Valorant

Valorant

AVERAGE FPS
485
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 485 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 391 410 431 522
1440p QHD 464 471 479 562
1080p Full HD 489 497 505 593

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 522
3840x2160 Medium 431
3840x2160 High 410
3840x2160 Ultra 391
2560x1440 Low 562
2560x1440 Medium 479
2560x1440 High 471
2560x1440 Ultra 464
1920x1080 Low 593
1920x1080 Medium 505
1920x1080 High 497
1920x1080 Ultra 489

Valorant with AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile combination delivers exceptional performance in Valorant, positioning it in the top 18% of all tested configurations for this title. The data shows a system that is fundamentally CPU-bound at lower resolutions, with frame rates that exceed the refresh rate capabilities of virtually all displays, while the GPU’s 16 GB of VRAM and high memory bandwidth ensure that even the most demanding settings do not introduce performance bottlenecks. The measured results indicate that this pairing is overkill for competitive play, yet it provides a substantial cushion for users who prioritize maximum visual fidelity without sacrificing the high frame rates essential for a fast-paced FPS.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combo in Valorant?

A: The combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile ranks 673rd out of 3,708 tested combinations for Valorant, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all systems tested for this game.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 9 8945HX posts an average benchmark score of 76,212, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX and 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D, while trailing the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P and AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX by 0.4%.

Q: What is the performance difference between the GPU and its nearest rival?

A: The RTX 5080 Mobile achieves an average benchmark score of 38,349, which is a 0.6% lead over the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile and a 0.1% lead over the NVIDIA GeForce MX570, while falling 0.9% behind both the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A and the AMD Radeon Pro 580X.

Q: What is the highest average frame rate recorded for this system?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 593 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This is the maximum measured value across all resolutions and settings combinations.

Q: What are the clock speeds of this CPU and GPU?

A: The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile has a base clock of 975 MHz and a boost clock of 1500 MHz.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile is equipped with 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 896.0 GB/s.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile is a defining component in this system’s Valorant performance, though its role shifts depending on the resolution and settings being used. The GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR7 memory is far more than Valorant requires, and the 896.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth ensures that texture streaming and asset loading never become a limiting factor. The benchmark results show that at 1080p Low settings, the system achieves 593 FPS, but at 1080p Ultra, it drops to 489 FPS, a difference of 104 FPS. This delta indicates that the GPU’s shading units, of which there are 7,680, are being utilized more heavily as settings increase, yet the frame rates remain so high that the GPU is never the primary bottleneck at this resolution.

At 4K resolution, the GPU’s role becomes more pronounced. The frame rate at 4K Low is 522 FPS, which drops to 410 FPS at 4K High and further to 391 FPS at 4K Ultra. This scaling shows that the RTX 5080 Mobile’s 23.04 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is being tasked with more work per frame as resolution and fidelity increase. The GPU’s boost clock of 1500 MHz, while seemingly modest for a desktop context, is paired with a 256-bit memory interface that delivers 896.0 GB/s, which is critical for maintaining high frame rates at 4K. The data suggests that even at the most demanding 4K Ultra preset, the GPU still has headroom, as the average frame rate of 391 FPS is far above what most displays can render.

The GPU’s benchmark percentile of 81 places it above the vast majority of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals in the database include the RTX 4080 Mobile, which it edges out by 0.6% in average score. This performance headroom means that in Valorant, the RTX 5080 Mobile is not a limiting factor; instead, it provides a stable platform for the CPU to push frame rates to their limits. The measured data confirms that the GPU’s capabilities are more than sufficient for this title, with the only observable constraint being the CPU at lower resolutions.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of resolution scaling that highlights the CPU-bound nature of Valorant on this system. Moving from 1080p to 1440p to 4K shows a progressive decline in frame rates, but the magnitude of that decline is not uniform across settings. At Low settings, the system delivers 593 FPS at 1080p, 562 FPS at 1440p, and 522 FPS at 4K. This represents a 5.2% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 12.0% drop from 1080p to 4K. The relatively small decreases indicate that at Low settings, the CPU is the dominant factor, as the GPU has ample resources to handle the reduced graphical load.

At Ultra settings, the scaling is more pronounced. The system achieves 489 FPS at 1080p, 464 FPS at 1440p, and 391 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 5.1%, but the drop from 1080p to 4K is 20.0%. This larger decline at 4K suggests that the GPU is beginning to play a more significant role, as the increased pixel count taxes the RTX 5080 Mobile’s rendering pipeline. However, even at this worst-case scenario, the 4K Ultra frame rate of 391 FPS remains exceptionally high, indicating that the GPU is still not a hard bottleneck.

The resolution scaling also shows that the gap between Low and Ultra settings narrows as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 104 FPS, while at 4K, the difference is 131 FPS. This widening gap at higher resolutions is a classic sign of GPU involvement, as the additional pixel fill rate demands more from the GPU’s 96 ROPs and 240 TMUs. The data indicates that the limiting component shifts from the CPU at 1080p to a more balanced CPU-GPU load at 4K, but the system never becomes GPU-bound in a way that compromises playability.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this system depend on the user’s priority between frame rate and visual quality. For competitive play where maximum frame rate is paramount, the Low preset at 1080p, delivering 593 FPS, is the clear choice. This configuration minimizes graphical overhead and allows the Ryzen 9 8945HX to operate at its full potential, as the CPU’s 32 threads are more than capable of driving frame rates well beyond the 400 FPS mark. The data shows that Low settings at 1440p still provide 562 FPS, making it a viable option for users who want a higher resolution without a significant frame rate penalty.

