Undisputed

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination delivers a remarkably consistent experience in Undisputed, with performance scaling predictably across resolutions and settings. The data indicates a pairing where the CPU provides ample headroom, leaving the GPU as the primary arbiter of frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions and quality presets. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, contextualizes it against rival hardware, and provides actionable settings guidance based strictly on the benchmark data.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is a 14-core, 14-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, featuring 24 MB of shared L3 cache. Its benchmark profile shows strong single-threaded capability, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4648, which is critical for a sports title like Undisputed where physics and AI logic often rely on fewer, faster cores.

In multi-threaded workloads, the processor scores 32924 in Cinebench R23, placing it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs. This robust performance suggests the CPU is rarely a bottleneck in this game. Evidence from the measured FPS data supports this: at 1080p with Low settings, the average frame rate reaches 271 FPS. Such a high figure indicates the CPU can feed frames far beyond typical display refresh rates, and the limiting factor at this setting is the GPU’s ability to render the scene, not the processor’s ability to compute game logic.

Comparing to its nearest rivals, the Ultra 5 245 sits in a tight competitive band. It is 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G and 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 9 7900 in average benchmark score. Conversely, it leads the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H by 0.6% and the Intel Core i5-14600K by 0.8%. These sub-1% deltas mean that in CPU-bound scenarios, performance differences among these processors are negligible. For Undisputed, the data shows the CPU’s role is to provide consistent, high-level throughput without creating frame pacing issues. The 14 threads, while not offering hyper-threading, are sufficient for the game’s demands, as evidenced by the high minimum frame rates at 1440p Medium (120 FPS) and 1080p Medium (166 FPS), which indicate stable frame delivery rather than sporadic spikes.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with a 5 nm process. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s. The GPU clock speeds are set at a base of 1830 MHz and a boost of 2460 MHz, with memory running at 17 Gbps effective. This configuration yields a Passmark G3D score of 19545, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs.

The GPU’s role in Undisputed is pivotal, as the frame rate variance across settings demonstrates. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS drops to 48, a clear sign that the GPU is heavily loaded and struggling to maintain fluid motion. In contrast, at 1080p Low, the average FPS is 271, showing the GPU can handle lighter loads with ease. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is a notable factor; while the game does not appear to exceed this limit based on the data, the high-resolution textures at Ultra settings likely approach it, contributing to the significant performance drop at 4K.

The RTX 4060’s nearest rivals in benchmark scores are older or integrated parts, such as the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (0.2% behind) and the AMD Radeon 780M (0.3% ahead). This positioning is unusual, as it suggests that in raw synthetic benchmarks, the RTX 4060’s score is comparable to much older hardware. However, the measured FPS in Undisputed shows a different story, as the GPU delivers playable frame rates at 1440p High (117 FPS) and 4K High (74 FPS). The data indicates that the RTX 4060’s architectural efficiency, including its 24 RT cores and 96 tensor cores, contributes to its real-world performance in this title, even if synthetic scores suggest parity with older parts. The 15.11 TFLOPS of FP32 compute provides ample shading power for the game’s visuals, but the 128-bit memory bus is a limiting factor at higher resolutions.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. The data provides a clear hierarchy of performance, with average FPS scaling inversely with both resolution and quality preset.

At 1080p, the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, with an average of 195 FPS and a minimum of 166 FPS. This ensures smooth gameplay on high-refresh-rate monitors without dipping below 144 FPS. The High preset at 1080p still delivers excellent performance at 162 FPS, but the Medium preset’s higher minimum frame rate (166 vs. unspecified for High) suggests better frame pacing. The Ultra preset at 1080p drops to 104 FPS average, which is still playable but sacrifices the headroom needed for competitive play.

For 1440p, the Medium preset again provides the best experience, with an average of 141 FPS and a minimum of 120 FPS. This is ideal for 144Hz monitors, as it maintains a frame rate above the 120 FPS threshold. The High preset at 1440p yields 117 FPS, which is acceptable but may show minor stutters on 144Hz displays. The Low preset at 1440p achieves 196 FPS, but the visual compromise is significant. The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to 75 FPS, which is below the threshold for high-refresh-rate gaming.

At 4K, the data shows that only the Low preset provides a high-refresh experience, with an average of 124 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K offers 89 FPS, which is playable on 60Hz displays but not on higher refresh rates. The High preset at 4K drops to 74 FPS, while the Ultra preset falls to 48 FPS, which is not recommended for smooth gameplay. The data suggests that for 4K, the Low preset is the only viable option for competitive play, while the Medium preset is suitable for casual play on standard displays.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 combination ranks 1503 out of 2813 tested combos in Undisputed. This places it in the middle of the field, indicating a balanced but not top-tier configuration. The rank reflects the GPU’s mid-range positioning, as the CPU’s high percentile (90th) is offset by the GPU’s lower percentile (61st).

