Thief
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 106 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 55 | 58 | 78 | 103 |
| 1440p QHD | 97 | 102 | 122 | 131 |
| 1080p Full HD | 120 | 121 | 138 | 150 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Thief with AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti, In-Depth Analysis
FAQ
Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + RTX 3080 Ti combination rank in Thief?
A: This combo ranks 585th out of 1,642 tested hardware combinations in the game’s database, placing it in the upper third of all systems. The CPU sits at the 79th percentile among all processors, while the GPU reaches the 83rd percentile among all graphics cards, indicating both components are above-average performers for their respective categories.
Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p Ultra settings?
A: At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the system delivers an average of 119.6 FPS. This is remarkably close to the 121 FPS recorded at High settings, suggesting that the Ultra preset’s additional graphical effects are handled with minimal performance penalty at this resolution.
Q: Is the RTX 3080 Ti a bottleneck at 4K Ultra?
A: Benchmark results indicate the GPU becomes the limiting factor at 3840x2160 Ultra, where average FPS drops to 55. The RTX 3080 Ti’s 12 GB GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus with 912.4 GB/s bandwidth is substantial, yet the 4K Ultra workload still pushes the card to its limits, producing a sub-60 FPS experience.
Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5500 compare to its nearest CPU rivals?
A: The Ryzen 5 5500’s average benchmark score of 20,875 is statistically tied with the Intel Core i5-12500 (20,897, -0.1% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4655GE (20,900, -0.1% delta), AMD EPYC 7J13 (20,845, +0.1% delta), and Intel Core i5-12600T (20,917, -0.2% delta). The differences are negligible, meaning the 5500 performs essentially identically to these competitors.
Q: What is the difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p?
A: At 2560x1440, Low settings produce an average of 130.5 FPS, while Ultra yields 96.9 FPS. This represents a 25.8% reduction in frame rate when moving from the lowest to highest quality preset, which is a moderate performance cost for the visual improvements Ultra provides.
Q: Does the game scale better with CPU or GPU performance?
A: The data shows GPU-bound scaling. At 1080p Low, the system hits 150.2 FPS, but at 4K Ultra it falls to 55 FPS. The CPU’s multi-threaded Cinebench R23 score of 16,429 is strong, but the frame rate drops are consistent with GPU limitations as resolution increases, not CPU constraints.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti is the dominant component in this pairing for Thief’s rendering workload. Built on the Ampere architecture with a GA102 chip manufactured on Samsung’s 8 nm process, this GPU packs 10,240 shading units, 320 texture mapping units, and 112 raster operation pipelines. The card operates at a base clock of 1365 MHz with a boost clock of 1665 MHz, and its memory runs at 1188 MHz with 19 Gbps effective speed.
The 12 GB GDDR6X frame buffer is critical for Thief’s larger texture sets and shadow maps. At 4K resolution, the memory subsystem delivers 912.4 GB/s of bandwidth across a 384-bit bus, which is essential for maintaining playable frame rates. The measured results confirm this: at 3840x2160 Ultra, the system averages 55 FPS, while dropping to High settings yields 58.1 FPS — a modest gain that suggests the GPU is nearing its architectural limits at 4K.
At lower resolutions, the GPU’s raw compute power shines. The card’s FP32 throughput of 34.10 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 186.5 GPixel/s allow it to push well beyond 100 FPS at 1440p across all settings. The RTX 3080 Ti’s nearest rival, the RTX 3090, has a negligible 0.5% higher average benchmark score, meaning Thief’s performance here is representative of top-tier Ampere graphics. The GPU’s 83rd percentile ranking among all graphics cards underscores its capability, though Thief’s 2014 engine does not utilize ray tracing or DLSS features, relying instead on traditional rasterization where this card excels.
Resolution Scaling
The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of GPU-bound scaling as resolution increases. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at Ultra settings, the average frame rate drops from 119.6 to 96.9 FPS — a 19% reduction. The subsequent jump to 3840x2160 at Ultra produces a more dramatic 43% drop to 55 FPS from the 1440p figure.
At Low settings, the scaling is even more pronounced. The system achieves 150.2 FPS at 1080p Low, 130.5 FPS at 1440p Low, and 102.8 FPS at 4K Low. This represents a 31.6% decline from 1080p to 4K at the lowest quality preset. The fact that even Low settings at 4K cannot maintain 120+ FPS indicates the pixel throughput requirement at 4K is the primary constraint, rather than shader complexity or texture bandwidth.
