Thief

Thief, a 2014 stealth title, may be older, but the benchmark data for the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti combo reveals a system that handles it with significant authority. The combination ranks 1010 out of 2851 tested combos for this game, placing it comfortably in the upper echelon of performance. This is a pairing where the modern GPU and CPU provide a substantial surplus of power, ensuring that the game’s engine is rarely the limiting factor, even at the highest settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 1010 out of 2851 tested configurations places it in the 65th percentile of all tested systems, meaning it outperforms nearly two-thirds of the other hardware pairings in the database for Thief. This suggests a high level of capability, but the data also shows that a significant number of combos can achieve better results, likely due to even more powerful CPUs or GPUs. The ranking is a strong indicator that this system is not a bottleneck for the game, but it also isn't at the absolute apex of performance.

Looking at the individual components, the CPU’s average benchmark score of 36945 places it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, which is a very strong showing. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, scores nearly identically at 36938, with a delta of 0%. The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D is just 0.2% behind, and the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is 0.4% behind. This indicates the 5600F is in a highly competitive performance tier, where minor architectural differences result in negligible performance gaps. The GPU is similarly positioned, with an average benchmark score of 44795 and an 84th percentile ranking. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile, is only 0.8% ahead, while the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT is 1.3% ahead. The RTX A6000 trails by 1.6%, showing the 4070 Ti is at the top of its class.

The measured FPS in Thief reinforces this high ranking. The system never dips below 66 FPS in any tested configuration, and at 1080p, it consistently exceeds 111 FPS. This performance level is far above what is needed for smooth gameplay, confirming that the combo’s high rank is reflected in real-world results. The data implies that for this specific title, the hardware is not the primary constraint, and the experience will be defined by the display's refresh rate and the user's settings preferences rather than hardware limitations.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a central figure in this combo’s performance. Its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s, which is more than sufficient for a game from 2014. The GPU’s core clocks are also a key factor; with a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz, the card can push significant frame rates. The data shows that the GPU is not a bottleneck at any resolution tested, as even at 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 66, which is playable.

The GPU’s role becomes more apparent when analyzing the performance scaling. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 138 FPS. When the resolution is increased to 4K Low, the average FPS drops to 102. This 36 FPS drop is relatively modest, indicating that the GPU has ample headroom. The shading units, 7680 in total, and the 80 ROPs are clearly capable of handling the pixel throughput demanded by 4K. The 40.09 TFLOPS of FP32 compute power is also a strong indicator of its ability to process the game’s graphics data.

The GPU’s high texture rate of 626.4 GTexel/s and pixel rate of 208.8 GPixel/s are crucial for maintaining high FPS with detailed textures. In Thief, the difference between High and Ultra settings at 1080p is only 2 FPS (113 vs 111), which suggests that the GPU is so fast that the added visual fidelity of Ultra settings comes at almost no performance cost. This is a hallmark of a GPU that is overqualified for the task at hand, providing a smooth and consistent experience regardless of the graphical load.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows clear scaling patterns as resolution increases, which helps identify the system's limiting component. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 138 at 1080p to 121 at 1440p and then to 102 at 4K. This is a steady decline, but the performance remains high. At Medium settings, the drop is from 124 at 1080p to 110 at 1440p and 91 at 4K. This scaling suggests that the GPU is beginning to feel the pressure of more pixels, but it still maintains very playable frame rates.

The most telling data point is at High settings. Here, the average FPS drops from 113 at 1080p to 99 at 1440p and then to 70 at 4K. The 29 FPS drop from 1440p to 4K is the largest single-step decline in the dataset, indicating that the GPU is becoming the primary bottleneck as the pixel count increases. At 4K High, the frame rate is still respectable, but it is clear that the GPU is working much harder. The Ultra settings tell a similar story, with a drop from 111 FPS at 1080p to 98 FPS at 1440p and finally to 66 FPS at 4K.

