Evolve

Evolve, the 2015 asymmetric FPS, presents an interesting stress profile for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 pairing. The measured frame rates across resolutions and settings reveal a system that is clearly capable of high refresh rates at 1080p but begins to show its limitations as pixel count and graphical fidelity increase. The data indicates a combo that is heavily influenced by GPU load, with the CPU’s strong single-threaded performance providing a solid foundation for the lower-resolution scenarios.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The performance trajectory from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 is steep and tells a clear story about where the bottleneck lies. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 115 FPS at 1080p to 77 FPS at 1440p, and finally to 44 FPS at 4K. This represents a 62% drop in performance from the lowest to the highest resolution, a pattern that strongly suggests the graphics card is the primary limiting factor. The RTX 4060, with its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit bus, is being pushed harder as the pixel count increases, and the data shows it cannot maintain the same throughput.

The scaling between Medium settings is equally telling. The transition from 147 FPS at 1080p to 99 FPS at 1440p is a 33% reduction, and the further drop to 56 FPS at 4K is another 43% reduction. These are not linear declines; they are accelerating, which is the classic signature of a GPU that is running out of fillrate and memory bandwidth. The 272.0 GB/s of bandwidth becomes a more precious resource as the resolution increases, and the performance curve reflects this constraint. The data implies that the CPU is not the primary obstacle in these higher-resolution scenarios.

At Low settings, the frame rates are high enough to suggest that the CPU’s role is more pronounced. The jump from 190 FPS at 1080p to 127 FPS at 1440p is a 33% drop, but the decline to 72 FPS at 4K is a 43% drop from the 1440p figure. While still a GPU-centric trend, the very high frame rates at lower resolutions mean the CPU must work harder to feed the GPU. The Core Ultra 5 245’s boost clock of 5.10 GHz and its 14 cores are sufficient to prevent the frame rate from collapsing entirely, but the scaling pattern indicates that the GPU is still the dominant force. The system is balanced for 1080p gaming, but the data shows that 4K Ultra is a stretch.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 is the workhorse of this combo, and its specifications directly correlate with the measured results. The GPU’s boost clock of 2460 MHz and 3072 shading units provide a substantial amount of compute power, which is evident in the 115 FPS High average at 1080p. However, the 8 GB VRAM capacity and 128-bit memory bus are the likely culprits for the performance degradation at higher resolutions. The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the average frame rate plummets to 31 FPS, a figure that is barely playable and points to the GPU being overwhelmed.

The memory bandwidth of 272.0 GB/s is a critical figure to consider. As the resolution increases, the demand for texture data and frame buffer operations grows, and this bandwidth becomes a limiting factor. The frame rate drop from 56 FPS at 4K Medium to 44 FPS at 4K High, and then to 31 FPS at 4K Ultra, illustrates how the GPU’s memory subsystem struggles as the settings are increased. The data suggests that the RTX 4060 is not a 4K-class card for this title, and its performance is more aligned with 1080p and 1440p gaming.

The GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 19545 and its 61st percentile ranking among all GPUs provide context for its overall capability. It sits in the mid-range tier, and the Evolve results are consistent with that positioning. The fact that the average frame rate at 4K Low is 72 FPS, which is higher than the 4K High result of 44 FPS, indicates that the GPU has enough raw compute power to handle the game, but the memory and bandwidth constraints become more severe with higher graphical fidelity. The 15.11 TFLOPS FP32 performance is only useful if the data can be fed to the cores fast enough, and the 128-bit bus is a bottleneck in this scenario.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combo’s rank of 1533 out of 2872 tested combinations places it in the lower-middle portion of the database. This ranking is a holistic measure of its performance across all tested games and settings, and it reflects the RTX 4060’s mid-range status. The CPU’s average benchmark score of 48995 places it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, which is a strong result. However, the GPU’s average benchmark score of 17639 puts it in only the 61st percentile, indicating that the GPU is the weaker link in this pairing.

The nearest rivals for the CPU are the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G and the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, with deltaPct values of -0.4% and -0.5% respectively. This means the Core Ultra 5 245 is essentially on par with these processors, with a negligible performance difference. The Intel Xeon Gold 5318H and Intel Core i5-14600K are also close, with the Core Ultra 5 245 performing 0.6% and 0.8% better, respectively. This indicates that the CPU is a very capable component that is unlikely to be the source of any frame rate limitations in Evolve.

On the GPU side, the nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon HD 7790, AMD Radeon 780M, AMD Radeon Pro 560, and AMD Radeon Pro 460, with deltaPct values of -0.2%, 0.3%, 0.5%, and 0.7% respectively. This is a fascinating set of comparisons, as it shows the RTX 4060 performing at a similar level to a mix of older discrete GPUs and an integrated graphics solution. This data reinforces the notion that the RTX 4060 is not a high-end part, and its performance in Evolve, particularly at 4K, is in line with these lower-tier rivals. The combo rank is a direct consequence of this GPU-centric performance ceiling.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured data, the optimal balance of visual quality and performance is achieved at 1080p with High settings. The 115 FPS average at this configuration is smooth and responsive, and it provides a significant visual upgrade over the Low preset’s 190 FPS, which is likely unnecessary for most displays. The Medium preset at 1080p offers 147 FPS, but the jump to High is a better use of the GPU’s headroom, as the frame rate remains well above the 60 FPS threshold. For players with high refresh rate monitors, the Low preset’s 190 FPS is the only option that can fully utilize a 144Hz or 165Hz display, but the visual trade-offs are considerable.

