Undisputed

Undisputed is a Sports title with a release date of 2023-10-10. The measured configuration combines an AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX with an NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile, and the dataIsMeasured field confirms these rows are measured rather than estimated. The dataset covers 3840x2160, 2560x1440, and 1920x1080 at Low, Medium, High, and Ultra settings. The CPU sits in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, the GPU sits in the 75th percentile, and the combo ranks 2056th out of 3718 tested combinations in this game.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX is an 8000-series mobile part built on Zen 4 (Dragon Range) at TSMC 5 nm. It has 16 cores and 32 threads, with a 2.50 GHz base clock and a 5.40 GHz boost clock. The cache layout includes 64 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and 64 MB L3. The memory interface is dual-channel DDR5 with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth, and the socket is AMD Socket FL1. The package also contains a Radeon 610M integrated GPU, but the measured rows pair this CPU with the discrete RTX 5070 Mobile.

Synthetic benchmarks place the CPU very high. It scores 42713 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 6030 in R23 single-core. In Cinebench R20 it scores 17939 multicore and 2532 single-core. In Cinebench R15 it scores 4305 multicore and 607 single-core. PassMark results are 51405 for multithread and 3907 for single thread. The average benchmark score is 76212, and the percentile versus all CPUs is 95.

The nearest rivals in aggregate score reinforce that standing. The Ryzen 9 8945HX is 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, whose average score is 76155. It is 0.4% behind the AMD EPYC Embedded 8224P, which scores 76492, and 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX, which scores 76513. It is 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D, which scores 75779.

For a sports title like Undisputed, the CPU’s role is to keep the game logic and frame submission ahead of the GPU. The measured 1920x1080 Low row reaches 267 average FPS, the highest value in the entire dataset. That result is strong evidence that the 16-core, 32-thread CPU is not the component limiting this combo at low settings. The 5.40 GHz boost clock and 64 MB L3 also provide enough single-thread capability to support high average FPS in less demanding rows. The benchmark scores and the FPS table together point to a CPU with substantial headroom in this game.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank in Undisputed is 2056 out of 3718 tested combinations. That places it in the lower portion of the list, not among the top results. This is an interesting outcome because the CPU is in the 95th percentile while the GPU is in the 75th percentile. The gap between those percentiles suggests the GPU is the component holding the combined result back relative to the CPU’s own classification.

The CPU’s nearest rivals are all very close in aggregate score. The 8945HX is effectively tied with the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, and it is only 0.4% behind the EPYC Embedded 8224P and Threadripper PRO 9945WX. Those are desktop and server-class parts, yet the mobile CPU is within a fraction of a percent of them. The GPU, by contrast, sits next to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti, RTX 2080 Ti, AMD Radeon RX 6800, and AMD Radeon RX 6700 in aggregate score, with deltas ranging from -1.7% to 0.5%. None of those are top-of-line current parts. This helps explain why the combined rank is 2056 of 3718 despite the CPU’s high percentile.

The measured FPS table is still useful in absolute terms. The lowest average FPS in the dataset is 47 at 3840x2160 Ultra, while the highest is 267 at 1920x1080 Low. The combo is therefore never severely underpowered in this title, even though its ranking relative to other tested combos is mid-lower rather than upper.

FAQ

Q: Is the CPU likely to bottleneck this GPU in Undisputed?

A: The data does not show a CPU bottleneck. The Ryzen 9 8945HX scores 42713 in Cinebench R23 multicore, 6030 in Cinebench R23 single-core, and sits in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. At 1920x1080 Low the combo averages 267 FPS, which is the strongest measured row in the dataset.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Mobile compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 29928. It is 0.1% below the RTX 3070 Ti, 0.5% above the RTX 2080 Ti, 0.6% below the RX 6800, and 1.7% below the RX 6700. Its PassMark G3D score is 20355.

Q: What does the 2560x1440 Medium row deliver?

A: At 2560x1440 Medium, the measured average is 139 FPS, with a minimum of 118 and a maximum of 160. This is the only 2560x1440 Medium row in the dataset, and it is the only 2560x1440 row with recorded min/max values.

Q: Is 3840x2160 playable with this combo?

A: Yes, but not on every preset. At 3840x2160, Low averages 122, Medium averages 88 with min 75 and max 101, High averages 73, and Ultra averages 47. The Ultra result is the lowest average in the entire dataset.

Q: Does the GPU support modern graphics APIs?

A: The RTX 5070 Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, according to the specification fields.

Q: What is the combo’s overall rank in Undisputed?

A: The combo ranks 2056 out of 3718 tested combinations. The CPU is in the 95th percentile, and the GPU is in the 75th percentile.

