The Technomancer
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 74 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 27 | 35 | 41 | 54 |
| 1440p QHD | 50 | 64 | 75 | 98 |
| 1080p Full HD | 77 | 98 | 115 | 149 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Technomancer with Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents an interesting challenge for the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT pairing. The measured frame rates reveal a system that is firmly capable at mainstream resolutions but struggles to maintain fluidity at 4K. The data indicates a clear performance hierarchy based on resolution, with the GPU becoming the primary limiting factor as pixel count increases.
Resolution Scaling
The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and tells a clear story about where this combo’s strengths lie. At 1080p with High settings, the system produces an average of 98 FPS, which is exceptionally smooth for an action RPG. Moving to 1440p High, the average drops to 64 FPS, a 34.7% reduction. The jump to 4K High is even more punishing, with the average falling to 35 FPS, a further 45.3% decline from the 1440p result. This scaling pattern is a classic sign of a GPU-bound scenario; the RX 7600 XT is being overwhelmed by the sheer pixel count at 4K.
The trend is consistent across all quality presets. At Low settings, the system achieves 149 FPS at 1080p, 98 FPS at 1440p, and 54 FPS at 4K. This represents a 63.8% total drop from 1080p to 4K. At Ultra settings, the numbers are 77 FPS, 50 FPS, and 27 FPS respectively, a 64.9% total decrease. The consistency of this percentage drop across different presets reinforces that the resolution is the dominant factor, not the complexity of the scene or the CPU's ability to feed the GPU.
The 4K results are the most telling. With an average of 35 FPS on High and only 27 FPS on Ultra, the game becomes borderline unplayable at this resolution. The data suggests that 4K is simply out of reach for this combination, regardless of the quality settings chosen. The system is far more comfortable at 1440p, where even High settings maintain a playable 64 FPS average. At 1080p, the combo excels, pushing well past 60 FPS on all presets and reaching 149 FPS on Low, making it an ideal setup for high-refresh-rate 1080p displays. The fundamental issue is that the RX 7600 XT, with its 128-bit memory bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, cannot sustain the throughput needed for 4K, and the data shows this clearly.
Settings Recommendations
For the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, the 1440p Medium preset is the sweet spot. The measured data shows an average of 75 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. This preset also provides a minimum FPS of 64, ensuring that frame times remain consistent during intense combat sequences. The jump from Medium to High at 1440p costs 11 FPS on average (75 to 64), which is a significant sacrifice for a marginal increase in visual quality in a game from this era.
At 1080p, players have more flexibility. The Medium preset delivers an excellent 115 FPS average with a minimum of 98 FPS, making it ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors. Even the High preset, at 98 FPS average, is more than sufficient for a smooth experience. The Ultra preset at 1080p, with 77 FPS, is also viable, but the performance cost is notable when compared to the High preset.
For 4K, the data offers little hope for a quality experience. The Low preset averages 54 FPS, which is technically playable but requires significant visual sacrifices. The High preset drops to 35 FPS, which is too low for a responsive action game. The Ultra preset, at 27 FPS, is effectively a slideshow. The recommendation is to avoid 4K entirely with this combo. The most practical approach is to target 1440p Medium for a high-quality experience with good frame pacing, or to drop to 1080p and run Ultra if maximum visual detail is the priority, accepting the 77 FPS average. The 1440p Medium setting offers the best compromise, providing a 75 FPS average with a solid minimum of 64 FPS.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the defining component in this system's gaming performance. Its 16 GB of GDDR6 memory is a substantial capacity, but the 128-bit memory bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth prove to be a bottleneck at higher resolutions. The data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K, where the average FPS drops to 35 on High and 27 on Ultra. These numbers indicate that the card lacks the raw throughput to feed the shaders at that pixel density.
The card’s clock speeds are high, with a boost clock of 2755 MHz and a game clock of 2470 MHz. These clocks contribute to its strong performance at 1080p, where it achieves 98 FPS on High settings. The GPU’s compute capabilities, rated at 22.57 TFLOPS, are sufficient for this older title at mainstream resolutions. The PassMark G3D score of 17132 places it in the 60th percentile of all GPUs, and its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, which scores slightly higher at 17208, and the older GeForce GTX 690, which is nearly identical at 17037.
The 16 GB VRAM capacity is noteworthy, but it does not translate into 4K capability in this game. The bottleneck is the memory bandwidth, not the capacity. The 288.0 GB/s figure is simply too low to handle the data requirements of 4K textures and geometry at high frame rates. At 1440p, the GPU performs admirably, delivering 75 FPS on Medium and 64 FPS on High. The data suggests that the RX 7600 XT is a capable 1080p and 1440p card, but its architectural limits are clearly exposed at 4K. The card's 204 mm² die size and 13,300 million transistors on a 6 nm process provide a solid foundation for 1080p gaming, but they are not enough to overcome the memory subsystem limitations at higher resolutions.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run The Technomancer at 4K?
