The Technomancer

The Technomancer is an Action RPG from 2016, and benchmark results for the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7800M show a configuration that is heavily dependent on resolution and settings to deliver a smooth experience. The data indicates a strong 1080p performer, a capable 1440p option, but a system that struggles to maintain playable framerates at 4K Ultra. The combination ranks in the 34th percentile of tested combos, suggesting that while the individual components are competent, their pairing yields mid-pack results for this specific title.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in The Technomancer?

A: The data shows 1920x1080 as the most effective resolution, with average framerates ranging from 74 FPS at Ultra settings to 145 FPS at Low settings. At 2560x1440, the average framerates drop to between 48 FPS and 95 FPS, while 3840x2160 results in averages from 27 FPS to 52 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H has an average benchmark score of 32697. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T, scores 32707, which is a 0% delta. The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 scores 32662, placing it 0.1% ahead of the Ultra 7 155H, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H scores 32812, which is -0.4% behind.

Q: Is the GPU's performance closer to professional or consumer cards?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800M has an average benchmark score of 27883 and sits in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20, scores 27839, which is a 0.2% delta, showing it is closely matched with a professional-grade card.

Q: What is the framerate difference between High and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the High preset yields an average of 62 FPS, while the Ultra preset yields an average of 48 FPS. This represents a 14 FPS drop in performance when moving from High to Ultra settings.

Q: Does the CPU's multi-threaded performance stand out?

A: Yes, its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 15028, and its Passmark multithread score is 24873. This indicates a strong multi-threaded capacity, which is further supported by its 16 cores and 22 threads.

Q: How much VRAM does the GPU have, and what is its memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7800M is equipped with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, providing a memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7800M is the primary driver of visual performance in The Technomancer, and its specifications explain the observed framerate scaling. The GPU features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 192-bit memory bus, which provides a 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. This memory configuration is substantial for a 2016 title, ensuring that texture loading and memory-intensive effects are not likely bottlenecks at standard resolutions. The GPU's architecture is RDNA 3.0, built on a 5 nm process, and it contains 3840 shading units. Its boost clock is listed at 2335 MHz, with a game clock of 2145 MHz, which are significant factors in its raw rendering throughput.

Benchmark results show the GPU's overall capability. Its Passmark G3D score is 17613, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2994. In Geekbench, it scores 120778 in OpenCL and 126668 in Vulkan, demonstrating strong compute and API-specific performance. These scores place the GPU in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. When compared to its nearest rivals, the data shows it is nearly identical in average score to the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 20 (27839 vs 27883, a 0.2% delta) and slightly behind the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti (28020, a -0.5% delta). This places the RX 7800M in a performance tier that is competitive with high-end consumer and professional cards from the past generation.

The impact of the GPU is clear in the measured FPS. At 1920x1080, the GPU handles the game with ease, producing an average of 145 FPS on Low and 95 FPS on High. The transition to 2560x1440 shows a predictable performance cost, with the High preset averaging 62 FPS. The most demanding scenario, 3840x2160, sees the GPU's limits exposed, with the Ultra preset averaging only 27 FPS. This pattern indicates that the RX 7800M's 12 GB VRAM and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for high-detail textures at 1440p, but the sheer pixel count at 4K overwhelms its rendering capabilities.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 7 155H serves as the central processor, and its specifications suggest it is well-equipped to feed the GPU in The Technomancer. This CPU is part of the Core Ultra Series 1, built on the Meteor Lake architecture with a 7 nm process. It has 16 cores and 22 threads, a configuration that provides substantial parallelism for modern workloads. Its base clock is 3.80 GHz, and it can boost up to 4.80 GHz. The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and a shared 24 MB of L3 cache. Its memory support is DDR5, running on a dual-channel bus with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

Synthetic benchmarks confirm the CPU's strong processing power. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 15028, and its single-core score is 1743. In Passmark, it achieves a multithread score of 24873 and a single-thread score of 3468. These results place the CPU in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 32697. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-14600T, has a virtually identical average score of 32707 (0% delta). The AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 360 is only 0.1% ahead, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 6850H is 0.4% behind. This indicates the Ultra 7 155H is a top-tier mobile processor in terms of raw compute.

