Valorant

Valorant

AVERAGE FPS
305
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 305 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 267 270 276 322
1440p QHD 287 291 295 349
1080p Full HD 304 312 315 367

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 322
3840x2160 Medium 276
3840x2160 High 270
3840x2160 Ultra 267
2560x1440 Low 349
2560x1440 Medium 295
2560x1440 High 291
2560x1440 Ultra 287
1920x1080 Low 367
1920x1080 Medium 315
1920x1080 High 312
1920x1080 Ultra 304

Valorant with Intel Core i5-9400 + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i5-9400 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Valorant, with the data showing a clear pattern of CPU limitation at lower resolutions. Across all measured settings, the average FPS never drops below 267, indicating that this combination is far beyond the threshold needed for competitive play. The benchmark results reveal a system where the GPU's immense power is largely held in check by the processor's six-core architecture, making the scaling behavior between 1080p and 4K particularly informative for understanding where the bottleneck truly lies.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate progression from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 tells a compelling story about component balance. At Low settings, the average FPS moves from 366.5 at 1080p down to 349 at 1440p, and finally to 322.3 at 4K. This represents only a 12.1% drop from 1080p to 4K, which is remarkably small for such a significant pixel count increase. The data suggests that at Low settings, the CPU is the primary limiting factor even at 4K, as the RX 9070 XT has ample headroom to render the scene quickly, but the i5-9400's six threads cannot feed frames any faster.

The scaling pattern changes noticeably when examining High settings. At 1920x1080, the average is 311.9 FPS, dropping to 290.5 at 2560x1440, and then to 270.2 at 3840x2160. This steeper decline of 13.4% between 1080p and 4K indicates that as visual complexity increases, the GPU begins to take on a more significant role. However, the absolute numbers remain extraordinarily high, suggesting that even at 4K Ultra, the system is nowhere near struggling. The Ultra preset shows a similar trend, with 303.5 FPS at 1080p, 287.2 at 1440p, and 267 at 4K, representing a 12.0% reduction.

The fact that the gap between Low and Ultra settings at 4K is only 55.3 FPS (322.3 versus 267) further reinforces the CPU-bound nature of this pairing. In a GPU-limited scenario, one would expect a much wider spread between the lowest and highest quality presets. The data indicates that the RX 9070 XT's 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 644.6 GB/s bandwidth are more than sufficient for Valorant's demands, leaving the i5-9400's 2.90 GHz base clock and 4.10 GHz boost clock as the constraining factor.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-9400 brings six cores and six threads to the table, built on the Coffee Lake architecture with a 14 nm process node. Its benchmark results show a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 7969 and a single-core score of 1125, placing it at the 50th percentile among all CPUs tested. The nearest rivals in the data include the Intel Core i3-10305 with an average score of 2300 (0.2% higher) and the Intel Xeon E-2134 at 2295 (0.4% higher), while the Intel Core i7-8809G sits slightly above at 2319 with a -0.6% delta. These close margins indicate that the i5-9400 performs almost identically to these alternatives in general compute tasks.

For Valorant specifically, the game's engine appears to favor the processor's single-thread performance, as evidenced by the relatively flat FPS curve across different resolutions. The 9 MB of shared L3 cache and 256 KB L2 cache per core provide adequate data locality for the game's rendering loops. The dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 42.7 GB/s bandwidth is not a limiting factor here, as the measured FPS at 1080p Low (366.5) approaches what the CPU can physically generate for the game's draw calls. The data implies that upgrading to a CPU with higher single-core clock speeds would yield larger FPS gains than any GPU change, since the RX 9070 XT is clearly idling in many scenarios.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS measured for this combo?

A: The maximum recorded average is 366.5 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K at Ultra settings?

A: At Ultra, the average FPS drops from 303.5 at 1920x1080 to 267 at 3840x2160, a reduction of 36.5 FPS or approximately 12.0%.

Q: Does the RX 9070 XT's 16 GB VRAM get fully utilized in Valorant?

A: The benchmark data shows no evidence of VRAM limitation, as even the largest resolution and highest settings still produce 267 FPS, indicating the 16 GB pool is far from exhausted.

Q: How does this combo rank among all tested configurations?

A: The combo ranks 1328 out of 1650 tested combinations, placing it in the lower 20% despite producing very high frame rates, which reflects the unusual pairing of a mid-range CPU with a high-end GPU.

Q: Which settings preset yields the highest FPS at 2560x1440?

A: Low settings produce 349 FPS at 1440p, which is 53.9 FPS higher than the next best preset, Medium, at 295.1 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the bottleneck at 4K High?

A: The data shows 270.2 FPS at 4K High versus 322.3 at 4K Low, a 52.1 FPS difference, suggesting the CPU remains the primary limiter since the GPU can handle the extra load without a proportional FPS drop.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the settings ladder shows a tight grouping: Low leads with 366.5 FPS, followed by Medium at 314.9, High at 311.9, and Ultra at 303.5. The spread between the lowest and highest preset is 63 FPS, which is substantial but still leaves even the worst case well above any modern display's refresh rate. Moving to 2560x1440, the same ordering persists, with Low at 349, Medium at 295.1, High at 290.5, and Ultra at 287.2. The gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 61.8 FPS, indicating that the additional resolution slightly compresses the differences between presets.

