Undisputed

The Intel Core i5-13400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER combination delivers exceptionally high frame rates in Undisputed, but the data reveals a clear and consistent pattern in how performance scales with resolution. At 1920x1080, the system produces staggering numbers, with the Low preset hitting an average of 415.9 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440, that same Low preset drops to 299.6 FPS, a significant reduction. At 3840x2160, the Low preset further declines to 190.1 FPS. This scaling—from 415.9 to 299.6 to 190.1 FPS—represents a 28% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 54% drop from 1080p to 4K. The Ultra preset tells a similar story: 160.4 FPS at 1080p, 117 FPS at 1440p, and 73.7 FPS at 4K. The frame rate reduction from 1080p to 4K is roughly 54% for Low and 54% for Ultra, indicating that the limiting component shifts decisively toward the GPU as pixel count increases. At 1080p, the CPU has more headroom to feed frames, but the GPU still manages to deliver over 400 FPS on Low, suggesting neither component is a bottleneck at that setting. The data implies that at 4K Ultra, the RTX 4070 SUPER is working near its limits, while at 1080p Low, the system is likely constrained by the CPU’s ability to issue draw calls.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS breakdown shows a consistent downward trend as resolution increases, but the magnitude of the drop varies by preset. For the Low preset, the average FPS falls from 415.9 at 1920x1080 to 299.6 at 2560x1440, a reduction of 116.3 FPS. At 3840x2160, the Low preset averages 190.1 FPS, representing another 109.5 FPS drop. This pattern suggests that at Low settings, the game is heavily CPU-bound at 1080p, where the i5-13400F’s 10 cores and 16 threads can push out over 400 frames per second. As resolution climbs to 4K, the GPU becomes the primary constraint, with the 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth handling the increased pixel load. The High preset shows a similar relative decline: 248.6 FPS at 1080p, 181.8 FPS at 1440p, and 115.2 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 4K for High is 133.4 FPS, or 54%. For Medium, the numbers are 298.2, 216.4, and 138.9 FPS respectively, with a 4K figure that is 46% lower than the 1080p result. The Ultra preset’s 73.7 FPS at 4K is 54% below its 160.4 FPS at 1080p. This consistent 46-54% reduction across all presets indicates that the RTX 4070 SUPER’s performance scales predictably with resolution, and the limiting component at 4K is unequivocally the GPU, given its 220 W TDP and 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is built on the Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD104 chip, manufactured on a 5 nm process by TSMC. It features 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU’s base clock is 1980 MHz with a boost clock of 2475 MHz, and it has 7168 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, and 80 ROPs. The memory clock is listed at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed. In Undisputed, a sports title that does not appear to require massive texture memory, the 12 GB VRAM is more than sufficient even at 4K Ultra. The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 73.7, which is playable but not high-refresh territory. At 4K High, the average jumps to 115.2 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset’s additional graphical features tax the GPU more heavily. The GPU’s 84th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 42576, places it in the upper tier. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA RTX A6000 (avgScore 42653, deltaPct -0.2%) and AMD Radeon RX 7650 GRE (avgScore 42723, deltaPct -0.3%). These rivals are within 0.3% of the RTX 4070 SUPER’s average score, suggesting that the GPU’s raw compute performance is competitive with professional-grade and mid-range alternatives. The 35.48 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 554.4 GTexel/s texture rate explain why the GPU can handle 4K High at over 100 FPS in this game, but the Ultra preset’s 73.7 FPS shows that the most demanding settings can still bring the GPU to its knees.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i5-13400F is a 10-core, 16-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, produced on Intel’s 10 nm process. It has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP. The CPU’s cache hierarchy includes 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. It supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration. The CPU’s benchmark scores are strong for its class: it achieves 21279 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 3004 in single-core, with a 3DMark max threads score of 7307. Its percentile ranking against all CPUs is 82, with an average benchmark score of 25236. The nearest rivals are the Intel Core i7-13620H (avgScore 25201, deltaPct 0.1%), AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D (avgScore 25365, deltaPct -0.5%), AMD EPYC 9474F (avgScore 25103, deltaPct 0.5%), and AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 340 (avgScore 25099, deltaPct 0.5%). These rivals are all within 0.5% of the i5-13400F’s average score, indicating that the CPU’s multi-threaded performance is tightly clustered with these alternatives. In Undisputed, the CPU’s role is evident at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low, the 415.9 FPS average is likely near the CPU’s maximum frame output, as the GPU can easily render frames at that rate. The boost clock of 4.60 GHz helps in single-threaded tasks, which are common in sports games for physics and AI calculations. The L3 cache of 20 MB provides sufficient bandwidth for game logic, though the game’s genre suggests it is not heavily cache-dependent.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the Intel Core i5-13400F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER ranks 289th out of 1580 tested combos in Undisputed. This places the combo in the 82nd percentile of all tested combinations, meaning it outperforms roughly 82% of the combos in the database. While the raw FPS numbers are exceptional—over 400 FPS at 1080p Low and over 100 FPS at 4K High—the rank suggests that there are 288 combos that achieve even higher performance, likely featuring more powerful CPUs or GPUs. The rank of 289 out of 1580 indicates that this combo is solidly above average but not at the very top tier. Given that the GPU ranks in the 84th percentile and the CPU in the 82nd percentile, the combo’s rank is consistent with both components’ individual standings. The data implies that the combo is well-balanced for this game, with neither component severely bottlenecking the other. The 1580 combos tested include a wide range of hardware, and the 289th position means the i5-13400F + RTX 4070 SUPER is in the top 18% of all tested systems. For a mid-range CPU paired with a high-end GPU, this is a strong result, but it also suggests that there is headroom for improvement with a more powerful CPU, such as those with higher core counts or faster boost clocks.

