Undisputed

# How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D combined with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 places at rank 1184 out of 2813 tested combos in Undisputed. This positions the pairing in the upper-middle portion of the database, sitting above roughly 58% of all recorded configurations. The rank reflects a system that is capable but not at the top tier for this sports title, with the data showing a balanced profile where neither component completely dominates the performance picture.

Benchmark results indicate the combo's standing is consistent with what the individual component scores suggest. The CPU holds a 92nd percentile ranking against all processors, while the GPU sits at the 61st percentile among all graphics cards. The CPU's strength is notable, but the GPU's more modest percentile pulls the overall combo rank down from what a top-tier processor alone might suggest. In practical terms, this means the pairing is competitive for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p play, but it does not reach the elite tier of configurations in the database for Undisputed.

The rank distribution shows a wide field, with most combos clustering in the middle ranges. At 1184 of 2813, the setup lands almost exactly at the median of the tested pool, indicating that while it outperforms a slight majority of systems, there remain many configurations ahead. This is not a surprising outcome given the GPU's age relative to the current market, even though the processor is a recent, high-end part.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 brings 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, yielding a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The memory operates at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. These specifications are central to how the card performs in Undisputed, particularly at higher resolutions where memory capacity and bandwidth become more strained.

The GPU's clock speeds are listed at a base of 1500 MHz and a boost of 1725 MHz. With 5888 shading units, 184 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units, the card delivers 20.31 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and a texture rate of 317.4 GTexel/s. The pixel rate stands at 165.6 GPixel/s. These figures place the RTX 3070 as a solid mid-to-high performer, though the 8 GB VRAM may become a limiting factor in more demanding scenarios.

In Undisputed specifically, the data shows the GPU handling 4K at Ultra settings with an average FPS of 54, which is playable but not ideal for competitive play. At 4K High, the average rises to 84 FPS, suggesting the card has enough headroom for quality settings at that resolution. The gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is substantial, with a jump from 141 FPS down to 54 FPS, representing a 62% drop from the lowest to the highest preset. This indicates that the RTX 3070's compute resources are the binding constraint at 4K Ultra, as the settings scaling produces a steep performance penalty.

The GPU's benchmark scores reinforce its mid-range standing. Its PassMark G3D score of 22214 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3162 place it within 1.5% of rivals such as the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (delta 0.7%), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (delta 1%), and AMD Radeon HD 7970M (delta 1.1%), with the NVIDIA Tesla K40c trailing by 1.5%. These narrow margins show the RTX 3070 sits in a tightly contested performance band, with no clear leader among its nearest competitors.

FAQ

Q: What is the combo's overall rank in Undisputed?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D with RTX 3070 ranks 1184 out of 2813 tested combos, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all configurations in the database.

Q: How much VRAM does the RTX 3070 have?

A: The GPU features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with a 256-bit bus and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is sufficient for most settings in Undisputed but may limit Ultra presets at 4K.

Q: What is the best 4K performance recorded?

A: At 3840x2160 with Low settings, the combo averages 141 FPS. The highest quality 4K preset, Ultra, drops to 54 FPS average.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU bottleneck this combo in Undisputed?

A: The resolution scaling data indicates the GPU becomes the primary limiter at 4K, as FPS drops significantly from 1080p to 4K. At lower resolutions, the CPU's strong performance (92nd percentile) allows high frame rates.

Q: What are the CPU's core and clock specifications?

A: The Ryzen 7 9850X3D has 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.60 GHz, plus 96 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: How does the RTX 3070 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The RTX 3070's average benchmark score of 17208 is within 1.5% of the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT (17083), NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17037), AMD Radeon HD 7970M (17019), and NVIDIA Tesla K40c (17468).

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data covers three resolutions and four quality settings, providing a comprehensive view of performance. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers high frame rates across all presets. Low settings produce an average of 308 FPS, Medium reaches 221 FPS with a minimum of 188 and maximum of 255, High averages 183 FPS, and Ultra drops to 118 FPS. These numbers indicate the system is well-suited for high-refresh-rate monitors at 1080p, with even Ultra settings staying above 100 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains strong but shows the expected scaling. Low settings average 222 FPS, Medium hits 160 FPS (minimum 136, maximum 184), High averages 132 FPS, and Ultra falls to 85 FPS. The 1440p results show a clear progression, with each settings tier costing roughly 30-40 FPS on average. The Ultra preset at 1440p still provides a playable experience, though not at the frame rates seen at 1080p.

At 3840x2160, the GPU begins to show its limits. Low settings average 141 FPS, which is respectable for 4K. Medium averages 101 FPS with a minimum of 86 and maximum of 116, High drops to 84 FPS, and Ultra falls to 54 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is the weakest measured point, dropping below the 60 FPS threshold that many consider the baseline for smooth gameplay. The data shows a consistent pattern across all resolutions: Low to Medium has a modest penalty, Medium to High a further step, and High to Ultra the largest single drop.

The min and max FPS data for Medium settings reveals some variance. At 1080p, the range spans 188 to 255 FPS, a 67 FPS spread. At 1440p, the range narrows to 136 to 184 FPS, a 48 FPS spread. At 4K, the range is 86 to 116 FPS, a 30 FPS spread. This tightening of variance at higher resolutions suggests the GPU workload becomes more consistent as it becomes the limiting factor, whereas at lower resolutions, CPU and memory variability play a larger role.