A: The data shows it is not viable. At 4K High settings, the average FPS is 35, and at Ultra it drops to 27. Even on Low settings, the average is only 54 FPS, which is below the ideal threshold for smooth action gameplay.
Q: What is the best resolution for this CPU and GPU pairing?
A: The 1440p Medium preset is the best choice. It provides a 75 FPS average with a minimum of 64 FPS, offering a good balance between visual quality and performance. 1080p is also excellent, with the High preset achieving 98 FPS.
Q: How does the RX 7600 XT compare to its direct rivals?
A: According to benchmark data, it is nearly identical to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690, with a delta of 0.3%. It is slightly behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070, which is 0.7% faster. Its PassMark G3D score is 17132, placing it in the 60th percentile of all GPUs.
Q: Is the game more CPU or GPU bound with this hardware?
A: At 1080p, the system is likely balanced, but as resolution increases, the GPU becomes the clear bottleneck. The dramatic FPS drops from 1080p to 4K (e.g., 98 to 35 FPS on High) indicate that the Radeon RX 7600 XT is the limiting component at higher resolutions.
Q: What is the performance difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?
A: The difference is significant. On Low settings, the average FPS is 98, while on Ultra it drops to 50. This represents a 49% performance decrease for the highest visual quality preset.
Q: Does the 16 GB VRAM help with 4K performance?
A: No. Despite having 16 GB of GDDR6 memory, the 4K performance is poor, with a 35 FPS average on High. The limiting factor is the 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth, not the capacity, showing that VRAM size alone does not guarantee high-resolution capability.
How This Combo Ranks
In the broader database of tested hardware combinations, this pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 245 and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT ranks 1781 out of 2825 combos for The Technomancer. This places it in the lower half of all tested systems, which is a direct reflection of its struggles at 4K resolution. The rank indicates that while the combo performs adequately at 1080p and 1440p, it is not a top-tier performer for this specific game.
The ranking is likely dragged down by the 4K results, where the GPU’s limitations are most apparent. A combo that can achieve 60 FPS at 4K would rank significantly higher. The data suggests that this is a mid-range pairing, suitable for mainstream gaming but not for enthusiasts seeking maximum fidelity. The CPU’s high percentile ranking (90th vs all CPUs) does not help the GPU’s poor 4K showing, reinforcing that the GPU is the bottleneck. The 1781st place out of 2825 combos is a sobering statistic, showing that many other systems can provide a better experience in this title, particularly at higher resolutions. However, for a 1080p gamer, this combo would feel much stronger than its overall rank suggests, as the 98 FPS average on High settings is a very good result.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 5 245, with its 14 cores and 14 threads, is not the limiting factor in this game. Its performance in synthetic benchmarks is strong; it achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 32924 and a single-core score of 4648. This places it in the 90th percentile of all CPUs, indicating ample processing power. The CPU's 5.10 GHz boost clock and 24 MB of shared L3 cache ensure that it can handle the game's logic and physics without becoming a bottleneck.
The measured FPS data supports this conclusion. At 1080p Low settings, the system achieves 149 FPS, which is a very high frame rate that demands significant CPU resources to feed the GPU. The fact that the frame rate scales down as resolution increases (to 98 FPS at 1440p and 54 FPS at 4K) is a classic sign of the GPU becoming the limiting factor, not the CPU. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would see similar frame rates across different resolutions.
The CPU's architecture, Arrow Lake on a 3 nm process, is modern and efficient. Its passmark multi-thread score of 38706 and single-thread score of 4394 further confirm its capability. The nearest rivals for the CPU include the AMD Ryzen 9 7900, which scores slightly higher (49228 vs 48995), and the Intel Core i5-14600K, which scores slightly lower (48618). These are all high-end processors, and the Core Ultra 5 245 performs on par with them. In The Technomancer, the CPU's role is to provide a stable platform for the GPU, and the data shows it does so effectively. The game is not CPU-intensive by modern standards, and this processor has more than enough headroom. The performance ceiling of this combo is defined by the Radeon RX 7600 XT, not the Core Ultra 5 245.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 5 245
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 245 + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT in The Technomancer
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 54.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 41.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 35.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 27.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 98.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 75.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 64.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 50.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 149.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 115.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 98.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 77.0 |
The Technomancer with iUltra 5 245 + Other GPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Technomancer with RX 7600 XT + Other CPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 5 245 + RX 7600 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.