The Technomancer

The Technomancer

AVERAGE FPS
33
playable

This combination offers playable performance with an average of 33 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 13 18 17 23
1440p QHD 26 28 35 42
1080p Full HD 33 46 52 68

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 23
3840x2160 High 18
3840x2160 Medium 17
3840x2160 Ultra 13
2560x1440 Low 42
2560x1440 Medium 35
2560x1440 High 28
2560x1440 Ultra 26
1920x1080 Low 68
1920x1080 Medium 52
1920x1080 High 46
1920x1080 Ultra 33

The Technomancer with Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 570, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i3-12100F paired with the AMD Radeon RX 570 is a combination that sits near the bottom of the performance hierarchy for The Technomancer. With a combo rank of 1617 out of 1656 tested configurations, this pairing places in the 2nd percentile of all tested combos, indicating that it will struggle significantly with this title. The data shows a system that can handle the game at lower resolutions and settings, but one that is fundamentally limited by its GPU at higher demands.

How This Combo Ranks

The ranking of 1617 out of 1656 combos is a stark indicator of this system's position. This is not a mid-pack or even a lower-mid-pack result; it is a placement in the bottom 2.4% of all tested configurations for The Technomancer. This suggests that the vast majority of other CPU and GPU pairings will deliver a more fluid experience. The data implies that this combination is best suited for older titles or less demanding esports games, but for a 2016 Action RPG like this one, it is at the extreme low end of playability.

Looking at the individual components, the bottleneck is clearly the graphics card. The CPU, while modest, is not the primary constraint. The Intel Core i3-12100F ranks in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs, which is a respectable mid-range standing. Its average benchmark score of 13516 places it in close competition with processors like the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, which scores 13534 and is a mere 0.1% faster, and the Intel Core i7-7700K, which scores 13280 and is 1.8% slower. This indicates the CPU has enough processing power to feed a more capable GPU than the one installed.

In contrast, the AMD Radeon RX 570, while also ranking in the 74th percentile of all GPUs, is an older architecture that is outclassed by modern parts. Its average benchmark score of 30158 puts it in the same performance tier as the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 (scoring 30109, which is 0.2% slower) and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT (scoring 30097, which is 0.2% faster). This is a curious result, as it suggests the RX 570's synthetic benchmark performance is on par with these much newer cards, yet its real-world gaming performance in this title is clearly far behind, as evidenced by the measured FPS. This discrepancy highlights the importance of game-specific measurements over synthetic averages.

FAQ

*Q: What is the overall performance ranking of this CPU and GPU combo for The Technomancer?*

A: The combination ranks 1617th out of 1656 tested combos, placing it in the bottom 2.4% of all systems tested for this game.

Q: How does the Intel Core i3-12100F perform in general compared to other CPUs?

A: The CPU has an average benchmark score of 13516 and sits in the 72nd percentile of all CPUs. It performs nearly identically to the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3975WX, which is just 0.1% faster, and is 1.8% faster than the Intel Core i7-7700K.

Q: What is the best-case scenario for this system's frame rate at 1080p?

A: The highest average frame rate recorded is 67.5 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 with Low settings. At High settings, the average drops to 45.9 FPS.

Q: Can this system achieve a playable frame rate at 4K resolution?

A: No. At 3840x2160, the highest average frame rate is only 22.8 FPS on Low settings. On Ultra settings, the average falls to a very low 12.6 FPS.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this system?

A: The GPU is the primary bottleneck. The CPU's 72nd percentile ranking and benchmark scores are sufficient to push a better graphics card. The GPU's measured performance in this game shows it is the component holding the system back.

Q: How does the RX 570's benchmark score compare to its nearest rivals?

A: Its average score of 30158 is essentially tied with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, which is 0.2% slower, and the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, which is also 0.2% slower. The NVIDIA Tesla M60 is 0.6% slower with a score of 29969.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is severe and tells a clear story about the system's limitations. At 1920x1080 with High settings, the system averages 45.9 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same settings, the frame rate falls to 28.3 FPS, a significant reduction. At 3840x2160, the average plummets to 17.7 FPS. This pattern indicates that the GPU's rendering capabilities are being overwhelmed as the pixel count increases.

This scaling behavior is typical of a system where the graphics card is the limiting factor. The data suggests that the RX 570's 4 GB of VRAM and 224.0 GB/s of memory bandwidth are insufficient for the demands of higher resolutions. The framerate at 4K, regardless of settings, remains in the teens or low twenties, indicating that the GPU is completely saturated. The CPU, with its strong single and multi-threaded scores, is not the cause of this dramatic drop; the GPU simply cannot process the data fast enough.

