Thief
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 64 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 28 | 30 | 39 | 51 |
| 1440p QHD | 48 | 51 | 66 | 88 |
| 1080p Full HD | 70 | 74 | 97 | 128 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with AMD Ryzen 7 3700X + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 delivers a solid 1080p experience in Thief, with the data indicating that the Medium preset offers the best balance of visual fidelity and frame rate, while the High preset remains perfectly playable. At 1440p, Medium is the recommended sweet spot, while 4K gaming is only viable at Low settings. This combination ranks in the 82.8th percentile of all tested combos for this game, placing it in the upper tier of systems, but its performance is clearly bounded by the GPU, especially at higher resolutions.
Settings Recommendations
The measured frame rates for this combination across three resolutions and four settings presets provide a clear picture of the performance scaling. At 1920x1080, the system is capable of high frame rates across all presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 128 FPS, which is exceptionally fluid and leaves significant headroom for any potential frame drops. The Medium preset is a strong recommendation as it delivers an average of 97 FPS with a minimum of 82 FPS and a maximum of 111 FPS. This indicates a stable, highly playable experience with a noticeable boost in visual quality over Low. The High preset is also very playable, with an average of 74 FPS. The Ultra preset, at an average of 70 FPS, shows a diminishing return for the performance cost, as it is only 4 FPS slower than High but with the highest visual demands. For the best overall experience at 1080p, the Medium preset is the clear choice, as it maintains an average well above 60 FPS with a comfortable minimum, providing the best balance between performance and graphical quality.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates begin to drop, but the system remains competent. The Low preset yields an average of 88 FPS, which is more than adequate for smooth gameplay. The Medium preset is again the standout recommendation, with an average of 66 FPS and a minimum of 56 FPS. This ensures that the gameplay remains fluid in most scenes, making it the best choice for a high-resolution experience. The High preset produces an average of 51 FPS, which is playable but begins to approach the lower bounds of what is considered ideal for a fast-paced action game. The Ultra preset, at an average of 48 FPS, is the least desirable option at this resolution, as performance dips below the 50 FPS mark. For a 1440p setup, the Medium preset is the optimal choice, providing the best performance while still maintaining a good level of graphical fidelity.
At the demanding resolution of 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor, and the settings recommendations must be adjusted accordingly. The Low preset is the only viable option, delivering an average of 51 FPS, which is playable. The Medium preset provides an average of 39 FPS with a minimum of 33 FPS, a playable but not ideal experience, as it may struggle during intense scenes. The High and Ultra presets, with averages of 30 FPS and 28 FPS respectively, are effectively unplayable for a smooth experience. For 4K, the Low preset is the only recommended setting, as it is the sole point of performance. The data clearly indicates that for most users, 1080p Medium or 1440p Medium provides the best experience.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 is a central component in determining this system's performance in Thief. The card is based on the Pascal architecture, fabricated on a 16 nm process at TSMC, and features the GP104 chip. It includes 1,920 shading units and 64 ROPs. These specifications are directly relevant to the game's rendering workload. The GPU's core clock is 1506 MHz with a boost clock of 1683 MHz, which are the base operating frequencies for this processor. In terms of memory, it is equipped with 8 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 256.3 GB/s. This memory configuration is a critical factor in the game's performance, especially at higher resolutions where larger amounts of data need to be processed.
The benchmark data shows the GTX 1070's performance relative to its peers. Its average benchmark score is 9,780, and it sits at the 47th percentile of all GPUs. Among its nearest rivals, the AMD FirePro W5000 is a close competitor, with an average score of 9,803, a negligible 0.2% difference. The NVIDIA Quadro M2000M is another close rival, with an average score of 9,832, 0.5% higher. The NVIDIA Tesla M10 and Tesla C2070 are also in the same performance tier, with scores of 9,724 and 9,716, respectively, putting the GTX 1070 slightly ahead of both. This positioning suggests that the GTX 1070 is a mid-to-upper tier graphics card from a previous generation, and its performance in this game will be constrained by its age but still capable of handling the game's engine.
