Undisputed

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 produces an extraordinarily high-performance combination in Undisputed, with frame rates that exceed the refresh rates of nearly all displays on the market. The data indicates a system that is overwhelmingly GPU-bound at lower resolutions, while still maintaining exceptional performance at 4K, making it a top-tier option for esports and competitive play.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a predictable but steep drop in performance as resolution increases, which is typical for a system with this level of processing power. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 542 FPS, which drops to 392 FPS at 1440p and further to 248 FPS at 4K. This represents a 54% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, highlighting the immense computational load that 4K resolution places on the GPU.

The scaling pattern shifts at higher settings. With Ultra settings, the average FPS goes from 208 at 1080p, to 150 at 1440p, and finally to 95 at 4K. This is a 54% drop from 1080p to 4K as well, but the absolute numbers are lower, indicating that the GPU is working closer to its limits with the more demanding visual effects. The consistent percentage drop across settings suggests that the RTX 5090 is the primary limiting factor at 4K, as the CPU has ample headroom to feed frames at lower resolutions.

The relationship between resolution and frame rate is not linear. The jump from 1080p to 1440p at Medium settings results in a drop from 390 FPS to 282 FPS, a 28% decrease. However, the jump from 1440p to 4K at the same settings is more severe, going from 282 FPS to 178 FPS, a 37% decrease. This suggests that the pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth of the RTX 5090, which are substantial, are still being saturated as the resolution increases. The data implies that the sweet spot for maximum frame rates is at 1080p, where the CPU can push the GPU to its absolute peak, while 4K is best reserved for those who prioritize visual fidelity over raw speed.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is the undisputed driving force behind this combo's performance, and its specifications directly correlate with the measured results. The GPU's 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus provides a massive 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth, which is crucial for handling the textures and geometry at 4K resolution without stuttering. This is evidenced by the 4K Medium result, which shows an average of 178 FPS with a minimum of 152 FPS, indicating that even in demanding scenes, the memory subsystem prevents significant frame drops.

The clock speeds of the RTX 5090, with a base of 2017 MHz and a boost of 2407 MHz, are relatively modest for a flagship GPU, but the architecture's efficiency is what sets it apart. The 21,760 shading units and 680 texture mapping units allow for massive parallel processing, which is evident in the 1080p Low result of 542 FPS, a number that is almost certainly CPU-limited at that point. The GPU's 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the raw compute power that enables these high frame rates, and the data shows that it scales well with resolution.

The GPU's role becomes more pronounced at 4K Ultra, where the average FPS drops to 95. This is the only setting where the RTX 5090 appears to be fully taxed, as the combination of high resolution and maximum visual effects pushes the GPU's capabilities. The fact that the card can still average nearly 100 FPS at this extreme setting reflects its engineering. The data suggests that for most players, the RTX 5090 will never be the bottleneck in Undisputed, and the limiting factor will instead be the monitor's refresh rate or the CPU's single-thread performance at very low resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve the highest possible frame rate?

A: The data clearly shows that 1920x1080 with Low settings yields the highest average FPS at 542. This is the only resolution and settings combination that approaches the 500 FPS mark, making it ideal for competitive play on high-refresh-rate monitors.

*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Undisputed?*

A: Yes, the benchmark results indicate that 4K gaming is not only possible but highly playable. At 4K with High settings, the combo averages 148 FPS, and even at Ultra settings, it maintains a 95 FPS average. This is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay.

Q: How much of a performance drop is there between Medium and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Medium preset delivers an average of 282 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to 150 FPS. This is a significant 47% reduction in frame rate, indicating that the Ultra preset's visual enhancements come at a substantial performance cost.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: The benchmark data suggests that the CPU is the limiting factor at 1080p. The jump from Low to Medium settings at 1080p results in a drop from 542 FPS to 390 FPS, which shows the GPU is still capable of more work. The Intel Core Ultra 5 235, with its 5.00 GHz boost clock, is likely the constraint at this resolution.

Q: What are the minimum FPS figures for the Medium preset across all resolutions?

A: The data shows that the Medium preset has recorded minimum FPS values at every resolution. At 1080p, the minimum is 332 FPS, at 1440p it is 240 FPS, and at 4K it is 152 FPS. These numbers indicate that even in the most demanding moments, frame rates remain high and consistent.

Q: How does the RTX 5090's performance in this game compare to its nearest rivals in other benchmarks?

