The Technomancer

The Technomancer

AVERAGE FPS
73
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 73 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 30 36 42 56
1440p QHD 46 65 72 97
1080p Full HD 78 96 114 148

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 56
3840x2160 Medium 42
3840x2160 High 36
3840x2160 Ultra 30
2560x1440 Low 97
2560x1440 Medium 72
2560x1440 High 65
2560x1440 Ultra 46
1920x1080 Low 148
1920x1080 Medium 114
1920x1080 High 96
1920x1080 Ultra 78

The Technomancer with AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT combination delivers a playable but not dominant experience in The Technomancer, with performance that scales predictably across resolutions and settings. The data shows a system where the GPU is the primary constraint at higher resolutions, while the CPU’s strong multi-threaded capabilities ensure headroom at 1080p. This pairing lands in the middle of the pack, with a combo rank of 1061 out of 1656 tested combinations, indicating that while it is not a top-tier setup, it is far from the bottom.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear and consistent drop in performance as resolution increases, which is typical for a system where the graphics card is the limiting factor. At 1080p with High settings, the combo averages 95.8 FPS. Moving to 1440p reduces this to 65.2 FPS, a decrease of approximately 32%. At 4K, the average further drops to 35.5 FPS, which is roughly 46% lower than the 1440p result and 63% below the 1080p figure. This steep decline indicates that the RX 7600 XT’s rendering capabilities are being saturated as pixel count rises.

The pattern is even more pronounced at Ultra settings. The 1080p Ultra average is 78 FPS, which falls to 46.3 FPS at 1440p (a 41% reduction) and then to 29.6 FPS at 4K (a 36% further drop). These numbers suggest that the GPU’s 16 GB of GDDR6 memory and 128-bit memory bus are not the bottleneck at lower resolutions, but the compute units and pixel fill rate struggle to keep up with the demands of 4K. The fact that the 4K Ultra result dips below 30 FPS highlights a hard ceiling for this hardware at the highest fidelity.

Conversely, the scaling from Low to Ultra at each resolution shows that settings have a significant impact. At 1080p, the difference between Low (148.2 FPS) and Ultra (78 FPS) is a 47% performance penalty. At 4K, the same settings change results in a 47% drop from 56 FPS to 29.6 FPS. This consistency suggests that the game’s graphical options uniformly increase the load on the GPU, rather than disproportionately affecting one specific component. The CPU, with its 12 cores and 24 threads, appears to have ample headroom, as even the lowest FPS figures are well above what would indicate a processor limitation.

FAQ

Q: What is the average frame rate at 1080p with High settings?

A: The average FPS at 1920x1080 with High settings is 95.8 frames per second.

Q: How does the performance at 4K Ultra compare to 1440p Ultra?

A: At 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 29.6, while at 1440p Ultra it is 46.3. This represents a 36% reduction in average frame rate when moving from 1440p to 4K.

Q: Is the Ryzen 9 9900X a bottleneck at any tested resolution?

A: The data does not indicate a CPU bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 148.2 FPS, and even at 4K Ultra, the frame rate is 29.6 FPS. Given the CPU’s high multi-threaded benchmark scores, such as 46438 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, the processor is not the limiting factor in these results.

Q: What is the best performance-to-settings ratio at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, the Medium settings yield an average of 72.4 FPS, while High settings yield 65.2 FPS. The difference is 7.2 FPS, making Medium a more efficient choice for smoother gameplay, though High is still playable.

Q: How does the RX 7600 XT compare to its closest rival, the RX 7600, in this game?

A: Based on the benchmark data, the RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score of 20146, which is 0.6% lower than the AMD Radeon RX 7600’s score of 20258. This indicates a negligible performance difference between the two cards in synthetic tests.

Q: Does the 16 GB VRAM provide an advantage at 4K?

A: While the 16 GB memory size is substantial, the 4K results show an average FPS of 35.5 at High and 29.6 at Ultra. These numbers suggest that the GPU’s compute power, not the VRAM capacity, is the limiting factor at this resolution.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the primary driver of frame rates in The Technomancer, and its specifications explain the observed performance. The card operates at a base clock of 1980 MHz and a boost clock of 2755 MHz, with a game clock of 2470 MHz. These clock speeds, combined with 2048 shading units and 64 ROPs, determine how quickly the GPU can process the game’s geometry and pixel data. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is sufficient for the game’s textures but does not compensate for the core’s limitations at high resolutions.

