Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT pairing delivers a remarkably consistent and highly playable experience in Undisputed, with the data showing a clear pattern of performance that scales predictably with resolution and settings. The measured results indicate that this combination is well-suited for high-refresh-rate 1080p and 1440p gaming, while 4K Ultra remains the only configuration that pushes the hardware to its limits.

FAQ

*Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 7400F a bottleneck for the RX 7600 XT in Undisputed?*

A: No, the data suggests the CPU is more than capable. The Ryzen 5 7400F has an average benchmark score of 32750 and sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T, scores nearly identically at 32707 (only 0.1% behind). The 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor with a 4.70 GHz boost clock provides ample headroom, as evidenced by the high frame rates at 1080p where CPU load is typically highest.

*Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Undisputed?*

A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K with High settings, the combo achieves an average of 65 FPS. However, 4K Ultra drops to 42 FPS average, which is below the smooth threshold for a sports game. The 16 GB of VRAM on the RX 7600 XT is not a limiting factor here; the GPU's compute power is what dictates the 4K performance ceiling.

Q: How does the RX 7600 XT compare to its closest competitors?

A: The RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score of 17083, placing it in the 60th percentile of all GPUs. Its closest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, which scores 17208 (0.7% higher). Interestingly, the next closest rival is the much older GeForce GTX 690, scoring 17037 (0.3% behind). This indicates the RX 7600 XT sits in a solid mid-range performance tier.

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 1440p monitor?

A: For 1440p, Medium settings provide an excellent balance with an average of 125 FPS and a minimum of 106 FPS. High settings also work well, delivering 103 FPS average. Ultra is playable at 67 FPS average, but the jump to High or Medium offers a significant frame rate increase for a minimal visual sacrifice.

Q: Is the 16 GB VRAM necessary for this game?

A: The data shows that Undisputed does not appear to be VRAM-limited for this GPU at any tested setting. The RX 7600 XT has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The consistent performance scaling from Low to Ultra suggests the game is not exceeding the memory capacity, allowing the GPU to focus on rendering rather than swapping assets.

Q: How does the CPU's single-thread performance influence the results?

A: The Ryzen 5 7400F shows strong single-thread capability with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3072. While Undisputed benefits from multi-threading across its 12 threads, the robust single-core performance ensures that game logic and physics calculations do not create frame hitches, as reflected in the solid minimum FPS numbers at Medium settings (e.g., 147 FPS at 1080p).

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the defining component for visual fidelity in Undisputed. Its RDNA 3.0 architecture with 2048 shading units and 64 ROPs handles the game's rendering tasks, with the boost clock of 2755 MHz providing the processing speed. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory is more than sufficient for the game's textures and assets, as the frame rates scale consistently with resolution, indicating no VRAM wall is hit.

The GPU's raw performance, measured at 22.57 TFLOPS FP32, is the primary driver of the frame rate differences between settings. For instance, at 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra cuts the average frame rate from 240 to 92 FPS. This significant drop highlights that the GPU is working progressively harder to render the increased graphical effects, shadows, and post-processing associated with higher presets. The 60th percentile ranking for the GPU, with an average benchmark score of 17083, places it in a capable mid-range tier that aligns perfectly with the 1080p and 1440p performance seen in the measured data.

The GPU's memory bandwidth of 288.0 GB/s and 128-bit bus are adequate for this title, as the game does not appear to be memory-bandwidth constrained. The consistent frame rates suggest that the GPU's shader units, rather than its memory subsystem, are the primary bottleneck at higher settings. The RX 7600 XT's performance relative to its rivals, such as being just 0.7% slower than the RTX 3070 in average benchmark score, confirms that it is a well-positioned graphics card for this generation of sports titles.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and predictable scaling pattern as resolution increases. At 1080p High, the system averages 143 FPS. Moving to 1440p High, that number drops to 103 FPS, a reduction of 40 FPS (approximately 28%). At 4K High, the average falls further to 65 FPS, another 38 FPS drop (approximately 37%). This pattern indicates that the GPU is the primary scaling factor as resolution increases.

This scaling behavior is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. At 1080p, the CPU has more headroom to feed frames, but the GPU is still the limiting factor, as seen in the 240 FPS Low setting result. As resolution increases to 1440p and 4K, the GPU's pixel-pushing workload grows exponentially, and the frame rate drops accordingly. The low-resolution results show less CPU bottlenecking; for instance, the 1080p Low result of 240 FPS is likely near the game's engine or VSync cap rather than a hardware limit.