In the context of The Technomancer, a game released in 2016, the CPU's 16 cores and 22 threads are likely more than sufficient to handle the game's logic and physics calculations. The high boost clock of 4.80 GHz is crucial for single-threaded performance, which often dictates minimum framerates in older titles. The data shows that the CPU does not bottleneck the GPU at lower resolutions, as evidenced by the high framerates at 1920x1080. However, at higher resolutions like 3840x2160, the workload shifts almost entirely to the GPU, and the CPU's role becomes less critical, as seen in the significant FPS drops that align with the GPU's limits.

How This Combo Ranks

The pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 7 155H and AMD Radeon RX 7800M achieves a combo rank of 1879 out of 2825 tested combinations in The Technomancer. This places the configuration in the lower half of tested systems, specifically in the 34th percentile. This ranking is somewhat surprising given the individual strengths of the components. The CPU is in the 83rd percentile of all CPUs, and the GPU is in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. The combination of two high-percentile parts resulting in a lower combo rank suggests that the pairing is not optimal for this specific game, or that other tested combos feature parts that are more synergistic for The Technomancer's engine.

The data indicates that the combo's performance is competitive with systems featuring the GPU's nearest rivals. Given that the RX 7800M is within 0.5% of the GTX 980 Ti's average score, the overall gaming experience is likely similar to a system with that card. The rank of 1879 implies that a significant number of other configurations, possibly featuring different CPU-GPU pairings, achieve higher average framerates or more consistent performance across settings. This mid-pack ranking is a key takeaway for potential users, indicating that while the hardware is modern and capable, it does not translate to a top-tier result for this particular game.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of performance scaling across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system is very capable. The Low preset achieves an average of 145 FPS, which is exceptionally smooth. The Medium preset averages 111 FPS with a minimum of 95 and a maximum of 128 FPS. The High preset produces an average of 95 FPS, while the Ultra preset drops to an average of 74 FPS. All of these results are playable, with even the lowest average (Ultra) being well above the standard 60 FPS threshold.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance becomes more demanding. The Low preset averages 95 FPS, which is still very smooth. The Medium preset averages 73 FPS with a minimum of 62 and a maximum of 84 FPS, indicating some frametime variance but remaining playable. The High preset averages 62 FPS, which is right at the edge of the 60 FPS target. The Ultra preset, however, sees a significant drop to an average of 48 FPS, which may feel less fluid.

At 3840x2160, the GPU is under heavy load. The Low preset is the only one to achieve a playable average, at 52 FPS. The Medium preset averages 40 FPS with a minimum of 34 and a maximum of 46 FPS, which is below the ideal threshold for smooth gameplay. The High preset averages 34 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages just 27 FPS. These 4K results clearly show that the combo is not suited for maximum settings at this resolution.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this combo is found at 1920x1080 with the High preset, which delivers an average of 95 FPS. This provides a perfect balance between visual fidelity and performance, as it is significantly smoother than the Ultra preset (74 FPS) while offering better visuals than the Medium preset (111 FPS). For users with high-refresh-rate monitors, the Low preset at 1080p (145 FPS) is the best choice for maximizing framerate.

For 2560x1440, the High preset is the recommended setting, yielding an average of 62 FPS. This is the highest visual quality option that maintains a framerate near the 60 FPS target. The Medium preset offers a more comfortable margin with 73 FPS, but the visual downgrade may not be worth it. The Ultra preset at 48 FPS is not recommended, as the drop below 60 FPS may be noticeable.

At 3840x2160, the data shows that the system is out of its depth for high-fidelity gaming. The Low preset, with an average of 52 FPS, is the only recommended option for playable performance. The Medium preset (40 FPS) and High preset (34 FPS) are below the smoothness threshold, and the Ultra preset (27 FPS) is not suitable for a playable experience. For 4K gaming, users should stick to Low settings or consider lowering the resolution to 1440p for better results.