Valorant

Valorant

AVERAGE FPS
370
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 370 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 255 268 281 426
1440p QHD 319 335 351 499
1080p Full HD 374 392 412 526

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 426
3840x2160 Medium 281
3840x2160 High 268
3840x2160 Ultra 255
2560x1440 Low 499
2560x1440 Medium 351
2560x1440 High 335
2560x1440 Ultra 319
1920x1080 Low 526
1920x1080 Medium 412
1920x1080 High 392
1920x1080 Ultra 374

Valorant with Intel Core i5-12400 + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, In-Depth Analysis

Valorant is an exceptionally CPU-bound title, and the measured FPS data for the Intel Core i5-12400 paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT confirms this dynamic decisively. Across every resolution and setting, the frame rates are astronomically high, far exceeding the refresh rates of typical gaming monitors. The data indicates that this combination is not just playable but overwhelmingly overpowered for Valorant, with the CPU’s six performance cores and the GPU’s large memory buffer ensuring that the game never becomes a visual bottleneck. The most significant takeaway is that players can expect a flawless competitive experience, with the lowest recorded average being 255 FPS at 4K Ultra, which still dwarfs the needs of any esports title.

Resolution Scaling

The scaling of frame rates from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic pattern of a game that is heavily reliant on processor performance. At 1080p with Low settings, the system produces an average of 526 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops this to 499 FPS, a reduction of approximately 5%. At 4K Low, the average falls to 426 FPS, which is a 19% decrease from the 1080p figure. This relatively modest drop when increasing resolution by 4x the pixel count suggests that the CPU is still the primary driver of performance at these lower graphical presets, as the GPU has ample headroom to handle the increased pixel workload without significantly impacting the overall frame rate.

However, the scaling becomes more pronounced when graphical settings are increased, which places a heavier load on the GPU. At High settings, the average FPS drops from 392 at 1080p to 335 at 1440p (a 15% decrease), and then to 268 at 4K (a 32% decrease from 1080p). This steeper decline indicates that the GPU is beginning to play a more substantial role in limiting performance, especially at 4K. The data shows that while the CPU remains the bottleneck at lower settings, the RX 7600 XT's capabilities are still sufficient to maintain a high level of performance at 4K, but the gap between resolutions widens as the graphical load increases.

The limiting component analysis is clear: the CPU is the primary driver at 1080p and 1440p, as evidenced by the small performance delta between these resolutions. The GPU becomes more of a factor at 4K, particularly on Ultra settings. The difference between 1080p Ultra (374 FPS) and 4K Ultra (255 FPS) is a 32% reduction, which is a significant drop but still leaves performance at a level that is far beyond what is necessary for smooth gameplay. This suggests that for a game like Valorant, the resolution scaling is not a concern; the hardware is strong enough to deliver high refresh rates at any resolution, with the CPU ultimately capping the maximum achievable FPS.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS achievable with this hardware configuration?

A: The highest recorded average FPS is 526, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This represents the maximum performance ceiling of this particular CPU and GPU combination when the graphical load is minimized.

Q: How does the system perform at 4K resolution, is it still competitive?

A: Yes, absolutely. Even at 3840x2160 (4K) with Ultra settings, the system maintains an average FPS of 255. At 4K with Low settings, the average jumps to 426 FPS. These numbers indicate that the hardware is more than capable of delivering a high-refresh-rate experience at 4K, a resolution typically reserved for more demanding titles.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck in Valorant?

A: The data strongly suggests the CPU is the primary bottleneck, especially at lower resolutions. The minimal FPS drop from 1080p to 1440p (e.g., from 526 to 499 FPS on Low) indicates that the processor is limiting the frame rate before the graphics card. The GPU only becomes a more significant factor at 4K with higher settings, where the FPS drop is more pronounced.

Q: Are the frame times stable, or are there drops?

A: For the Medium settings preset, the data includes minimum and maximum FPS values, which provide insight into frame time consistency. At 1080p Medium, the FPS ranges from 350 to 474. At 1440p Medium, it ranges from 299 to 404, and at 4K Medium, it ranges from 239 to 323. These ranges show some variance but remain consistently high, indicating generally stable performance without severe stutters.

Q: How does this combo rank against other tested configurations in Valorant?

A: This specific combination of the Intel Core i5-12400 and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT ranks at #2100 out of 3708 tested combos for Valorant. This places it in the top 57% of all tested systems, which is a strong result given the game's high frame rate demands and the fact that many top combos likely include more expensive, higher-core-count processors.

Q: What is the best setting to use for the most consistent high FPS?

A: The data shows that Low settings provide the highest average FPS and likely the most consistent performance, with a 526 FPS average at 1080p. While High settings still yield an impressive 392 FPS at 1080p, Low settings will maximize the frame rate ceiling and reduce the chance of any CPU-related frame dips in intense combat scenarios.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, and its specifications directly explain the exceptional performance seen in Valorant. With a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, the processor has the single-thread grunt that esports titles like Valorant heavily favor. The benchmark scores for the CPU support this, with a strong 3dmark_single_thread score of 910 and a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2257, indicating excellent per-core performance.

The game's engine benefits significantly from high clock speeds and strong single-core performance, which is why the CPU is the limiting factor at lower resolutions. The data shows that the FPS does not increase dramatically when dropping from 1080p to 1440p, as the processor is already working near its maximum capacity to feed the GPU with draw calls. The 12 threads provide enough parallelism for modern games, but the game's primary thread is likely the bottleneck, meaning the boost clock of 4.40 GHz is the most critical specification for achieving the highest frame rates.

