Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER pairing delivers exceptional performance in Undisputed, a sports title that clearly favors high frame rates. The data shows a combination capable of crushing even 4K Ultra demands, though the scaling patterns reveal a nuanced relationship between the processor's six cores and the GPU's massive rendering throughput.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Ryzen 5 7600 brings a 6-core, 12-thread configuration based on the Zen 4 Raphael architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. Its base clock sits at 3.80 GHz with a boost up to 5.10 GHz, and it carries 32 MB of shared L3 cache. These specifications place it in the 83rd percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26,617. The single-thread performance is particularly strong, as evidenced by a 3DMark single-thread score of 999 and a Cinebench R23 single-core result of 3,246.

In Undisputed, the CPU's role becomes most apparent at lower resolutions where the GPU has headroom. At 1080p Low settings, the combo achieves 477.3 FPS, while at 4K Low it drops to 217.2 FPS — a massive gap that indicates the processor is not the limiting factor even at high frame rates. The 3DMark multi-threaded scores show a plateau from 8 threads (5,508) to max threads (6,503), suggesting the six physical cores handle the game's thread demands efficiently. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 7600 scores 0.2% higher than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D and 0.3% higher than the Intel Core i9-11900K, while trailing the Intel Core i9-12900HK by 0.2%. This tight grouping means the CPU choice between these parts would have minimal impact on Undisputed's frame rates, as the game appears to scale more with GPU capability.

The 65W TDP and dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth provide ample data throughput. The PassMark multi-thread score of 27,058 and single-thread score of 3,910 reinforce a balanced profile: enough multi-core muscle for background tasks, but the single-thread strength that sports games often leverage for physics and AI calculations. The data implies the CPU can feed the RTX 4080 SUPER effectively across all tested settings, since even the most demanding 4K Ultra scenario (85.1 FPS) leaves the GPU as the clear bottleneck.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The RTX 4080 SUPER is a formidable Ada Lovelace part with 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 736.3 GB/s of bandwidth. Its boost clock reaches 2550 MHz, and the memory runs at 1438 MHz (23 Gbps effective). The GPU's 52.22 TFLOPS of FP32 compute and 816.0 GTexel/s texture rate explain why it dominates in Undisputed's benchmark rows. It ranks in the 88th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 53,610.

The GPU's nearest rivals show how close the top tier is: the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT trails by 0.2%, and the Radeon Pro W6600M by 0.4%, while the RX 7700S is 2.1% behind and the RTX 5070 Ti sits 2.9% lower. This positioning suggests the RTX 4080 SUPER is at the upper edge of current performance, which the Undisputed measurements confirm. At 4K Ultra, it produces 85.1 FPS — a playable but not excessive result — while dropping to High settings at the same resolution yields 132.1 FPS, a 55% improvement that shows how sensitive the game is to specific rendering features.

The 16 GB VRAM capacity proves sufficient across all tested configurations; no resolution or setting combination appears to hit a memory ceiling. The pixel rate of 285.6 GPixel/s and 112 ROPs handle the 3840x2160 frame buffer without issue. The data suggests the GPU's raw rasterization power is the primary driver of Undisputed's performance, with the 0.2% deltaPct separating it from the RX 6900 XT translating into only a few FPS in practice — though the measured results here are consistently high regardless of the comparison point.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo achieves at 1080p?

A: The maximum measured average FPS is 477.3, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This drops to 182.7 FPS at Ultra settings, showing a 2.6x performance range within the same resolution.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance compare to its multi-thread results?

A: The Ryzen 5 7600 scores 999 in 3DMark single-thread and 6,503 in max threads, while Cinebench R23 shows 3,246 single-core versus 22,992 multi-core. The ratio indicates strong scaling across its 6 cores, but the single-thread score is what matters most for Undisputed's physics-heavy gameplay.

Q: Is the GPU or CPU more important for 4K performance in this game?

A: The data shows the GPU dominates at 4K. The 4K Low setting produces 217.2 FPS while 4K Ultra drops to 85.1 FPS — a 132.1 FPS swing caused entirely by graphical settings. The CPU's 83rd percentile ranking suggests it keeps up, but the GPU's 88th percentile and 52.22 TFLOPS compute drive the resolution scaling.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested systems for this game?

A: This pairing ranks 115th out of 1,580 tested combos in Undisputed, placing it in the top 7.3% of all configurations measured. This high percentile aligns with the GPU's 88th percentile ranking.

Q: How much faster is 1080p Low compared to 4K Ultra?

A: The difference is 477.3 FPS versus 85.1 FPS, a 5.6x gap. This massive spread indicates the game is heavily GPU-bound at higher resolutions, since the CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock cannot compensate for the increased pixel workload.

