The Technomancer

The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents an interesting scalability test for the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 pairing. The data indicates this combination is exceptionally powerful, ranking in the top percentile of all tested configurations. The benchmark results show that this system is capable of delivering high frame rates even at demanding 4K resolutions, with performance scaling predictably as settings are adjusted from Low to Ultra.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 is a 20-core, 20-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture. It operates with a base clock of 2.40 GHz and can boost up to 5.30 GHz, supported by a 30 MB shared L3 cache. This processing power places the CPU in the 93rd percentile of all tested processors, indicating it is a top-tier performer for gaming workloads. In the context of The Technomancer, a game from 2016, the CPU's high single-thread performance, evidenced by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 5960, ensures that game logic and physics calculations are handled with minimal bottleneck.

While the game may not utilize all 20 cores, the processor's robust multi-threaded capabilities, demonstrated by a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 42216, provide ample headroom. The data shows that the CPU's average benchmark score is 64640, which is nearly identical to its nearest rivals. For instance, the AMD EPYC 4464P has an average score of 64823, a negligible -0.3% difference, while the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F scores 64438, a 0.3% difference. This suggests that in CPU-bound scenarios, the Core Ultra 7 265 is on par with these alternatives, providing consistent performance.

The measured frame rates in The Technomancer suggest that at lower resolutions like 1920x1080, the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU with enough data to reach very high frame rates, such as 329 FPS on Low settings. The high boost clock of 5.30 GHz is likely a key factor in these results, as it ensures fast response times for the game's core logic threads. The processor's 65W TDP also indicates efficient power delivery, which helps maintain sustained boost clocks during extended gaming sessions, contributing to stable frame times. Overall, the data confirms that the Core Ultra 7 265 is more than sufficient for this title, providing a strong foundation for the system's overall performance.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is the dominant component in this configuration, utilizing the AD102 chip and Ada Lovelace architecture. It features 24 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 384-bit bus, providing a massive 1.01 TB/s of memory bandwidth. This is crucial for high-resolution textures and effects, which The Technomancer can leverage at 4K. The GPU's base clock is 2235 MHz, boosting up to 2520 MHz, and it has a significant 82.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. This raw power translates directly to high frame rates, particularly at lower settings where the GPU is less constrained.

Benchmark results for the RTX 4090 show an average score of 60347, placing it in the 88th percentile of all GPUs. Interestingly, its nearest rivals are professional workstation cards, such as the Intel Arc Pro A60 and AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48, which have nearly identical average scores. This highlights the RTX 4090's position as a top-tier consumer product, with its closest competitors being in a different market segment. The 24 GB VRAM is a significant advantage, ensuring that even the most demanding textures in The Technomancer will not exceed memory limits, preventing potential stuttering.

The data shows a clear correlation between GPU load and resolution. At 3840x2160, the RTX 4090 produces an average of 77 FPS on High settings, which is a demanding workload. In contrast, at 1920x1080 on High settings, the average frame rate jumps to 216 FPS, indicating that the GPU is less of a bottleneck at lower resolutions. The 21 Gbps effective memory speed is a key contributor here, allowing the GPU to quickly access texture data. The GPU's 128 RT cores and 512 tensor cores are not directly relevant to this non-ray-traced title, but the sheer compute power of its 16384 shading units is what drives the impressive frame rates seen in the measured data.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the performance difference between the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and the Intel Core Ultra 7 265F?

A: The benchmark data shows a negligible difference. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265 has an average score of 64640, while the 265F scores 64438, making the 265 a 0.3% faster variant in synthetic tests.

Q: How does the RTX 4090's benchmark score compare to its closest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M?

A: The RTX 4090 has an average benchmark score of 60347, which is 2.5% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M's score of 61896. This indicates the RTX 4090 is slightly ahead in overall compute performance.

Q: What are the average frame rates for the RTX 4090 at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the system achieves an average of 165 FPS, with a minimum of 140 FPS and a maximum of 190 FPS, indicating strong and consistent performance.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to be a bottleneck at 1080p Low settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system reaches an average of 329 FPS. This high frame rate suggests the CPU is well-equipped to handle the game's logic, and the GPU is not heavily stressed, indicating a balanced configuration where neither component is a significant bottleneck at this setting.