The GPU’s 22.57 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is a moderate figure, and the benchmark results reflect this. At 1080p, the card is able to push high frame rates, with a 148.2 FPS average on Low settings. However, as the resolution increases, the pixel fill rate of 176.3 GPixel/s becomes a limiting factor. This is evident in the 4K results, where even Medium settings only achieve 41.9 FPS. The card’s 32 ray tracing cores are present, but the game’s performance suggests that traditional rasterization workloads are the primary concern.

The RX 7600 XT’s position in the market is also telling. It holds a percentile rank of 63 among all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 20146 places it within 1.9% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER. The data indicates that this is a mid-range card that can handle 1080p and 1440p gaming well, but it is not designed for 4K Ultra settings. The 16 GB VRAM is a forward-looking feature, but it does not boost the card’s raw compute performance to match higher-tier competitors.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers its best results. The Low preset averages 148.2 FPS, which is the highest frame rate recorded for this combo. Medium settings reduce this to 114.2 FPS, a 23% drop. High settings further lower the average to 95.8 FPS, and Ultra settings bring it down to 78 FPS. All of these figures are comfortably above 60 FPS, indicating that 1080p is the sweet spot for this hardware, regardless of the graphical preset.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance remains playable but begins to show strain. The Low preset averages 97.4 FPS, which is still excellent. Medium settings produce 72.4 FPS, and High settings yield 65.2 FPS. The Ultra preset, however, drops to 46.3 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold. This suggests that users seeking a smooth 1440p experience should stick to Medium or High settings, as the Ultra preset introduces a significant performance penalty.

At 3840x2160, the results are marginal. The Low preset averages 56 FPS, which is just under 60 FPS and may be acceptable for some users. Medium settings drop to 41.9 FPS, High to 35.5 FPS, and Ultra to 29.6 FPS. None of these 4K results are ideal for fast-paced action, and the Ultra preset is effectively unplayable by modern standards. The data shows a clear hierarchy: 1080p is fully playable at all settings, 1440p is playable up to High, and 4K is only viable at Low settings.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT ranks 1061 out of 1656 tested combos in The Technomancer. This places it in the 64th percentile of all tested systems, meaning that roughly two-thirds of the configurations tested perform better. This ranking is consistent with the GPU’s mid-range standing, as the RX 7600 XT has a percentile rank of 63 among all GPUs. The CPU, by contrast, is a high-end part with a percentile rank of 94 among all CPUs, but its performance advantage is not fully utilized in this game.

The CPU’s nearest rivals include the AMD Ryzen 9 9900X3D, which has a delta of -0.4% in average benchmark score, and the Intel Core i7-14700F, which is 0.7% higher. These small differences indicate that the Ryzen 9 9900X is well-matched with its peers, but the GPU’s performance is what ultimately determines the combo’s ranking. The RX 7600 XT’s nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 7600, is only 0.6% faster in average score, which explains why this combo does not stand out from the crowd.

The measured FPS data corroborates this mid-pack positioning. At 1080p High, the 95.8 FPS average is respectable, but many other combos likely achieve higher numbers. The 4K Ultra result of 29.6 FPS is a clear indicator that this system is not optimized for high-resolution gaming. The combo’s rank of 1061 suggests that it is a balanced but unremarkable pairing, suitable for 1080p gaming and light 1440p use, but not for pushing the limits of The Technomancer’s graphical fidelity.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

Cores / Threads 12 / 24
Base Clock 4400 MHz
Boost Clock 5600 MHz
TDP 120W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2755 MHz MHz
TDP 190 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT in The Technomancer

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 56.0
3840x2160 Medium 41.9
3840x2160 High 35.5
3840x2160 Ultra 29.6
2560x1440 Low 97.4
2560x1440 Medium 72.4
2560x1440 High 65.2
2560x1440 Ultra 46.3
1920x1080 Low 148.2
1920x1080 Medium 114.2
1920x1080 High 95.8
1920x1080 Ultra 78.0

The Technomancer with Ryzen 9 9900X + Other GPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

The Technomancer with RX 7600 XT + Other CPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 9900X + RX 7600 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.