Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D paired with the Intel Arc B370 presents a stark study in component imbalance within the sports title Undisputed. The data shows a processor capable of leading-edge performance constrained by a graphics solution whose benchmark percentile places it near the bottom of the database. This analysis examines how the CPU's substantial compute resources interact with the GPU's limited throughput to define the gaming experience across resolutions and settings.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D is a desktop processor built on the Zen 5 architecture (Granite Ridge), featuring 8 cores and 16 threads. Its base clock is 4.70 GHz, boosting up to 5.20 GHz. The CPU's large 96 MB of shared L3 cache is a critical feature for gaming workloads, as it reduces latency when accessing frequently used data. In multi-threaded synthetic tests, the processor scores 23,230 in Cinebench R23 and 18,696 in Geekbench multicore, while its single-thread performance is equally strong at 2,080 and 2,964 points respectively. These figures place the 9800X3D in the 87th percentile of all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 39,768.

Given this CPU's pedigree, one might expect Undisputed—a sports simulation that tracks multiple boxers, physics, and environmental interactions—to be easily handled. The game's simulation logic should benefit significantly from the 16 threads available. However, the measured FPS data reveals that the CPU's potential is largely untapped in this configuration. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 115 FPS, yet at 4K Ultra, it drops to just 20 FPS. This dramatic scaling is not indicative of a CPU bottleneck; instead, it suggests the processor is waiting on the graphics subsystem.

The 9800X3D's nearest rivals in the database—the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS (deltaPct 0.4%), AMD Ryzen AI 9 365 (deltaPct -0.7%), and AMD Ryzen 7 7700 (deltaPct -0.8%)—all have average scores within 1% of the 9800X3D. This tight clustering implies that the CPU is not the differentiator in this combo's performance. The 9800X3D is effectively a high-end engine throttled by a low-power accessory. The data implies that the CPU is more than capable of feeding frames to a more powerful GPU, but with the Arc B370, it has no opportunity to demonstrate its full gaming capability.

FAQ

Q: Why does the FPS drop so severely when moving from 1080p to 4K?

A: The average FPS falls from 115 at 1080p Low to 52 at 4K Low. This 63 FPS reduction is a direct result of the Intel Arc B370's limited pixel throughput, as the GPU must render over four times as many pixels at 4K. The CPU's performance is consistent, but the graphics card's fill rate becomes the limiting factor.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 9800X3D a good match for the Intel Arc B370 in this game?

A: The benchmark data suggests it is not an optimal pairing. The CPU ranks in the 87th percentile of all CPUs, while the GPU sits in the 5th percentile. This massive gap means the processor's capabilities are largely wasted, as the GPU cannot translate the CPU's compute headroom into higher frame rates.

Q: What is the best performance setting for this combo at 1920x1080?

A: Based on the measured rows, the Low preset provides the highest average FPS at 115. The Medium preset offers 83 FPS with a minimum of 70 FPS, which is a more stable experience for gameplay. The High preset delivers 68 FPS, while Ultra drops to 44 FPS.

Q: How does the Arc B370's performance compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The Intel Arc B370 has an average benchmark score of 1,184. Its closest competitors are the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (score 1,186, deltaPct -0.2%), ATI Radeon HD 5770 (score 1,190, deltaPct -0.5%), and AMD Radeon HD 7650M (score 1,192, deltaPct -0.7%). These scores are nearly identical, indicating the Arc B370's performance class is similar to these older mobile and desktop parts.

Q: Does the game run better at Medium settings than High at 1440p?

A: Yes. At 2560x1440, the Medium preset achieves an average of 60 FPS with a minimum of 51 FPS, while the High preset averages 49 FPS. The Medium preset also provides a defined FPS range (51-69), whereas the High preset lacks such data in the measurements.

Q: What does the combo's rank of 2592 out of 2813 combos indicate?

A: It shows that this specific CPU-GPU combination performs worse than 2,591 other tested combos in Undisputed. The rank is influenced heavily by the GPU's low percentile, despite the CPU's high percentile, confirming that the graphics card is the dominant performance limiter.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The resolution scaling data provides clear evidence of a GPU-bound scenario. At Low settings, the average FPS goes from 115 at 1080p, to 83 at 1440p, and finally to 52 at 4K. This represents a 54.8% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K. The scaling is even more drastic at High settings, where FPS drops from 68 at 1080p to 49 at 1440p and 31 at 4K—a 54.4% decrease overall.

The pattern is consistent with a graphics card that has a fixed rendering capacity. When pixel count increases, the GPU's workload scales linearly, and the frame rate drops proportionally. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect the FPS to remain relatively flat across resolutions, as the processor's workload does not change significantly with resolution. The data shows a steep drop, which indicates that the Intel Arc B370's shading units (1,280), texture mapping units (40), and raster output pipelines (20) are saturated.