At 3840x2160, the pattern continues with Low at 322.3, Medium at 276.1, High at 270.2, and Ultra at 267. Here, the Low-to-Ultra spread tightens further to 55.3 FPS. Interesting to note is that the drop from 1080p to 4K for each preset is relatively consistent: Low loses 44.2 FPS, Medium loses 38.8, High loses 41.7, and Ultra loses 36.5. This uniformity suggests that the game's rendering pipeline scales predictably with pixel count, and the RX 9070 XT's 4096 shading units and 128 ROPs handle the increased fragment work efficiently. The pixel rate of 380.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 760.3 GTexel/s are more than adequate for Valorant's relatively simple geometry.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 1328 out of 1650 places this configuration in the 19.5th percentile of all tested pairings, meaning roughly 80% of other CPU-GPU combinations achieve higher average FPS in this game. This is a surprising result given the absolute frame rates, but it reflects the fact that most competitive configurations likely pair the RX 9070 XT with a more powerful processor. The data suggests that while this combo produces playable frame rates, it is not optimizing the GPU's potential. The i5-9400's 50th percentile CPU ranking, combined with the RX 9070 XT's 82nd percentile GPU ranking, creates a mismatch where the processor's six threads cap the system's output.

When considering the nearest rivals for the CPU, the Intel Core i3-10305 (0.2% higher average score) and the Intel Xeon E-2134 (0.4% higher) would likely produce nearly identical performance in Valorant, as their compute scores are within a margin of error. The GPU's nearest rivals, including the AMD Radeon Pro 575 (-0.1% delta) and NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (0.2% delta), are not representative of the RX 9070 XT's true tier in gaming workloads, as the PassMark G3D score of 26795 and 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 7260 indicate substantial rasterization capability. The low combo rank is thus a direct consequence of the CPU bottleneck, not a reflection of the GPU's weakness.

Settings Recommendations

For players prioritizing maximum frame rate, the Low preset at 1920x1080 delivers the highest measured average of 366.5 FPS. This setting is optimal for competitive play where every frame counts, especially if using a high-refresh-rate monitor. The Medium preset at 1080p, with 314.9 FPS, offers a balanced trade-off between visual fidelity and performance, sacrificing only 51.6 FPS compared to Low. At 1440p, Low still reigns supreme at 349, while Medium provides 295.1 FPS, which is still exceptionally smooth for most displays.

The data suggests that Ultra settings are rarely justified, as they only yield 303.5 FPS at 1080p and 267 at 4K, representing a 17.2% and 17.2% reduction from Low respectively, without providing meaningful competitive advantages in a tactical shooter. For 4K users, the High preset at 270.2 FPS is marginally better than Ultra at 267, but both are so close that the visual differences likely outweigh the 3 FPS delta. The recommendation is to select Low for maximum responsiveness, Medium for a balance, and to avoid Ultra unless the game's visuals are the primary concern, given the CPU-limited nature of this pairing.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT is built on the RDNA 4.0 architecture using a 4 nm process, featuring 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die. Its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus provides 644.6 GB/s of bandwidth, which is vastly more than Valorant requires, as evidenced by the consistent frame rates across resolutions. The GPU's boost clock of 2970 MHz and game clock of 2400 MHz are high, but the benchmark results show that these clocks are not the limiting factor in this game. The FP32 compute of 48.66 TFLOPS and texture rate of 760.3 GTexel/s are substantial, yet the measured FPS at 1080p Low (366.5) versus 4K Low (322.3) demonstrates that the GPU is capable of much more than the CPU can feed it.

The GPU's percentile ranking of 82 places it well above average, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 7260 confirms strong DirectX 12 performance. However, in Valorant, the DirectX 12 API is not heavily utilized, and the game's performance is more dependent on the CPU's single-thread speed. The PassMark scores, including a G3D score of 26795 and a DirectX 11 score of 292, suggest the GPU is well-suited for modern titles, but this specific game's low graphical demands mean the RX 9070 XT is effectively underutilized. The data implies that the GPU's 304 W TDP and dual-slot cooler are overkill for achieving these frame rates, and a less powerful card would likely produce nearly identical results when paired with this CPU.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-9400

Cores / Threads 6 / 6
Base Clock 2900 MHz
Boost Clock 4100 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1151
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2970 MHz MHz
TDP 304 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-9400 + AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT in Valorant

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 322.3
3840x2160 Medium 276.1
3840x2160 High 270.2
3840x2160 Ultra 267.0
2560x1440 Low 349.0
2560x1440 Medium 295.1
2560x1440 High 290.5
2560x1440 Ultra 287.2
1920x1080 Low 366.5
1920x1080 Medium 314.9
1920x1080 High 311.9
1920x1080 Ultra 303.5

Valorant with ii5-9400 + Other GPUs

See how Valorant performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Other Games with ii5-9400 + RX 9070 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.