Q: What is the difference in average FPS between High and Ultra settings at 4K resolution?

A: At 3840x2160, the High preset yields an average of 77 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to an average of 61 FPS. This represents a 16 FPS decrease in performance when moving from High to Ultra.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 7 265 compare to the AMD EPYC 9124 in average benchmark score?

A: The Core Ultra 7 265 has an average score of 64640, which is 0.7% higher than the AMD EPYC 9124's score of 65104, showing they are essentially equivalent in performance.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 7 265 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 is ranked 60th out of 2825 tested combinations for The Technomancer. This places the system in the top 2% of all configurations, which is a remarkable result. The data confirms that this pairing is exceptionally well-suited for this title, providing an experience that is superior to the vast majority of other hardware setups. The high rank is a direct consequence of the strengths of both components: the CPU's strong single-thread performance for game logic and the GPU's immense rasterization power.

This top-tier ranking is reflected in the measured frame rates, which are extremely high across all resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system consistently exceeds 169 FPS even on the Ultra preset, and at 2560x1440, it maintains an average of over 110 FPS on Ultra. The only scenario where the system drops below 60 FPS is at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, where it averages 61 FPS. This suggests that the combination is near the peak of what is achievable, and only the most demanding settings at 4K challenge it. The data indicates that users with this combination will have a significant performance advantage over most other systems.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a detailed look at how the system performs across different settings and resolutions. At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional performance. On Low settings, it achieves an average of 329 FPS. Medium settings yield an average of 253 FPS, with a minimum of 215 FPS and a maximum of 291 FPS. High settings produce an average of 216 FPS, and Ultra settings still provide a very high average of 169 FPS. This shows that at 1080p, the system is not constrained by any component, delivering smooth gameplay even at the highest settings.

At 2560x1440, performance remains outstanding. The Low preset averages 215 FPS, while Medium averages 165 FPS with a minimum of 140 FPS and a maximum of 190 FPS. High settings average 141 FPS, and Ultra settings maintain a strong average of 110 FPS. This resolution provides a good balance between visual fidelity and high refresh rates, with all settings comfortably above 100 FPS. The data confirms that 1440p is a sweet spot for this combination, allowing for high frame rates without sacrificing visual quality.

At 3840x2160, the system still delivers very playable performance. Low settings average 118 FPS. Medium settings average 91 FPS with a minimum of 77 FPS and a maximum of 104 FPS. High settings average 77 FPS, while Ultra settings drop to an average of 61 FPS. This is the only resolution where the system struggles to maintain very high frame rates, with the Ultra preset hovering near the 60 FPS threshold. The data shows a clear progression of performance degradation as resolution and settings increase, with the 4K Ultra preset being the most demanding scenario tested.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured data, the optimal settings depend on the user's display and preference for frame rate versus visual quality. For users with a 1920x1080 display, the High preset is an excellent choice, delivering an average of 216 FPS. This provides a very high frame rate that is well-suited for fast-paced action, and the visual quality is significantly better than Low or Medium. While Ultra also performs well at 169 FPS, the difference between High and Ultra may not be worth the 47 FPS performance cost for most users, making High the most balanced option.

For 2560x1440 displays, the High preset offers an average of 141 FPS, which is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. This setting provides a great balance between visual fidelity and performance. The Ultra preset is also viable, with an average of 110 FPS, but it comes with a 31 FPS reduction compared to High. For users who prioritize a higher frame rate, the Medium preset at 165 FPS is a good alternative, offering a significant boost over High while still providing decent visuals. The data suggests that High is the recommended preset for 1440p, as it provides a smooth and immersive experience.

At 3840x2160, the choice is more nuanced. The High preset averages 77 FPS, which is a solid performance level for 4K gaming, providing a good balance of quality and speed. The Medium preset, at 91 FPS, is also a strong option, offering a higher frame rate with a minor reduction in visual quality. The Ultra preset, while visually the most impressive at an average of 61 FPS, is right at the edge of the typical 60 FPS target. For the best experience at 4K, the Medium or High presets are recommended, as they provide a more comfortable performance margin. The Ultra preset is best suited for users with variable refresh rate displays who can tolerate the lower average FPS.