The Technomancer
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 69 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 26 | 33 | 38 | 50 |
| 1440p QHD | 47 | 60 | 70 | 91 |
| 1080p Full HD | 71 | 92 | 107 | 140 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Technomancer with Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + AMD Radeon 8050S, In-Depth Analysis
The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents a demanding workload for the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H and AMD Radeon 8050S combination. Benchmark results show a playable experience at 1080p and 1440p, but the system struggles to maintain smooth frame rates at 4K. The data indicates a clear GPU-bound scenario at higher resolutions, with the CPU providing sufficient headroom to drive the Radeon 8050S effectively across most settings.
Resolution Scaling
The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and consistent, confirming that the AMD Radeon 8050S is the primary limiting factor in this configuration. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 92 FPS at 1920x1080 to 60 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of 32 FPS, and then plunges to 33 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 64% loss in average FPS from 1080p to 4K, a scaling curve typical of a GPU that is running out of pixel throughput at higher resolutions.
The pattern holds across all quality presets. At Low settings, the transition from 140 FPS at 1080p to 91 FPS at 1440p shows a 49 FPS drop, and the 4K result of 50 FPS is a 64% reduction from the 1080p baseline. Medium settings follow the same trajectory: 107 FPS at 1080p, 70 FPS at 1440p, and 38 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset, which is the most demanding, sees the most dramatic falloff, with the system managing 71 FPS at 1080p, 47 FPS at 1440p, and only 26 FPS at 4K.
The data reveals that the biggest relative jump in performance cost occurs between 1440p and 4K. Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 at High settings costs 32 FPS, but moving from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 costs 27 FPS, despite the latter being a much larger increase in pixel count. This suggests that the Radeon 8050S hits a memory bandwidth or fill-rate wall at 4K, where the system-shared memory configuration becomes a bottleneck. The 4K results are consistently below the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, making 4K an impractical target for this combo except for Low settings, which only achieve 50 FPS.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H is a 14-core, 18-thread processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. Its benchmark scores place it in the 79th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27507. This performance level is nearly identical to its nearest rivals, with a delta of -0.1% compared to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 and -0.3% compared to the Intel Core i5-12600K. The data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this game, as frame rates scale almost entirely with resolution and settings.
At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 140 FPS, which is a high frame rate that demands significant CPU work for game logic and draw calls. The fact that the system can hit this number indicates that the Core Ultra 5 125H has ample single-thread and multi-thread performance for The Technomancer. The Cinebench R23 scores of 12804.5 multi-core and 1647.5 single-core provide context for this capability, showing a balanced processor that can handle both the physics and AI workloads of an Action RPG while feeding the GPU.
The GPU's system-shared memory architecture means that the CPU's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is also relevant. The Radeon 8050S relies on the same memory pool as the CPU, and the data suggests that at 4K, the memory subsystem becomes a shared bottleneck. The CPU's dual-channel memory support and the GPU's "System Dependent" bandwidth figure point to a scenario where higher resolution textures and pixel data compete with CPU operations for the same bandwidth. The performance drop from 1440p to 4K at all settings is more severe than the pixel count increase alone would suggest, which is indicative of this memory contention.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data provides clear guidance for selecting the optimal settings preset for this hardware combination. For a 60 FPS target at 1920x1080, the High preset delivers an average of 92 FPS, which is well above the threshold, while Medium achieves 107 FPS. The Ultra preset, at 71 FPS, is also playable, but it sacrifices some headroom. The best experience at 1080p is the High preset, as it provides a smooth frame rate with a 21 FPS buffer above the 60 FPS target, allowing for dips without dropping below playability. The Low preset at 140 FPS is unnecessary for typical displays and does not offer a better visual experience.
At 2560x1440, the High preset achieves exactly 60 FPS on average, with Medium at 70 FPS. The High preset is the recommended choice for 1440p gaming, as it hits the 60 FPS target precisely, while Medium offers a safety margin of 10 FPS above the target. The Ultra preset at 47 FPS is below the 60 FPS threshold and should be avoided for competitive or fast-paced play, but it remains an option for slower, story-driven sections. The data indicates that High is the sweet spot for 1440p, balancing visual quality with a playable frame rate.
