Thief

Thief

AVERAGE FPS
65
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 65 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 31 32 39 48
1440p QHD 47 52 65 85
1080p Full HD 73 76 100 128

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 48
3840x2160 Medium 39
3840x2160 High 32
3840x2160 Ultra 31
2560x1440 Low 85
2560x1440 Medium 65
2560x1440 High 52
2560x1440 Ultra 47
1920x1080 Low 128
1920x1080 Medium 100
1920x1080 High 76
1920x1080 Ultra 73

Thief with AMD Ryzen 9 5900X + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 5900X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 delivers a playable but resolution-sensitive experience in Thief, with performance scaling that clearly identifies the GPU as the primary bottleneck. The data shows a stark contrast between 1080p and 4K output, where the frame rate nearly halves, indicating that the 12-core CPU has ample headroom while the 8 GB graphics card struggles under higher pixel counts.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS reveals a predictable but steep decline as resolution increases, confirming that the GTX 1070 is the limiting component in this configuration. At 1080p with High settings, the combo produces 76.1 FPS, which drops to 52.1 FPS at 1440p—a 31.5% reduction. Moving to 4K, the average falls to 31.6 FPS, which is 58.5% lower than the 1080p result. This pattern holds across all settings presets, with the gap between 1080p and 4K widening as graphical demands increase.

The scaling from 1440p to 4K is particularly telling. At Medium settings, the frame rate drops from 65.3 FPS to 39.3 FPS, a 39.8% loss. At Ultra, the drop is from 47.2 FPS to 30.9 FPS, a 34.5% reduction. These numbers indicate that the GPU's 256-bit memory bus and 256.3 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for 4K textures and shader work, forcing the system into sub-60 FPS territory regardless of the preset chosen.

The 1080p results tell a different story. The jump from Low at 127.5 FPS to Ultra at 72.9 FPS shows a 42.8% performance penalty for maximum quality, but even the highest preset remains comfortably above 60 FPS. This suggests that at 1080p, the CPU's single-thread performance (3dmark_single_thread score of 941) is sufficient to feed the GPU, and the system is not yet starved for pixel throughput. The resolution scaling data points to a classic GPU-bound scenario: the Ryzen 9 5900X's 12 cores and 24 threads are largely idle while the GTX 1070's 1920 shading units work at full capacity.

CPU Role

The Ryzen 9 5900X is a Zen 3 Vermeer part with 12 cores and 24 threads, running at a base clock of 3.70 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. Its benchmark results show exceptional multi-threaded capability, with a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 33150 and a 3dmark_max_threads score of 10075. In Thief, a game released in 2014, this level of CPU performance is far beyond what the title can utilize. The data suggests the processor is never the bottleneck, as even at 1080p Low—where CPU overhead is highest relative to GPU load—the system achieves 127.5 FPS.

The CPU's single-thread performance is also strong, with a Passmark single-thread score of 3469 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2202. These figures indicate that the Ryzen 9 5900X can handle the game's AI, physics, and draw call processing without breaking a sweat. The 64 MB of L3 cache further aids in reducing memory latency, which is beneficial for the open-world traversal and stealth mechanics that require frequent asset loading.

Given that the CPU sits in the 90th percentile versus all CPUs and outperforms the AMD EPYC 4245P by 0.2% and the Intel Core i7-13700F by 0.9%, it is clear that processor headroom is not a concern. The game's frame rates are instead dictated by the GPU's ability to rasterize scenes at each resolution. The data shows no scenario where the CPU limits performance; even the most demanding 4K Ultra preset at 30.9 FPS is a GPU limitation, not a CPU one.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is a Pascal-architecture card with 8 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 256.3 GB/s of bandwidth. Its base clock of 1506 MHz and boost clock of 1683 MHz, combined with 1920 shading units, provide a raw FP32 throughput of 6.463 TFLOPS. In Thief, this hardware configuration is the decisive factor in performance outcomes.

The GPU's 51st percentile ranking versus all GPUs places it squarely in the mid-range category, and its average benchmark score of 12331 is nearly identical to the NVIDIA Quadro K4200 (0.7% higher) and the GTX 1650 SUPER (1.4% lower). This mid-pack positioning explains why the card can handle 1080p Ultra at 72.9 FPS but falls to 30.9 FPS at 4K Ultra. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for the game's textures at 1080p and 1440p, but at 4K, the memory bandwidth becomes a limiting factor.

The performance gap between Low and Ultra settings at each resolution highlights the GPU's architecture. At 1080p, the difference is 54.6 FPS (127.5 vs 72.9), while at 4K, the difference shrinks to 17.5 FPS (48.4 vs 30.9). This compression at higher resolutions indicates that the GPU is already saturated at 4K, and reducing settings cannot fully compensate for the pixel throughput deficit. The 1070's 64 ROPs and 202.0 GTexel/s texture rate are simply overwhelmed when rendering 8.3 million pixels per frame.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 9 5900X and GTX 1070 ranks 1388 out of 1642 tested combos in Thief, placing it in the bottom 15.5% of all configurations. This low ranking is surprising given the CPU's top-tier status, but it underscores the GPU's role as the performance limiter. The data shows that the 12-core processor is wasted in this pairing, as the GTX 1070 cannot leverage the CPU's multi-threaded muscle beyond what a much simpler processor could provide.

