Undisputed

The Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT delivers a remarkably strong showing in Undisputed, ranking 1,710th out of 3,718 tested combinations. This places the pairing in the top half of all systems, a notable achievement for a quad-core processor that relies on a discrete GPU to carry the graphical load. The data confirms that this combo is well-balanced for the game, with average frame rates that remain playable even at demanding settings and resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 1,710 out of 3,718 tested configurations puts it in the 54th percentile of all system pairings for Undisputed. This is a respectable position, suggesting the i3-12100F and RX 6750 XT work together without a severe bottleneck at most settings. The CPU itself, with an average benchmark score of 13,494, sits in the 68th percentile against all CPUs, indicating solid single-thread performance that is critical for a sports title. Its nearest rivals in raw compute include the Intel Core 3 N355 (deltaPct 0) and the Intel Core i5-9500 (deltaPct 0.3), meaning the i3-12100F is essentially on par with those chips in synthetic tests. The GPU, meanwhile, scores in the 71st percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26,011. It outperforms the AMD Radeon R9 M395X by 0.5% and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile by 1.1%, showing it is a competitive mid-range part. The game’s measured data, however, reveals that the GPU is the primary driver of performance, as frame rates scale predictably with resolution and settings, while the CPU’s four cores and eight threads are sufficient to avoid major frame dips.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution to play Undisputed with this combo?*

A: Based on the measured data, 2560x1440 offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, with average frame rates of 124 FPS at High settings and 80 FPS at Ultra. At 1920x1080, the system can push 172 FPS on High, but the jump to 1440p is smoother for those with higher-resolution monitors.

*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Undisputed?*

A: Yes, but with compromises. At 3840x2160, the combo achieves 78 FPS on High settings and 95 FPS on Medium, which is playable. However, Ultra settings drop to 50 FPS, which may feel less responsive for a sports game requiring quick reactions.

Q: How does the CPU affect performance in this game?

A: The Intel Core i3-12100F performs well for Undisputed, with a single-thread score of 1,674 in Cinebench R23, which is strong for a budget chip. The data shows that even at 1080p Low settings, the system hits 288 FPS, suggesting the CPU is not a limiting factor until very high frame rates.

Q: Is the RX 6750 XT a good match for the i3-12100F in this title?

A: Yes. The GPU’s 12 GB of VRAM and 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth are ample for Undisputed. The measured FPS indicates that the GPU is the main bottleneck at higher settings, but the pair produces no obvious stutter, with minimum FPS recorded at 81 FPS at 4K Medium.

Q: What settings should I use for a competitive edge?

A: For maximum responsiveness, 1920x1080 Low settings yield 288 FPS, which is exceptionally high. For a balance of visuals and speed, 2560x1440 High at 124 FPS is recommended, as it keeps the action smooth without sacrificing too much detail.

Q: How does this combo compare to other systems?