Medium settings show the most linear scaling: 138.2 FPS at 1080p, 121.9 FPS at 1440p, and 77.7 FPS at 4K. The 1440p to 4K drop of 36.2% is steeper than the 1080p to 1440p drop of 11.8%, confirming that the GPU’s fill rate and memory bandwidth become increasingly strained as resolution grows. At High settings, the pattern repeats: 121 FPS at 1080p, 102.3 FPS at 1440p, and 58.1 FPS at 4K. The data suggests that Thief is almost entirely GPU-limited across all resolutions, with the Ryzen 5 5500 providing sufficient CPU headroom even at 1080p where frame rates exceed 150 FPS.
Measured FPS Breakdown
1920x1080: The system delivers its highest frame rates at this resolution. Low settings produce an average of 150.2 FPS, which is the maximum recorded across the entire test matrix. Medium settings yield 138.2 FPS, High settings achieve 121 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 119.6 FPS. The spread between Low and Ultra is 30.6 FPS, or 20.4%, which is the smallest relative spread across all resolutions tested.
2560x1440: At 1440p, the average frame rates remain highly playable across all presets. Low settings hit 130.5 FPS, Medium settings reach 121.9 FPS, High settings deliver 102.3 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 96.9 FPS. The difference between Medium and High (19.6 FPS) is larger than the difference between High and Ultra (5.4 FPS), suggesting diminishing returns at the top end of the quality spectrum.
3840x2160: The 4K results show the most significant performance variation. Ultra settings yield 55 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold many players consider essential. High settings improve this to 58.1 FPS, still marginal for smooth gameplay. Medium settings provide a more comfortable 77.7 FPS, while Low settings achieve 102.8 FPS. The gap between Ultra and Low at 4K is 47.8 FPS, indicating that quality preset choices have the largest impact at this resolution.
Across all settings, the 1080p to 4K degradation ranges from 31.6% (Low) to 54% (Ultra). The High preset’s 52% drop from 121 FPS to 58.1 FPS highlights that Thief’s higher-quality effects — likely including advanced shadows and post-processing — disproportionately tax the GPU at 4K.
Settings Recommendations
For players targeting 60 FPS as a baseline, the data indicates that 4K Ultra (55 FPS) and 4K High (58.1 FPS) both fall short. The Medium preset at 4K (77.7 FPS) is the minimum quality level that comfortably exceeds 60 FPS while providing a substantial visual upgrade over Low. Given that Medium at 4K delivers 77.7 FPS versus Low’s 102.8 FPS, the 24.4% performance cost buys meaningful graphical fidelity improvements.
At 1440p, all presets exceed 90 FPS, making the Ultra setting (96.9 FPS) the recommended choice for players with high-refresh-rate monitors. The difference between High (102.3 FPS) and Ultra (96.9 FPS) is only 5.3%, so the Ultra preset’s additional effects are nearly free at this resolution. For players who prioritize maximum frame rates, Low (130.5 FPS) or Medium (121.9 FPS) are viable, but the visual compromises may not be justified given the Ultra preset’s solid performance.
At 1080p, the Ultra preset (119.6 FPS) is the optimal choice. It delivers a near-identical frame rate to High (121 FPS), with a negligible 1.2% difference. The Medium (138.2 FPS) and Low (150.2 FPS) presets offer higher frame rates, but the Ultra preset’s performance is already well above the refresh rate of most standard monitors. The 30.6 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is the smallest across all resolutions, reinforcing that the GPU has ample headroom at this resolution.
The overall best experience per the measured rows is the Ultra preset at 1440p, which balances a 96.9 FPS average with the highest visual quality available. For 4K users, the Medium preset (77.7 FPS) represents the sweet spot, delivering smooth gameplay without the steep performance penalty of High or Ultra. This combination of the Ryzen 5 5500 and RTX 3080 Ti is best utilized at 1440p Ultra, where the system’s strengths are fully realized without hitting the GPU’s 4K limitations.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 5500
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5500 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti in Thief
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 102.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 77.7 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 58.1 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 55.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 130.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 121.9 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 102.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 96.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 150.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 138.2 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 121.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 119.6 |
Thief with Ryzen 5 5500 + Other GPUs
See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Thief with RTX 3080 Ti + Other CPUs
See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 5500 + RTX 3080 Ti
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.