Thief
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 183 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 89 | 93 | 120 | 158 |
| 1440p QHD | 148 | 154 | 195 | 244 |
| 1080p Full HD | 205 | 213 | 262 | 313 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090, In-Depth Analysis
# Thief Performance Analysis: AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
This combo ranks 427th out of 2,851 tested configurations in Thief, placing it in the top 15% of all system pairings evaluated. The ranking reflects a high-end mobile CPU paired with a flagship desktop GPU, yet the game's age and engine characteristics mean the bottleneck shifts dramatically across resolutions. The measured FPS data reveals a system that delivers exceptional frame rates at 1080p and 1440p, while 4K performance becomes the primary challenge, with settings choices determining whether the experience remains fluid or dips below 60 FPS.
How This Combo Ranks
The 427th position out of 2,851 combos places this pairing in the 85th percentile of all tested configurations for Thief. This is a strong showing, but not a top-tier result, which is curious given the components involved. The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX holds a 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 sits at the 92nd percentile among all GPUs. Individually, both components are elite, yet their combined performance in Thief doesn't crack the top 400 combos.
The data suggests that Thief's engine, released in 2014, may not fully utilize the modern hardware's capabilities. The CPU's benchmark scores are exceptional — a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,713 and a single-core score of 6,030 — while the GPU's Passmark G3D score of 39,650 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 18,355 demonstrate raw power. However, the game's age means it likely doesn't scale perfectly with such high-end components. The nearest CPU rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, scores nearly identically at 76,155 average versus 76,212 for the Ryzen, a mere 0.1% difference, yet neither pushes this combo significantly higher in Thief's rankings.
The GPU's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB (0.3% higher average score) and the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT (1.1% higher), which suggests the RTX 5090's massive compute resources are somewhat underutilized in this title. The ranking implies that Thief's performance ceiling is reached well before these components' full potential is tapped, making the combo's position more about engine limitations than hardware deficiencies.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX features 16 cores and 32 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz. This Zen 4 architecture chip, built on a 5 nm process by TSMC, delivers 64 MB of L3 cache and supports DDR5 memory with dual-channel bandwidth of 83.2 GB/s. For Thief, a stealth game from 2014, the CPU's role is primarily about maintaining consistent frame pacing and handling game logic, AI, and physics calculations.
The CPU's Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42,713 and single-core score of 6,030 indicate exceptional processing capability. In Thief, the single-core performance is likely more critical, as older game engines often rely heavily on one or two threads. The 5.40 GHz boost clock provides strong single-threaded throughput, which should help maintain high FPS in CPU-bound scenarios. The Passmark single-thread score of 3,907 and multi-thread score of 51,405 further confirm the CPU's strength.
However, the data shows that at 1080p Low settings, the combo achieves 191 FPS, which is the highest measured average across all configurations. This suggests the CPU can feed the GPU adequately at lower resolutions. The CPU's 95th percentile ranking among all CPUs indicates it outperforms the vast majority of processors, yet in Thief, the game's engine may not fully exploit all 16 cores. The L3 cache of 64 MB is substantial, but Thief's data footprint may not require such large cache allocations, meaning the CPU's advantages are only partially realized.
The Ryzen 9 8945HX's nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX, scores 76,155 average, just 0.1% lower, indicating these are essentially performance equals. The AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D, with its 3D V-Cache, scores 75,779, 0.6% lower, which is surprising given the cache advantages typically seen in gaming. This suggests Thief doesn't benefit significantly from large cache sizes, further reinforcing that the game's engine limits CPU impact.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 is a flagship GPU with 32 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 512-bit bus, providing 1.79 TB/s of bandwidth. Its base clock is 2017 MHz with a boost clock of 2407 MHz, and the memory runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective). The GPU features 21,760 shading units, 680 TMUs, and 176 ROPs, with 170 RT cores and 680 tensor cores. The FP32 performance of 104.8 TFLOPS and a pixel rate of 423.6 GPixel/s demonstrate immense rendering capability.