A: The combo ranks 1,710th out of 3,718, placing it above average. The CPU’s nearest rivals, like the Intel Core i5-9500, are within 0.3% of its average score, while the GPU is about 1.1% faster than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile, indicating a competitive mid-range pairing.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT is the workhorse of this combo, and its specifications directly explain the measured performance. With 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, the GPU delivers 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is more than sufficient for Undisputed’s textures and geometry at 4K. The memory clock runs at 2250 MHz, or 18 Gbps effective, while the base clock is 2150 MHz and the boost clock reaches 2600 MHz. The game clock is rated at 2495 MHz, which is the typical sustained speed under load. These clocks, combined with 2,560 shading units and 64 ROPs, allow the card to push a pixel rate of 166.4 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 416.0 GTexel/s. The FP32 performance of 13.31 TFLOPS is respectable for a RDNA 2.0 part. In the benchmark data, the GPU’s PassMark G3D score of 20,700 reflects its strong rasterization performance, which is what Undisputed relies on. The card’s 71st percentile ranking against all GPUs confirms it sits above the median, and its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon R9 M395X, trails by only 0.5%, highlighting that the RX 6750 XT is a mature, well-optimized product. The GPU’s TDP of 250 W and dual-slot design are typical for this class, but the actual frame rates show that it is the component that dictates scaling across resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the lowest resolution tested, the combo achieves 288 FPS on Low, which is exceptional and indicates a GPU-bound scenario where the CPU can feed frames quickly. On Medium, the average drops to 207 FPS, with a minimum of 176 FPS and a maximum of 238 FPS, showing a stable range. High settings yield 172 FPS, while Ultra falls to 110 FPS. This scaling suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor, as the CPU’s performance is consistent. Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain high: 208 FPS on Low, 150 FPS on Medium (with a min of 127 and max of 172), 124 FPS on High, and 80 FPS on Ultra. The drop from Low to Ultra at this resolution is 128 FPS, indicating that the GPU’s compute units are increasingly taxed. At 3840x2160, the results show the GPU’s limits more clearly. Low settings produce 132 FPS, Medium drops to 95 FPS (with min 81 and max 109), High reaches 78 FPS, and Ultra falls to 50 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is 82 FPS, which is a larger relative drop than at 1080p, confirming that the RX 6750 XT is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions. Notably, the minimum FPS values are only recorded for Medium settings, but they show no severe frame-time spikes, suggesting a smooth experience even when the GPU is under load.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and non-linear, which is typical for a GPU-bound game. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 288 at 1080p to 208 at 1440p (a 28% drop), and then to 132 at 4K (a 37% drop from 1440p). This indicates that the GPU is handling the increased pixel count effectively, but the scaling is not perfect due to other overheads. At High settings, the decline is more pronounced: 172 FPS at 1080p, 124 FPS at 1440p (a 28% drop), and 78 FPS at 4K (a 37% drop from 1440p). The consistent percentage drops across settings suggest that the CPU is not introducing a bottleneck at lower resolutions; instead, the GPU’s rendering pipeline is the limiting factor. The largest absolute drop occurs between 1080p and 1440p at Ultra settings, where FPS goes from 110 to 80 (a 27% reduction), but the drop from 1440p to 4K at Ultra is 30 FPS (a 37.5% reduction), showing that the GPU’s memory bandwidth and compute units are saturated. The fact that the system can still hit 50 FPS at 4K Ultra reflects the RX 6750 XT’s 12 GB VRAM, which prevents texture swapping. However, for a sports game like Undisputed, the data suggests that playing at 4K High is the sensible ceiling, as the 78 FPS average is above the typical 60 FPS target, while Ultra should be reserved for those who prioritize visuals over frame rate.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal settings depend on the user’s display and performance goals. For players with a 1080p monitor, the data shows that High settings at 172 FPS is the best experience, as it provides a high frame rate without the visual degradation of Low. Ultra at 110 FPS is also viable for those who want maximum detail, but the 62 FPS gap between High and Ultra suggests diminishing returns. At 1440p, High settings at 124 FPS is the sweet spot, offering a fluid experience that exceeds the refresh rate of most 144Hz monitors. Medium at 150 FPS is slightly faster, but High adds visual fidelity that is worth the 26 FPS cost. Ultra at 80 FPS is playable, but the drop to below 100 FPS might be noticeable in fast-paced exchanges. For 4K, High settings at 78 FPS is the recommended preset, as it maintains a playable frame rate while preserving detail. Medium at 95 FPS is also a strong choice, but the minimum FPS of 81 indicates occasional dips. Low at 132 FPS is excessive for most displays, and Ultra at 50 FPS is below the ideal threshold for a responsive sports title. The data suggests that the combo is best utilized at 1440p High, where the GPU’s 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are fully leveraged, and the CPU’s single-thread performance ensures no frame drops. Ultimately, the measured results show that this pairing is versatile, but the most balanced experience is achieved by selecting High settings at any resolution, as it provides a consistent 78-172 FPS range that suits both competitive and casual play.