Downfall
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 98 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 35 | 56 | 68 | 83 |
| 1440p QHD | 56 | 90 | 109 | 134 |
| 1080p Full HD | 79 | 126 | 153 | 187 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Downfall with AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + AMD Radeon 8050S, In-Depth Analysis
Downfall, a 2016 horror title, remains a demanding benchmark for modern hardware, and the combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX processor with the AMD Radeon 8050S graphics solution delivers a distinctive performance profile. This pairing, measured directly in the game, places 2154th out of 2928 tested combos, indicating a mid-pack standing that is heavily influenced by the GPU's role at higher resolutions. The data reveals a system capable of excellent 1080p performance but one that requires careful settings management for 4K play, with the CPU's substantial multi-core resources providing a stable foundation across all tested configurations.
FAQ
Q: What is the overall standing of this CPU and GPU combo in Downfall?
A: The combo ranks 2154th out of 2928 tested combinations. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the overall performance distribution, suggesting that while it can run the game, many other hardware pairings deliver higher frame rates.
Q: How does the Ryzen 9 8945HX compare to its closest CPU rivals in general benchmarks?
A: The Ryzen 9 8945HX has an average benchmark score of 76212. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, scores 76155, which is a 0.1% difference. Another close competitor, the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D, scores 75779, making the 8945HX 0.6% faster. This places it in a very tight performance cluster.
Q: What is the best settings preset for a smooth experience at 2560x1440?
A: The Medium preset at 2560x1440 provides a strong balance, yielding an average of 109 FPS with a minimum of 93 FPS and a maximum of 126 FPS. This is the only preset at this resolution with full frame time data, indicating a stable and playable experience.
Q: Is the Radeon 8050S more powerful than its closest GPU rivals?
A: According to average benchmark scores, the Radeon 8050S scores 62108. This is 0.3% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M's score of 61896. However, it is 2.5% slower than the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 and 2.6% slower than the AMD Radeon RX 7600M.
Q: What is the performance penalty for using the Ultra preset at 4K resolution?
A: At 3840x2160, the Ultra preset delivers an average of 35 FPS. This is a significant drop from the High preset's 56 FPS and represents a substantial burden on the GPU, making it the least playable setting at this resolution.
Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its single-threaded performance?
A: The Ryzen 9 8945HX shows exceptional multi-threaded capability, scoring 42713 in Cinebench R23 multi-core. In contrast, its single-core score in the same test is 6030. This large gap highlights the processor's 16-core, 32-thread design, which is far more suited to heavily parallel workloads than lightly threaded tasks.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX and AMD Radeon 8050S achieves a rank of 2154 out of 2928 tested combinations in Downfall. This percentile placement, roughly in the 26th percentile of all combos, signals that this hardware pairing is not optimized for this specific title's demands. The ranking is likely dragged down by the GPU's performance, as the CPU's general benchmark percentile is high. The Ryzen 9 8945HX sits in the 95th percentile when compared to all CPUs, a stark contrast to the combo's overall game rank. This discrepancy suggests that the Radeon 8050S is the primary limiting factor in achieving higher frame rates, especially at more demanding resolutions and settings.
The combo's rank becomes clearer when examining the GPU's standing. The Radeon 8050S is in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, which is still respectable but lower than the CPU's 95th percentile. The delta between the CPU's high standing and the combo's lower rank illustrates a bottleneck scenario where the GPU cannot fully utilize the processor's capabilities in this game. Benchmark results indicate that while the CPU is a top-tier mobile part, the overall system performance in Downfall is capped by the graphics solution. This is a classic case where a powerful processor is paired with a mid-range to upper-mid-range integrated GPU, resulting in a system that is better balanced for productivity tasks than for high-end gaming at maximum settings.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon 8050S is an integrated graphics processor built on the RDNA 3.5 architecture, using the Strix Halo chip. Its performance in Downfall is directly tied to its clock speeds and memory configuration. The GPU has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz. These clocks, while respectable, are not the primary constraint; the memory is "System Shared," meaning it uses the system's main DDR5 memory rather than dedicated VRAM. The memory bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent," which implies that performance can vary based on the system's memory configuration and speed. This shared memory architecture is a key factor in the GPU's performance ceiling.
In the measured FPS data, the GPU's role is evident. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves an average of 187 FPS, showing that the GPU can handle the game's lighter loads. However, as resolution and settings increase, the frame rate drops sharply. At 4K with Ultra settings, the average FPS falls to 35, indicating that the GPU is severely strained. This pattern is typical for a GPU that relies on system memory, as the bandwidth demands at higher resolutions exceed what the shared memory can efficiently provide. The GPU's pixel rate of 179.2 GPixel/s and texture rate of 358.4 GTexel/s are fixed hardware capabilities, but the memory bottleneck becomes more pronounced at 4K. The data shows a clear scaling pattern where the GPU's performance degrades significantly with increased graphical load, underscoring its role as the limiting component in this combo for this game.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For a smooth and responsive experience, the Medium preset provides the best balance of performance and visual fidelity across all resolutions. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset delivers an average of 153 FPS with a minimum of 130 FPS and a maximum of 176 FPS. This is the only settings level at 1080p with full frame time data, indicating a stable and highly playable experience. The High preset at 1080p is also excellent, with an average of 126 FPS, but the Medium preset offers more headroom.