Measured FPS Breakdown

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

|---|---:|---:|---:|---:|

| 3840x2160 | High | 73 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 122 | — | — |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 88 | 75 | 101 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 47 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | High | 115 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 193 | — | — |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 139 | 118 | 160 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 74 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | High | 159 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 267 | — | — |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 192 | 163 | 221 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 102 | — | — |

At 3840x2160, the ordering by average FPS is Low at 122, Medium at 88, High at 73, and Ultra at 47. At 2560x1440, Low averages 193, Medium 139, High 115, and Ultra 74. At 1920x1080, Low averages 267, Medium 192, High 159, and Ultra 102. The same preset ordering appears at every resolution: Low is fastest, then Medium, then High, then Ultra.

Medium is the only preset with min/max data in all three resolutions. At 1920x1080, the Medium range is 163 to 221. At 2560x1440, it is 118 to 160. At 3840x2160, it is 75 to 101. The presence of those bound values makes Medium the most fully characterized preset in the measured dataset.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Mobile is a GeForce 50-series part with a GB206 chip on Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It is built at TSMC 5 nm using 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die. The GPU has 8 GB GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, which yields 384.0 GB/s bandwidth. Its base clock is 907 MHz, its boost clock is 1425 MHz, and the memory clock is 1500 MHz with 24 Gbps effective data rate.

The shader configuration is substantial for a mobile part: 4608 shading units, 144 texture units, 48 ROPs, 36 RT cores, and 144 tensor cores. Peak FP32 performance is 13.13 TFLOPS, and FP16 performance is also 13.13 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The GPU’s aggregate average benchmark score is 29928, with a percentile of 75. In synthetic tests it scores 122238 in Geekbench OpenCL, 116960 in Geekbench Vulkan, and 20355 in PassMark G3D.

These resources map to the measured game data. At 1920x1080 Low, the GPU can deliver 267 average FPS. At 3840x2160 Low, it still averages 122. The higher settings and resolutions tax the same 8 GB frame buffer and 384.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 3840x2160 Ultra row averages only 47 FPS, while 3840x2160 High averages 73 and 3840x2160 Medium averages 88. That spread indicates the GPU is the component that reacts most strongly to preset and resolution changes. The CPU’s high percentile and strong multithread scores suggest it is not the reason for the 3840x2160 Ultra slowdown; the measured GPU profile is the more likely limit.

Settings Recommendations

Among the measured rows, Medium offers the most balanced experience across all three resolutions. At 1920x1080, Medium averages 192 FPS with a 163 to 221 range, while High averages 159 and Ultra averages 102. At 2560x1440, Medium averages 139 with a 118 to 160 range, while High averages 115 and Ultra averages 74. At 3840x2160, Medium averages 88 with a 75 to 101 range, while High averages 73 and Ultra averages 47.

A notable data point is that the Medium minimum is higher than the High average at every resolution. At 1920x1080, Medium min 163 exceeds High avg 159. At 2560x1440, Medium min 118 exceeds High avg 115. At 3840x2160, Medium min 75 exceeds High avg 73. This means the measured data favors Medium not just in average FPS but also in the available lower bound of recorded performance.

Low is faster in every resolution, but it uses the Low visual preset. If maximum FPS is the only goal, Low is the measured choice: 267, 193, and 122 average FPS across the three resolutions. If visual fidelity matters more, Medium is the strongest preset with recorded frame bounds. Ultra is the slowest measured preset in every resolution and is particularly weak at 3840x2160, where it averages 47 FPS.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS declines consistently as resolution increases. On Low, the average moves from 267 at 1920x1080 to 193 at 2560x1440, then 122 at 3840x2160. On Medium, it moves from 192 to 139 to 88. On High, it moves from 159 to 115 to 73. On Ultra, it moves from 102 to 74 to 47.

Every preset loses average FPS at each higher resolution. Even the Low preset, which minimizes the graphics workload, drops from 267 to 122 when moving from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. This pattern indicates that the discrete GPU is the component responding to resolution changes. The CPU’s benchmark scores and percentile do not change with resolution; the FPS decline is therefore best explained by the GPU’s workload scaling.

The 3840x2160 Ultra result of 47 FPS is the lowest average in the dataset, while the 1920x1080 Low result of 267 FPS is the highest. That spread is consistent with a GPU-bound result at high resolution and high settings. The CPU, with its 95th percentile standing and 16-core/32-thread configuration, remains capable throughout the resolution sweep; the measured FPS table shows that the RTX 5070 Mobile is the primary factor in this combo’s scaling behavior.