A: In general benchmark scores, the RTX 5090 is 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB and 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT. It is 1.4% behind the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X. These are synthetic benchmark differences and do not directly translate to Undisputed performance.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 combination ranks 86th out of 2,813 tested combos in Undisputed. This places it in the top 3% of all systems tested, a position that reflects the sheer power of the RTX 5090. The rank is impressive, but it also indicates that there are 85 other combinations that perform even better in this specific game.

The CPU's own benchmark percentile is 89, meaning it performs better than 89% of all CPUs tested. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-13900HX, has an average score that is only 0.1% higher, indicating that the Core Ultra 5 235 is a highly competitive processor. The GPU's percentile is 92, and its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X, is only 1.4% ahead in average score. This shows that both components are near the top of their respective classes.

The high combo rank is a direct result of the GPU's dominance. The data shows that the RTX 5090 is a top-10% GPU, and when paired with a capable CPU like the Core Ultra 5 235, the combination is almost guaranteed to be in the upper echelon of gaming performance. The 86th rank out of 2,813 suggests that the few combos that beat it likely use even more powerful (and more expensive) CPUs, but the difference in real-world gaming performance at 4K is likely negligible.

The ranking data also implies that this setup is not just for 1080p esports. The performance at 4K Ultra, while lower than other settings, is still high enough to rank this combo among the best for high-resolution gaming. The 86th position is a strong indicator that this is a top-tier system for Undisputed, and it should be able to handle any settings or resolution the player chooses without issue.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides a clear picture of how each preset impacts performance, and the optimal choice depends heavily on the player's display and priorities. For players with a 1080p monitor with a 360Hz or higher refresh rate, the Low preset is the only option that can fully saturate the display, as it delivers an average of 542 FPS. However, the visual compromise may be too significant for some, making the Medium preset at 390 FPS a more balanced choice.

For 1440p users, the High preset is arguably the best balance of visual quality and performance. It delivers an average of 233 FPS, which is more than enough for even the fastest 240Hz monitors, while also providing the improved textures and lighting that High settings typically offer. The Ultra preset at 150 FPS is also viable for 1440p 144Hz monitors, but the 47% drop from Medium to Ultra is a significant cost for the extra visual fidelity.

At 4K, the High preset is the clear recommendation. It provides an average of 148 FPS, which is excellent for 4K gaming and easily handles 120Hz displays. The Ultra preset at 95 FPS is also playable, but the drop to below 100 FPS may be noticeable to sensitive players. The Medium preset at 178 FPS is an option for those who prioritize frame rate above all else, but High offers a much better visual experience for only a 17% performance hit. The data suggests that High is the "sweet spot" for 4K on this hardware, providing a premium experience without sacrificing the high frame rates that make the game feel responsive.

Measured FPS Breakdown

1920x1080 (1080p)

• Low: The average FPS is 542, with no minimum or maximum values recorded. This is the highest average frame rate in the entire dataset, showcasing the system's raw performance at the lowest visual fidelity.
• Medium: The average FPS is 390, with a minimum of 332 and a maximum of 449. The minimum FPS is still exceptionally high, indicating consistent performance even in demanding scenes.
• High: The average FPS is 323, with no minimum or maximum values recorded. This is a strong result that is well above the refresh rate of most high-end monitors.
• Ultra: The average FPS is 208, with no minimum or maximum values recorded. This is the lowest result at 1080p but remains a very playable frame rate.

2560x1440 (1440p)

• Low: The average FPS is 392, with no minimum or maximum values recorded. This is a significant drop from 1080p Low but is still an excellent result.
• Medium: The average FPS is 282, with a minimum of 240 and a maximum of 324. The minimum FPS of 240 is still high enough for a 240Hz monitor.
• High: The average FPS is 233, with no minimum or maximum values recorded. This is a solid result that is just above the threshold for 240Hz displays.
• Ultra: The average FPS is 150, with no minimum or maximum values recorded. This is a 35% drop from the High preset at the same resolution.

3840x2160 (4K)

• Low: The average FPS is 248, with no minimum or maximum values recorded. This is a very high frame rate for 4K and demonstrates the GPU's capabilities.
• Medium: The average FPS is 178, with a minimum of 152 and a maximum of 205. The minimum FPS of 152 shows that the system can maintain high frame rates even in the most demanding 4K scenes.
• High: The average FPS is 148, with no minimum or maximum values recorded. This is the recommended setting for 4K, as it balances visual quality with performance.
• Ultra: The average FPS is 95, with no minimum or maximum values recorded. This is the lowest result in the dataset but is still a playable frame rate for 4K gaming.