Thief

Thief

AVERAGE FPS
137
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 137 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 68 70 89 122
1440p QHD 110 118 152 185
1080p Full HD 161 172 191 208

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 122
3840x2160 Medium 89
3840x2160 High 70
3840x2160 Ultra 68
2560x1440 Low 185
2560x1440 Medium 152
2560x1440 High 118
2560x1440 Ultra 110
1920x1080 Low 208
1920x1080 Medium 191
1920x1080 High 172
1920x1080 Ultra 161

Thief with Intel Core i5-14600K + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i5-14600K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX delivers a commanding performance profile in Thief, a 2014 stealth title that remains surprisingly demanding at high resolutions. The benchmark data shows this combination ranking in the 94th percentile of tested systems, with frame rates that suggest the GPU is the primary driver of performance at 4K, while the CPU's strong single-thread capabilities keep frame rates elevated at lower resolutions. This analysis breaks down the measured results across all settings and resolutions, contextualizes the combo's standing among 1,642 tested configurations, and offers guidance on the optimal settings for different display targets.

FAQ

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14600K compare to its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X?

A: The i5-14600K has an average benchmark score of 49,166, which is 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 9 5950X's 49,062. This effectively places them at parity in overall CPU performance, though the i5-14600K's 14 cores and 20 threads provide a different workload profile than the 16-core Ryzen.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking among all tested graphics cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX sits in the 85th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44,019. Its nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro 580, which scores 44,195, a 0.4% difference, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti trails by 2%.

*Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested CPU-GPU pairings in Thief?*

A: This specific combination ranks 103rd out of 1,642 tested combos, placing it in the top 6.3% of all systems evaluated in the game. This high ranking reflects the strong synergy between the CPU's 5.30 GHz boost clock and the GPU's 24 GB of VRAM.

*Q: What is the best measured average FPS for this combo in Thief?*

A: The highest recorded average frame rate is 208.3 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings. This drops to 161.1 FPS at Ultra settings at the same resolution, showing a 22.6% performance cost for the highest visual quality.

*Q: Does the GPU's 24 GB VRAM provide a measurable advantage in Thief?*

A: While the game is from 2014 and likely does not require 24 GB, the data shows the card maintains high frame rates even at 3840x2160 Ultra, where it averages 68.2 FPS. The 960.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 384-bit bus width likely contribute to stable performance at 4K resolution.

Q: What is the CPU's single-core performance score on Cinebench R23?

A: The i5-14600K scores 4,642 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 32,881 in multi-core. This single-core strength is relevant for Thief, which is a 2014 title that may rely more heavily on fewer threads.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-14600K and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX achieves a rank of 103 out of 1,642 tested combos in Thief. This places the pairing in the 94th percentile of all configurations, indicating that only about 6% of tested systems deliver higher frame rates in this title. The rank reflects the balanced nature of this pairing: the CPU scores in the 93rd percentile of all processors, while the GPU sits in the 85th percentile, yet together they outperform many combinations featuring individually higher-ranked components.

The CPU's nearest rivals provide context for its contribution. The AMD Ryzen 9 5950X scores 49,062 (0.2% lower), the Intel Core i5-14600KF scores 49,367 (0.4% higher), and the AMD EPYC 4345P scores 49,595 (0.9% higher). These deltas are minimal, meaning the i5-14600K is effectively on par with its closest competitors in raw compute. For Thief, the more relevant metric may be the CPU's 5.30 GHz boost clock, which supports high frame rates at lower resolutions where the GPU is not the bottleneck.

On the GPU side, the RX 7900 XTX's nearest rivals show a wider spread. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 44,900 (2% higher), while the AMD Radeon Pro 580 scores 44,195 (0.4% higher). The RX 7900 XTX scores 44,019, placing it below the RTX 4070 Ti but above the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 (43,313, 1.6% lower) and the RTX 4090 Mobile (43,667, 0.8% lower). Despite sitting in the 85th percentile, the GPU's high memory bandwidth and 24 GB VRAM help it achieve strong results in Thief's larger textures and environments.

The combo rank of 103 is particularly notable because Thief is a 2014 title with a release date of 2014-02-24. Older games often respond well to high single-thread CPU performance and high GPU fill rates. The i5-14600K's 5.30 GHz boost clock and the RX 7900 XTX's 479.6 GPixel/s pixel rate combine to push frame rates well above 60 FPS at 4K and above 160 FPS at 1080p, which explains the top-6% overall rank.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the dominant component in this pairing for Thief, particularly at higher resolutions. The GPU features 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus, delivering 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This memory configuration is far beyond what a 2014 game requires, but the data shows it does not hurt performance. The card's base clock is 1929 MHz, with a boost clock of 2498 MHz and a game clock of 2365 MHz, all of which are well above the thresholds needed for a title of this era.

At 3840x2160, the GPU's role is clearly visible in the scaling between settings. Low settings produce 122 FPS, Medium drops to 89.2 FPS, High yields 70 FPS, and Ultra settles at 68.2 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 32.8 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is just 1.8 FPS. This suggests that the GPU's raw compute and memory bandwidth are sufficient to handle 4K even at High settings, with Ultra settings adding only a marginal load on the 61.39 TFLOPS FP32 throughput.