For users who prefer a balance of visual fidelity and performance, the Medium preset offers the best measured compromise. At 1080p Medium, the system achieves 505 FPS, which is only 88 FPS lower than Low settings but provides improved graphical quality. The Medium preset also records minimum frame rate data, with a 1080p minimum of 430 FPS and a 1440p minimum of 407 FPS, indicating that this settings level maintains consistent performance even in demanding scenes. The 4K Medium preset delivers 431 FPS, which remains exceptionally high for a 4K resolution and suggests that this is the sweet spot for high-resolution gaming.

The High and Ultra presets offer diminishing returns in terms of visual quality while incurring measurable frame rate costs. At 1080p, High delivers 497 FPS, which is 8 FPS lower than Medium, and Ultra delivers 489 FPS, which is 16 FPS lower. The data suggests that the visual improvements from Medium to Ultra are not worth the frame rate reduction for most users, especially in a competitive FPS where higher refresh rates provide a tangible advantage. The recommendation is to use Medium settings for the best experience, as it provides a robust frame rate buffer while maintaining a higher level of graphical detail than Low.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete measured FPS data for Valorant with this system is as follows. At 1920x1080 resolution, the Low preset achieves an average of 593 FPS, the Medium preset achieves an average of 505 FPS with a minimum of 430 FPS and a maximum of 581 FPS, the High preset achieves an average of 497 FPS, and the Ultra preset achieves an average of 489 FPS. At 2560x1440 resolution, the Low preset delivers 562 FPS, the Medium preset delivers 479 FPS with a minimum of 407 FPS and a maximum of 551 FPS, the High preset delivers 471 FPS, and the Ultra preset delivers 464 FPS.

At 3840x2160 resolution, the Low preset achieves 522 FPS, the Medium preset achieves 431 FPS with a minimum of 366 FPS and a maximum of 495 FPS, the High preset achieves 410 FPS, and the Ultra preset achieves 391 FPS. The data shows a consistent pattern where the Medium preset is the only one with recorded minimum and maximum FPS values, providing a more complete picture of performance variability. Across all resolutions, the Low preset consistently delivers the highest average frame rates, while the Ultra preset delivers the lowest. The gap between Low and Ultra is 104 FPS at 1080p, 98 FPS at 1440p, and 131 FPS at 4K.

The frame rate data also reveals that the system maintains high performance even at the most demanding settings. The lowest average frame rate recorded is 391 FPS at 4K Ultra, which is still substantially higher than the refresh rate of most high-end monitors. The minimum FPS values for the Medium preset, which are the only minimums recorded, range from 366 FPS at 4K to 430 FPS at 1080p, indicating that the system does not experience significant frame drops. This consistency suggests that the combination of the Ryzen 9 8945HX and RTX 5080 Mobile provides a stable gaming experience across all tested configurations.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX plays a pivotal role in Valorant’s performance, as the game is known to be heavily dependent on single-thread performance. The CPU’s Zen 4 architecture, built on a 5 nm process, features 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. The high boost clock is particularly important for Valorant, as the game’s engine relies on fast single-thread execution for game logic and physics. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 6,030 and multi-core score of 42,713 reflect its strength, with the multi-core score being particularly impressive for a mobile processor.

The benchmark data shows that the Ryzen 9 8945HX’s nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, which has an average score of 76,155, and the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D, which has an average score of 75,779. The Ryzen 9 8945HX’s average score of 76,212 places it slightly ahead of both, with a deltaPct of 0.1% and 0.6% respectively. This performance advantage, combined with the CPU’s 64 MB of L3 cache, ensures that Valorant’s level geometry and game state data are readily accessible, reducing latency and improving frame consistency.

The CPU’s role is most evident at 1080p Low settings, where the system achieves 593 FPS. At this resolution and settings level, the GPU is underutilized, and the CPU is the primary driver of frame rate. The fact that the system maintains over 500 FPS even at 4K Low settings indicates that the CPU’s 5.40 GHz boost clock is sufficient to feed the GPU with data, preventing a CPU bottleneck that would otherwise limit performance. The CPU’s 32 threads also provide ample headroom for background tasks and streaming, ensuring that Valorant’s performance is not impacted by system overhead. The data confirms that the Ryzen 9 8945HX is a formidable match for the RTX 5080 Mobile in this title, with the CPU’s high clock speeds and large cache proving to be ideal for Valorant’s demanding single-threaded workloads.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX

Cores / Threads 16 / 32
Base Clock 2500 MHz
Boost Clock 5400 MHz
TDP 55W
Socket AMD Socket FL1
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile

VRAM 16 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1500 MHz MHz
TDP 80 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile in Valorant

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 522.0
3840x2160 Medium 431.0
3840x2160 High 410.0
3840x2160 Ultra 391.0
2560x1440 Low 562.0
2560x1440 Medium 479.0
2560x1440 High 471.0
2560x1440 Ultra 464.0
1920x1080 Low 593.0
1920x1080 Medium 505.0
1920x1080 High 497.0
1920x1080 Ultra 489.0

Valorant with Ryzen 9 8945HX + Other GPUs

See how Valorant performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Valorant with RTX 5080 Mobile + Other CPUs

See how Valorant performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 8945HX + RTX 5080 Mobile

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.