Q: Does the RTX 4080 SUPER outperform its nearest rival by a large margin?

A: No, the margin is narrow. The RTX 4080 SUPER's average benchmark score of 53,610 is only 0.2% higher than the AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT's 53,489. In practice, this represents a negligible FPS difference in Undisputed, suggesting the measured results here are more about the specific game optimization than raw GPU superiority.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo ranks 115th out of 1,580 tested configurations in Undisputed, placing it in the top 7.3% of all systems measured. This is a strong result, though not a top-tier placement, which makes sense given the GPU's 88th percentile and CPU's 83rd percentile standings. The rank suggests that while the RTX 4080 SUPER is exceptional, there are systems with even more powerful GPUs (like the RTX 50-series successors or dual-GPU setups) that push higher in the rankings.

The gap between the combo's rank (115th) and the GPU's percentile (88th) hints that Undisputed is sensitive to CPU performance at lower settings. At 1080p Low, the 477.3 FPS result requires the CPU to process a massive number of frames per second, and while the Ryzen 5 7600 handles it, higher-tier CPUs with more cores or faster single-thread speeds could push even further. The nearest CPU rival data shows only 0.2-0.3% differences among top contenders, so the rank is more likely determined by GPU choices above the RTX 4080 SUPER's tier.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K reveals a clear GPU-bound profile. At Low settings, the transition from 1920x1080 (477.3 FPS) to 3840x2160 (217.2 FPS) represents a 54.5% reduction — a substantial but expected scaling for a 4x pixel increase. The same resolution jump at Ultra settings shows a steeper relative drop: from 182.7 FPS to 85.1 FPS, a 53.4% decrease. Interestingly, the percentage drops are nearly identical across settings, indicating the game's rendering load scales uniformly with resolution.

This uniform scaling pattern suggests the limiting component shifts from CPU at 1080p Low (where 477.3 FPS approaches the CPU's frame generation ceiling) to GPU at 4K Ultra (where 85.1 FPS reflects the GPU's pixel throughput limits). The medium settings show the smoothest scaling curve: 341.5 FPS at 1080p, 245.8 FPS at 1440p, and 155.4 FPS at 4K — each step down by roughly 30-37%. The high settings follow a similar pattern, with 282.7, 205.2, and 132.1 FPS respectively. This consistency implies the game engine has well-balanced workload distribution, where no single component becomes a sudden bottleneck at any tested resolution.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured results span from 477.3 FPS on Low to 182.7 FPS on Ultra, with Medium at 341.5 FPS and High at 282.7 FPS. The 1440p resolution shows 345.7 FPS on Low, 245.8 FPS on Medium, 205.2 FPS on High, and 132.6 FPS on Ultra. The 4K results at 3840x2160 are 217.2 FPS on Low, 155.4 FPS on Medium, 132.1 FPS on High, and 85.1 FPS on Ultra.

The data reveals a consistent pattern: each settings tier (Low to Medium to High to Ultra) reduces FPS by roughly 20-35%, regardless of resolution. The largest single-step drop occurs between Medium and High at 4K, where FPS falls from 155.4 to 132.1 (15% decrease). The smallest drop is between High and Ultra at 1440p, where FPS goes from 205.2 to 132.6 (35% decrease) — this is actually one of the steeper drops. The most efficient setting progression is at 1080p, where the difference between Low and Medium (135.8 FPS) is nearly identical to the difference between High and Ultra (100 FPS), suggesting diminishing returns at the highest settings.

Settings Recommendations

The measured rows point to High settings as the optimal balance for most users. At 1080p High, the combo delivers 282.7 FPS — well above any refresh rate — while 1440p High hits 205.2 FPS and 4K High manages 132.1 FPS. These numbers indicate High settings provide a substantial visual upgrade over Medium (which shows 341.5, 245.8, and 155.4 FPS respectively) while maintaining frame rates that exceed typical 144Hz displays at 1080p and 1440p, and comfortably exceed 60 FPS at 4K.

For competitive play or maximum frame rates, Low settings at 1080p (477.3 FPS) or 1440p (345.7 FPS) are the clear choice, though the visual compromise is significant. Ultra settings are only recommended for 1080p users with 165Hz or 240Hz monitors, as the 182.7 FPS result still leaves headroom, but at 1440p the 132.6 FPS and 4K's 85.1 FPS may not justify the graphical overhead. The data suggests Medium settings offer the most consistent experience across all resolutions, with the smallest percentage drop from Low (28-29% at each resolution) while providing a meaningful visual upgrade over Low. However, given that High settings at 4K still exceed 120 FPS, most users with high-refresh displays should prioritize High as the default preset for this combination.