In Thief, the GPU's role is heavily dependent on resolution and settings. At 1080p, the GPU is often underutilized, with the CPU becoming the limiting factor. The data shows 1080p Low at 191 FPS, Medium at 173 FPS, High at 154 FPS, and Ultra at 147 FPS. The relatively small gap between Low and Ultra (44 FPS difference) suggests the GPU has ample headroom at this resolution. At 1440p, the GPU begins to assert more influence: Low hits 169 FPS, Medium 139 FPS, High 106 FPS, and Ultra 101 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 68 FPS drop, indicating the GPU is working harder.
At 4K, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. Low settings yield 108 FPS, Medium 82 FPS, High 62 FPS, and Ultra 59 FPS. The 49 FPS drop from Low to Ultra at 4K demonstrates the GPU's limits under heavy load. The RTX 5090's nearest GPU rival, the NVIDIA Tesla P100 PCIe 16 GB, scores 0.3% higher in average benchmarks, while the AMD Radeon RX 6850M XT scores 1.1% higher, which is unexpected given the RTX 5090's specifications. This suggests Thief doesn't leverage the RTX 5090's advanced features like ray tracing or DLSS, which are not mentioned in the measured data, and the game's older DirectX 11-era rendering path may not fully utilize the GPU's modern architecture.
The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 39,650 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 376,728 indicate strong raw performance, but Thief's measured FPS suggests the game's engine caps utilization. The 92nd percentile ranking among all GPUs confirms the RTX 5090 is elite, yet the combo's 427th rank in Thief implies the game doesn't reward this GPU's full capabilities.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings produce an average of 191 FPS, Medium 173 FPS with a minimum of 147 and maximum of 199, High 154 FPS, and Ultra 147 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 44 FPS, which is the smallest across all resolutions, indicating the CPU is the primary limiter at 1080p. Even at Ultra, the 147 FPS average is well above the 60 FPS threshold, making this resolution ideal for high-refresh-rate displays.
At 2560x1440, performance remains strong but shows more variation. Low settings average 169 FPS, Medium 139 FPS with a range of 118 to 160, High 106 FPS, and Ultra 101 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra widens to 68 FPS, suggesting the GPU is becoming more involved. The Medium settings' minimum of 118 FPS ensures smooth gameplay even during demanding scenes. High and Ultra settings stay above 100 FPS, making 1440p a viable option for high refresh rates, though the drop from Low to High (63 FPS) indicates the GPU's load is increasing.
At 3840x2160, performance becomes more variable and settings-dependent. Low settings average 108 FPS, Medium 82 FPS with a minimum of 70 and maximum of 94, High 62 FPS, and Ultra 59 FPS. The Low to Ultra gap is 49 FPS, but the more significant finding is that only Low settings maintain an average above 100 FPS. Medium settings dip to a 70 FPS minimum, which could cause noticeable stutters. High and Ultra both hover near 60 FPS, with Ultra marginally below at 59 FPS, meaning the combo barely maintains playable frame rates at the highest settings.
The Medium settings at 4K show the most detailed data with a 70-94 FPS range, indicating variability that could impact gameplay smoothness. The measured FPS breakdown reveals that this combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it consistently exceeds 100 FPS at all settings, while 4K requires careful settings management to stay above 60 FPS.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is stark and reveals the limiting component at each stage. At Low settings, performance falls from 191 FPS at 1080p to 169 FPS at 1440p (an 11.5% decrease) and then to 108 FPS at 4K (a 43.5% decrease from 1080p). This pattern suggests the CPU is the primary limiter at 1080p, as the GPU has enough headroom to maintain high frame rates. The 1440p to 4K drop of 61 FPS indicates the GPU becomes the bottleneck at higher resolutions.
At Medium settings, the progression is 173 FPS at 1080p, 139 FPS at 1440p, and 82 FPS at 4K. The 1080p to 1440p drop is 34 FPS (19.7%), while the 1440p to 4K drop is 57 FPS (41%). This increasing percentage drop at 4K confirms the GPU's growing role as the resolution scales. The High settings show a similar trend: 154 FPS at 1080p, 106 FPS at 1440p, and 62 FPS at 4K. The 1440p to 4K drop of 44 FPS (41.5%) mirrors the Medium settings' pattern.
Ultra settings follow the same trajectory: 147 FPS at 1080p, 101 FPS at 1440p, and 59 FPS at 4K. The 1080p to 1440p drop is 46 FPS (31.3%), which is the largest percentage drop among all settings, suggesting that Ultra settings begin taxing the GPU even at 1440p. The 1440p to 4K drop of 42 FPS (41.6%) is consistent with other settings.