The rank reflects the overall frame rates achieved across all tested resolutions and settings. While the combo excels at 1080p Low (127.5 FPS), it falters at 4K Ultra (30.9 FPS), and the average across all twelve measurement points is dragged down by the poor high-resolution results. This pairing is a classic example of a CPU-GPU mismatch, where the processor's 90th percentile standing is mitigated by the GPU's 51st percentile performance. The result is a system that is overbuilt for the CPU's workload but underbuilt for the GPU's task, leading to a suboptimal overall ranking.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best results. Low settings produce 127.5 FPS, Medium reaches 99.8 FPS, High achieves 76.1 FPS, and Ultra drops to 72.9 FPS. All four presets are playable, with even the highest quality setting maintaining a frame rate that exceeds 60 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 42.8% performance reduction, which is a typical cost for enabling maximum graphical features.

At 2560x1440, performance becomes more strained. Low settings still deliver a smooth 84.5 FPS, but Medium falls to 65.3 FPS, High drops to 52.1 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 47.2 FPS. The transition from High to Ultra at this resolution costs 4.9 FPS, a relatively small penalty, suggesting that the Ultra preset's additional effects are not the primary burden. The 1440p results show that the GTX 1070 can handle the resolution with reduced settings, but High and Ultra presets push it below the 60 FPS threshold.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is clearly overmatched. Low settings yield 48.4 FPS, Medium produces 39.3 FPS, High falls to 31.6 FPS, and Ultra manages only 30.9 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra at 4K is just 0.7 FPS, indicating that the card is completely GPU-bound and additional settings have negligible impact. Even the lowest preset cannot reach 50 FPS at this resolution, making 4K gaming impractical for this combo.

Settings Recommendations

The data indicates that the optimal experience is achieved at 1080p with High settings, which delivers 76.1 FPS while maintaining a balance between visual quality and performance. This preset offers a significant improvement over Medium's 99.8 FPS in terms of graphical fidelity, while the drop to Ultra at 72.9 FPS provides only a marginal visual gain for a 4.2% performance loss. For players seeking maximum smoothness, 1080p Low at 127.5 FPS is the fastest option, but the visual downgrade may not be worth the extra 51.4 FPS over High.

At 1440p, Low settings at 84.5 FPS are the only preset that comfortably exceeds 60 FPS. Medium at 65.3 FPS is playable, but High at 52.1 FPS and Ultra at 47.2 FPS introduce noticeable stutter in fast-moving scenes. For 1440p users, the recommendation is to stick with Medium settings to maintain a consistent frame rate.

For 4K, no preset achieves a playable frame rate. Even Low at 48.4 FPS falls below the 60 FPS target, and the 30.9 FPS at Ultra is borderline unplayable for a stealth game requiring quick reactions. The data suggests that this combo is not suitable for 4K gaming, and users should either lower resolution or upgrade the GPU to achieve acceptable performance.

FAQ

*Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Thief?*

A: The data shows 1920x1080 is the sweet spot, with all presets achieving above 72.9 FPS, including Ultra at 72.9 FPS and High at 76.1 FPS.

*Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Thief?*

A: No. The highest 4K result is 48.4 FPS at Low settings, and Ultra drops to 30.9 FPS. None of the 4K presets reach 60 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 9 5900X scores 0.2% higher than the AMD EPYC 4245P, 0.9% higher than the Intel Core i7-13700F, and 0.7% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8845HS in average benchmark scores.

Q: What is the performance gap between 1080p and 4K at High settings?

A: At High settings, the frame rate drops from 76.1 FPS at 1080p to 31.6 FPS at 4K, a 58.5% reduction.

Q: Which settings preset provides the best balance at 1440p?

A: Medium settings at 65.3 FPS is the only preset above 60 FPS at this resolution, making it the recommended choice for playable performance.

Q: How does the GTX 1070 rank against its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The GTX 1070 scores 0.7% higher than the NVIDIA Quadro K4200, 1.3% higher than the GTX 880M, and 1.4% higher than the GTX 1650 SUPER.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 5900X

Cores / Threads 12 / 24
Base Clock 3700 MHz
Boost Clock 4800 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM4
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070

VRAM 8 GB GDDR5
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1683 MHz MHz
TDP 150 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 5900X + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 in Thief

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 48.4
3840x2160 Medium 39.3
3840x2160 High 31.6
3840x2160 Ultra 30.9
2560x1440 Low 84.5
2560x1440 Medium 65.3
2560x1440 High 52.1
2560x1440 Ultra 47.2
1920x1080 Low 127.5
1920x1080 Medium 99.8
1920x1080 High 76.1
1920x1080 Ultra 72.9

Thief with GTX 1070 + Other CPUs

See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 5900X + GTX 1070

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.