This pattern implies that at 1080p and 1440p, the CPU is likely contributing more to the overall performance ceiling, or at least that the GPU has enough headroom to not be the limiting factor. However, at 4K, the GPU’s workload becomes so significant that it dictates the final frame rate. The data suggests that for a 4K display, the user will need to adjust settings to maintain high FPS, whereas at 1440p and below, the system can handle even the most demanding presets with ease.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured data, the ideal settings depend heavily on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p, the system is so powerful that the Ultra preset, with an average FPS of 111, is the recommended choice. The difference between Ultra and High is only 2 FPS, so there is little reason to not select the highest visual quality. For 1440p, the Ultra preset still averages 98 FPS, which is excellent for a high-refresh-rate monitor, making it the best option.

The situation changes at 4K. The Ultra preset drops to 66 FPS, which is playable but may be below the refresh rate of some high-end displays. The High preset at 4K averages 70 FPS, which is a marginal improvement. The Medium preset, however, provides a significant jump to 91 FPS. Given that the jump from High to Medium is 21 FPS, while the visual difference is often subtle, the Medium preset offers the best balance of performance and fidelity for 4K. The data suggests that for a 4K experience with a target of 90+ FPS, Medium settings are the sweet spot, while High is the maximum for those who prioritize visuals over frame rate.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following is a complete breakdown of the measured average FPS for each resolution and settings combination.

1920x1080:

• Low: 138 FPS
• Medium: 124 FPS (min 106, max 143)
• High: 113 FPS
• Ultra: 111 FPS

2560x1440:

• Low: 121 FPS
• Medium: 110 FPS (min 93, max 126)
• High: 99 FPS
• Ultra: 98 FPS

3840x2160:

• Low: 102 FPS
• Medium: 91 FPS (min 78, max 105)
• High: 70 FPS
• Ultra: 66 FPS

The data clearly shows a consistent hierarchy, with Low settings always yielding the highest frame rates and Ultra the lowest. The Medium settings provide a balanced middle ground, with the min and max FPS indicating that the frame time is relatively stable, especially at 1440p. The 4K High and Ultra results are the only ones that dip below the 70 FPS mark, suggesting that this resolution is where the hardware begins to show its limits.

FAQ

Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo can achieve in Thief?

A: The highest average FPS is 138, which is achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: At 4K resolution, which settings preset provides the highest average FPS?

A: The Low preset provides the highest average FPS at 4K, with a score of 102 FPS.

Q: How much of a performance difference is there between High and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: The difference is minimal. High settings average 99 FPS, while Ultra settings average 98 FPS, a delta of just 1 FPS.

Q: Is the system more limited by the CPU or the GPU at 1080p?

A: The data suggests the system is not heavily limited by either at 1080p, as the FPS remains very high. The small performance gap between High and Ultra settings indicates the GPU has significant headroom.

Q: What is the lowest average FPS recorded for this combo?

A: The lowest average FPS is 66, which occurs at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings.

Q: How does the CPU's benchmark score compare to its closest rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F has an average benchmark score of 36945, which is essentially identical to its closest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 5 225, which scores 36938, a 0% difference.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture. With a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.00 GHz, it provides a solid foundation for gaming. The CPU's 32 MB of shared L3 cache is a key asset, as it helps reduce memory latency and improves performance in games that rely on frequent data access. Its benchmark results, particularly the Passmark single-thread score of 2872, indicate strong per-core performance, which is crucial for many game engines.

In Thief, the CPU's role appears to be supportive rather than a bottleneck. At 1080p, the system achieves very high frame rates, and the difference between Low and Ultra settings is only 27 FPS (138 vs 111). This suggests that the CPU can easily feed the GPU with data, even at lower resolutions where CPU load is typically higher. The CPU's 85th percentile ranking against all CPUs reinforces that it is a high-performing part that won't hold back a powerful GPU like the RTX 4070 Ti.

The data implies that for this specific game, the CPU's performance is more than adequate. The system's performance scaling is largely dictated by the GPU as resolution increases, which is the expected behavior for a balanced system. The CPU's strong multi-threaded score of 19236 in the Passmark test also ensures that any background tasks or game logic won't cause performance dips. Overall, the Ryzen 5 5600F provides a stable and capable platform, allowing the GPU to deliver its full potential in Thief.