to Low.
Q: Is the Intel Core i7-14700F holding back the GTX 1070 in this game?
A: The benchmark data suggests the opposite. The CPU has 20 cores and 28 threads with a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, and the FPS scaling with resolution indicates the GPU is the bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 489 FPS, which is high, but the proportional drops at higher resolutions point to GPU limitations, not CPU ones.
Q: What is the best resolution to play Valorant with this combo for maximum FPS?
A: Based on the measured data, 1920x1080 on Low settings provides the highest average FPS at 489. If a player prefers higher visual fidelity, 1080p Ultra still offers 292 FPS, which is far above the refresh rate of most monitors.
Q: How does the GTX 1070's memory capacity affect performance in Valorant?
A: The 8 GB of GDDR5 memory is not a limiting factor in this game. The measured FPS at 4K Ultra (199 FPS) shows that the game fits comfortably within the memory capacity, and performance is more tied to the GPU's compute power than its VRAM allocation.
Q: Does the Ultra preset provide a significantly better experience than High?
A: The data shows minimal FPS differences between High and Ultra presets. At 4K, the difference is 10 FPS (209 vs 199), and at 1080p, it is 15 FPS (307 vs 292). The visual gains from Ultra are likely minor, but the FPS cost is also small, so it is a matter of preference.
Q: Why is the FPS at 1440p Low (417) so much higher than 4K Low (333)?
A: This is due to the pixel count difference. 1440p has about 3.7 million pixels, while 4K has about 8.3 million. The GTX 1070's pixel rate of 107.7 GPixel/s is better utilized at 1440p, resulting in a 25.2% higher FPS compared to 4K on the same Low settings.
How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 combination ranks 2979 out of 3708 tested combos in Valorant. This places it in the 19.6th percentile of all tested configurations, meaning that about 80% of other combos tested in this game perform better. This ranking is surprising given the high CPU performance, but it underscores the significant impact of the GPU on the overall result. The i7-14700F itself has a percentile rank of 91 among all CPUs, showing its top-tier processing power. In contrast, the GTX 1070 has a percentile rank of 47 among all GPUs, indicating it is an average performer.
The disparity between the CPU's high percentile and the GPU's mid-range percentile explains the combo's lower overall rank. The data suggests that the CPU is capable of pushing far higher frame rates, but the GPU is the limiting factor. Compared to other combos that might pair a similar CPU with a more powerful GPU, this configuration falls behind. The combo rank of 2979 indicates that while the system is more than playable, it is not among the top performers in the database for Valorant. The benchmark results show that this pairing is a classic case of a strong processor being held back by a mid-range graphics card, resulting in a combo that excels at 1080p but loses ground at higher resolutions.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the Low preset yields the highest average at 489 FPS. The Medium preset averages 322 FPS, with a minimum of 274 and a maximum of 370 FPS. High settings average 307 FPS, and Ultra settings average 292 FPS. This shows a clear trend: lowering the settings increases FPS, but even at Ultra, the frame rate is very high, making 1080p a smooth experience on any preset.
At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 417 FPS, dropping significantly from the 1080p figure. Medium settings average 275 FPS, with a minimum of 233 and a maximum of 316 FPS. High settings average 262 FPS, and Ultra settings average 249 FPS. The pattern is consistent, with a roughly 14-15% drop in FPS from 1080p to 1440p for each preset, confirming that the GPU is scaling with resolution.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 333 FPS, which is still very high. Medium settings average 220 FPS, with a minimum of 187 and a maximum of 252 FPS. High settings average 209 FPS, and Ultra settings average 199 FPS. The 4K data shows the most significant FPS cost, with the Low preset dropping 25.2% from 1440p and the High preset dropping 20.2% from 1440p. The minimum FPS recorded in the entire dataset is 187 FPS at 4K Medium, which is still well above the 144 Hz refresh rate common in gaming monitors. This breakdown highlights that the combo is capable of high performance in all scenarios, with the only trade-off being the FPS ceiling at higher resolutions.
Settings Recommendations
For players using this combo, the choice of settings depends on the resolution of their monitor and their preference for visual fidelity. At 1920x1080, the data shows that the Low preset offers the highest average FPS at 489, which is ideal for competitive play where frame rate is paramount. However, even the Ultra preset at 292 FPS is far above the refresh rate of most standard monitors, so players can opt for higher visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. The Medium preset offers a balanced 322 FPS, with the measured minimum of 274 FPS ensuring consistent performance.
At 2560x1440, the Low preset provides 417 FPS, which is excellent for high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors. The Medium preset at 275 FPS is still very smooth, and the minimum of 233 FPS means there will not be any noticeable stutters. The High and Ultra presets are also viable, with 262 and 249 FPS respectively, offering a good balance between visuals and performance. For 1440p gaming, the Medium preset appears to be the sweet spot, as it provides a significant FPS boost over High (275 vs 262) while still maintaining good graphical quality.
At 3840x2160, the Low preset is the only one that breaks the 300 FPS barrier, averaging 333 FPS. This makes it the best choice for 4K gaming with this combo if maximum FPS is the goal. The Medium preset at 220 FPS is still excellent for 4K, and the minimum of 187 FPS ensures that even in intense scenes, the frame rate remains high. The High and Ultra presets offer 209 and 199 FPS respectively, which are also very playable. Given the minimal FPS difference between High and Ultra, the Ultra preset is recommended for 4K players who want the best visuals, as the 10 FPS cost is negligible for most users.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-14700F is a powerful processor with 20 cores and 28 threads, based on the Raptor Lake architecture. Its base clock is 2.10 GHz, but it can boost up to 5.40 GHz, offering substantial single-thread performance that is critical for Valorant. The CPU's benchmark scores are impressive, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122 and a single-core score of 4958. The Geekbench single-core score of 2429 further confirms its strength in tasks that rely on a few fast cores, which is exactly what Valorant's engine uses.
The data suggests that the CPU is not the bottleneck in this combo. At 1080p Low, the FPS is 489, which is extremely high, but the fact that it does not go higher is likely due to the GPU's limitations rather than the CPU's. The CPU's percentile rank of 91 indicates it is among the top 9% of all processors, and its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, have similar average scores, showing that it is a top-tier performer. In Valorant, the CPU's job is to handle game logic and draw calls, and with 28 threads, it has plenty of headroom.
The CPU's high boost clock of 5.40 GHz is particularly beneficial for Valorant, as the game is known to favor high single-core performance. The measured FPS at 1080p Low (489) reflects the CPU's ability to feed the GPU with data quickly. However, the data also shows that as resolution increases, the CPU's role diminishes, and the GPU becomes the limiting factor. This is evident from the FPS drops at 1440p and 4K, which are proportional to the increase in pixel count, not the CPU's processing capability. Overall, the i7-14700F provides a strong foundation for this combo, ensuring that the GTX 1070 is the only thing standing between the system and even higher frame rates.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-14700F
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-14700F + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 in Valorant
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 333.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 220.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 209.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 199.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 417.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 275.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 262.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 249.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 489.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 322.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 307.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 292.0 |
Valorant with GTX 1070 + Other CPUs
See how Valorant performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-14700F + GTX 1070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.