The CPU's performance relative to its rivals also contextualizes its capability. Compared to the Intel Core i3-14100F, which has an average benchmark score of 18519, the i5-12400 has an average score of 18683, placing it 0.9% higher. This indicates that while the i5 has more cores, its performance in this specific game is not drastically different from a newer, cheaper quad-core part, reinforcing the idea that single-thread performance and clock speed are paramount in Valorant. The CPU's 18 MB of shared L3 cache also aids in keeping frequently accessed game data close to the cores, reducing latency and further boosting the frame rate.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at how the system performs across different resolutions and settings. Starting at 1920x1080, the system delivers outstanding performance across the board. On Low settings, it achieves an average of 526 FPS. Moving to Medium, the average is 412 FPS, with a minimum of 350 and a maximum of 474. High settings produce an average of 392 FPS, while Ultra settings yield 374 FPS. This shows a clear progression where lower settings unlock higher frame rates, but even the most demanding preset remains exceptionally fast.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains staggeringly high. Low settings average 499 FPS, which is only a 27 FPS drop from the 1080p result. Medium settings average 351 FPS, with a range of 299 to 404. High settings average 335 FPS, and Ultra settings average 319 FPS. The relatively small gaps between resolutions at this level further confirm the CPU's dominance as the performance limiter, as the GPU is still capable of handling the increased pixel count with minimal impact on the frame rate.

At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to show its influence more clearly, but the results are still impressive. Low settings average 426 FPS, a significant drop from the 1080p figure but still a phenomenal number. Medium settings average 281 FPS, with a minimum of 239 and a maximum of 323. High settings average 268 FPS, and Ultra settings average 255 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra settings at 4K is 171 FPS, which is larger than at 1080p (152 FPS), demonstrating that the GPU is becoming a more significant factor as the pixel count increases, yet the overall performance is still far beyond the needs of any competitive player.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, based on the RDNA 3.0 architecture, plays a supporting role in this configuration, but its specifications ensure that it never becomes a liability in Valorant. The GPU is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, which is far more than required for a game like Valorant, and this capacity ensures that texture loading and memory bandwidth are never a concern. The 288.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth and the 128-bit bus provide more than enough throughput for the game's low-resolution textures and simple geometry.

With a boost clock of 2755 MHz and 2048 shading units, the GPU has the raw compute power to handle the game at any resolution. Its benchmark scores, such as a Passmark G3D score of 17132, place it in the 60th percentile of all GPUs, showing it is a competent mid-range performer. The data shows that at 1080p and 1440p, the GPU is not the limiting factor, as the FPS is capped by the CPU. However, at 4K Ultra, the GPU's workload increases, and the FPS drops to 255, indicating that the graphics card is now being utilized to a greater extent.

The GPU's performance relative to its rivals is interesting, as it sits very close to some older or different-class parts. For instance, it is only 0.3% faster than an NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 and 0.4% faster than an AMD Radeon HD 7970M, according to average benchmark scores. This comparison highlights that while the RX 7600 XT is a modern card, its raw compute in synthetic benchmarks is not dramatically ahead of much older high-end parts. However, in a game like Valorant, the combination of its modern architecture, high clock speeds, and ample VRAM ensures it can easily keep pace with the CPU's output, providing a smooth and high-FPS experience.

Settings Recommendations

For the competitive gamer seeking the absolute highest frame rates, the Low preset at 1080p is the clear choice, delivering a 526 FPS average. This setting minimizes the GPU's workload and allows the CPU to push its maximum frame output, which is ideal for players with 360Hz or 500Hz monitors who want to ensure they are never leaving performance on the table. The data shows that this preset offers the most headroom for avoiding any potential frame dips during chaotic team fights.

For players who desire a balance between visual fidelity and performance, the High preset at 1080p is an excellent option, providing a 392 FPS average. This is still an extraordinarily high frame rate that will satisfy the vast majority of high-refresh-rate displays. The jump from Low to High settings does come with a 134 FPS cost, but the visual improvements are often worth it for players who are not strictly chasing the highest possible number. The Medium preset at 1080p, with an average of 412 FPS, is a middle ground, but the High preset offers a better visual experience for a relatively small performance cost compared to Ultra.

At 1440p, the High preset is the recommended sweet spot, yielding a 335 FPS average. This provides excellent clarity and smoothness for players with 1440p monitors. The Ultra preset at 1440p also performs admirably at 319 FPS, but the performance difference is minimal, making High the better choice for maximizing FPS without a noticeable visual sacrifice. For 4K gaming, the Low preset is recommended for the best experience, as it achieves 426 FPS, while the Ultra preset, at 255 FPS, is still playable but offers diminishing returns on visual quality for the 171 FPS loss. The data indicates that for this hardware combination, prioritizing lower settings is the key to unlocking the full potential of the CPU's high clock speeds.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-12400

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 2500 MHz
Boost Clock 4400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2755 MHz MHz
TDP 190 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400 + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT in Valorant

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 426.0
3840x2160 Medium 281.0
3840x2160 High 268.0
3840x2160 Ultra 255.0
2560x1440 Low 499.0
2560x1440 Medium 351.0
2560x1440 High 335.0
2560x1440 Ultra 319.0
1920x1080 Low 526.0
1920x1080 Medium 412.0
1920x1080 High 392.0
1920x1080 Ultra 374.0

Valorant with ii5-12400 + Other GPUs

See how Valorant performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Valorant with RX 7600 XT + Other CPUs

See how Valorant performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-12400 + RX 7600 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.