For 4K resolution, the results are less encouraging. The Low preset achieves 50 FPS, Medium 38 FPS, High 33 FPS, and Ultra 26 FPS. None of these presets reach the 60 FPS standard for smooth gameplay. The Low preset is the only viable option for 4K, and it still falls short of the ideal target. Users with 4K displays should consider lowering the resolution to 1440p for a significantly better experience, as the High preset at 1440p offers nearly double the frame rate of the High preset at 4K.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 125H and AMD Radeon 8050S ranks 2087 out of 2825 tested combos for The Technomancer, placing it in the 26th percentile of all configurations. This rank reflects the GPU's mid-range standing; the Radeon 8050S sits in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 62108. Its nearest rivals, the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (0.3% faster), AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (2.5% faster), and AMD Radeon RX 7600M (2.6% faster), all have similar computational power. However, the combo's overall rank is dragged down by the 4K performance, which is weak relative to other configurations that may have stronger GPUs or more traditional discrete memory setups.
The rank of 2087 out of 2825 indicates that this combo is positioned in the lower half of all tested systems for this specific title. While the 1080p and 1440p results are respectable, the inability to maintain 60 FPS at 4K places it behind many other combos that can handle higher resolutions more effectively. The CPU's performance, which is comparable to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 and Intel Core i5-12600K, is not a differentiator here; the GPU is the determining factor for the combo's ranking. The data suggests that this pairing is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it performs admirably, but it is not a top-tier configuration for 4K in The Technomancer.
FAQ
Q: Can this combo run The Technomancer at 4K with playable frame rates?
A: No. At 4K, the highest average frame rate is 50 FPS with the Low preset. The High preset averages 33 FPS, Medium 38 FPS, and Ultra 26 FPS. All of these are below the 60 FPS standard for smooth gameplay, so 4K is not recommended.
Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for a 60 FPS experience?
A: At 1920x1080, the High preset averages 92 FPS, and the Medium preset averages 107 FPS. At 2560x1440, the High preset averages exactly 60 FPS, and the Medium preset averages 70 FPS. For a consistent 60 FPS, the High preset at 1440p is the highest quality option that meets the target.
Q: How does the CPU performance compare to its direct rivals?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H has an average benchmark score of 27507, which is 0.1% lower than the AMD Ryzen 7 5800 and 0.3% lower than the Intel Core i5-12600K. It is 0.5% higher than the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck in this game?
A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck. The frame rate scales significantly with resolution, dropping from 140 FPS at 1080p Low to 50 FPS at 4K Low. The CPU's high benchmark scores, which place it in the 79th percentile, indicate it has the headroom to drive the GPU at lower resolutions.
Q: What is the frame time consistency like at Medium settings?
A: At Medium settings, the measured minimum and maximum frame rates are provided. At 1080p, the average is 107 FPS with a range of 91 to 123 FPS. At 1440p, the average is 70 FPS with a range of 60 to 81 FPS. At 4K, the average is 38 FPS with a range of 33 to 44 FPS.
Q: What is the launch MSRP of the CPU in this combo?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 125H has a launch MSRP of $375.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The following table details the exact average frame rates measured for The Technomancer across all tested resolutions and settings.
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920x1080 | Low | 140 | N/A | N/A |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 107 | 91 | 123 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 92 | N/A | N/A |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 71 | N/A | N/A |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 91 | N/A | N/A |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 70 | 60 | 81 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 60 | N/A | N/A |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 47 | N/A | N/A |
| 3840x2160 | Low | 50 | N/A | N/A |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 38 | 33 | 44 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 33 | N/A | N/A |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 26 | N/A | N/A |
The data shows a consistent performance hierarchy across all presets, with Low being the fastest and Ultra the slowest at every resolution. The Medium preset is the only one with full min/max data, revealing a variance of 32 FPS at 1080p, 21 FPS at 1440p, and 11 FPS at 4K, which indicates that frame pacing becomes more consistent as the resolution increases. The 1080p Low result of 140 FPS is the highest recorded average, while the 4K Ultra result of 26 FPS is the lowest, representing an 81% performance difference between the two extremes.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 5 125H
AMD Radeon 8050S
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 125H + AMD Radeon 8050S in The Technomancer
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 50.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 38.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 33.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 26.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 91.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 70.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 60.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 47.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 140.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 107.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 92.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 71.0 |
The Technomancer with iUltra 5 125H + Other GPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Other Games with iUltra 5 125H + 8050S
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.