Undisputed

Undisputed is a boxing title that can be surprisingly demanding, and the combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX and AMD Radeon 8050S shows a clear performance profile across the tested resolutions. The data indicates a system that is capable of delivering high refresh rates at 1080p, but requires careful settings management to maintain smooth gameplay at 4K. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS, the role of the components, and the most practical settings for this specific hardware pairing.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a predictable but significant drop in performance as resolution increases, which points directly to the GPU as the primary limiting factor in this pairing. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 225 FPS, which drops to 162 FPS at 1440p and further down to 103 FPS at 4K. This scaling pattern shows that the CPU is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions, as the frame rate is high enough to indicate headroom, but the GPU's workload increases substantially with each pixel count rise.

The most telling comparison is at High settings across all three resolutions. The system delivers 134 FPS at 1080p, which is excellent for smooth gameplay. Moving to 1440p, this drops by 37 FPS to 97 FPS, a 27.6% reduction. The jump to 4K is even more punishing, with the average FPS falling to 61, which is a 37.1% reduction from the 1440p figure. This steep decline from 1440p to 4K is characteristic of a GPU that is running out of pixel-pushing power, especially in a game with detailed character models and arena environments.

The scaling from 1080p to 4K at Medium settings reinforces this conclusion. The average FPS goes from 162 at 1080p to 117 at 1440p, and then to 74 at 4K. The delta between 1440p and 4K (43 FPS) is larger than the delta between 1080p and 1440p (45 FPS), showing that the performance cost per pixel increases as you approach the higher resolution. This is a classic sign that the Radeon 8050S is the component under the most stress, as the Ryzen 9 8945HX has the multi-core muscle to keep up with frame generation but cannot help with the raw fill rate required at 4K.

The data suggests that 1080p is where this combo shines, providing frame rates that are well above the threshold for competitive play. The 1440p resolution offers a good balance, with High settings still capable of pushing nearly 100 FPS. However, 4K is only viable with Low settings, where the 103 FPS average shows the GPU can handle the load when visual effects are minimized. For users targeting 4K, the data indicates that the Radeon 8050S is the bottleneck, and any settings above Low will result in frame rates that dip below the 60 FPS target for consistent smoothness.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon 8050S is a critical component in this setup, and its specifications directly explain the performance ceiling observed in the measured data. It is built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture with a 4 nm process, featuring 2048 shading units and 64 ROPs. Its boost clock of 2800 MHz and base clock of 1295 MHz are solid, but the most defining characteristic is its memory configuration: it uses "System Shared" memory. This means the GPU relies on the system's DDR5 RAM rather than dedicated VRAM, which can impact performance in memory-intensive scenarios.

The GPU's raw compute power is listed at 11.47 TFLOPS for FP32, which places it in a mid-range tier for mobile graphics. Its benchmark scores reflect this positioning. The Geekbench OpenCL score is 65818, and the Vulkan score is 58398. These scores put it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, indicating it performs better than most, but it is not a top-tier part. The nearest rivals in the data include the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, which is 0.3% faster, and the AMD Radeon RX 7600M, which is 2.6% faster. This shows that while the 8050S is competitive, it is not at the very top of the mobile GPU hierarchy.

In the context of Undisputed, the GPU's role is clear from the frame rate scaling. The game's visual effects, such as character detail, lighting, and arena textures, all rely on the GPU's ability to process geometry and pixels. At 1080p, the 8050S can handle these tasks efficiently, as evidenced by the 225 FPS at Low settings. However, at 4K, the number of pixels quadruples, and the GPU's fill rate and memory bandwidth become strained. The fact that the 4K Ultra setting drops to 39 FPS shows that the GPU is simply overwhelmed by the combination of high resolution and maximum visual fidelity.

The "System Shared" memory is a key factor here. Unlike a dedicated GPU with its own VRAM, the 8050S must share the system's memory bus with the CPU. This can lead to contention, especially at higher resolutions where the GPU needs to access more texture data. The data doesn't provide a direct measurement of this bottleneck, but the steep performance drop at 4K suggests that the shared memory architecture may be contributing to the lower frame rates. For users, this means that the GPU is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where its compute power is sufficient, but 4K should be reserved for less demanding titles or lower settings.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution to play Undisputed with this CPU/GPU combo?

A: Based on the measured data, 1920x1080 is the most optimal resolution. It provides the highest frame rates across all settings, with an average of 225 FPS at Low and 134 FPS at High. For a balance of visual quality and performance, 2560x1440 is also viable, maintaining 97 FPS at High, but 3840x2160 should only be used with Low settings to stay above 100 FPS.

Q: How does the AMD Radeon 8050S compare to its direct competitors?

A: The Radeon 8050S has an average benchmark score of 62108, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs. It is slightly faster than the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M, which has a deltaPct of 0.3%, meaning the 8050S is 0.3% faster. It is slower than the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (2.5% slower), the AMD Radeon RX 7600M (2.6% slower), and the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (2.7% slower).

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX a bottleneck for the Radeon 8050S in this game?

A: No, the data indicates the CPU is not the limiting factor. The Ryzen 9 8945HX scores 42713 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and ranks in the 95th percentile of all CPUs. The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K shows a pattern consistent with GPU limitations, not CPU bottlenecks, as the performance drop is directly related to resolution increases.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, the average frame rate with Low settings is 103 FPS. With Ultra settings, the average drops to 39 FPS. This represents a 64 FPS difference, making Ultra settings unplayable for smooth gameplay while Low settings provide a comfortable experience.

