The Technomancer

The Technomancer

AVERAGE FPS
133
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 133 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 47 63 75 93
1440p QHD 88 117 138 176
1080p Full HD 137 177 210 271

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 93
3840x2160 Medium 75
3840x2160 High 63
3840x2160 Ultra 47
2560x1440 Low 176
2560x1440 Medium 138
2560x1440 High 117
2560x1440 Ultra 88
1920x1080 Low 271
1920x1080 Medium 210
1920x1080 High 177
1920x1080 Ultra 137

The Technomancer with Intel Core i5-14600K + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX, In-Depth Analysis

The Technomancer is an Action RPG from 2016 that scales broadly with hardware, and the pairing of the Intel Core i5-14600K with the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX delivers a mix of high refresh rate dominance at lower resolutions and demanding loads at 4K. The data shows a system with substantial headroom, but the game's engine introduces significant bottlenecks that shift depending on the resolution and quality preset selected.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate progression from 1080p to 4K reveals a classic shift in bottleneck behavior. At 1920x1080 with Ultra settings, the combo produces 136.7 FPS, but dropping to Low settings at the same resolution pushes the average to 270.6 FPS. This massive 134 FPS swing at the same resolution indicates that at 1080p, the CPU is doing heavy lifting; the Radeon RX 7900 XTX is capable of far more frames than the scene can render when settings are reduced, but the engine's thread utilization caps the output. The gap between High (177.2 FPS) and Low (270.6 FPS) at 1080p shows that the CPU can keep up when the GPU load is minimal, but the scaling is not linear, suggesting that the i5-14600K's 14 cores and 20 threads are not fully utilized by this 2016 title.

Moving to 2560x1440, the average frame rates compress slightly. Ultra settings yield 88.4 FPS, while Low settings reach 175.5 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra shrinks from 134 FPS at 1080p to 87 FPS at 1440p. This narrowing indicates that the GPU is beginning to take on more responsibility as the pixel count rises, yet the CPU still has enough headroom to avoid being the sole limiting factor. The High preset at 1440p (117.4 FPS) remains well above 60 FPS, showing that this resolution is a comfortable middle ground for the combination.

At 3840x2160, the trend reverses decisively. Ultra settings drop to 46.6 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold, while Low settings manage 93.4 FPS. The difference between Low and Ultra here is 46.8 FPS, less than half the delta seen at 1080p. This compression strongly suggests that the GPU is now the primary constraint. The RX 7900 XTX's 24 GB of GDDR6 memory and 960.0 GB/s bandwidth are being taxed heavily by the 4K pixel workload, and the CPU's role diminishes. The data shows that the system transitions from a CPU-bound state at 1080p to a GPU-bound state at 4K, with the crossover occurring somewhere in the 1440p to 4K range.

Settings Recommendations

Benchmark results indicate that the Ultra preset is not a viable choice for 4K gaming on this setup, as it averages 46.6 FPS, which will feel stuttery on most modern displays. Dropping to High at 4K brings the average to 63.3 FPS, which is a playable baseline, but the data shows that Medium (74.7 FPS) provides a more comfortable margin above 60 FPS. For 4K users, the Medium preset is the practical ceiling; it sacrifices some visual fidelity compared to High but offers an 18% performance uplift in the measured rows.

At 1440p, the High preset (117.4 FPS) is the sweet spot. It delivers a smooth experience that benefits from high refresh rate monitors without pushing the GPU into diminishing returns. The Ultra preset at 1440p (88.4 FPS) is still playable, but the jump from High to Ultra costs 29 FPS, which is a significant loss for marginal visual gains in a game from this era. For 1080p, the High preset (177.2 FPS) is the recommended choice for competitive play, as it clears the 144 Hz barrier with room to spare. The Medium preset (210.2 FPS) is overkill for most displays, and the Low preset (270.6 FPS) is only useful for esports-style scenarios where maximum frame rate is the sole priority.

The data suggests that High is the overall best experience across all resolutions. It provides 177.2 FPS at 1080p, 117.4 FPS at 1440p, and 63.3 FPS at 4K, making it the only preset that maintains a playable frame rate at every tested resolution. Ultra is only recommended for 1080p or 1440p users who prioritize image quality over frame rate stability.

How This Combo Ranks

The Intel Core i5-14600K and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX combination ranks 222nd out of 1656 tested combos for The Technomancer, placing it in the top 13.4% of all configurations. This is a strong showing, but not a dominant one, which aligns with the measured frame rates that show the system is not always pushing the highest possible numbers. The rank indicates that while this pairing is capable, there are 221 other combinations that deliver better average performance in this specific title.

The CPU's performance percentile of 93 against all processors, with an average benchmark score of 49166, places it in the top tier of available chips. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X, scores 49062 with a deltaPct of 0.2, meaning the i5-14600K is essentially tied with that 16-core part in synthetic workloads. The Intel Core i5-14600KF scores 49367 with a deltaPct of -0.4, showing that the overclocked "K" variant is slightly slower than its "KF" counterpart in these benchmarks, likely due to the integrated UHD Graphics 770 drawing a small amount of power. The GPU's percentile of 85 against all graphics cards, with an average benchmark score of 44019, is also strong, though its nearest rivals show a tighter grouping. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti scores 44900 with a deltaPct of -2, meaning the RX 7900 XTX is 2% slower in average synthetic tests, which is a narrow margin that does not always translate to real-world game performance.