At 2560x1440, the Medium preset is again the recommended choice, yielding an average of 109 FPS with a minimum of 93 FPS. This provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS, ensuring smooth gameplay. The High preset at this resolution averages 90 FPS, which is still playable but offers less headroom for demanding scenes. For 4K gaming, the Medium preset is the only viable option for a playable experience, with an average of 68 FPS and a minimum of 58 FPS. The High preset at 4K drops to an average of 56 FPS, which is borderline, while the Low preset averages 83 FPS but sacrifices visual quality. The Ultra preset is not recommended at any resolution, as it produces an average of 79 FPS at 1080p, 56 FPS at 1440p, and only 35 FPS at 4K. For the best experience, the data strongly suggests using the Medium preset, as it offers the most consistent frame pacing and avoids the sharp performance drops seen at High and Ultra.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at how the combo performs across different resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system shows a wide range of performance. With Low settings, it achieves an average of 187 FPS, demonstrating the GPU's ability to handle light loads with ease. The Medium preset delivers a strong 153 FPS average, with a minimum of 130 FPS and a maximum of 176 FPS, indicating stable performance. The High preset averages 126 FPS, which is still very smooth. The Ultra preset, however, drops to an average of 79 FPS, showing a significant performance hit when all settings are maxed out.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance scales down as expected. The Low preset averages 134 FPS, which is still high. The Medium preset provides an average of 109 FPS, with a minimum of 93 FPS and a maximum of 126 FPS, making it the most balanced option at this resolution. The High preset averages 90 FPS, which is respectable but not as fluid as the Medium setting. The Ultra preset falls to an average of 56 FPS, which is on the edge of playability for a horror game that may require quick reactions.
At 3840x2160, the GPU's limitations become apparent. The Low preset averages 83 FPS, which is surprisingly playable for 4K. The Medium preset averages 68 FPS, with a minimum of 58 FPS and a maximum of 78 FPS, providing a stable experience that is close to a 60 FPS target. The High preset drops to an average of 56 FPS, which is just below the ideal threshold. The Ultra preset is the weakest performer, with an average of only 35 FPS, making it unsuitable for smooth gameplay. The data shows a consistent pattern: the Medium preset is the sweet spot for this combo, offering the best compromise between visual quality and frame rate at every resolution.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX is a high-end mobile processor based on the Zen 4 architecture, codenamed Dragon Range. It features 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. This processor is a powerhouse for multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42713. In contrast, its single-core score is 6030, which is also strong but highlights the CPU's design focus on parallel processing. The CPU's 64 MB of L3 cache and support for DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s provide a solid foundation for feeding the GPU and handling game logic.
In Downfall, the CPU's role is to maintain stable frame rates by ensuring that the game's simulation and AI processes are handled efficiently. The benchmark results indicate that the CPU is not a bottleneck in this combo. The combo's rank of 2154 out of 2928 is primarily due to the GPU's performance, as the CPU's own percentile ranking is 95th. The processor's high multi-core score, 17939 in Cinebench R20 and 4305 in R15, suggests it can handle the game's background tasks without issue. The PassMark tests further support this, with a multi-thread score of 51405 and a physics score of 2168. The CPU's 5 nm process node and 55 W TDP indicate an efficient design that can sustain high clocks under load.
The CPU's performance relative to its rivals is also notable. The Ryzen 9 8945HX has an average benchmark score of 76212, which is essentially tied with the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX at 76155 (a 0.1% difference). It is also 0.6% faster than the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D and 0.4% faster than the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX. This places it at the top of its performance class. However, this CPU strength does not translate into a high combo rank in Downfall, confirming that the game is heavily GPU-bound. The data shows that even with a top-tier CPU, the system's frame rates are capped by the Radeon 8050S, making the CPU's considerable power largely underutilized in this specific title. This is a crucial insight for potential users: the processor is a long-term investment, but its gaming potential is limited by the integrated GPU.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX
AMD Radeon 8050S
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + AMD Radeon 8050S in Downfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 83.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 68.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 56.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 35.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 134.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 109.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 90.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 56.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 187.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 153.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 126.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 79.0 |
Downfall with Ryzen 9 8945HX + Other GPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Downfall with 8050S + Other CPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 8945HX + 8050S
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.