The Technomancer

The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents an interesting challenge for the Intel Core i7-12700K and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER combination. The data shows a system capable of delivering playable framerates across most settings, though 4K Ultra pushes it to its limits. The benchmark results indicate a clear performance hierarchy that shifts depending on resolution and preset, revealing the nuanced balance between the CPU and GPU in this specific title.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i7-12700K is a 12-core, 20-thread processor based on the Alder Lake architecture, built on a 10 nm process. It operates at a base clock of 3.60 GHz and can boost up to 5.00 GHz. This configuration provides substantial multi-threaded capability, as reflected in its 3DMark scores: 9,276 in the 16-thread test and 9,979 at max threads. Single-threaded performance is also strong, with a 3DMark single-thread score of 1,043 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2,308. The processor sits at the 84th percentile against all CPUs, indicating solid overall performance.

In the context of The Technomancer, the CPU's role appears to be secondary in determining average framerates, as the game is likely more GPU-bound at higher resolutions. The processor's ability to feed the GPU is not the limiting factor in the measured results. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 142 FPS, which is high but not exceptionally so, suggesting the CPU can handle the game's demands without becoming a bottleneck. The data shows that the i7-12700K is a capable performer, and its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-13600T, which has an average score 0.1% lower, and the Intel Core i7-12700KF, which is 0.2% lower. This proximity in scores suggests that the i7-12700K is well-positioned in the mid-to-high end of the desktop CPU market.

The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 19,784 and single-core score of 1,850.5 further underscore its capability. For a game like The Technomancer, which was released in 2016, the CPU is more than sufficient. The benchmark results indicate that at lower resolutions like 1080p, the CPU can help push framerates higher, but the overall performance is still largely dictated by the GPU. The processor's 25 MB of shared L3 cache and support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory provide a solid foundation for gaming, and the 3DMark 4-thread score of 4,011 suggests it can handle the workload of a game that may not be heavily multi-threaded.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER is built on the Turing architecture and features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The GPU has a base clock of 1,470 MHz and a boost clock of 1,650 MHz, with memory clocked at 1,750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). It contains 2,176 shading units, 136 texture mapping units, and 64 ROPs. The RTX 2060 SUPER sits at the 62nd percentile against all GPUs, with a PassMark G3D score of 16,462.

In The Technomancer, the GPU's performance is the primary driver of framerates. The data shows clear scaling with resolution. At 1080p, the average FPS ranges from 142 on Low to 73 on Ultra. At 1440p, it drops to 93 FPS on Low and 48 FPS on Ultra. At 4K, framerates fall further, with 51 FPS on Low and 26 FPS on Ultra. This scaling indicates that the GPU is the limiting component, especially at higher resolutions and settings. The 8 GB of VRAM is sufficient for the game, as no memory-related issues are evident in the data.

The RTX 2060 SUPER's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (0.4% lower), the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (0.5% lower), and the AMD Radeon RX 460 (1.5% lower). The GPU's performance is competitive, but the data suggests that for The Technomancer, it delivers a solid experience up to 1440p High, with 61 FPS, and is playable at 4K with Low settings at 51 FPS. The GPU's 7.181 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 224.4 GTexel/s texture rate indicate it is a mid-range card that can handle this older title well.

FAQ

Q: What is the best performance for the Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER in The Technomancer at 1080p?

A: The highest average FPS at 1080p is achieved with Low settings, reaching 142 FPS. High settings deliver 93 FPS, Medium provides 109 FPS, and Ultra drops to 73 FPS.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K resolution?

A: At 4K (3840x2160), the average FPS ranges from 51 FPS on Low settings to 26 FPS on Ultra. Medium settings yield 39 FPS, and High settings provide 34 FPS. The performance is playable only on Low settings.

Q: What is the combo's rank in this game compared to other tested combinations?

A: The combo is ranked 2,609 out of 3,696 tested combinations, placing it in the 70.5th percentile of all tested combos.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance more in this game?

A: The GPU is the limiting factor, as the FPS scales more with resolution and settings than the CPU's core count or clock speed. The CPU's high multi-threaded scores (e.g., 3DMark max threads at 9,979) do not translate to proportional FPS gains.

Q: What is the average FPS at 1440p with Medium settings?

A: At 1440p with Medium settings, the average FPS is 71, with a minimum of 61 FPS and a maximum of 82 FPS.

