The Technomancer
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 50 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 18 | 24 | 29 | 38 |
| 1440p QHD | 32 | 43 | 53 | 66 |
| 1080p Full HD | 51 | 65 | 78 | 101 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Technomancer with Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB, In-Depth Analysis
The Intel Core i7-12700K paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB ranks 1501 out of 1656 tested combos in The Technomancer, placing this configuration in the bottom 10% of all tested systems. This is a low ranking, but the data indicates the pairing is workable for the game's minimum requirements, with the GPU acting as the primary constraint on performance. The measured results show a system that can handle 1080p gaming comfortably at medium settings, but which struggles significantly at higher resolutions.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the Intel Core i7-12700K and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB sits at rank 1501 out of 1656 tested combos in The Technomancer. This places the system in a weak position relative to the broader test pool, where the majority of other combinations deliver higher average frame rates. The ranking reflects the GPU's limited capacity for this title, as the CPU is a high-tier part that should not be the bottleneck. The data suggests that the RTX 3050 4 GB is the limiting factor, holding the system back from higher positions in the ranking table. While the rank is low, the measured frame rates do show that the combo is capable of producing playable results at certain settings, particularly at 1080p and 1440p with lower quality presets. The score gap between this combo and the top of the field is substantial, but the data shows a consistent scaling pattern that allows users to tune settings for a playable experience.
GPU Role
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB is built on the Ampere architecture with a GA107 chip manufactured on an 8 nm process by Samsung. It features 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering a bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1545 MHz and a boost clock of 1740 MHz, with memory running at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). These specifications indicate a modest graphics solution, and the benchmark data reflects this in The Technomancer. The 4 GB VRAM capacity is a critical factor, as the game's demands at higher resolutions and quality settings quickly exceed what this buffer can hold. The GPU's percentile rank against all GPUs is 50, meaning it sits exactly at the median of the tested GPU pool. The measured FPS data shows that at 4K Ultra, the average frame rate drops to 17.7 FPS, which is a direct consequence of the GPU's limited memory bandwidth and shading power. At 1080p Low, the same GPU achieves 100.9 FPS, demonstrating that the card has sufficient raw compute for lighter workloads but lacks the headroom for high-fidelity rendering.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data suggests that the optimal experience with this combo is achieved at 1080p with Medium settings, which yields an average of 77.7 FPS. This provides a smooth frame rate while maintaining a reasonable level of visual quality. At 1080p High, the average drops to 64.7 FPS, which is still playable but offers diminishing returns for the additional graphical load. For users prioritizing frame rate, 1080p Low delivers 100.9 FPS, but the visual compromise is significant. At 1440p, the Medium preset produces 52.7 FPS, which is acceptable for slower-paced gameplay, but High settings at this resolution drop to 43.3 FPS, and Ultra falls to 31.6 FPS, which may feel stuttery. The data clearly shows that 4K is not a viable option for this combo, as even Low settings only reach 37.5 FPS, and Ultra drops to 17.7 FPS. The best balance of performance and visual fidelity is achieved at 1080p Medium, as it maintains a frame rate well above the 60 FPS threshold while offering a substantial upgrade over Low settings.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the average frame rates are 100.9 FPS on Low, 77.7 FPS on Medium, 64.7 FPS on High, and 50.8 FPS on Ultra. This shows a steady decline as quality increases, with the gap between Low and Ultra being exactly 50.1 FPS. At 2560x1440, the averages are 65.5 FPS on Low, 52.7 FPS on Medium, 43.3 FPS on High, and 31.6 FPS on Ultra. The drop from 1080p to 1440p at the same settings is consistent, reducing performance by roughly 35% to 38%. At 3840x2160, the averages are 37.5 FPS on Low, 29 FPS on Medium, 24 FPS on High, and 17.7 FPS on Ultra. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is steeper, with performance dropping by approximately 43% to 44% at each quality level. The data indicates that the GPU's memory bandwidth of 192.0 GB/s becomes a severe bottleneck as resolution increases, since the 4 GB VRAM buffer is insufficient for the higher memory footprints required at 4K.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is dramatic and reveals the limiting component. At 1080p Ultra, the average is 50.8 FPS, but at 4K Ultra, it falls to 17.7 FPS, a reduction of 65%. This steep decline is indicative of a GPU-bound scenario, where the RTX 3050 4 GB lacks the memory capacity and bandwidth to handle the increased pixel count. The scaling is less severe at lower settings: from 1080p Low at 100.9 FPS to 4K Low at 37.5 FPS, a drop of 63%. This consistency across settings suggests that the resolution increase places a uniform strain on the GPU's resources. The CPU, an Intel Core i7-12700K with 12 cores and 20 threads, is unlikely to be the bottleneck here, as its benchmark scores show high single-thread performance (3dmark_single_thread score of 1043 and passmark_singlethread score of 4013). The data points to the GPU's 4 GB VRAM as the critical constraint, since the game's texture and geometry demands at higher resolutions exceed this capacity, causing the frame rate to plummet.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in The Technomancer?