Resolution Scaling

The resolution scaling from 1080p to 4K shows a clear pattern of GPU-bound performance. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 308 at 1080p to 222 at 1440p (a 28% reduction) and then to 141 at 4K (a 54% reduction from 1080p). For Medium settings, the progression is 221 to 160 to 101, representing a 28% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 54% drop from 1080p to 4K. High settings follow similarly: 183 to 132 to 84, with a 28% and 54% reduction respectively. Ultra settings show the same pattern: 118 to 85 to 54, with a 28% and 54% reduction.

This consistent scaling across all settings indicates that the frame rate drop is primarily driven by pixel count rather than settings complexity. The ratio of FPS from 1080p to 1440p is approximately 1.39x across all presets, while the ratio from 1080p to 4K is approximately 2.19x. These ratios align closely with the pixel count increases: 1440p has 1.78x the pixels of 1080p, and 4K has 4x the pixels. The fact that FPS does not drop proportionally to pixel count suggests that the system is not purely pixel-bound; other factors such as memory bandwidth and cache efficiency help mitigate the scaling penalty.

The data points to the GPU as the limiting component at higher resolutions. The RTX 3070's 448.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes more stressed as pixel count increases, and the 8 GB VRAM capacity may also contribute to the scaling behavior. At 1080p, the CPU's strength (with its 96 MB L3 cache and high boost clock) allows frame rates to reach as high as 308 FPS, indicating that the processor is not a bottleneck at lower resolutions. As resolution increases, the GPU workload grows, and the frame rates converge toward what the GPU can sustain regardless of CPU capability.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and frame rate priorities. At 1920x1080, all presets deliver playable frame rates, with High at 183 FPS and Ultra at 118 FPS. For competitive play or high-refresh displays, High settings strike a balance between visual quality and performance, staying well above 144 FPS. Ultra remains viable at 118 FPS, making it suitable for those prioritizing image quality over maximum frame rates.

At 2560x1440, High settings average 132 FPS, which is smooth and responsive. Medium at 160 FPS offers additional headroom for competitive play, while Ultra at 85 FPS is still playable but may not satisfy users with 144 Hz monitors. The data suggests High is the recommended preset for 1440p, as it provides a substantial visual upgrade over Medium while maintaining frame rates above 120 FPS. Ultra at 1440p is a reasonable choice for those who prefer maximum quality and can tolerate frame rates in the 80s.

At 3840x2160, the recommendations shift. Low settings average 141 FPS, which is excellent for 4K but sacrifices most visual features. Medium at 101 FPS provides a good balance, with a minimum of 86 FPS ensuring consistent performance. High at 84 FPS is playable but approaches the edge of smoothness. Ultra at 54 FPS falls below the 60 FPS threshold and is not recommended for most users. For 4K, Medium is the sweet spot, offering a substantial visual improvement over Low while maintaining frame rates above 90 FPS.

The min and max FPS data for Medium settings shows that the 4K configuration has a tighter range (86-116 FPS) than lower resolutions, indicating more consistent frame pacing. This makes Medium at 4K a reliable choice for sustained performance. For users who prefer higher visual fidelity at 4K, High at 84 FPS is acceptable, but the 54 FPS Ultra result is best avoided unless the user is willing to accept lower frame rates.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 9850X3D is a Zen 5 architecture processor on the Granite Ridge codename, built on TSMC's 4 nm process. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 4.70 GHz and boost clock of 5.60 GHz. The CPU includes 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and a substantial 96 MB of shared L3 cache. This large cache pool is particularly beneficial for gaming workloads that exhibit data locality.

The processor's benchmark results demonstrate strong multithreaded and single-threaded performance. In Cinebench R23, it scores 22807 multicore and 2228 single-core. PassMark tests show a multithread score of 41318 and single-thread score of 4704. The CPU's average benchmark score of 58386 places it in the 92nd percentile of all processors, with nearest rivals including the Intel Xeon Platinum 8260M (delta 0.1%), Intel Xeon w5-2545 (delta -0.2%), Intel Core i9-14900 (delta 0.5%), and AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 470 (delta -0.7%). These margins are minimal, indicating the 9850X3D performs essentially on par with these high-end alternatives.

In Undisputed, the CPU's role is most apparent at lower resolutions. At 1080p, frame rates reach 308 FPS on Low settings, which would be impossible if the processor were the limiting factor. The high boost clock and large L3 cache help maintain these elevated frame rates. At 4K, the CPU's influence diminishes as the GPU becomes the bottleneck, evidenced by the steep FPS drops across all settings. The data shows that the CPU has sufficient headroom to feed the RTX 3070 at all tested resolutions and settings, with the GPU consistently being the performance limiter at higher pixel counts.

The CPU's 120 W TDP and dual-channel DDR5 memory support (89.6 GB/s bandwidth) provide a capable platform for this game. The PCIe Gen 5 interface with 24 lanes ensures the GPU has ample bandwidth for data transfer. The processor's release in January 2026 makes it a current-generation part, and its active production status suggests ongoing availability. The launch MSRP is $499, positioning it as a high-end desktop processor.