Undisputed

Undisputed, the boxing sim from Steel City Interactive, places a heavy load on both processor and graphics hardware. The pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F with the AMD Radeon RX 580 produces a playable but constrained experience, with the final frame rate heavily dependent on resolution and quality preset. The data indicates this combo is a mid-to-low-tier performer in the game’s benchmark database, ranking 2568th out of 2813 tested combinations. The 8-core, 16-thread Ryzen 7 9700F provides ample CPU headroom, but the legacy Polaris GPU becomes the primary bottleneck as resolution increases, making the RX 580 the decisive factor in most scenarios.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F is a Zen 5 architecture processor, built on TSMC's 4 nm process. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. This configuration is substantial for a sports title like Undisputed, which typically relies on a few high-frequency cores for game logic and physics, while not heavily utilizing all 16 threads. The CPU’s 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s of dual-channel DDR5 memory bandwidth ensure that data is fed to the cores quickly, preventing CPU-side stalls in most situations.

In the context of this combo, the CPU’s performance is not the limiting factor. The Ryzen 7 9700F scores 4691 in Passmark's single-thread test and 36470 in the multi-thread test, placing it in the 94th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals in the Passmark database, such as the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX and the Intel Core i7-14700KF, show delta percentages of only 0.2% and -0.2%, respectively. This indicates the 9700F is a top-tier processor for gaming workloads. The bottleneck is exclusively on the graphics side. The RX 580, with its 2017-era Polaris 20 chip and GCN 4.0 architecture, is an end-of-life product that scores only 8813 in Passmark's G3D test, placing it in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs.

The data from the measured FPS rows confirms this analysis. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 122 FPS, suggesting the CPU can handle high frame rates. However, as the GPU load increases with higher settings and resolutions, the frame rate drops precipitously, a classic sign of a GPU-bound system. The CPU’s high single-thread score is critical for maintaining stable minimums, but it cannot compensate for the GPU’s limited raw throughput. The Ryzen 7 9700F has a 65W TDP and is unlocked, but its power and thermal characteristics are not the concern here; the 185W TDP of the RX 580 is the dominant power draw. The CPU simply prepares the frames; the GPU is responsible for rendering them.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combined performance of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F and AMD Radeon RX 580 lands this pairing at rank 2568 out of 2813 tested combos in Undisputed. This puts it in the bottom 9% of all tested systems, which is a clear indicator of the GPU's age. The CPU alone is a top-tier component, but the overall rank is dragged down by the graphics card. This rank suggests that while the game is playable, the experience will be far from the high-refresh-rate, high-detail performance that modern systems can achieve.

To contextualize this rank, consider the GPU’s nearest rivals in the Passmark database. The RX 580's average benchmark score of 12928 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Mobile (12940) and the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER (12986), with delta percentages of -0.1% and -0.4%, respectively. This means the RX 580 is performing right in line with those older mid-range cards. When paired with a high-end CPU like the 9700F, the combination’s rank is dictated almost entirely by the GPU tier. A system with a weaker CPU but a stronger GPU would likely rank significantly higher in this game, as Undisputed appears to be more graphically intensive than CPU-intensive.

The rank of 2568 also implies that most other tested combos have superior graphics hardware. The data shows that the combo is GPU-limited at nearly every setting above the lowest. At 1080p Ultra, the system only manages 47 FPS, a score that would be considered below the threshold for smooth gameplay on many displays. The fact that the combo ranks so low despite having a top-6% CPU underscores the importance of GPU selection for this title. The takeaway is that the Ryzen 7 9700F is wasted potential in this pairing; its power is simply not being utilized due to the RX 580's constraints.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data across resolutions clearly illustrates the GPU bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 122 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low, the frame rate drops to 88 FPS, a 27.9% decrease. At 4K Low, it falls further to 56 FPS, which is a 54.1% decrease from the 1080p baseline. This scaling pattern is typical for a GPU that is running out of pixel-pushing power. The CPU is not the limiting factor here, as a CPU bottleneck would show relatively flat frame rates across resolutions, or at least a less dramatic drop.

The scaling becomes even more pronounced at higher settings. At Medium settings, the average FPS drops from 88 at 1080p to 64 at 1440p and 40 at 4K. For High settings, the averages are 73, 53, and 33 FPS for 1080p, 1440p, and 4K, respectively. At Ultra settings, the system struggles, with 47 FPS at 1080p, 34 FPS at 1440p, and a mere 21 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 4K at Ultra is a 55.3% reduction, highlighting that the RX 580’s 256-bit memory bus and 256.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for the higher resolution’s data demands.

These numbers suggest that the 8 GB of GDDR5 memory on the RX 580 is also a factor. At 4K, the game is likely exceeding the memory capacity or the bandwidth is saturated, leading to significant frame rate penalties. The consistent drop across all settings indicates that the GPU is the bottleneck. If the CPU were the limiting factor, the frame rate would be more consistent across resolutions, as the CPU's workload (game logic, physics) does not scale with resolution. The data confirms that the Ryzen 7 9700F has plenty of headroom; the RX 580 is the component that dictates the playable resolution and settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following data is taken directly from the measured FPS rows, providing a complete picture of the combo's performance envelope.

