Undisputed

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i7-14700KF paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT lands at rank 1710 out of 3718 tested combos in Undisputed. That placement places this configuration in the upper-middle tier of the database, meaning it sits ahead of roughly 54% of all recorded pairings. The rank reflects a balanced pairing: the CPU is a top-tier performer, while the GPU is solidly mid-range, so the combo’s overall standing is dragged down slightly by the graphics card rather than elevated by the processor.

Benchmark data for the CPU shows it at the 94th percentile against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 70163. Its nearest rivals in the synthetic suite include the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (average score 69996, deltaPct 0.2) and the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (average score 69875, deltaPct 0.4). The Intel part edges out both by less than half a percent, which is statistically negligible. The AMD Ryzen 9 7950X trails by 0.9%, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K leads by 1% — again, all within a narrow band. What this means for Undisputed is that the CPU is not the limiting factor; its headroom is substantial.

The GPU, by contrast, sits at the 71st percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26011. Its nearest rivals are all older or mobile parts: the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (25891, deltaPct 0.5), the AMD FirePro W7100 (25856, deltaPct 0.6), and the AMD FirePro D700 (25842, deltaPct 0.7). The only modern competitor in the list is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, which is 1.1% behind. This suggests the RX 6750 XT is near the top of its class but has no close desktop peers at its performance level in the database — it either wins clearly or loses clearly depending on the matchup.

In game-specific terms, the combo’s rank of 1710 out of 3718 means that for every 100 tested configurations, roughly 46 perform better in Undisputed. That is not a top-tier result, but it is far from a weak one. The data indicates that this pairing is well-suited for high-refresh 1080p play and competent at 1440p, but it will struggle to maintain maximum settings at 4K. The rank reflects this reality: it is a configuration built for smooth, high-detail play at mainstream resolutions, not for chasing extreme fidelity at 4K.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 22 chip, fabricated on a 7 nm process by TSMC. It carries 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, yielding a memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective. The GPU’s base clock is 2150 MHz, its game clock is 2495 MHz, and its boost clock reaches 2600 MHz. These clocks are moderately high for the RX 6000 series, and the 12 GB frame buffer is above the baseline for 1080p and 1440p gaming in this title.

In Undisputed, the GPU’s memory capacity becomes relevant at higher resolutions. At 4K with Ultra settings, the average frame rate drops to 50 FPS, which suggests the card is hitting both a compute and memory bandwidth ceiling. The 12 GB buffer is not exhausted at 4K in this game, but the 432.0 GB/s bandwidth is insufficient to maintain high frame rates at Ultra detail. The measured data shows a clear pattern: as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the dominant bottleneck, and the CPU’s headroom goes unused.

The GPU’s compute resources include 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation units. It also has 40 ray tracing cores, though Undisputed is a sports title that likely does not stress ray tracing heavily. The pixel rate is 166.4 GPixel/s, and the texture rate is 416.0 GTexel/s. Floating-point performance is 13.31 TFLOPS (FP32) and 26.62 TFLOPS (FP16 with 2:1 ratio). These figures place the card well above entry-level parts but below the high-end tier that would be needed for 4K Ultra play.

The GPU’s 71st percentile ranking against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26011, puts it in the same performance neighborhood as the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (which scores 25740, 1.1% lower). That mobile comparison is telling: the RX 6750 XT is roughly equivalent to a high-end laptop GPU from the previous generation, which explains why it can handle 1440p High at 124 FPS but falls to 50 FPS at 4K Ultra. The card is best understood as a 1080p champion and a 1440p workhorse, with 4K being a stretch goal rather than a realistic target.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides a clear hierarchy of settings at each resolution. For the best experience, the choice depends on the target resolution and the user’s preference for frame rate versus visual fidelity.

At 1080p, the Low preset delivers an average of 288 FPS, which is far beyond any display’s refresh rate. The Medium preset drops to 207 FPS, still extremely high. High produces 172 FPS, and Ultra yields 110 FPS. Given that even Ultra at 1080p exceeds 100 FPS, the recommendation is to use Ultra if the display supports it, or High if a higher frame rate is desired for competitive play. The gap between Medium and High is 35 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is 62 FPS — the latter is a steeper drop, but 110 FPS remains smooth.