Q: Should I use an external display or the built-in IGP?

A: The Radeon 8050S is an integrated GPU (IGP) with a slot width of "IGP" and display outputs that are "Portable Device Dependent." The data suggests it is designed for integrated use in a laptop. For the best performance, you should use the laptop's native display, as external output capabilities are not specified in the data.

Q: Does the CPU's 16-core configuration help in Undisputed?

A: The Ryzen 9 8945HX has 16 cores and 32 threads, which provides substantial multi-threaded performance. While Undisputed may not use all cores, the high single-core score of 6030 in Cinebench R23 ensures that the game's main thread is well-served. This helps maintain high frame rates at 1080p, where the CPU's headroom prevents any potential stutters.

How This Combo Ranks

In the database of tested hardware combinations for Undisputed, this pairing of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX and AMD Radeon 8050S holds a specific position. The combo rank is 2087 out of 2813 tested combos. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the ranking, which is somewhat surprising given the individual component performance. The CPU itself is a top-tier part, ranking in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU is in the 89th percentile. However, the combined rank suggests that the GPU is holding back the overall gaming experience in this specific title.

The rank of 2087 out of 2813 means that roughly 74% of tested systems perform better in Undisputed. This is not a poor result, but it indicates that there are many other combinations that can achieve higher frame rates. The CPU's nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX with a 0.1% higher average score, show that the processor is competitive, but the GPU's nearest rivals, like the AMD Radeon RX 7600M which is 2.6% faster, suggest that a slightly better GPU would push this combo higher up the rankings.

The data implies that this combo is balanced toward CPU-heavy tasks, but for gaming, the GPU is the deciding factor. The rank reflects the measured FPS data, which shows that while the system can hit high frame rates at 1080p, it struggles at 4K. The 2087 rank is a holistic measure across all resolutions and settings, and the lower scores at 4K Ultra likely pull the overall rank down. For users considering this combo, it is important to understand that it is a capable gaming system, but it is not designed for maximum settings at 4K, which is reflected in its ranking.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table summarizes the exact average FPS figures from the measured data for all resolutions and settings.

| Resolution | Settings | Average FPS |

| :--------- | :------- | :---------- |

| 3840x2160 | High | 61 |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 103 |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 74 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 39 |

| 2560x1440 | High | 97 |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 162 |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 117 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 62 |

| 1920x1080 | High | 134 |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 225 |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 162 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 86 |

The data is clear and consistent. At 1080p, the system is highly capable. The jump from 1080p to 1440p shows a uniform reduction in FPS across all settings, with an average drop of about 30-40%. For example, at High settings, the FPS drops from 134 to 97, and at Ultra, it drops from 86 to 62. This is a manageable loss that still keeps the game playable.

Moving to 4K, the performance penalty becomes severe. At High settings, the FPS falls to 61, which is just at the edge of playability. At Ultra, it plummets to 39, which is not smooth for a fast-paced sports game. The Low setting at 4K provides 103 FPS, which is the only way to get a high refresh rate experience at this resolution. The Medium setting at 4K (74 FPS) is a compromise, offering a playable frame rate while maintaining some visual fidelity.

The min and max FPS figures are only provided for Medium settings. At 1080p Medium, the frame rate ranges from 137 to 186 FPS, indicating a stable experience with minimal frame time spikes. At 1440p Medium, the range is 99 to 134 FPS, which is still smooth. At 4K Medium, the range is 63 to 85 FPS, showing that while the average is 74, there can be dips below 60 FPS in demanding scenes, which might cause noticeable stutters.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the user's target resolution and refresh rate. For a 1080p display, the system has enough headroom to run at High settings with an average of 134 FPS, which is ideal for a 144Hz monitor. For those with a 60Hz display, Ultra settings at 86 FPS are still well above the refresh rate, providing a visually rich experience without any performance concerns. Pushing to Low at 225 FPS is only beneficial for extreme esports-style play, which is not typical for a boxing game.

For 1440p users, High settings at 97 FPS is the sweet spot. It provides a significant visual upgrade over 1080p while maintaining a frame rate that is smooth on most 144Hz monitors. Medium settings at 117 FPS is also a viable option, offering a slight performance boost at the cost of some graphical detail. Ultra settings at 62 FPS are playable but leave little room for frame drops, so High or Medium is recommended for a more consistent experience.

For 4K displays, the recommendation is more restrictive. Low settings at 103 FPS is the only option that guarantees a high refresh rate experience. Medium settings at 74 FPS are acceptable for a 60Hz display, but the min FPS of 63 suggests that there might be occasional drops below 60, which could be noticeable. High settings at 61 FPS are borderline, and Ultra at 39 FPS is not recommended for competitive or smooth play. The data indicates that this combo is not suited for 4K Ultra, so users should prioritize frame rate over visual fidelity at this resolution.

In summary, the best experience per the measured rows is to use High settings at 1080p or 1440p. This provides a high frame rate without sacrificing too much visual quality. For 4K, Low settings are the only way to fully utilize the display's refresh rate. The system's CPU and GPU are well-matched for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the GPU's memory configuration and compute power limit its 4K potential to lower presets.