Valorant

Valorant is a competitive FPS where high and consistent frame rates matter more than absolute graphical fidelity, and the measured data for the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G paired with the Intel Arc B390 shows a combo that is firmly at the lower end of the tested spectrum. The combo ranks 2534th out of 2883 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom 12% of all tested systems for this game. While the system is capable of delivering playable frame rates at every tested resolution, its performance ceiling is limited, and the data suggests that the Intel Arc B390 is the primary bottleneck, especially when compared to its peer group of older discrete GPUs. The measured results indicate that this setup is best suited for competitive play at 1080p with lower settings, where it can exceed 300 FPS, rather than for pushing high graphical presets at higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall performance rank of the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + Intel Arc B390 combo in Valorant?

A: The combo ranks 2534th out of 2883 tested combinations (comboRankInGame). This places it in the lower percentile of tested systems, indicating that while it can run the game, its performance is below the vast majority of other tested hardware pairings.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B390's benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Arc B390 has an average benchmark score of 1482. Its closest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX, scores 1463, which is 1.3% lower. Other close rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce 800M (1460, 1.5% lower), the NVIDIA GeForce GT 625 OEM (1446, 2.5% lower), and the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 (1443, 2.7% lower). This means the Arc B390 is slightly faster than these older, low-end GPUs.

Q: What is the best measured FPS result for this combo in Valorant?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 331, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. The next highest is 282 FPS at 2560x1440 with Low settings, and 225 FPS at 3840x2160 with Low settings, showing that the lowest settings preset consistently yields the highest frame rates.

Q: Does the Ryzen 5 4600G have integrated graphics, and what is its TDP?

A: Yes, the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G includes integrated Radeon Vega 7 graphics. It has a TDP of 65 watts. The CPU itself is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz.

Q: What is the memory configuration for the Intel Arc B390?

A: The Intel Arc B390 uses System Shared memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM of its own. Its memory type, bus width, and bandwidth are all listed as "System Shared" or "System Dependent," which shows it relies on the system's main memory for graphics operations.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 4600G's multi-core performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 4600G has an average benchmark score of 17507. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE, scores 17482, which is 0.1% lower. The Intel Core 7 150U scores 17395 (0.6% lower), while the AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE scores 17614 (0.6% higher) and the Intel Core i3-14100T scores 17648 (0.8% higher). The differences are minimal.

How This Combo Ranks

The data for this specific combination of an AMD Ryzen 5 4600G and an Intel Arc B390 places it at rank 2534 out of 2883 tested combos in Valorant. This is a clear indicator that the system sits in the bottom tier of performance for this game among all tested hardware pairings. To put that in perspective, only 349 tested combos perform worse. This ranking is not a reflection of the CPU's capabilities, as the Ryzen 5 4600G holds a 71st percentile ranking among all CPUs, but rather highlights the significant performance limitation imposed by the Intel Arc B390, which sits in the 9th percentile of all GPUs. The pairing of a mid-range CPU with a very low-end integrated graphics solution results in a system that is severely GPU-bound.

The percentile data further underscores this imbalance. The CPU's 71st percentile ranking suggests it is a competent processor for general tasks and even gaming, but the GPU's 9th percentile ranking drags the entire combo down. In practical terms, this means that the frame rates achieved are almost entirely dictated by the Arc B390's capabilities. The measured FPS data confirms this, as the system's performance is more in line with what one would expect from the GPU's nearest rivals, such as the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 or GT 520MX, rather than a modern gaming system. The combo's rank is a direct consequence of this GPU bottleneck, and the data suggests that any upgrade path would need to start with the graphics solution.

The ranking also reveals that while the system is technically playable, it is far from optimal for a competitive title like Valorant. Most other tested combos will deliver significantly higher frame rates, providing a smoother and more responsive experience. The 2534th rank is a strong signal that this configuration is not intended for high-refresh-rate competitive play, but rather for entry-level or budget-conscious builds where the primary goal is simply to run the game. The measured FPS data, however, does show that the system can hit very high frame rates at lower settings, which is a saving grace for those who prioritize performance over visual quality.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B390 is the defining component in this combo's performance, and its specifications illustrate why it ranks so low. It is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a TDP of 80 W, built on Intel's 3 nm process. Its core configuration includes 1536 shading units, 48 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 24 render output units (ROPs). It also features 12 ray tracing cores. The GPU's clocks are set with a base of 300 MHz and a boost of 2500 MHz. The pixel rate is listed as 60.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 120.0 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 7.680 TFLOPS.

The most critical aspect of the Arc B390's design for gaming is its memory subsystem. It uses "System Shared" memory, meaning it has no dedicated VRAM; instead, it shares the system's main memory. This is a major limitation, as the memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent." This dependence on shared memory and system bandwidth is a primary reason for its low benchmark score of 1482, which places it in the 9th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals are all older, low-end discrete GPUs like the NVIDIA GeForce GT 520MX and GT 710, which is a clear indication of its performance class.