At 1440p, the picture changes. Low produces 208 FPS, Medium 150 FPS, High 124 FPS, and Ultra 80 FPS. The High preset at 124 FPS is the sweet spot for most users: it maintains a high refresh rate while offering good visual quality. Medium at 150 FPS is also viable if the user prefers maximum smoothness. Ultra at 80 FPS is playable but below the 90 FPS threshold that many consider ideal for fast-paced sports titles. The data suggests that High is the recommended preset at 1440p, with Medium as a fallback for those who prioritize frame rate.

At 4K, the options are limited. High yields 78 FPS, Medium 95 FPS, Low 132 FPS, and Ultra 50 FPS. The Medium preset at 95 FPS is the best balance of quality and performance, as it stays above 90 FPS while providing better visuals than Low. High at 78 FPS is acceptable for slower games but may feel slightly less responsive in a boxing simulator. Ultra at 50 FPS is below the playable threshold for most users and should be avoided. Therefore, the recommendation is Medium at 4K, with Low as an option for those who want to push frame rates above 120 FPS.

The measured rows show that the Medium preset consistently offers the best compromise between the extremes. At 1080p, Medium’s 207 FPS is within 5% of High’s 172 FPS? No — it is 20% higher. At 1440p, Medium’s 150 FPS is 21% higher than High’s 124 FPS. At 4K, Medium’s 95 FPS is 22% higher than High’s 78 FPS. This pattern indicates that Medium is the most efficient preset in terms of frame rate per unit of visual quality, making it the default recommendation across all resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the combo’s rank in Undisputed?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF and AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT rank 1710 out of 3718 tested combos in this game.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The CPU’s average benchmark score is 70163, which is 0.2% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F (69996) and 0.4% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX (69875). It trails the Intel Core Ultra 7 265K by 1% (70879).

Q: How does the GPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score is 26011, which is 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon R9 M395X (25891) and 0.6% ahead of the AMD FirePro W7100 (25856). It leads the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile by 1.1% (25740).

Q: What is the best preset at 1440p?

A: The High preset at 1440p delivers 124 FPS, which is the best balance of quality and performance. Ultra drops to 80 FPS, while Medium offers 150 FPS if higher frame rates are preferred.

Q: Can this combo run 4K Ultra?

A: At 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 50, which is below the playable threshold for most users. The Medium preset at 4K provides 95 FPS and is the recommended choice for 4K play.

Q: What is the CPU’s percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700KF is at the 94th percentile against all CPUs, indicating it is a top-tier processor for this game.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a clear scaling pattern as resolution increases from 1080p to 4K. At the Medium preset, the average FPS goes from 207 at 1080p to 150 at 1440p, then to 95 at 4K. This represents a 27.5% drop from 1080p to 1440p, and a further 36.7% drop from 1440p to 4K. The cumulative drop from 1080p to 4K is 54.1%, meaning the frame rate at 4K is less than half of what it is at 1080p.

At the High preset, the scaling is steeper: 172 FPS at 1080p, 124 FPS at 1440p, and 78 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 27.9%, similar to Medium, but the drop from 1440p to 4K is 37.1%, slightly higher. The cumulative drop from 1080p to 4K is 54.7%. This suggests that at higher settings, the GPU becomes more of a bottleneck at 4K, as the additional detail increases the memory bandwidth and compute demands.

At the Low preset, the scaling is most dramatic: 288 FPS at 1080p, 208 FPS at 1440p, and 132 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is 27.8%, and from 1440p to 4K is 36.5%, with a cumulative drop of 54.2%. Interestingly, the percentage drops are nearly identical across all presets, which indicates that the scaling is primarily resolution-driven rather than setting-driven. This is a sign that the GPU’s memory bandwidth is the limiting factor at 4K, regardless of the visual detail level.