A: The data shows that 1920x1080 is the only resolution where the combo consistently exceeds 60 FPS across all settings, with Low at 100.9 FPS and Medium at 77.7 FPS. At 2560x1440, only Low settings achieve a playable 65.5 FPS, while 3840x2160 never reaches above 37.5 FPS.
Q: How does the RTX 3050 4 GB's VRAM affect performance?
A: The 4 GB GDDR6 memory size is the primary limiting factor. At 4K Ultra, the average frame rate drops to 17.7 FPS, which indicates that the GPU cannot store the necessary textures and buffers for high-resolution rendering, leading to severe performance degradation.
Q: Is the Intel Core i7-12700K holding back the GPU?
A: No, the data suggests the opposite. The CPU's benchmarks, including a cinebench_r23_multicore score of 29241 and a 3dmark_max_threads score of 9979, show it is a high-performance part. The measured FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K is consistent with a GPU bottleneck, not a CPU one.
Q: What settings should I use for a smooth 60+ FPS experience?
A: At 1080p, both Low (100.9 FPS) and Medium (77.7 FPS) settings deliver averages above 60 FPS. At 1440p, only Low (65.5 FPS) clears this threshold. No 4K setting achieves 60 FPS.
Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested systems?
A: The combo ranks 1501 out of 1656 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom 9% of all systems tested in The Technomancer. This low rank is driven by the GPU's performance, not the CPU.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p?
A: At 1080p, Low delivers 100.9 FPS while Ultra delivers 50.8 FPS, a difference of 50.1 FPS. This 50% performance penalty for Ultra settings highlights the GPU's limitations at higher quality presets.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-12700K is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Its benchmark scores are strong, including a cinebench_r23_multicore score of 29241 and a passmark_multithread score of 34404, placing it in the 89th percentile of all CPUs. In The Technomancer, the CPU's role appears to be secondary, as the frame rates are clearly dictated by the GPU. The measured FPS at 1080p Low (100.9 FPS) indicates that the CPU can feed the GPU adequately at lower resolutions, but the rapid drop at higher resolutions (37.5 FPS at 4K Low) is characteristic of a GPU limitation. The CPU's 25 MB of shared L3 cache and support for DDR4 and DDR5 memory provide ample bandwidth for game logic, but the game's rendering demands outpace the RTX 3050 4 GB's capabilities. The data shows that the i7-12700K is not a bottleneck in this pairing, as the performance scaling aligns with the GPU's memory bandwidth (192.0 GB/s) and VRAM size (4 GB). For this game, the CPU's high single-thread performance (3dmark_single_thread score of 1043) ensures that frame pacing is consistent, but the ultimate FPS ceiling is set by the graphics card. The combo's low rank of 1501 out of 1656 is therefore attributable to the GPU, not the CPU, which performs well above its class in this title.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-12700K
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB in The Technomancer
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 37.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 29.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 24.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 17.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 65.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 52.7 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 43.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 31.6 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 100.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 77.7 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 64.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 50.8 |
The Technomancer with RTX 3050 4 GB + Other CPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-12700K + RTX 3050 4 GB
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.