In the context of Valorant, this GPU's role is to render the game's relatively light graphics. The measured FPS data shows that the Arc B390 is capable of producing high frame rates, but it is heavily influenced by the settings and resolution. The data reveals a clear trend: lowering settings has a dramatic positive impact on FPS. For example, at 1920x1080, moving from Ultra (198 FPS) to Low (331 FPS) yields a 67% increase in average frame rate. This indicates that the GPU is the primary constraint and that it performs best when its workload is minimized. The boost clock of 2500 MHz is high, but the shared memory and limited ROPs likely prevent it from sustaining performance in more demanding scenarios.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for this combo provides a detailed look at its performance across resolutions and settings. At 3840x2160, the system achieves an average of 141 FPS on High settings, 149 FPS on Medium, and 135 FPS on Ultra. The Low setting yields a significantly higher 225 FPS. The Medium setting at this resolution also has recorded min and max FPS of 126 and 171, respectively. This shows that even at 4K, the system can maintain playable frame rates, but the jump to Low settings is necessary for a smoother experience.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance improves across the board. The High preset yields 177 FPS, Medium yields 186 FPS, and Ultra yields 169 FPS. The Low preset jumps to 282 FPS. The Medium preset shows a min of 158 FPS and a max of 214 FPS. This resolution appears to be a sweet spot for the system, as it provides a good balance between visual fidelity and frame rate, especially on the Medium preset. The 1440p Low setting is particularly strong, offering a frame rate that is more than sufficient for high-refresh-rate monitors.

At 1920x1080, the system's performance is at its peak. The High preset achieves an average of 207 FPS, Medium achieves 218 FPS, and Ultra achieves 198 FPS. The Low preset at this resolution is the highest recorded result for the entire combo, with an average of 331 FPS. The Medium preset at 1080p also shows a min of 185 FPS and a max of 250 FPS. These results indicate that 1080p is the only resolution where the system can truly stretch its legs, with the Low preset delivering frame rates that are competitive for esports play. The data shows a consistent pattern: for any given resolution, the Low preset provides a massive FPS advantage over the other presets.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend entirely on the user's resolution and refresh rate priorities. For those with a 1920x1080 monitor, the Low preset is the clear winner, delivering an average of 331 FPS. This is the only setting that pushes the system beyond the 300 FPS mark, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate competitive play. The Medium preset at 218 FPS is also highly playable and offers better visual quality, making it a strong alternative if a slightly lower frame rate is acceptable. The High and Ultra presets, while still above 190 FPS, provide diminishing returns and are less optimal for pure competitive performance.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset again provides the highest frame rate at 282 FPS, which is excellent for most high-refresh-rate 1440p monitors. However, the Medium preset at 186 FPS is a more balanced choice, offering significantly better visuals with only a modest FPS penalty. The High and Ultra presets, at 177 FPS and 169 FPS respectively, are also viable for 1440p gaming if the user prefers graphical fidelity over maximum frame rates. The data suggests that Medium is the recommended preset for 1440p, as it provides a good compromise between visual quality and smooth performance.

For 3840x2160, the situation is more constrained. The Low preset is the only setting that provides a substantial frame rate advantage, delivering 225 FPS. The High, Medium, and Ultra presets all hover between 135 and 149 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced competitive play. The Medium preset at 149 FPS is the best of the higher-quality options, but the Low preset is the recommended choice for 4K gaming if a high refresh rate is the goal. Overall, the data strongly suggests that the Low preset is the best choice for maximizing performance at any resolution, with Medium being a viable option for those who want better visuals at 1080p or 1440p.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G is a solid mid-range processor that, in this pairing, is not the limiting factor. It is a 6-core, 12-thread CPU based on the Zen 2 architecture (codename Renoir), built on a 7 nm process. It has a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.20 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. Its cache configuration includes 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The CPU supports DDR4 memory with a dual-channel bus and a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s.

The CPU's benchmark scores are respectable for its class. Its average benchmark score is 17507, placing it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs. In Cinebench R23, it scores 13593 in multi-core and 1919 in single-core. In Geekbench, it scores 6637 multi-core and 1460 single-core. These numbers indicate that the CPU has enough processing power to handle Valorant's game logic and physics without becoming a major bottleneck. Its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE and Intel Core 7 150U, have nearly identical average scores, confirming that the 4600G is a competitive performer in its segment.

In the context of Valorant, the CPU's role is to manage the game's simulation, AI, and network code. The measured FPS data shows that the system can achieve over 300 FPS at 1080p Low settings, which demonstrates that the CPU is capable of feeding frames to the GPU at that rate. The bottleneck is clearly the Intel Arc B390, as the FPS scales significantly with GPU load (i.e., lowering settings). The CPU's 12 threads and 4.2 GHz boost clock provide ample headroom for the game's single-threaded and multi-threaded tasks, ensuring that the GPU is the limiting factor in most scenarios. The data suggests that the Ryzen 5 4600G is more than adequate for this game and would be able to support a much more powerful GPU without issue.