The GPU's 192 ROPs and 384 TMUs contribute to the high pixel and texture rates (479.6 GPixel/s and 959.2 GTexel/s, respectively). In Thief, which features complex lighting and shadow effects typical of the stealth genre, these rates help maintain consistent frame rates. The data shows the GPU is not a bottleneck at 1080p, where even Ultra settings yield 161.1 FPS, but at 4K, the card is clearly working harder, as evidenced by the 68.2 FPS at Ultra.

The GPU's 5 nm process node from TSMC, with 57,700 million transistors on a 529 mm² die, provides the efficiency to sustain high clocks without thermal throttling. While Thief does not stress the ray tracing capabilities (the card has 96 RT cores), the DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensures compatibility with modern drivers. The measured data confirms the GPU's role as the primary performance driver at 4K, while the CPU takes over at lower resolutions.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data provides clear guidance for optimal settings based on resolution. At 3840x2160, High settings deliver 70 FPS, which is above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. Ultra settings drop to 68.2 FPS, a negligible 1.8 FPS difference, so players with capable displays should choose Ultra for the best visual fidelity. Medium settings at 89.2 FPS offer a solid middle ground for those seeking higher headroom, while Low at 122 FPS is unnecessarily fast unless the user prioritizes maximum frame rate over visuals.

At 2560x1440, the data shows that Ultra settings produce 110.2 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS target and suitable for high-refresh-rate monitors. High settings at 118.3 FPS and Medium at 152.4 FPS provide diminishing returns over Ultra, so the recommendation is to use Ultra for the best experience. Low settings at 185 FPS are only relevant for competitive play, which is not typical for a single-player stealth title.

At 1920x1080, all settings exceed 160 FPS, with Ultra at 161.1 FPS, High at 172 FPS, Medium at 190.5 FPS, and Low at 208.3 FPS. Given that the gap between Ultra and Low is 47.2 FPS, but the visual impact of Ultra in a 2014 game is significant, the data strongly supports using Ultra settings. The 161.1 FPS at Ultra is sufficient for even the fastest 1080p displays, making this the clear recommendation for 1080p users.

Across all resolutions, the data indicates that the combo has enough headroom to run Ultra settings without dropping below 60 FPS. The only exception is 4K, where Ultra sits at 68.2 FPS, still above the threshold. Therefore, the optimal experience is Ultra settings at 1080p or 1440p, and High or Ultra at 4K depending on whether the user prefers a small frame rate boost or maximum visual quality.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates reveal a consistent pattern across resolutions. At 1920x1080, the combo achieves 208.3 FPS on Low, 190.5 FPS on Medium, 172 FPS on High, and 161.1 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from Low to Ultra is a 22.6% reduction, which is modest given the visual improvements. The step from High to Ultra is the smallest, at 10.9 FPS, while the step from Low to Medium is 17.8 FPS, and from Medium to High is 18.5 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the frame rates drop significantly but remain high. Low settings yield 185 FPS, Medium produces 152.4 FPS, High delivers 118.3 FPS, and Ultra reaches 110.2 FPS. The reduction from 1080p to 1440p ranges from 11.2% on Low (208.3 to 185) to 31.6% on High (172 to 118.3). This indicates that the GPU is becoming more of a factor at 1440p, but the CPU's 5.30 GHz boost clock still keeps frame rates above 110 FPS at Ultra.

At 3840x2160, the performance impact is most pronounced. Low settings measure 122 FPS, Medium drops to 89.2 FPS, High yields 70 FPS, and Ultra produces 68.2 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra is a 44.1% reduction, highlighting the GPU's workload at 4K. The gap between High and Ultra is just 1.8 FPS, suggesting that Ultra settings at 4K add minimal overhead over High for this particular game. The step from Medium to High is 19.2 FPS, while the step from Low to Medium is 32.8 FPS, indicating that Medium is a significant jump in visual quality from Low.

Comparing across resolutions, the data shows that 4K Ultra (68.2 FPS) is 57.6% slower than 1080p Ultra (161.1 FPS), while 1440p Ultra (110.2 FPS) is 31.6% slower than 1080p Ultra. These percentages illustrate the GPU's scaling behavior: the RX 7900 XTX maintains playable frame rates at 4K but clearly prefers 1440p for high-refresh-rate experiences. The measured data confirms that this combo is best suited for 1440p Ultra or 4K High, with 1080p Ultra providing an exceptionally smooth experience for esports-style play in this stealth title.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-14600K

Cores / Threads 14 / 20
Base Clock 3500 MHz
Boost Clock 5300 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

VRAM 24 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2498 MHz MHz
TDP 355 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-14600K + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX in Thief

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 122.0
3840x2160 Medium 89.2
3840x2160 High 70.0
3840x2160 Ultra 68.2
2560x1440 Low 185.0
2560x1440 Medium 152.4
2560x1440 High 118.3
2560x1440 Ultra 110.2
1920x1080 Low 208.3
1920x1080 Medium 190.5
1920x1080 High 172.0
1920x1080 Ultra 161.1

Thief with ii5-14600K + Other GPUs

See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Thief with RX 7900 XTX + Other CPUs

See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-14600K + RX 7900 XTX

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.