Undisputed

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 achieves a combo rank of 830 out of 3,718 tested combinations in Undisputed. That places this pairing in the top 22% of all tested systems, a strong result for a mobile processor paired with a flagship desktop GPU. The ranking reflects a system that is heavily GPU-limited at most settings, allowing the RTX 4090 to stretch its legs, though the Ultra 7 155H still demonstrates enough single-threaded capability to avoid becoming a bottleneck at lower resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo rank of 830 out of 3,718 represents a top-quartile finish, but it is not a top-tier result for a GPU as powerful as the RTX 4090. The data indicates that the Ultra 7 155H, while competent, does not fully unlock the potential of the RTX 4090 in this title. For context, the CPU’s general benchmark average sits at 32,697, which places it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals, the Intel Core i5-14600T and AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360, score nearly identically with average scores of 32,707 and 32,662, respectively, showing that the Ultra 7 155H is right in the middle of a tightly packed performance cluster.

The ranking is more impressive when you consider the sheer number of combinations tested. Being in the top 830 out of 3,718 means this setup outperforms roughly 78% of all other CPU-GPU pairings in this benchmark database. However, the delta between this combo and the very top of the list is likely driven by CPU throughput. The RTX 4090, with its 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 24 GB of GDDR6X memory, is capable of far more than what this combo delivers at 1080p, where the CPU begins to limit frame rates. In short, the rank is respectable but leaves performance on the table.

GPU Role

The RTX 4090 is the undisputed star of this pairing. Its specifications are staggering: 16,384 shading units, 512 texture mapping units, and 176 raster operation pipelines. The GPU operates at a base clock of 2235 MHz with a boost clock of 2520 MHz, and the 24 GB of GDDR6X memory runs across a 384-bit bus, delivering 1.01 TB/s of bandwidth. These numbers translate directly into the high frame rates observed in Undisputed, particularly at 1440p and 4K where the GPU’s raw fill rate and memory bandwidth become the dominant factors.

In this game, the GPU’s role is clear: it is the primary driver of performance at every resolution above 1080p. At 4K Ultra, the combo still manages 66 FPS, a playable result for a demanding setting. The 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores are present, though Undisputed is a sports title that likely does not leverage ray tracing heavily; the raw rasterization performance is what carries the load. The pixel rate of 443.5 GPixel/s ensures that even at 4K, the GPU can push through the geometry and texture work required by the game’s boxing arenas and character models.

Interestingly, the GPU’s benchmark percentile is 88, with an average score of 60,347, and its nearest rivals—such as the Intel Arc Pro A60 and AMD Radeon Pro W6600M—are professional workstation cards that trail significantly in gaming scenarios. This underscores that the RTX 4090 is in a different class entirely, and the measured FPS in Undisputed confirms it: even at 4K High, the combo achieves 102 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS target most gamers consider smooth.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a system that transitions from CPU-bound to GPU-bound as resolution increases. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 377 FPS, but at 4K Low, it drops to 172 FPS. That is a 54% reduction in frame rate, a massive drop that signals the GPU is being pushed much harder at higher pixel counts. However, the fact that 1080p Low does not scale linearly to 4K Low—which would be roughly a quarter of the frame rate—shows that the CPU is still contributing at 1080p, preventing the GPU from fully saturating.

Look at the Medium settings, which include min and max FPS data. At 1080p Medium, the average is 271 FPS with a min of 230 and max of 312. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 196 FPS, and at 4K Medium, it falls to 124 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 27.7%, while the drop from 1440p to 4K is 36.7%. This pattern indicates that the GPU is becoming the limiting factor more aggressively as resolution climbs, which is expected for a high-end card that is not fully utilized at 1080p.

At Ultra settings, the scaling is even more pronounced. The combo delivers 144 FPS at 1080p Ultra, 104 FPS at 1440p Ultra, and 66 FPS at 4K Ultra. The 1080p to 1440p drop is 27.8%, but the 1440p to 4K drop is 36.5%. This suggests that at Ultra, the GPU’s shading units and memory bandwidth are the bottleneck, and the CPU’s role diminishes. For a builder, this means that if you are targeting 4K, the RTX 4090 is doing nearly all the work, and the Ultra 7 155H is more than adequate. At 1080p, however, the CPU is holding the GPU back, as evidenced by the massive frame rates that no monitor can display.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the best experience in Undisputed depends on your refresh rate and resolution. For 4K, the High preset is the sweet spot, delivering 102 FPS on average. Dropping to Medium yields 124 FPS, but the visual fidelity loss may not be worth the 22 FPS gain, especially since High already clears the 100 FPS threshold. Ultra at 4K is playable at 66 FPS, but the frame rate dips below the 70 FPS mark that many competitive players consider a minimum for smooth motion. If you have a 120 Hz 4K display, Medium is the safer choice to maintain a higher average.