1080p (1920x1080):

• Low: The system achieves an average of 122 FPS. This is the only setting where the combo approaches high-refresh-rate territory.
• Medium: The average drops to 88 FPS, with a minimum of 75 FPS and a maximum of 101 FPS.
• High: The average is 73 FPS. This is a playable frame rate for most users.
• Ultra: The average falls to 47 FPS. This is below the 60 FPS target and will be noticeable in fast-paced action.

1440p (2560x1440):

• Low: The average is 88 FPS. This is still smooth, but a 27.9% drop from the 1080p Low result.
• Medium: The average is 64 FPS, with a minimum of 54 FPS and a maximum of 73 FPS. This is borderline playable.
• High: The average is 53 FPS. This is playable but not ideal for competitive play.
• Ultra: The average drops to 34 FPS. This is a stuttery experience and is not recommended.

4K (3840x2160):

• Low: The average is 56 FPS. This is playable, but not a smooth experience.
• Medium: The average is 40 FPS, with a minimum of 34 FPS and a maximum of 46 FPS.
• High: The average is 33 FPS. This is below the threshold for smooth gameplay.
• Ultra: The average is 21 FPS. This is unplayable and renders the setting moot.

The data shows a clear pattern: the combo is only capable of delivering a consistently smooth 60+ FPS experience at 1080p Low. At 1080p Medium and High, it stays above 60 FPS but with less headroom. For 1440p, users will have to stick to Low or Medium to get acceptable performance. 4K is only viable on the Low preset, and even then, the frame rate is not ideal.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 9700F + AMD Radeon RX 580 combo capable of running Undisputed at 1440p with high settings?

A: No. The measured data shows an average of 53 FPS at 2560x1440 with High settings. While this is above 30 FPS, it is below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. For a better experience at 1440p, the Medium preset (64 FPS) is more suitable.

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve a frame rate above 100 FPS?

A: The only measured setting that exceeds 100 FPS is 1920x1080 with Low settings, which achieves an average of 122 FPS. The next highest, 1080p Medium, averages 88 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its nearest rivals in the Passmark database?

A: The Ryzen 7 9700F has an average benchmark score of 69996. Its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 7940HX, scores 69875, a delta of 0.2%. The Intel Core i7-14700KF scores 70163, a delta of -0.2%. This indicates the CPU is statistically on par with these top-tier parts.

Q: Is the RX 580 the limiting factor in this pairing?

A: Yes. The GPU's average benchmark score is 12928, placing it in the 53rd percentile of all GPUs. The frame rate drops significantly as resolution and settings increase (e.g., from 122 FPS at 1080p Low to 21 FPS at 4K Ultra), which is a classic sign of a GPU bottleneck, not a CPU one.

Q: What frame rate can I expect at 4K with the Medium preset?

A: The measured data shows an average of 40 FPS at 3840x2160 with Medium settings, with a minimum of 34 FPS and a maximum of 46 FPS. This is a playable but not a smooth experience.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the components?

A: The AMD Ryzen 7 9700F has a launch MSRP of $289. The AMD Radeon RX 580 has a launch MSRP of 229 USD.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Given the measured data, the optimal experience for this combo is a balancing act between visual fidelity and frame rate. The primary goal should be to maintain a frame rate at or above 60 FPS to ensure responsive gameplay in a sports title where timing is critical.

• For 1080p displays: The High preset is the best choice. It delivers an average of 73 FPS, which is smooth and visually detailed. The Medium preset (88 FPS) is also excellent if you prefer a higher frame rate buffer. The Ultra preset is not worth the performance cost, as it drops the average to 47 FPS, which can feel sluggish. The Low preset (122 FPS) is only necessary for competitive play on high-refresh-rate monitors, as the visual quality loss is significant.

• For 1440p displays: The Medium preset is the recommended starting point, offering an average of 64 FPS. This is playable and looks decent. If you experience any stutters, dropping to Low (88 FPS) will provide a substantial performance boost and ensure a very smooth experience. The High preset (53 FPS) is too close to the 60 FPS line and will likely suffer from frame pacing issues. Ultra is not viable at this resolution.

• For 4K displays: This combo is not well-suited for 4K gaming. The Low preset is the only playable option, yielding an average of 56 FPS. While this is technically above 30 FPS, the visual quality will be severely compromised. For a better experience at this resolution, consider lowering the resolution scaling or upgrading the GPU. The Medium (40 FPS) and High (33 FPS) presets are too slow for a responsive experience, and Ultra (21 FPS) is unplayable.

In summary, the data supports a simple rule: prioritize frame rate over ultra settings. The RX 580's age is evident at higher presets, so sticking to Medium or High at 1080p and Medium or Low at 1440p will provide the most enjoyable experience. The Ryzen 7 9700F ensures that the system will not be CPU-limited, but the GPU must be managed carefully to get the most out of Undisputed.