The data at Medium settings provides the clearest picture of this scaling. At 1080p Medium, the average is 173 FPS. At 1440p Medium, it drops to 125 FPS. At 4K Medium, it falls to 79 FPS. This consistent reduction of roughly 30% per resolution step confirms that the RX 7600 XT's rendering throughput is the bottleneck, not the Ryzen 5 7400F. The CPU, with its 32 MB of L3 cache and 12 threads, is clearly capable of keeping up with the GPU's demands at every resolution tested.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive look at this system's performance across three resolutions and four settings presets.

1080p:

• Low: 240 FPS average
• Medium: 173 FPS average (min 147, max 199)
• High: 143 FPS average
• Ultra: 92 FPS average

1440p:

• Low: 174 FPS average
• Medium: 125 FPS average (min 106, max 144)
• High: 103 FPS average
• Ultra: 67 FPS average

4K (3840x2160):

• Low: 110 FPS average
• Medium: 79 FPS average (min 67, max 91)
• High: 65 FPS average
• Ultra: 42 FPS average

The 1080p results are exceptional for esports-level play. The 240 FPS at Low confirms the CPU's capability, as this is a frame rate that many systems cannot achieve. The jump from High to Ultra at 1080p is substantial, a 51 FPS drop (143 to 92), suggesting the Ultra preset imposes a heavy rendering load on the GPU.

At 1440p, the system remains highly capable. The 125 FPS average at Medium with a 106 FPS minimum ensures a smooth experience even in chaotic moments. Ultra at 1440p is playable at 67 FPS, but the data shows that High is the sweet spot for maintaining a high refresh rate.

The 4K results are the most telling of the GPU's limits. While Low delivers a playable 110 FPS, the Ultra preset's 42 FPS average falls below the 60 FPS threshold that most players consider minimum for a sports title. The 65 FPS at High is the most viable 4K option, offering smooth gameplay without the heavy performance penalty of Ultra.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F plays a supporting but crucial role in this configuration. As a 6-core, 12-thread Zen 4 processor on the AMD Socket AM5 platform, it provides the necessary compute for game logic, AI, and physics. Its boost clock of 4.70 GHz and 32 MB of L3 cache ensure that it can feed the GPU efficiently. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 21765 and single-core score of 3072 demonstrate solid all-around performance.

The CPU's benchmark position is strong. With an average score of 32750, it sits in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are all within a 0.3% performance delta, indicating that the 7400F is a well-optimized chip for its price point. For instance, the Intel Core i5-14600T scores 32707 (0.1% lower), and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812 (0.2% higher). This tight grouping shows that the 7400F offers performance on par with other high-end mid-range processors.

In Undisputed, the CPU's role is evident in the frame rate consistency. The minimum FPS numbers at Medium settings (147 at 1080p, 106 at 1440p) are relatively high, indicating that the processor can handle the game's simulation load without causing stutters. The fact that the 1080p Low result hits 240 FPS suggests that the CPU is not a limiting factor at lower resolutions, where the GPU has less work to do. The 65W TDP of the 7400F also indicates efficient operation, leaving thermal headroom for sustained performance.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides clear guidance for optimizing the experience in Undisputed with this hardware.

For 1080p displays, the High preset at 143 FPS average is the recommended starting point. It offers a significant visual upgrade over Medium while maintaining a frame rate that exceeds most high-refresh monitors' capabilities. If you have a 240Hz monitor, the Medium preset at 173 FPS average is an excellent choice, as it still looks good while pushing frame rates high. The Ultra preset at 92 FPS is not recommended unless you prioritize maximum visual fidelity over frame rate, as the drop from High is substantial.

For 1440p gamers, the Medium preset is the clear winner. At 125 FPS average with a 106 FPS minimum, it provides a smooth, responsive experience that takes full advantage of 144Hz displays. The High preset at 103 FPS is also perfectly playable and is a great choice if you prefer better visual effects. The Ultra preset at 67 FPS is playable but leaves little headroom for demanding scenes; it is best reserved for those who prioritize image quality over frame rate consistency.

For 4K resolutions, the High preset at 65 FPS is the only recommendation. It delivers a smooth experience that is close to the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset at 79 FPS is also viable if you want extra headroom, but the visual difference between Medium and High is often worth the slight frame rate cost. The Ultra preset at 42 FPS is not recommended for competitive play, as the low frame rate will hinder timing and responsiveness. The Low preset at 110 FPS is an option for maximum smoothness, but it sacrifices too much visual quality for a game that benefits from graphical detail in its character models and environments.

Ultimately, the sweet spot for this system is 1440p with Medium or High settings, where the balance between visual fidelity and performance is ideal. The 16 GB VRAM on the RX 7600 XT ensures that you will not run into memory limitations at these settings, allowing you to focus on the gameplay.