The combo's rank of 222 out of 1656 suggests that other pairings with faster CPUs or GPUs can achieve better results in this game, but the measured FPS data shows that this system is never severely bottlenecked. The ranking reflects the balance of the two components, where neither is holding the other back to a significant degree.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the measured averages are as follows: Low settings produce 270.6 FPS, Medium produces 210.2 FPS, High produces 177.2 FPS, and Ultra produces 136.7 FPS. These numbers show a clear linear scaling with settings, where each step down in quality yields a substantial frame rate increase. The gap between Medium and High is 33 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is 40.5 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset imposes a heavy load on the GPU even at 1080p.

At 2560x1440, the averages are: Low at 175.5 FPS, Medium at 137.9 FPS, High at 117.4 FPS, and Ultra at 88.4 FPS. The scaling here is less aggressive than at 1080p, with the difference between Low and Medium being 37.6 FPS, and between Medium and High being 20.5 FPS. The Ultra preset at 88.4 FPS is still above 60 FPS, but the drop from High to Ultra is 29 FPS, which is a notable penalty for the highest quality settings.

At 3840x2160, the averages are: Low at 93.4 FPS, Medium at 74.7 FPS, High at 63.3 FPS, and Ultra at 46.6 FPS. This is the only resolution where the Ultra preset falls below the 60 FPS threshold. The scaling from Low to Medium is 18.7 FPS, from Medium to High is 11.4 FPS, and from High to Ultra is 16.7 FPS. The data shows that the GPU is the limiting factor at 4K, as the frame rate differences between settings are smaller in absolute terms compared to 1080p, but the overall performance is lower across the board.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the dominant component at 4K, where its 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is critical for The Technomancer at high resolutions, as the game's textures and geometry data require substantial bandwidth. The boost clock of 2498 MHz, with a game clock of 2365 MHz, allows the GPU to sustain high throughput during intense scenes. The 6144 shading units and 192 ROPs contribute to the pixel rate of 479.6 GPixel/s, which is what drives the 4K performance.

At 1080p, the GPU is not fully utilized, as evidenced by the 270.6 FPS at Low settings. The CPU becomes the bottleneck here, but the GPU's raw compute power (61.39 TFLOPS FP32) ensures that it never limits the frame rate at lower resolutions. The GPU's benchmark scores reflect its capability; the passmark G3D score of 31238 places it in the 85th percentile of all GPUs, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 6841 shows strong modern API performance. However, The Technomancer is a 2016 title, and the data shows that the GPU's performance is less impactful at 1080p than the CPU's, which is a common pattern for older games that were not designed for the high core counts of modern processors.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-14600K plays a decisive role in the lower resolution results. With 14 cores (6 performance cores and 8 efficiency cores) and 20 threads, the CPU has a high boost clock of 5.30 GHz and a base clock of 3.50 GHz. The 24 MB of shared L3 cache is substantial for a mainstream processor, and the benchmark scores show a strong single-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4642) that is critical for game engines that rely on a few primary threads.

The data shows that at 1080p Low, the CPU is the limiting factor, as the GPU is capable of far more than 270.6 FPS. The 14 cores do not all contribute equally; The Technomancer likely uses a fraction of them, which means the high boost clock is more important than the core count. The nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 9 5950X with 16 cores, scores nearly identically (49062 vs 49166, deltaPct of 0.2), suggesting that in synthetic tests, the i5-14600K's higher clock speeds compensate for its fewer cores. In this game, the CPU's performance is sufficient to push frame rates high at 1080p, but the engine's limitations prevent the system from reaching the GPU's full potential.

At 4K, the CPU's role diminishes, as the frame rates drop to 63.3 FPS at High settings, which is still a significant load on the GPU. The CPU's 125 W TDP and support for DDR5 memory (though the memory bandwidth is not listed) provide ample headroom for the game's logic, but the measured FPS at 4K is clearly GPU-bound. The CPU's passmark multithread score of 38682 and single-thread score of 4270 indicate that it does not bottleneck the RX 7900 XTX at any resolution, but the game's engine is the ultimate arbiter of performance. The data shows that the i5-14600K is a capable partner for this GPU, with enough single-core speed to keep frame rates high at 1080p and enough cores to handle background tasks without affecting gameplay.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-14600K

Cores / Threads 14 / 20
Base Clock 3500 MHz
Boost Clock 5300 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX

VRAM 24 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2498 MHz MHz
TDP 355 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-14600K + AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX in The Technomancer

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 93.4
3840x2160 Medium 74.7
3840x2160 High 63.3
3840x2160 Ultra 46.6
2560x1440 Low 175.5
2560x1440 Medium 137.9
2560x1440 High 117.4
2560x1440 Ultra 88.4
1920x1080 Low 270.6
1920x1080 Medium 210.2
1920x1080 High 177.2
1920x1080 Ultra 136.7

The Technomancer with ii5-14600K + Other GPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

The Technomancer with RX 7900 XTX + Other CPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-14600K + RX 7900 XTX

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.