This ranking suggests that while the CPU is capable of supporting higher-end GPUs, the RTX 4060 limits the overall performance ceiling. The data confirms this, as the frame rates at 4K Ultra (48 FPS) are significantly lower than what a higher-tier GPU would achieve. However, the combo is not a slouch; it outperforms 46.6% of all tested combinations, which is a respectable position for a mid-range setup. The rank also implies that many lower-end combos with less capable CPUs or GPUs will struggle to match the 1080p High performance of 162 FPS. The combination’s strength lies in its consistency across resolutions, with playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p on Medium and High presets, making it a versatile choice for a wide range of gaming scenarios.

FAQ

*Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Undisputed?*

A: Yes, but with limitations. At 4K High, the average FPS is 74, which is playable on a 60Hz monitor. At 4K Medium, the average FPS is 89, and at 4K Low, it reaches 124 FPS. However, 4K Ultra drops to 48 FPS, which is not smooth for fast-paced gameplay.

Q: What is the best setting for a 144Hz monitor at 1440p?

A: The Medium preset at 1440p is the best choice, with an average of 141 FPS and a minimum of 120 FPS. This keeps the frame rate above the 120 FPS threshold, ensuring a smooth experience on a 144Hz display.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 compare to its synthetic benchmark rivals in this game?

A: While the RTX 4060’s Passmark G3D score is nearly identical to that of the AMD Radeon HD 7790 (0.2% difference) and AMD Radeon 780M (0.3% difference), the measured FPS in Undisputed shows that the RTX 4060 delivers far higher real-world performance, with 162 FPS at 1080p High versus what older parts would likely achieve.

Q: Is the CPU a bottleneck at 1080p Low settings?

A: No, the data suggests the CPU is not a bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the average FPS is 271, which is exceptionally high. The CPU’s Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4648 and multi-core score of 32924 provide ample headroom, meaning the GPU is the limiting factor even at low settings.

Q: What is the minimum frame rate at 1080p Medium?

A: The minimum frame rate at 1080p Medium is 166 FPS, with an average of 195 FPS and a maximum of 225 FPS. This indicates stable performance without significant dips.

Q: How does the combo rank relative to all tested configurations?

A: This combo ranks 1503 out of 2813 tested combos, placing it in the middle of the pack. It outperforms roughly 53% of all tested combinations, reflecting its balanced mid-range performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across all resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 271 FPS, the Medium preset averages 195 FPS (with a minimum of 166 and maximum of 225), the High preset averages 162 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 104 FPS. This shows a clear linear scaling, with each step up in quality reducing the average FPS by a significant margin.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 196 FPS, the Medium preset averages 141 FPS (with a minimum of 120 and maximum of 162), the High preset averages 117 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 75 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is noticeable, with the Medium preset losing 54 FPS (from 195 to 141) and the High preset losing 45 FPS (from 162 to 117).

At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 124 FPS, the Medium preset averages 89 FPS (with a minimum of 76 and maximum of 103), the High preset averages 74 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 48 FPS. The 4K resolution significantly stresses the GPU, with the Ultra preset falling below 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K provides the only instance where minimum and maximum frame rates are recorded, showing a range of 76 to 103 FPS, which indicates some variance but remains playable.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The resolution scaling analysis reveals a clear pattern of GPU-bound performance. Moving from 1080p to 1440p, the average FPS drops by approximately 28% across all settings. For example, the Medium preset drops from 195 FPS at 1080p to 141 FPS at 1440p, a reduction of 54 FPS. The High preset drops from 162 FPS to 117 FPS, a reduction of 45 FPS. This consistent percentage drop indicates that the GPU’s pixel processing power is the primary constraint, as the CPU has sufficient headroom to handle the increased resolution without becoming a bottleneck.

The transition from 1440p to 4K shows a more pronounced drop, averaging around 40% across settings. The Medium preset drops from 141 FPS to 89 FPS, a reduction of 52 FPS, while the High preset drops from 117 FPS to 74 FPS, a reduction of 43 FPS. This steeper decline at 4K is typical of a GPU with a 128-bit memory bus and 8 GB of VRAM, as the higher resolution demands more memory bandwidth and capacity. The Ultra preset at 4K suffers the most, dropping to 48 FPS, which is a 36% reduction from the 1440p Ultra score of 75 FPS.

The data suggests that the RTX 4060’s memory subsystem, with a bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s, is the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The 1080p results, with frame rates exceeding 162 FPS on High settings, demonstrate that the GPU’s compute capabilities are more than adequate for the game’s rendering demands. However, as resolution increases, the memory bandwidth and VRAM capacity become insufficient to maintain high frame rates, leading to the significant drops observed. The CPU’s role in this scaling is minimal, as its high benchmark scores ensure it can keep up with the GPU’s output even at 4K Low, where the average FPS reaches 124. This indicates that for players seeking higher resolutions, a GPU with a wider memory bus or more VRAM would be a better upgrade path than a faster CPU.