The difference between Low and Ultra settings at the same resolution also highlights the GPU's strain. At 1440p, Low settings yield 42.4 FPS, while Ultra yields 25.7 FPS. This shows that even when reducing the graphical load, the system struggles to maintain high frame rates at higher resolutions. The game is clearly demanding, and this hardware combination is only viable for lower resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the results show a playable experience at lower presets. The Low preset achieves an average of 67.5 FPS, which is a smooth frame rate. Medium settings deliver 52.2 FPS, while High settings drop to 45.9 FPS. The Ultra preset brings the average down to 33.2 FPS, which is less desirable for a fluid experience.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance becomes more strained. The Low preset still manages an average of 42.4 FPS, but the Medium preset falls to 35.0 FPS. High settings average 28.3 FPS, and Ultra settings drop to 25.7 FPS. These numbers indicate that 1440p is only suitable for Low or Medium settings for a playable frame rate.

At 3840x2160, the system is unable to provide a playable experience. The Low preset averages 22.8 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. Medium settings average 17.0 FPS, and High settings average 17.7 FPS. The Ultra preset is the lowest, with an average of 12.6 FPS. This data confirms that 4K is not a viable option for this combination.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i3-12100F is a 4-core, 8-thread processor from the Alder Lake architecture. It has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. Its benchmark results are surprisingly strong for a quad-core part, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11912 and a single-core score of 1681. Its Geekbench single-core score of 2224 and multi-core score of 7413 further demonstrate its capability.

In the context of The Technomancer, this CPU is more than adequate for the task. The game, released in 2016, is unlikely to be heavily multi-threaded in a way that would challenge a modern 4-core processor. The CPU's strong single-core performance, as seen in the 3dmark single-thread score of 893, is crucial for game logic and physics. The data indicates that the CPU is not the source of the low frame rates; it is likely idling while waiting for the GPU to render frames.

The comparison to the Intel Core i7-7700K, which the i3-12100F beats by 1.8% in average benchmark score, is telling. The i7-7700K was a high-end gaming CPU in the same era as this game. The fact that the i3-12100F can match or exceed it in synthetic tests suggests that the CPU's performance headroom is not being fully utilized. This supports the conclusion that the GPU is the sole limiting factor.

Settings Recommendations

The data suggests that the best experience for this system is at 1920x1080 with the Low preset, where it achieves 67.5 FPS. This is the only configuration that provides a frame rate above 60 FPS. For players who prefer more visual fidelity, the Medium preset at 1080p, with an average of 52.2 FPS, is a reasonable compromise between smoothness and visual quality.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset is the only option that provides a frame rate above 40 FPS (42.4 FPS). The Medium preset is borderline, with an average of 35.0 FPS. For a more stable experience, sticking to Low at 1440p is recommended. The High and Ultra presets at this resolution are not recommended due to sub-30 FPS averages.

The 4K resolution should be avoided entirely. The maximum average frame rate is 22.8 FPS on Low settings, which is not a playable experience. The recommendation is to play at 1080p to get the best performance. The gap between Low and Medium at 1080p is 15.3 FPS, which is significant. Given the game's age, the visual difference between Low and Medium may be worth the performance hit for some, but the data shows that High and Ultra presets are too demanding for this GPU.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 570 is the definitive bottleneck in this system. It features 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 224.0 GB/s. Its base clock is 1168 MHz with a boost clock of 1244 MHz. While its synthetic benchmark score of 30158 is surprisingly high for its age, the in-game measurements tell a different story.

The RX 570's GCN 4.0 architecture, built on a 14 nm process, is simply not efficient enough for the demands of The Technomancer at higher resolutions. The 4 GB VRAM is likely a limiting factor at 1440p and 4K, as the game may be exceeding this capacity and causing performance degradation. The measured FPS shows that even at low settings, the GPU cannot maintain high frame rates at 4K, peaking at just 22.8 FPS.

The comparison to the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT in synthetic benchmarks is misleading. While the average scores are nearly identical, the RX 570's real-world performance in this game is far behind what these modern cards would deliver. This is because synthetic tests do not always reflect the specific workloads of a game. The data clearly shows that for this title, the RX 570 is a low-end performer, and its age is a significant factor in the overall poor ranking of this combo.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i3-12100F

Cores / Threads 4 / 8
Base Clock 3300 MHz
Boost Clock 4300 MHz
TDP 58W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 570

VRAM 4 GB GDDR5
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 1244 MHz MHz
TDP 150 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i3-12100F + AMD Radeon RX 570 in The Technomancer

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 22.8
3840x2160 High 17.7
3840x2160 Medium 17.0
3840x2160 Ultra 12.6
2560x1440 Low 42.4
2560x1440 Medium 35.0
2560x1440 High 28.3
2560x1440 Ultra 25.7
1920x1080 Low 67.5
1920x1080 Medium 52.2
1920x1080 High 45.9
1920x1080 Ultra 33.2

The Technomancer with ii3-12100F + Other GPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

The Technomancer with RX 570 + Other CPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii3-12100F + RX 570

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.