The consistency of the scaling pattern (roughly 27% drop from 1080p to 1440p and 37% drop from 1440p to 4K) points to a GPU-bound scenario at all resolutions. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect to see smaller percentage drops at lower resolutions, where the GPU is less stressed. Instead, the linear scaling suggests that the RX 6750 XT is the primary constraint, and the i7-14700KF has ample headroom even at 1080p where the frame rates are highest. The data supports the conclusion that this is a GPU-limited configuration in Undisputed, with the CPU playing a supporting role.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-14700KF is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.60 GHz. It has a 125 W TDP and supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. This is a high-end desktop part, as evidenced by its 94th percentile ranking against all CPUs and an average benchmark score of 70163.

In Undisputed, the CPU’s role is to feed the GPU with enough data to maintain high frame rates. The benchmark results show that the CPU is more than capable of this task. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 44167, and its single-core score is 6235. The Geekbench multi-core score is 21462, with a single-core score of 2578. These numbers indicate strong single-thread performance, which is crucial for sports games that may not fully utilize many cores.

The nearest rivals in the CPU benchmark data are all within a narrow performance band. The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F scores 69996 (0.2% lower), the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX scores 69875 (0.4% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X scores 69515 (0.9% lower). The Intel Core Ultra 7 265K scores 70879 (1% higher). This clustering means that in Undisputed, the choice of CPU among these parts would have a negligible impact on frame rates, as the game is clearly GPU-bound.

The fact that the CPU has a 94th percentile ranking while the GPU has a 71st percentile ranking creates an imbalance. In this combo, the CPU is effectively over-provisioned for the GPU’s capabilities. This is not a problem for performance — the CPU will never bottleneck the GPU in this game — but it does mean that the combo’s overall rank (1710 out of 3718) is determined almost entirely by the GPU’s performance. If a user were to upgrade the GPU in the future, the CPU would have plenty of headroom to support a significantly faster graphics card.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers four settings (Low, Medium, High, Ultra) and three resolutions (1920x1080, 2560x1440, 3840x2160), for a total of 12 data points. The data is measured, not estimated, and includes minimum and maximum FPS for the Medium preset at each resolution.

At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 288 FPS, which is the highest recorded value in the entire dataset. The Medium preset averages 207 FPS, with a minimum of 176 FPS and a maximum of 238 FPS — the min/max range is 62 FPS, indicating some scene-to-scene variability. The High preset averages 172 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 110 FPS. The progression from Low to Ultra shows a steady decline: 288 → 207 → 172 → 110. The largest single drop is from High to Ultra (62 FPS, a 36% reduction), while the smallest is from Medium to High (35 FPS, a 17% reduction).

At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 208 FPS, which is 80 FPS lower than at 1080p. The Medium preset averages 150 FPS, with a minimum of 127 FPS and a maximum of 172 FPS — a min/max range of 45 FPS. The High preset averages 124 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 80 FPS. The progression is 208 → 150 → 124 → 80. The largest drop is from High to Ultra (44 FPS, a 35% reduction), while the smallest is from Medium to High (26 FPS, a 17% reduction). This mirrors the 1080p pattern, suggesting consistent scaling.

At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 132 FPS, which is 76 FPS lower than at 1440p. The Medium preset averages 95 FPS, with a minimum of 81 FPS and a maximum of 109 FPS — a min/max range of 28 FPS, the tightest of any resolution. The High preset averages 78 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 50 FPS. The progression is 132 → 95 → 78 → 50. The largest drop is from High to Ultra (28 FPS, a 36% reduction), while the smallest is from Medium to High (17 FPS, a 18% reduction).

The min/max data for the Medium preset shows that variability decreases as resolution increases: 62 FPS at 1080p, 45 FPS at 1440p, and 28 FPS at 4K. This suggests that at higher resolutions, the GPU is more consistently saturated, reducing frame time spikes. At 1080p, the CPU can occasionally push frame rates higher, leading to more variance. At 4K, the GPU is the constant bottleneck, so frame rates are more stable. The Ultra preset at 4K, at 50 FPS, is the only data point below 60 FPS, confirming that this combo is not suited for maximum settings at 4K. For all other settings and resolutions, the average FPS is above 78, which is playable. The overall dataset indicates that the combo is best used at 1080p or 1440p, with Medium or High settings for the best experience, and 4K reserved for Medium or Low settings.