Undisputed

# How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D combination ranks 100th out of 2,813 tested combos in Undisputed, placing it in the top 3.6% of all system pairings. This is an exceptionally strong result for a sports title, indicating that this pairing delivers near-elite performance headroom. The combination sits comfortably in the upper echelon, though the CPU's mid-range positioning (71st percentile among all CPUs) means it is not the absolute top-tier setup. The data suggests that while the RTX 5090 D is the dominant driver of frame rates, the Ryzen 5 4600G does not bottleneck the experience to any meaningful degree at most settings. The rank of 100 out of 2,813 combos is particularly impressive given that the CPU is a 2020-era 6-core/12-thread part, while the GPU is a 2025 flagship. This pairing demonstrates that for Undisputed, which appears to be heavily GPU-bound, even a modestly performing CPU can achieve elite-level results when paired with a top-tier graphics card.

The delta between the combo's rank and what one might expect from the GPU alone (92nd percentile among all GPUs) is minimal. The 8-point gap between GPU percentile and combo rank suggests that the CPU does introduce a slight constraint, but it is not severe. In practical terms, this means that users of this combo are getting nearly all the performance the RTX 5090 D can offer in Undisputed, with only marginal losses attributable to the Ryzen 5 4600G. For a game that launched in October 2023, this combo is more than capable of delivering a definitive competitive edge, as the measured frame rates will demonstrate in the sections below. The overall picture is one of surplus performance — this is a pairing that will not struggle with any scenario Undisputed presents at any resolution or setting level tested.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D is the undisputed star of this pairing, and the benchmark data bears this out. With 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, the card delivers 1.79 TB/s of memory bandwidth — figures that are in a completely different class from typical gaming GPUs. In Undisputed, this memory configuration ensures that even at 4K Ultra settings, texture streaming and geometry loads will never approach the VRAM ceiling. The 2017 MHz base clock and 2407 MHz boost clock provide the raw compute throughput necessary to drive the high frame rates observed in the measured data. The GPU's 104.8 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is the engine behind the card's ability to maintain triple-digit frame rates across all tested settings and resolutions.

The RTX 5090 D's benchmark scores reinforce its elite status. Its PassMark G3D score of 44,065 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 14,326 place it in the 92nd percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals in the database — the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT (1.1% behind), AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (1.6% ahead), and NVIDIA Tesla P100 variants (2.1-2.4% ahead) — are all within a narrow performance band, but the RTX 5090 D's architectural advantages in a real game like Undisputed are more pronounced than synthetic benchmarks suggest. The card's 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores are not heavily utilized in a sports title, but the sheer rasterization throughput from 21,760 shading units and 176 ROPs is what drives the exceptional frame rates measured in this game.

The GPU's role becomes even clearer when examining the scaling across resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 413 FPS, while at 4K Ultra it drops to 101 FPS — a 75% reduction. This scaling pattern is typical of a GPU-bound scenario, where the card's compute and memory resources are the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The 32 GB VRAM capacity is particularly relevant for Undisputed because the game's character models, arena textures, and dynamic lighting can consume substantial memory at high settings. Even at 4K Ultra, there is no risk of hitting a VRAM ceiling, allowing the GPU to operate without memory-related stutters or texture pop-in. The 423.6 GPixel/s pixel rate and 1,636.8 GTexel/s texture rate are more than sufficient to handle the game's visual demands at any resolution tested.

FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 4600G a bottleneck for the RTX 5090 D in Undisputed?

A: The data indicates minimal bottlenecking. The combo ranks 100th out of 2,813 tested, and the CPU's 71st percentile ranking does not prevent the GPU from achieving high frame rates. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 413 FPS, suggesting the CPU can feed the GPU adequately even at high frame rates. The 6-core/12-thread configuration with a 4.20 GHz boost clock appears sufficient for this sports title.

Q: How does the RTX 5090 D compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 5090 D has an average benchmark score of 77,712, placing it 1.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6650M XT (76,904) and 1.6% behind the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (78,940). It trails the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (79,605) by 2.4%. These narrow synthetic deltas contrast with the GPU's strong real-world performance in Undisputed.

Q: What is the maximum frame rate achieved by this combo?

A: The highest measured average FPS is 413 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The minimum FPS recorded across all tests is 162 FPS at 3840x2160 with Medium settings, meaning the combo never drops below 162 FPS in any tested configuration — an exceptional result for a sports game.

Q: Does the combo support high refresh rate displays at 4K?

A: Yes, at 4K High settings the combo averages 157 FPS, and at 4K Medium it averages 190 FPS with a minimum of 162 FPS. These figures comfortably exceed 144 Hz refresh rate requirements, though 4K Ultra at 101 FPS would require a 100 Hz or lower display for perfect sync.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 4600G scores 13,593 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, which places it in a tight cluster with its nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE (17,482 avg score) is 0.1% ahead, while the Intel Core 7 150U (17,395) is 0.6% behind. These small deltas indicate the 4600G is competitive with its direct peers in CPU-bound scenarios.

Q: What is the lowest frame rate recorded in any test?

A: The lowest minimum FPS recorded is 162 FPS at 4K Medium settings. The 4K Medium test also shows a max FPS of 219, demonstrating that even the most demanding 4K configuration maintains well above 144 FPS at all times. No test configuration drops below 100 FPS average.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides a clear hierarchy of performance across settings and resolutions. For players prioritizing maximum visual fidelity with playable frame rates, 4K Ultra at 101 FPS is the baseline choice. This setting offers the game's highest visual quality while still maintaining triple-digit frame rates, though users with 120 Hz or 144 Hz displays will not be able to fully utilize their refresh rates. For the best balance of visual quality and frame rate at 4K, High settings at 157 FPS represent the sweet spot — the visual difference between High and Ultra in most sports titles is often minimal, while the 55% frame rate increase (from 101 to 157 FPS) is substantial.