The GPU's memory is a critical factor. With 8 GB of GDDR5 memory, the card has a substantial capacity for the game's assets. The game, released in 2014, was designed for systems of that era, and the 8 GB frame buffer is more than sufficient for the textures and geometry of the game. The bandwidth of 256.3 GB/s, while not top-of-the-line, is enough to feed the GPU at the frame rates observed. The data shows that at 1080p, the GPU is not the bottleneck, as frame rates are high across all presets. However, as the resolution increases to 1440p and 2160p, the GPU's workload increases, and the frame rate drops. This indicates that the GPU is the primary factor limiting performance at higher resolutions, as the pixel count and fill rate requirements increase.
The GTX 1070's boost clock of 1683 MHz is the maximum frequency that the GPU can reach under load, and the performance results show that it can sustain high frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. The GPU's ROPs and TMUs are also essential. The 64 ROPs handle the final pixel output, while the 120 TMUs handle texture mapping. For a game that relies heavily on lighting and shadows, these units are critical. The data shows that at 4K, the GPU's capabilities are stretched, with the Ultra preset falling to an average of 28 FPS. This is a clear sign that the GPU is the limiting factor at this resolution, as the CPU is not the primary constraint. The GPU's performance in this game is solid, but it has clear limits, particularly at 4K.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 3700X is a powerful processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, based on the Zen 2 architecture, fabricated on a 7 nm process. Its base clock is 3.60 GHz and can boost up to 4.40 GHz. This is a significant amount of processing power, more than enough to handle the game's CPU requirements. The CPU's performance in general benchmarks is strong. In Cinebench R15, it scores 2,092 points in multi-core and 204 in single-core. In Geekbench, it scores 8,899 in multi-core and 1,593 in single-core. These numbers indicate a very capable processor for both multithreaded and single-threaded workloads.
The CPU's overall performance percentile is the 84th, meaning it performs better than 84% of all tested CPUs. Its average benchmark score is 34,260. Among its nearest rivals, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 350 has an average score of 34,222, a negligible 0.1% difference, putting the two on par. The AMD EPYC 4244P also scores 34,220, again a 0.1% difference. The Intel Core i5-13450HX is a bit higher, with a score of 34,333, giving the Ryzen a 0.2% deficit. The Intel Core Ultra 7 165H has a score of 34,083, putting the Ryzen 0.5% ahead. This demonstrates that the 3700X is a high-end CPU that competes with some of the best processors in the market, despite being from an older generation.
In the context of this game, the CPU's performance is more than sufficient. The data shows that the frame rates are largely dictated by the GPU, not the CPU. At 1080p, even with the Low preset yielding 128 FPS, the CPU is able to keep up without becoming a bottleneck. The CPU's high single-thread performance (a Cinebench R15 score of 204 and a Geekbench single-core score of 1,593) ensures that the game's main thread logic is handled efficiently. The multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R15 multi-core score of 2,092, is also crucial for handling background tasks and game physics. The high transistor count of 3,800 million on a 74 mm² die size reflects the CPU's complexity and capability.
The CPU's performance in the game is reflected in the frame rates when the resolution is lowered. At 1080p, the frame rate is high, indicating the CPU is not a limiting factor. Even at 4K, when the GPU is heavily stressed, the CPU is not the primary bottleneck, as the frame rate drops from 128 FPS at 1080p Low to 51 FPS at 4K Low, which is a direct result of the GPU's workload. The Ryzen 7 3700X is a high-end CPU that will not hold back the GTX 1070 in this game. Its the memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s is also sufficient for the game's needs, and the dual-channel memory support ensures adequate data throughput. The CPU's performance in the game is not a weak point, and the results show that the GPU is the primary constraint.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Ryzen 7 3700X and GTX 1070 ranks 3,079th out of a possible 3,720 tested combinations for this game. This places it in the 82.9th percentile, meaning it performs better than 82.9% of all tested configs. This is a solid ranking, indicating that the system is well above average for this game. While not a top-tier 4K beast, it is a very capable mid-to-high range configuration. The rank is determined by the measured FPS data, which shows the system's strengths and weaknesses. The ranking is a reflection of the balanced performance between the CPU and GPU, but the GPU's limitations at high resolutions are the main factor preventing a higher rank.
