Thief

# Thief with Intel Core i5-12600KF + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT

FAQ

Q: What is the combo's overall ranking among tested configurations in Thief?

A: This pairing of the Intel Core i5-12600KF and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT ranks 203rd out of 1,642 tested combos in Thief, placing it in the top 12.4% of all configurations.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in aggregate benchmark scores?

A: The Core i5-12600KF posts an average benchmark score of 27,827, which is essentially tied with the Intel Core i9-10900K at 27,829 (0% delta). It sits 0.1% behind the Core i5-12600K (27,851) and 0.2% behind the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H (27,872), while running 0.4% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13700H (27,716).

Q: What is the GPU's competitive position relative to nearby alternatives?

A: The RX 7900 XT averages 38,358 across GPU benchmarks. It matches the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile (38,349, 0% delta), runs 0.3% ahead of the NVIDIA CMP 70HX (38,225), and leads the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile (38,135) by 0.6%. Notably, it trails the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 (38,494) by 0.4%.

Q: Which resolution and settings combination delivers the highest average frame rate?

A: The maximum measured performance occurs at 1920x1080 with Low settings, producing 193.2 FPS average. The same resolution at Ultra still yields 151.6 FPS, showing substantial headroom across the settings spectrum.

Q: How does the GPU's memory configuration support high-resolution gaming?

A: The RX 7900 XT carries 20 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 320-bit bus, with bandwidth rated at 800.0 GB/s. Memory clocks run at 2500 MHz (20 Gbps effective), which provides ample capacity for demanding titles at 4K resolutions.

Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra settings at 4K?

A: At 3840x2160, the average FPS drops from 109.6 on Low to 59.0 on Ultra — a reduction of 50.6 FPS, or roughly 46%. This indicates that settings scaling has a profound impact on performance at this resolution.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-12600KF and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT secures the 203rd position among 1,642 tested configurations in Thief. This places it comfortably within the upper tier of results, outperforming approximately 87.6% of all tested combos. The ranking reflects a balanced pairing where neither component bottlenecks the other to a significant degree in this title.

The CPU's aggregate benchmark standing provides context: the i5-12600KF sits at the 84th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27,827. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i9-10900K, matches it almost exactly at 27,829. The i5-12600K, a near-identical sibling, edges ahead by just 0.1% with a score of 27,851. This level of parity suggests that CPU-side performance in Thief is unlikely to differentiate meaningfully among these comparable processors.

On the GPU side, the RX 7900 XT holds the 82nd percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 38,358. Its nearest competitor, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile, achieves 38,349 — a statistical dead heat. The RX 7900 XT also outperforms the NVIDIA CMP 70HX by 0.3% (38,225) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile by 0.6% (38,135). These margins are small, indicating that the GPU's position in the hierarchy is well-established and competitive.

The 203rd overall rank in Thief, when combined with the component-level percentiles, suggests that this configuration delivers consistent performance without a glaring weak link. The data indicates a system that scales predictably with settings and resolution, a trait visible in the measured FPS breakdown.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XT is the dominant component in this pairing for Thief's rendering workload. Built on the Navi 31 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture, the GPU operates at a base clock of 1387 MHz and a boost clock of 2394 MHz, with a game clock rated at 2025 MHz. These frequencies, combined with 5,376 shading units, 336 texture mapping units, and 192 render output units, provide substantial raw compute capacity.

Memory configuration is a critical asset: 20 GB of GDDR6 across a 320-bit bus yields 800.0 GB/s of bandwidth. For a 2014 title like Thief, this memory subsystem is vastly overprovisioned, but the headroom explains why the GPU maintains high frame rates even at 4K Ultra settings. The memory clock of 2500 MHz (20 Gbps effective) ensures that texture streaming and asset loading never become a limiting factor.

The GPU's compute capabilities are substantial, with FP32 throughput rated at 51.48 TFLOPS and FP16 at 103.0 TFLOPS (2:1). Pixel rate stands at 459.6 GPixel/s, and texture rate at 804.4 GTexel/s. These specifications translate into the measured performance in Thief, where the GPU consistently delivers playable frame rates across all tested settings at 4K, and far exceeds 100 FPS at lower resolutions.

The 84 ray accelerators and 12 Ultimate (12_2) DirectX support indicate modern feature readiness, though Thief's age means these capabilities are not heavily exercised. The GPU's PCIe 4.0 x16 interface pairs with the CPU's Gen 4, 20-lane support, ensuring no bandwidth constraints at the system level.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data reveals a consistent performance hierarchy across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the configuration delivers 193.2 FPS on Low, 176.3 FPS on Medium, 158.6 FPS on High, and 151.6 FPS on Ultra. The gap between Low and Ultra is 41.6 FPS, representing a 21.5% reduction from the lowest to highest settings. Even at the most demanding 1080p preset, the frame rate remains well above the refresh rate of most monitors.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance scales down predictably. Low settings produce 169.4 FPS, Medium yields 140.8 FPS, High achieves 109.7 FPS, and Ultra delivers 104.5 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra here is 64.9 FPS, a 38.3% drop. Notably, the step from Medium to High at this resolution incurs a 31.1 FPS penalty, the largest single-setting jump in the dataset, indicating a significant increase in rendering complexity at that tier.

At 3840x2160, the configuration remains capable but the settings impact becomes more pronounced. Low settings yield 109.6 FPS, Medium drops to 84.7 FPS, High falls to 64.7 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 59.0 FPS. The Ultra result, while the lowest in the dataset, still clears the 60 FPS threshold by a narrow margin — a signal of the GPU's bandwidth and compute resources. The spread from Low to Ultra at 4K is 50.6 FPS, a 46.2% reduction.

Across all resolutions, the pattern holds: Low and Medium settings maintain frame rates that exceed typical display refresh rates, while High and Ultra remain playable even at 4K. The data shows no sub-60 FPS results in any tested configuration.

Resolution Scaling

Frame rate degradation from 1080p to 4K follows a clear pattern that illuminates the balance between CPU and GPU. At Low settings, the drop from 193.2 FPS at 1920x1080 to 109.6 FPS at 3840x2160 represents a 43.3% reduction. This is a relatively shallow decline, suggesting that the CPU is keeping pace with the GPU's increased output demands at lower graphical loads.

At Medium settings, the scaling shows 176.3 FPS at 1080p falling to 84.7 FPS at 4K — a 51.9% decrease. The steeper drop indicates that the GPU is beginning to become the primary limiter as pixel count rises. This trend intensifies at High settings, where 158.6 FPS at 1080p declines to 64.7 FPS at 4K, a 59.2% reduction.

Ultra settings exhibit the most severe scaling: 151.6 FPS at 1080p drops to 59.0 FPS at 4K, a 61.1% decrease. The widening percentage gap with each settings tier points to the GPU carrying an increasing load as both resolution and graphical complexity rise. The CPU, with its 10 cores and 16 threads, maintains sufficient headroom that it does not become the constraining factor at any tested point.

The data suggests that at 1080p, the configuration is partly CPU-bound, particularly at Low and Medium settings where frame rates exceed what the GPU's rendering pipeline can fully utilize. At 4K Ultra, the GPU's resources are nearly saturated, evidenced by the 59.0 FPS result. The 20 GB memory buffer and 800.0 GB/s bandwidth prevent any memory-related stutter, but the raw compute limits are visible at the highest settings. This scaling profile indicates a well-matched pairing where the CPU supports the GPU effectively across the entire resolution and settings matrix, with the GPU emerging as the expected bottleneck at 4K.