FAQ

*Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves in Undisputed?*

A: The highest average FPS is 415.9, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low preset.

*Q: What is the lowest average FPS this combo achieves in Undisputed?*

A: The lowest average FPS is 73.7, achieved at 3840x2160 resolution with the Ultra preset.

Q: How does the combo rank among all tested combinations in the game?

A: The combo ranks 289th out of 1580 tested combinations, placing it in the top 18% of all combos.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be the limiting factor at 4K Ultra?

A: At 4K Ultra, the GPU is the limiting factor, as evidenced by the 73.7 FPS average, which is significantly lower than the 160.4 FPS at 1080p Ultra.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra presets at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Low preset averages 299.6 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 117 FPS, a difference of 182.6 FPS.

Q: How does the GPU’s average benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score is 42576, which is 0.2% lower than the NVIDIA RTX A6000’s score of 42653.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

At 1920x1080, the system delivers the following average FPS figures: Low preset at 415.9 FPS, Medium preset at 298.2 FPS, High preset at 248.6 FPS, and Ultra preset at 160.4 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 255.5 FPS, showing a massive performance range depending on visual quality. At 2560x1440, the averages are: Low at 299.6 FPS, Medium at 216.4 FPS, High at 181.8 FPS, and Ultra at 117 FPS. The spread here is 182.6 FPS. At 3840x2160, the averages are: Low at 190.1 FPS, Medium at 138.9 FPS, High at 115.2 FPS, and Ultra at 73.7 FPS. The spread is 116.4 FPS. The data shows that the relative performance gap between presets narrows as resolution increases. At 1080p, the Low preset is 2.6 times faster than Ultra (415.9 vs 160.4 FPS). At 4K, the Low preset is also 2.6 times faster than Ultra (190.1 vs 73.7 FPS). This consistency suggests that the Ultra preset imposes a similar relative performance cost across all resolutions. The highest FPS recorded in the entire dataset is 415.9 at 1080p Low, and the lowest is 73.7 at 4K Ultra. The data also reveals that the High preset at 4K (115.2 FPS) is almost identical to the Ultra preset at 1440p (117 FPS), indicating that the user can trade resolution for settings to achieve similar frame rates.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user’s display resolution and frame rate target. For 1920x1080 users with a 240 Hz monitor, the High preset at 248.6 FPS is the best choice, as it provides a smooth high-refresh experience while maintaining better visual quality than Medium (298.2 FPS) or Low (415.9 FPS). The Ultra preset at 160.4 FPS is still above 144 Hz, making it viable for 144 Hz displays, but the 88.2 FPS difference between High and Ultra might not justify the visual gains for competitive play. At 2560x1440, the High preset at 181.8 FPS is ideal for 165 Hz monitors, while Medium at 216.4 FPS suits 240 Hz displays. The Ultra preset at 117 FPS is adequate for 120 Hz panels but falls short of 144 Hz. For 3840x2160 users, the High preset at 115.2 FPS is the best option for 120 Hz displays, while the Medium preset at 138.9 FPS can drive 144 Hz monitors with a slight reduction in visual fidelity. The Ultra preset at 73.7 FPS is only suitable for 60 Hz displays, and the Low preset at 190.1 FPS is excessive for most 4K monitors. The data suggests that the High preset offers the best balance of visual quality and performance across all resolutions, as it consistently delivers frame rates that are within 20% of the Medium preset’s performance while providing better graphics. For users prioritizing maximum frame rates, the Low preset is always the fastest option, but the visual compromise is substantial. The Medium preset serves as a middle ground, offering significantly higher FPS than High while maintaining decent visual quality. Ultimately, the High preset is recommended for the majority of users, as it provides a superior experience on high-refresh displays without the performance penalty of Ultra.