Q: Are there any settings where the combo achieves 100+ FPS?

A: Yes, at 1080p with Low settings (142 FPS) and at 1080p with Medium settings (109 FPS). At 1440p with Low settings, it reaches 93 FPS, which is below 100.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER combination is ranked 2,609 out of 3,696 tested combos in The Technominer. This places it in the 70.4th percentile of all tested systems, which is a solid mid-to-high position. The ranking reflects a balance between the CPU's capability and the GPU's performance in this game. The CPU is a strong performer, but the GPU is more of a mid-range part, which limits the overall ranking. The combo outperforms a significant portion of tested systems, but it is not in the top tier for this game.

The rank indicates that this combination is well above average for running The Technomancer. The CPU's high single-threaded performance and the GPU's adequate VRAM and bandwidth work together to provide a smooth experience at most settings. The bottleneck in this combo is the GPU, as evidenced by the FPS scaling with resolution. The CPU, with its high benchmark scores, is not a limiting factor in this title. The combo's rank is respectable, and the system is well-suited for this game, especially considering the game's 2016 release date.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data shows a clear relationship between resolution, settings, and performance. At 1920x1080, the average FPS scales from 142 FPS on Low to 73 FPS on Ultra. The Medium setting provides a 109 FPS average, with a minimum of 93 and a maximum of 126. High settings average 93 FPS. The 1080p data shows that the combo can easily handle the game at this resolution, with even Ultra settings staying above 70 FPS.

Moving to 2560x1440, performance drops. Low settings average 93 FPS, High 61 FPS, Medium 71 FPS (min 61, max 82), and Ultra 48 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is significant, with a reduction of about 34-35% across settings, reflecting the increased GPU load. At 1440p, the combo is still playable, but Ultra settings drop below the 60 FPS threshold.

At 3840x2160, the performance is more challenging. Low settings provide an average of 51 FPS, which is borderline playable. Medium averages 39 FPS (min 33, max 45), High 34 FPS, and Ultra 26 FPS. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the bottleneck, and only Low settings approach a playable threshold. The data indicates that the combo is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K reserved for less demanding games or lower settings.

Settings Recommendations

For the Intel Core i7-12700K + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER in The Technomancer, the data suggests that the best experience depends on the resolution. At 1080p, the High setting at 93 FPS offers a smooth experience with good visual quality. Medium at 109 FPS is also an excellent choice, providing a higher framerate with minimal visual loss. Ultra at 73 FPS is playable but not necessary for a competitive edge.

At 1440p, the recommended setting is High, which averages 61 FPS, providing a stable experience. Medium at 71 FPS is even better for those prioritizing framerate, and Low at 93 FPS offers a very smooth experience but with reduced visual fidelity. Ultra at 48 FPS is not recommended for a 60 Hz display, as it may result in a less fluid experience.

For 4K, the only viable setting is Low, which averages 51 FPS. This provides a playable experience, but the visual quality is significantly reduced. Medium, High, and Ultra are all below 40 FPS, which is not ideal for a smooth experience. The data shows that the best balance of quality and performance is achieved at 1440p Medium or High, and at 1080p, Medium is the sweet spot for a high framerate with good visuals.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data shows a clear drop when moving from 1080p to 4K. At Low settings, the average FPS falls from 142 at 1080p to 93 at 1440p and 51 at 4K. This represents a 35% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 64% drop from 1080p to 4K. At Medium settings, the drop is from 109 FPS at 1080p to 71 FPS at 1440p and 39 FPS at 4K, a 35% and 64% decrease, respectively. High settings show a similar scaling: 93 FPS at 1080p, 61 FPS at 1440p, and 34 FPS at 4K. Ultra settings drop from 73 FPS at 1080p to 48 FPS at 1440p and 26 FPS at 4K.

This scaling indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting component. The CPU's performance is sufficient, as evidenced by the high FPS at 1080p, but the GPU cannot maintain high and framerates at higher resolutions. The drop from 1440p to 4K is particularly steep, with a 45-46% reduction, highlighting the GPU's limitations. The data suggests that for a smoother experience at 4K, the user would need a more powerful GPU. The scaling pattern is typical for a mid-range GPU, where the main constraint is the fill rate and pixel processing, which are both GPU-bound tasks.