Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 delivers a highly playable experience in Undisputed, but the performance curve reveals a clear division of labor between the CPU and GPU. At 1080p, the combination produces excellent frame rates that cater to high-refresh-rate displays, while 4K performance becomes heavily constrained by the graphics card. The benchmark data shows that this combo ranks in the 31st percentile among all tested combinations for this title, indicating that while it is not a top-tier enthusiast setup, it offers solid mid-range capability for boxing simulation fans.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows a predictable yet steep decline as resolution increases, with the severity of the drop varying significantly by quality preset. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 228.3 FPS at 1920x1080 to 169.7 FPS at 2560x1440, representing a 25.7% reduction. Moving to 3840x2160 at Low yields 104.2 FPS, which is a 54.3% drop from the 1080p baseline. This pattern indicates that even at the lowest graphical settings, the GPU is the primary scaling factor, as the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads provide ample headroom for the physics and AI calculations inherent to a sports simulation.

The High preset tells a similar story but with a more moderate absolute range. At 1080p High, the combo achieves 138.8 FPS, which drops to 98.9 FPS at 1440p (a 28.8% decline) and further to 60.7 FPS at 4K (a 56.3% decline from 1080p). The fact that 4K High still maintains above 60 FPS average suggests that the RX 7600's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient to avoid catastrophic stuttering, but the frame rate ceiling is clearly dictated by the GPU's 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power.

Ultra settings amplify the GPU bottleneck dramatically. The 1080p Ultra average of 88.7 FPS falls to 65.9 FPS at 1440p and plummets to 41.4 FPS at 4K. The gap between 1080p and 4K at Ultra is 53.3%, which is nearly identical to the percentage drop seen at Low settings. This consistency across presets suggests that resolution scaling in Undisputed is primarily a function of pixel throughput rather than shader complexity, meaning the RX 7600's 64 ROPs and 128 TMUs are the limiting factors at higher resolutions. The 4K Ultra result of 41.4 FPS is the only measured configuration that falls below the 60 FPS playability threshold, and it does so by a substantial margin.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain a 60 FPS average?

A: The data shows that all three tested resolutions can achieve 60 FPS or higher at High settings, with 4K High averaging 60.7 FPS. For a more comfortable margin above 60 FPS, 1440p High delivers 98.9 FPS, while 1080p High reaches 138.8 FPS.

Q: How much performance is gained by dropping from Ultra to High at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, the average frame rate increases from 41.4 FPS on Ultra to 60.7 FPS on High, representing a 46.6% improvement. This is the largest relative jump between adjacent presets at any resolution.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance at 1080p Low?

A: The 1080p Low result of 228.3 FPS suggests the GPU is still the primary limiter, as the Ryzen 5 7600X's single-thread score of 3406 in Cinebench R23 and multi-thread score of 24128 indicate substantial headroom for the game's logic at that frame rate.

Q: Is the RX 7600's 8 GB VRAM sufficient for 4K gameplay?

A: Based on the measured results, 8 GB is adequate for maintaining 60 FPS at 4K High (60.7 FPS), but the 41.4 FPS at 4K Ultra suggests that higher texture and shading demands exceed what the memory subsystem can efficiently feed, likely due to bandwidth limitations rather than capacity alone.

*Q: How does this combo's rank in Undisputed compare to its overall hardware percentiles?*

A: The combo ranks 1090 out of 1580 tested combinations (roughly the 31st percentile) in this game. The CPU sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, while the GPU is at the 63rd percentile among all GPUs, indicating the pairing is well-balanced but the game itself is demanding relative to the hardware's general capabilities.

Q: What is the difference between Low and Medium settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Low averages 169.7 FPS while Medium averages 119.5 FPS, a 29.6% reduction. This suggests Medium introduces substantial graphical effects that increase GPU load without a commensurate visual benefit for competitive play.

Settings Recommendations

For players prioritizing a smooth, consistent experience, the High preset at 1440p represents the optimal balance in the measured data. The 98.9 FPS average at this configuration is well above the 60 FPS threshold, providing enough headroom for demanding scenes during close-quarters boxing exchanges. The jump from Medium to High at 1440p costs only 20.6 FPS (from 119.5 to 98.9), which is a modest penalty relative to the visual uplift that High typically provides over Medium in modern titles.