The system's ranking is also influenced by the GPU's overall performance. The GTX 1070 has a percentile of 47% relative to all GPUs, which is a major factor. Its performance is in the lower half of all GPUs, but its score of 9,780 is still respectable. The CPU's percentile of 84% is much higher, but it is not the sole determinant of ranking, as the GPU is the bottleneck. The data shows that the combo is capable of achieving good frame rates in the vast majority of settings, and the ranking reflects that. The rank of 3,079 is likely to be in the lower half of the top 1,000, but it is a strong performance for a system with a last-gen GPU.
The ranking is also a function of the game's age. The game was released on 2014-02-24, and the tech has moved on. This system is still capable of running it at high frame rates, but newer CPUs and GPUs are much faster. The ranking is a good indicator of the system's performance relative to other tested combos, and it shows that this system is a still viable option for playing the game. The system's performance is strong enough to be in the top 17% of all combos, which is a positive sign. The key takeaway is that this combo is a competent performer, but not a top-tier, and its rank reflects that.
Resolution Scaling
The measured frame rates across the three resolutions provide a clear picture of how the system scales with resolution. At 1080p (1920x1080), the Low preset achieves an average of 128 FPS. When moving to 1440p, the Low preset average drops to 88 FPS, a 31% reduction. At 4K, the Low preset average is 51 FPS, a significant 60% drop from 1080p. This demonstrates a consistent performance degradation as the resolution increases. The frame rate drops are not linear, with a larger drop from 1440p to 4K than from 1080p to 1440p. This indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the pixel count increase is the main performance.
Looking at the Medium preset, the frame drop is similar. At 1080p, the Medium preset averages 97 FPS. At 1440p, it drops to 66 FPS, a 32% reduction. At 4K, it drops to 39 FPS, a 60% drop. This again shows the GPU is the main bottleneck. The High preset at 1080p averages 74 FPS, at 1440p it is 51 FPS (a 31% drop), and at 4K it is 30 FPS (a 59% drop). The pattern is consistent: the frame rate drops by roughly 30% from 1080p to 1440p, and another 50-60% from 1440p to 4K.
This scaling behavior is a classic sign of a GPU-limited system. The CPU is not the bottleneck, as the frame rate drops are proportional to the increase in pixels. At 1080p, the GPU can render the game at high speed, but at 4K, the GPU's fill rate and bandwidth are not enough to maintain high frame rates. The data shows that the GTX 1070 is a 1080p-centric GPU, and its performance at 4K is only acceptable at Low settings. The CPU's performance is not a factor in these drops, as the frame rate is high at 1080p and the drop is due to the GPU. The system is clearly limited by the GPU at higher resolutions.
FAQ
Q: What is the best setting for 1080p gameplay with this system?
A: The Medium preset offers the best balance, with an average of 97 FPS and a minimum of 82 FPS.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Thief?
A: At 4K, only the Low preset is playable, with an average of 51 FPS. Higher presets result in averages below 40 FPS.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?
A: The GPU is the primary limiting factor, as frame rates drop significantly with resolution, while the CPU's performance is more than sufficient.
Q: How does the GTX 1070 compare to its nearest rivals?
A: It is 0.2% slower than the AMD FirePro W5000 and Quadro M2000M, but 0.6% faster than the NVIDIA Tesla M10 and 0.7% faster than the Tesla C2070.
Q: What is the combo's ranking among all tested systems?
A: It ranks 3,079 out of 3,720 combos, placing it in the 82.9th percentile.
Q: Does the Ryzen 7 3700X's core count help in this game?
A: The 8 cores and 16 threads are more than enough, as the game is not CPU-heavy, but the CPU's strong single-thread performance (a 223 in a Cinebench R15 single-core) ensures smooth gameplay.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 3700X + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 51.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 39.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 30.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 28.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 88.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 66.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 51.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 48.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 128.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 97.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 74.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 70.0 |
Thief with GTX 1070 + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 3700X + GTX 1070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.