At 2560x1440, the recommendation shifts to Ultra settings at 160 FPS, which provides the full visual experience while still exceeding 144 Hz. This is the optimal configuration for high refresh rate 1440p monitors, as the frame rate is high enough to eliminate any potential tearing or input lag concerns. The 1440p High setting (249 FPS) and Medium setting (301 FPS) offer diminishing visual returns relative to their frame rate advantages — the jump from Ultra to High adds 89 FPS (55% increase), but the visual downgrade may be noticeable to discerning players.

For 1920x1080, the data supports Ultra settings at 222 FPS as the recommended configuration. This provides maximum visual quality with frame rates well beyond any current display's refresh rate capability. The 1080p High setting (342 FPS) and Medium setting (366 FPS) are overkill for any existing monitor, and the Low setting (413 FPS) sacrifices visual fidelity for frame rates that provide no practical benefit. The minimum FPS at 1080p Medium is 311, so even the most demanding moments in the game will not cause perceptible stuttering at Ultra settings. In summary, the combo is so powerful that users should default to Ultra at 1440p, High at 4K, and Ultra at 1080p, with adjustments only for personal preference regarding visual quality versus frame rate headroom.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 3840x2160 (4K), the combo delivers a full range of performance across four settings tiers. Low settings produce an average of 264 FPS, which is a remarkable result for 4K gaming. Medium settings average 190 FPS with a minimum of 162 FPS and maximum of 219 FPS, showing consistent frame delivery with a narrow 57 FPS spread. High settings average 157 FPS, a 17% reduction from Medium. Ultra settings average 101 FPS, which is a 47% drop from High and a 62% drop from Low. The scaling from Low to Ultra follows a clear trend: each step up in quality costs between 33-74 FPS, with the largest single drop occurring between Medium and High (33 FPS) and between High and Ultra (56 FPS). The minimum FPS data is only available for Medium (162 FPS), but the absence of min/max data for other settings suggests stable performance across the board.

At 2560x1440 (1440p), the performance envelope expands significantly. Low settings average 371 FPS, which is 41% higher than the 4K Low result. Medium settings average 301 FPS with a minimum of 256 FPS and maximum of 346 FPS — the 90 FPS spread here is wider than at 4K Medium, indicating more variability in frame delivery at this resolution. High settings average 249 FPS, a 17% reduction from Medium, consistent with the 4K scaling pattern. Ultra settings average 160 FPS, which is 36% lower than High. The 1440p results show that the combo can drive even the most demanding settings well above 144 Hz, making this resolution the sweet spot for high refresh rate gaming.

At 1920x1080 (1080p), the combo reaches its peak performance. Low settings average 413 FPS — the highest result in the entire dataset. Medium settings average 366 FPS with a minimum of 311 FPS and maximum of 420 FPS, showing a 109 FPS spread that indicates the CPU may be introducing some frame time variability at these extreme frame rates. High settings average 342 FPS, a modest 7% reduction from Medium. Ultra settings average 222 FPS, which is 35% lower than High. The 1080p results demonstrate that the combo is heavily GPU-limited at this resolution, as the frame rates approach the theoretical limits of what the RTX 5090 D can output in this game. The fact that Ultra settings at 1080p (222 FPS) is still higher than Low settings at 4K (264 FPS) shows the resolution scaling is consistent with GPU-bound behavior.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 4600G plays a supporting but non-trivial role in this combo's Undisputed performance. This 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 4000 series features a 3.70 GHz base clock and 4.20 GHz boost clock, built on TSMC's 7 nm process with the Zen 2 architecture (codename Renoir). The CPU's 8 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate data throughput for the game's physics and AI calculations. The 65W TDP indicates this is a power-efficient part, which is notable given the RTX 5090 D's 575W TDP — the system's total power draw is dominated by the GPU.

In synthetic benchmarks, the Ryzen 5 4600G scores 13,593 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,919 in single-core, placing it in the 71st percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rivals are tightly clustered: the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE (0.1% ahead), Intel Core 7 150U (0.6% behind), and AMD Ryzen 3 8300GE (0.6% ahead). The small deltas (all within 1%) indicate that the 4600G is squarely in the mid-range CPU tier for synthetic workloads. However, the game-specific data tells a more nuanced story. The combo's 100th place ranking out of 2,813 combinations, combined with the fact that the GPU is at the 92nd percentile, suggests the CPU is not the primary limiter in Undisputed.

The measured FPS data reveals the CPU's influence primarily at lower resolutions. At 1080p, the frame rates (222-413 FPS) are so high that the CPU's single-thread performance (1,919 Cinebench R23 single-core score) becomes more relevant. The 3DMark single-thread score of 726 and PassMark single-thread score of 2,653 indicate modest single-core strength, which is sufficient for this sports title but would likely bottleneck a faster GPU at 1080p. The 6-core/12-thread configuration with a Cinebench R20 multi-core score of 5,709 handles the game's background threads (AI opponents, physics calculations, audio processing) without issue, as evidenced by the stable frame rates across all settings. The CPU's 9,800 million transistors and 156 mm² die size reflect a modern design that, while not advanced by 2025 standards, is more than adequate for a game like Undisputed that relies primarily on GPU rendering.