At 1080p, the Medium preset at 167 FPS is the sweet spot for high-refresh-rate monitors, as it remains above 144 Hz while offering better visual fidelity than Low. The Ultra preset at 1080p (88.7 FPS) is playable but sacrifices the smoothness that the CPU and GPU combination can otherwise deliver; the 46.9% drop from High to Ultra at this resolution indicates diminishing returns for the extra graphical load.

For 4K displays, the data strongly recommends High settings (60.7 FPS) as the ceiling for this combo. The 4K Medium result of 75.8 FPS offers a safety margin, but the 4K Ultra result of 41.4 FPS is simply too low for a responsive fighting game where timing is critical. The 4K Low result of 104.2 FPS demonstrates that even at minimum settings, the combination can handle 4K, but the visual compromise may not be worth the frame rate gain over High. Overall, the measured rows indicate that High is the most efficient preset across all resolutions, with 1440p High being the recommended target for a balanced experience.

How This Combo Ranks

In Undisputed, this pairing of the Ryzen 5 7600X and RX 7600 achieves a combo rank of 1090 out of 1580 tested combinations, placing it in the lower third of all systems evaluated. This rank is notably lower than what the individual component percentiles might suggest. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking and the GPU's 63rd percentile ranking would imply a more favorable overall position, but the game's specific demands—likely including heavy CPU-bound simulation logic alongside GPU-intensive rendering—create a bottleneck that prevents this combo from reaching higher tiers.

The gap between the component-level strengths and the in-game rank suggests that Undisputed does not scale perfectly with the Ryzen 5 7600X's architecture. The CPU's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850U (0% delta) and the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X (0.2% delta), have similar average scores, yet the 6-core/12-thread configuration of the 7600X may not be optimally utilized by the game's threading model. Similarly, the GPU's nearest rivals—the RX 7600 XT at 0.6% delta and the RTX 3070 Mobile at -1.3% delta—show that the RX 7600 is competitively positioned in raw benchmarks, but the in-game rank reveals that Undisputed may favor other hardware traits not captured by synthetic tests.

The measured FPS data provides context for this rank. At 1080p Ultra, the combo delivers 88.7 FPS, which is respectable but not exceptional for a modern GPU. The 4K Ultra result of 41.4 FPS is particularly telling, as it falls well below the 60 FPS target that most competitive games aim for. This performance profile places the combo in a position where it can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming with ease, but it struggles to maintain high frame rates at 4K with maximum settings, aligning with its 31st percentile rank among all tested systems.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 plays a decisive role in determining the performance envelope for this combo, particularly at higher resolutions and quality settings. The GPU's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but becomes a limiting factor at 4K. The memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) is modest by modern standards, and the data reflects this: the frame rate drops from 138.8 FPS at 1080p High to 60.7 FPS at 4K High, a decline that cannot be attributed to CPU limitations given the Ryzen 5 7600X's strong single-thread performance.

The GPU's clock speeds—1720 MHz base, 2250 MHz game, and 2655 MHz boost—are indicative of a mid-range part that relies on high frequencies to compensate for a relatively small die (204 mm²) and 13,300 million transistors. The 2048 shading units and 32 ray accelerators deliver 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, which translates to the measured frame rates across the preset spectrum. The RT capabilities, while present via DirectX 12 Ultimate support, are not heavily exercised in Undisputed based on the performance data, as the game appears to be rasterization-bound given the consistent scaling pattern.

The RX 7600's nearest rival, the RX 7600 XT, scores only 0.6% higher in average benchmarks, yet the in-game results suggest that the 7600's capabilities are well-matched to the Ryzen 5 7600X's processing power. The GPU's 63rd percentile ranking among all GPUs aligns with the measured FPS data, which shows strong 1080p performance (228.3 FPS at Low) but increasingly constrained 4K results. The 165 W TDP and dual-slot design indicate this is a power-efficient part, but the 4K Ultra result of 41.4 FPS demonstrates that raw compute throughput, rather than power delivery, is the limiting factor in the most demanding scenarios.