At 1440p, the High preset’s 77 FPS average is a solid choice for a 60Hz monitor, but it may not be enough for a 144Hz display. The Medium preset at 99 FPS is a better choice for those seeking higher refresh rates, as it maintains a good balance between visual fidelity and speed. The Ultra preset at 54 FPS is borderline, and it would be better to drop to High for a more consistent experience. The data suggests that 1440p is a playable resolution for this combo, but it requires a willingness to adjust settings.

The 4K results are more problematic. The Ultra preset’s 31 FPS average is not playable, and the High preset’s 44 FPS is also below the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset’s 56 FPS is the only 4K configuration that approaches playability, but it still falls short of a smooth 60 FPS experience. The Low preset’s 72 FPS is the only 4K option that exceeds 60 FPS, but it sacrifices most of the visual details that make the game appealing. For 4K gaming, the data indicates that players should stick to Low or Medium settings, and even then, they may need to accept some frame rate dips.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for a 60 FPS experience?

A: The data shows that 1440p High settings produce an average of 77 FPS, which is comfortably above 60 FPS. For 1080p, the High preset at 115 FPS is also an excellent choice. At 4K, the Medium preset’s 56 FPS is the closest to 60 FPS, but it does not quite reach that target.

Q: How does the CPU’s performance compare to its direct rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 245’s average benchmark score is 48995, which is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G (49196) and AMD Ryzen 9 7900 (49228), with deltaPct values of -0.4% and -0.5% respectively. It also outperforms the Intel Xeon Gold 5318H and Intel Core i5-14600K by 0.6% and 0.8%.

Q: Is the RTX 4060 a good match for the Core Ultra 5 245 in this game?

A: The combo ranks 1533 out of 2872, which is in the lower-middle half. The CPU is in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 61st percentile. This suggests the GPU is the limiting factor, and the pairing is balanced for 1080p but not for higher resolutions.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves an average of 190 FPS, while the Ultra preset achieves 80 FPS. This is a 110 FPS difference, or a 58% reduction in performance when moving from Low to Ultra.

Q: Does the game use more than 8 GB of VRAM at 4K Ultra?

A: The data does not specify VRAM usage. However, the significant frame rate drop to 31 FPS at 4K Ultra, combined with the GPU’s 8 GB memory capacity, suggests that the memory size or bandwidth is a likely performance constraint.

Q: What are the minimum and maximum frame rates recorded for Medium settings?

A: At 1920x1080 Medium, the minimum FPS is 125 and the maximum is 169. At 2560x1440 Medium, the minimum is 84 and the maximum is 114. At 3840x2160 Medium, the minimum is 48 and the maximum is 65.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 5 245 is a 14-core, 14-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, built on a 3 nm process. Its base clock of 3.50 GHz and boost clock of 5.10 GHz are significant factors in its performance. The PassMark single-thread score of 4394 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4648 indicate strong single-threaded capability, which is crucial for games like Evolve that may not fully utilize all 14 cores. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the CPU is able to push frame rates to 190 FPS, which reflects its high clock speeds.

The CPU’s 24 MB of shared L3 cache and support for DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s are also relevant. The high-speed memory interface ensures that the CPU can quickly feed data to the GPU, which is important at lower resolutions where the GPU is not the bottleneck. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32924 and PassMark multi-thread score of 38706 show that the processor has substantial multi-threaded power, but this is less critical for a game like Evolve, where the workload is often more dependent on a few fast cores.

The CPU’s performance is essentially tied with its nearest rivals, as shown by the deltaPct values of -0.4% and -0.5% against the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5755G and Ryzen 9 7900, respectively. This means that any frame rate differences between these CPUs in Evolve would be negligible. The data implies that the CPU is not a limiting factor in this game, and the measured frame rates are primarily a function of the GPU’s capabilities. The 90th percentile ranking for the CPU confirms that it is a high-performing part that will not hold back the RTX 4060 in most scenarios.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

1920x1080:

• Low: Average 190 FPS. This is the highest frame rate recorded for this combo.
• Medium: Average 147 FPS, with a minimum of 125 FPS and a maximum of 169 FPS.
• High: Average 115 FPS.
• Ultra: Average 80 FPS.

The 1080p results show a clear progression, with the Low preset providing a 65% higher frame rate than Ultra. The Medium preset’s minimum of 125 FPS ensures that it remains above the 60 FPS threshold even during demanding scenes. The High preset’s 115 FPS is a strong result for a visually detailed setting.

2560x1440:

• Low: Average 127 FPS.
• Medium: Average 99 FPS, with a minimum of 84 FPS and a maximum of 114 FPS.
• High: Average 77 FPS.
• Ultra: Average 54 FPS.

At 1440p, the frame rates are still respectable, but the drop from 1080p is noticeable. The Low preset loses 63 FPS, while the High and Ultra presets lose 38 and 26 FPS, respectively. The Medium preset’s minimum of 84 FPS is still above the 60 FPS target, but the Ultra preset’s 54 FPS average is below it.

3840x2160:

• Low: Average 72 FPS.
• Medium: Average 56 FPS, with a minimum of 48 FPS and a maximum of 65 FPS.
• High: Average 44 FPS.
• Ultra: Average 31 FPS.

The 4K results highlight the GPU’s limitations. Even the Low preset, with an average of 72 FPS, is the only configuration that exceeds 60 FPS. The Medium preset’s minimum of 48 FPS indicates that there will be noticeable stutters in heavy scenes. The Ultra preset’s 31 FPS average is not a playable experience. The data shows a consistent and steep decline in performance as resolution increases, with the GPU’s memory bandwidth being the most likely constraint.