Undisputed

Undisputed pairs the AMD Ryzen 5 2600 with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, and the measured data places this combination at rank 744 out of 1580 tested combos in the game. That puts it just inside the top half of all configurations, a solid middle-tier standing that reflects the balance between a capable six-core Zen processor from 2018 and a modern Ampere graphics card. The ranking is not a top-tier placement, but it is far from a weak one; the data indicates this combo sits in a broad competitive band where neither component is a clear outlier relative to the overall field.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 744 out of 1580 tested combos means it outperforms roughly 53% of all configurations tested in Undisputed. This is a respectable position for a pairing that combines a 2000-series Ryzen 5 with a GeForce 30-series GPU, showing that the platform’s age does not preclude it from delivering a competitive experience in this title. The Ryzen 5 2600 itself holds a percentile rank of 77 against all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 19616, placing it within a narrow margin of its nearest rivals: it trails the Intel Core i5-1345U by 0.4% (19691 vs. 19616), leads the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U by 0.6%, sits 0.6% behind the Intel Core i5-11600KF (19740), and edges the Intel Core i7-10700F by 0.7% (19485). These deltaPct values are all sub-1%, indicating that the CPU’s compute performance is effectively on par with a cluster of modern mid-range and older high-end chips.

On the GPU side, the RTX 3070 holds a percentile rank of 72 against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 28238. Its nearest rivals show a similar tight clustering: the AMD FirePro S7150 leads by 0.6% (28409), the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT trails by 0.9% (27985), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti trails by 1% (27956), and the AMD Radeon R9 M295X leads by 1.1% (28541). This means the RTX 3070’s raw compute performance is statistically indistinguishable from those cards in synthetic tests, though the measured FPS in Undisputed will tell the real story. The combo’s overall rank of 744 suggests that the pairing’s strengths and weaknesses roughly cancel out, resulting in a configuration that is neither a bottleneck-heavy mismatch nor an overkill setup for this title.

GPU Role

The RTX 3070 brings 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth. Its base clock is 1500 MHz, boosting to 1725 MHz, and it features 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The memory runs at 1750 MHz, which translates to 14 Gbps effective. These specifications are central to understanding the GPU’s behavior in Undisputed, a sports title that appears to scale strongly with both raw throughput and memory bandwidth. The 8 GB capacity is adequate for the resolutions tested here, as the data shows no signs of memory-related stalling or frame drops that would indicate a VRAM ceiling being hit at any setting.

The GPU’s pixel rate of 165.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 317.4 GTexel/s suggest it can handle high-resolution rendering without becoming the primary constraint in most scenarios. However, the measured FPS patterns across settings reveal that the RTX 3070 is not always the limiting factor. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo hits 307.5 FPS, which is far beyond what any display can show, indicating that the CPU is likely the ceiling at that point. As resolution and settings scale up, the GPU’s role becomes more pronounced, but the data shows that even at 4K Ultra, the card still manages 53 FPS, proving it has enough headroom to avoid a complete collapse under heavy load.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS progression from 1080p to 4K follows a predictable pattern, but the magnitude of the drop varies significantly by settings preset. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 307.5 at 1080p to 221.6 at 1440p to 140.3 at 4K. That represents a 54.4% drop from 1080p to 4K, which is substantial but still leaves the game playable at high frame rates on a 4K display. At High settings, the drop is steeper in percentage terms: from 182.9 at 1080p to 134.3 at 1440p to 86.1 at 4K, a 52.9% reduction overall. Medium settings show 223.3 at 1080p, 159.1 at 1440p, and 100.8 at 4K, a 54.9% drop. Ultra settings produce the most dramatic scaling: 118.3 at 1080p, 84.7 at 1440p, and 53 at 4K, a 55.2% reduction.

These numbers indicate that the GPU becomes progressively more dominant as resolution increases, but the rate of FPS loss is remarkably consistent across all presets—hovering around 53-55% from 1080p to 4K. This consistency suggests that the scaling is primarily driven by GPU workload rather than CPU overhead. At 1080p Low, the 307.5 FPS figure is so high that it almost certainly runs into CPU limits; the Ryzen 5 2600’s 12 threads and 16 MB of shared L3 cache are enough to drive that frame rate, but the GPU is nowhere near saturation. By 4K Ultra, however, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, as evidenced by the 53 FPS result, which aligns with the card’s raw compute capabilities at that load.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1080p, the combo delivers its best results across all settings. Low settings produce an average of 307.5 FPS, which is the highest recorded figure in the entire dataset. Medium settings drop to 223.3 FPS, still an exceptionally smooth experience. High settings yield 182.9 FPS, and Ultra settings fall to 118.3 FPS. These numbers show that at 1080p, the combination can drive even the most demanding preset well above the 100 FPS threshold, making it entirely viable for high-refresh-rate monitors. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 189.2 FPS, indicating that the settings slider has a massive impact on performance at this resolution.

Moving to 1440p, the performance remains strong but begins to show the GPU’s workload increasing. Low settings average 221.6 FPS, which is a drop of 85.9 FPS from 1080p. Medium settings hit 159.1 FPS, a reduction of 64.2 FPS. High settings average 134.3 FPS, down 48.6 FPS. Ultra settings produce 84.7 FPS, down 33.6 FPS from the 1080p Ultra result. The delta between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 136.9 FPS, a narrower margin than at 1080p, which confirms the GPU is taking on more of the load. At 4K, the results are more modest but still playable. Low settings average 140.3 FPS, Medium settings 100.8 FPS, High settings 86.1 FPS, and Ultra settings 53 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra at 4K is 87.3 FPS, the smallest of the three resolutions, showing that the GPU is becoming the dominant constraint and that settings changes have a reduced relative impact.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data suggests that the optimal experience depends heavily on the target resolution and refresh rate. For 1080p displays, Ultra settings at 118.3 FPS is the best choice for players who prioritize visual fidelity, as it remains well above the 60 FPS floor and is smooth enough for most gaming scenarios. Those with 144Hz or higher refresh rate monitors should consider High settings at 182.9 FPS, which balances visual quality with a frame rate that can fully utilize such displays. Low settings at 307.5 FPS is unnecessary for practical use, as the extra frames beyond 240Hz offer diminishing returns, but it demonstrates the combo’s headroom.

At 1440p, Ultra settings at 84.7 FPS is a viable option for players who want maximum visual quality, though it falls short of the 100 FPS mark. High settings at 134.3 FPS is the sweet spot for 144Hz monitors, providing a smooth experience with only a modest reduction in graphical fidelity. Medium settings at 159.1 FPS is an alternative for those who prioritize frame rate above all else, but the difference between Medium and High is only 24.8 FPS, making High the more balanced recommendation. Low settings at 221.6 FPS is overkill for most displays, but it confirms the combo can handle competitive play at high refresh rates.

For 4K, the recommendations shift dramatically. Ultra settings at 53 FPS is borderline playable but not ideal for a sports title where smoothness matters. High settings at 86.1 FPS is the clear winner here, offering a solid frame rate that stays above 60 FPS and provides enough headroom for slight dips. Medium settings at 100.8 FPS is a good alternative for players who want a smoother experience, but the visual downgrade from High is noticeable. Low settings at 140.3 FPS is the best choice for high-refresh-rate 4K displays, though it sacrifices significant visual quality. The data overall indicates that High settings at 1440p and 4K, and Ultra settings at 1080p, represent the best balance of performance and visual quality for this combo.