At 1440p, High is the recommended preset, hitting 162 FPS. This is ideal for 144 Hz or 165 Hz monitors, as it stays above the refresh rate in most scenes. Medium at 196 FPS is also excellent if you prefer a higher frame rate cushion, but the jump from High to Medium is only 34 FPS, which may not justify the visual downgrade. Ultra at 1440p delivers 104 FPS, which is still smooth, but it falls below the 144 FPS target that competitive players often seek. Low at 1440p is unnecessary; 272 FPS is overkill for any display, and the visual quality loss is significant.

At 1080p, the recommendation is High at 224 FPS, which is perfect for 240 Hz monitors. Medium at 271 FPS is even better if you have a 300 Hz panel, but again, the graphical trade-off is steep. Ultra at 144 FPS is the minimum for a 144 Hz display, and it provides the best image quality. Low at 377 FPS is purely for benchmarking or extreme esports scenarios, as the game will look noticeably worse. For most users, High at 1440p or 4K offers the best balance of visual quality and frame rate, ensuring a responsive and immersive boxing experience.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance across all settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the combo achieves 377 FPS on Low, 271 FPS on Medium (with a min of 230 and max of 312), 224 FPS on High, and 144 FPS on Ultra. The jump from Low to Medium is a 28.1% drop, while the jump from Medium to High is a 17.3% drop, and High to Ultra is a 35.7% drop. This non-linear scaling shows that Ultra settings impose a significant load on the GPU, likely due to increased shadow quality and texture filtering.

At 2560x1440, the results are 272 FPS on Low, 196 FPS on Medium (min 166, max 225), 162 FPS on High, and 104 FPS on Ultra. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistent across settings: Low drops 27.9%, Medium drops 27.7%, High drops 27.7%, and Ultra drops 27.8%. This uniform scaling indicates that the GPU is handling the resolution increase proportionally, with no sudden bottlenecks. The min FPS at Medium, 166, is still well above 144 Hz, ensuring smooth gameplay.

At 3840x2160, the combo delivers 172 FPS on Low, 124 FPS on Medium (min 105, max 142), 102 FPS on High, and 66 FPS on Ultra. The drop from 1440p to 4K is steeper: Low drops 36.8%, Medium drops 36.7%, High drops 37.0%, and Ultra drops 36.5%. This consistent ~37% reduction across all settings confirms that the GPU is the sole limiting factor at 4K. The min FPS at 4K Medium, 105, is still playable, but the Ultra setting at 66 FPS is starting to approach the lower bound of what most gamers would accept for a smooth experience.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H is a 16-core, 22-thread processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 7 nm process. It operates at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boosts up to 4.80 GHz, with a 24 MB shared L3 cache. The CPU’s benchmark scores are solid but not spectacular: it achieves 15,028 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,743 in single-core, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 32,697 is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, with the Intel Core i5-14600T at 32,707 and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 at 32,662, all within a 0.2% delta.

In Undisputed, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with enough data to maintain high frame rates. At 1080p Low, the 377 FPS result suggests the CPU is working hard to keep up, but it is not fully saturated. The single-core performance, as indicated by the Cinebench R23 score of 1,743, is adequate for this sports title, which likely relies on a few heavily-threaded physics or AI tasks. The 22 threads and 24 MB of L3 cache provide sufficient headroom for background processes and game logic. However, the fact that 1080p Low does not exceed 377 FPS, while the RTX 4090 is theoretically capable of more, points to the CPU being a mild bottleneck at the lowest settings.

At 4K, the CPU becomes a non-factor. The 172 FPS at 4K Low versus 377 FPS at 1080p Low shows that the GPU is now the limiting component, and the CPU has ample capacity to handle the reduced frame rate. The passmark multithread score of 24,873 and floating-point math score of 63,703 indicate strong overall compute capability, which helps maintain consistent frame pacing. For a builder, this means the Ultra 7 155H is a capable partner for the RTX 4090 in this game, provided you are targeting 1440p or 4K. At 1080p, you are leaving performance on the table, but any display above 240 Hz will still be fully utilized.