The data indicates that the CPU limits performance at 1080p, as evidenced by the relatively small FPS differences between Low and Ultra (44 FPS). At 1440p, the GPU starts to become more significant, with the Low to Ultra gap widening to 68 FPS. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, as the Low to Ultra gap narrows to 49 FPS, but the absolute FPS values drop significantly. The 4K results, particularly the 59 FPS average at Ultra, show that the RTX 5090 is being pushed to its limits in this game at the highest resolution.
FAQ
Q: Is this combo capable of running Thief at 4K with playable frame rates?
A: Yes, but only at Low settings, which average 108 FPS. Medium settings average 82 FPS with a 70 FPS minimum, High averages 62 FPS, and Ultra averages 59 FPS, which is marginally below the 60 FPS threshold.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Thief?
A: 1440p offers the best balance, with all settings exceeding 100 FPS (Low: 169, Medium: 139, High: 106, Ultra: 101). 1080p provides higher frame rates, but the CPU limits the GPU's potential, as shown by the small FPS differences between settings.
Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its nearest rival in Thief?
A: The AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX scores 76,212 average, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core Ultra 9 285HX (76,155) and 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 9950X3D (75,779). This indicates near-identical performance among top-tier CPUs in Thief.
Q: Does the RTX 5090's 32 GB of VRAM matter for Thief?
A: The measured data shows no VRAM-related performance differences, as Thief from 2014 likely doesn't require more than a few gigabytes of VRAM. The GPU's 1.79 TB/s bandwidth and 104.8 TFLOPS FP32 performance are more relevant to FPS results.
Q: Why does the combo rank 427th despite having top-tier components?
A: The game's engine, released in 2014, appears to limit performance scaling. The CPU and GPU individually rank in the 92nd-95th percentiles, but Thief's older engine likely doesn't fully utilize their modern features, capping the combo's ranking at the 85th percentile of tested configurations.
Q: What are the FPS differences between Low and Ultra settings at each resolution?
A: At 1080p, the difference is 44 FPS (191 to 147). At 1440p, it widens to 68 FPS (169 to 101). At 4K, it narrows to 49 FPS (108 to 59). This pattern shows the GPU becoming more dominant at higher resolutions, but with diminishing returns at 4K.
Settings Recommendations
For the best experience, 1440p with High settings (106 FPS average) provides a strong balance of visual quality and performance. The 106 FPS average ensures smooth gameplay, and the drop from Ultra (101 FPS) is minimal. Players seeking maximum visual fidelity at 1440p can use Ultra settings without sacrificing playability, as the 101 FPS average remains well above 60 FPS.
At 1080p, the data shows that even Ultra settings (147 FPS) deliver excellent performance. Since the CPU limits performance at this resolution, players can max out settings without significant FPS loss. The 44 FPS difference between Low and Ultra is the smallest across all resolutions, making 1080p the best choice for players who prioritize maximum settings with high refresh rates.
For 4K, the settings recommendation is more nuanced. Low settings (108 FPS) are the only option that provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS. Medium settings (82 FPS average, 70 FPS minimum) are playable but may experience occasional dips. High settings (62 FPS) and Ultra (59 FPS) are borderline, with Ultra falling below the 60 FPS threshold. Players should opt for Medium settings at 4K to maintain a consistent experience, as the 70 FPS minimum provides a safety buffer. If visual quality is paramount, High settings at 62 FPS average are acceptable, but Ultra is not recommended due to the sub-60 FPS average.
The measured data suggests that Thief's optimal experience with this combo is at 1440p, where all settings exceed 100 FPS, allowing players to prioritize visual quality without worrying about frame rate drops. At 1080p, the CPU bottleneck means settings have minimal impact, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate displays. At 4K, the GPU becomes the limiting factor, and players must choose between Low settings for high frame rates or Medium for balanced visuals, as Ultra dips below the 60 FPS threshold.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 8945HX + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 89.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 93.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 120.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 158.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 148.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 154.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 195.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 244.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 205.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 213.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 262.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 313.0 |
Thief with Ryzen 9 8945HX + Other GPUs
See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Thief with RTX 5090 + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 9 8945HX + RTX 5090
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.