The Arc B370's base clock of 300 MHz and boost clock of 2400 MHz are not the issue; rather, the sheer number of processing units is insufficient for high-resolution gaming. Its pixel rate of 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate of 96.00 GTexel/s are modest figures that explain the performance collapse. At 4K Ultra, the combo only manages 20 FPS, which is unplayable. The data strongly suggests that users should stick to 1080p or 1440p Medium/Low settings to achieve playable frame rates.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combo rank of 2592 out of 2813 tested combinations in Undisputed places this pairing in the bottom 8% of all tested systems. This low ranking is almost entirely attributable to the Intel Arc B370, which has a percentileVsAllGpus of 5. The CPU, in contrast, has a percentileVsAllCpus of 87. When combined, the system's overall performance is dragged down to a level comparable to systems with much older hardware.

To contextualize this rank, consider that the GPU's nearest rivals—the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and ATI Radeon HD 5770—are over a decade old. The Arc B370's average benchmark score of 1,184 is within 0.7% of these legacy parts. This means that the combo's performance is akin to pairing a modern 8-core processor with a graphics card from a previous era. The result is a system that cannot deliver a smooth experience in Undisputed at higher settings.

The rank also suggests that there are 221 combos that perform worse, likely involving even older CPUs or integrated graphics. However, for a system built around the Ryzen 7 9800X3D, this rank is disappointing. The data implies that the user would see a massive improvement in ranking and playability by swapping the Arc B370 for a more capable GPU, as the CPU has ample headroom to support it.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the combo's capabilities across all tested configurations. At 1920x1080, the Low preset yields an average of 115 FPS. Medium settings produce an average of 83 FPS, with a minimum of 70 FPS and a maximum of 95 FPS. High settings average 68 FPS, while Ultra drops to 44 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the performance declines noticeably. The Low preset averages 83 FPS. Medium settings average 60 FPS, with a minimum of 51 FPS and a maximum of 69 FPS. High settings average 49 FPS, and Ultra falls to 32 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the combo struggles significantly. Low settings average 52 FPS. Medium settings average 38 FPS, with a minimum of 32 FPS and a maximum of 43 FPS. High settings average 31 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 20 FPS.

These numbers reveal a clear pattern: the combo is only capable of delivering a consistently smooth 60+ FPS experience at 1080p Low. At 1440p, only Low settings maintain an average above 60 FPS. The 4K resolution is not viable for competitive or enjoyable play, with even Low settings falling below 60 FPS. The minimum FPS data points (70 at 1080p Medium, 51 at 1440p Medium, 32 at 4K Medium) show that frame pacing can be erratic, making medium settings risky for fast-paced gameplay.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

For a balanced experience at 1080p, the Medium preset is the recommended choice. It provides an average of 83 FPS with a minimum of 70 FPS, ensuring that the frame rate rarely dips below the threshold for smooth gameplay. While Low offers higher average FPS (115), the visual quality compromise may not be worth the extra frames. The High preset at 68 FPS is also playable, but the Medium preset's defined minimum of 70 FPS makes it a safer bet for maintaining consistent performance during intense boxing matches.

At 1440p, the situation is more nuanced. The Low preset averages 83 FPS, which is excellent, but the Medium preset at 60 FPS with a minimum of 51 FPS might be preferable for users who prioritize visual fidelity over raw frame rate. However, given the minimum FPS is below 60, there is a risk of stutter. The High preset at 49 FPS is borderline, and Ultra at 32 FPS should be avoided.

At 4K, none of the settings provide an ideal experience. The Low preset at 52 FPS is the only option that approaches playability, but it still falls short of the 60 FPS target. Medium (38 FPS), High (31 FPS), and Ultra (20 FPS) are all too slow for a fluid experience. Users with 4K displays should consider lowering the resolution to 1440p or 1080p for this combo.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B370 is a graphics processor built on the Xe3-LPG architecture (Panther Lake). It features 1,280 shading units, 40 TMUs, and 20 ROPs, with 10 ray tracing cores. Its base clock is 300 MHz, with a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The GPU has no dedicated VRAM; instead, it uses System Shared memory, with bandwidth dependent on the system configuration. Its TDP is just 25 W, making it an integrated-class part with a performance percentile of 5.

These specifications directly explain the measured FPS in Undisputed. The GPU's low ROP count (20) and pixel rate (48.00 GPixel/s) are the primary bottlenecks at higher resolutions. At 4K, the GPU must fill over 8.3 million pixels per frame, and its limited throughput results in the observed 20-52 FPS range. The shared memory architecture also means that the GPU competes with the CPU for memory bandwidth, potentially causing additional stutters.

The GPU's nearest rivals in the database are all older, low-performance parts, confirming that the Arc B370 is not suited for modern gaming at high resolutions. Its 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 compute is modest, and while it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, the raw hardware is insufficient. The data indicates that for Undisputed, the GPU is the clear limiting factor. The CPU could easily push over 100 FPS at 1080p if paired with a more powerful GPU, but the Arc B370 caps the system's potential, resulting in a combo that ranks near the bottom of the database.