The Technomancer
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 115 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 45 | 56 | 65 | 84 |
| 1440p QHD | 78 | 99 | 116 | 152 |
| 1080p Full HD | 119 | 154 | 177 | 235 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Technomancer with AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070, In-Depth Analysis
The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents an interesting test case for the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 pairing. This combination, ranked 403rd out of 1656 tested combos, demonstrates a clear performance hierarchy across resolutions and settings. The data reveals a system where the GPU becomes the primary constraint at higher resolutions, while the CPU's strong multi-threaded capabilities ensure headroom at lower settings.
Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component
The measured FPS data shows a dramatic scaling curve as resolution increases, which points directly to the GPU as the limiting factor in this configuration. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 235 FPS, but this drops to 152 FPS at 1440p and further to 83.8 FPS at 4K. This represents a 64.3% reduction in frame rate from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, a pattern consistent with GPU-bound performance where pixel throughput becomes the bottleneck.
The scaling becomes even more pronounced at higher quality presets. At Ultra settings, the frame rate falls from 118.6 FPS at 1080p to 77.7 FPS at 1440p, and then to 44.9 FPS at 4K. The gap between 1080p and 4K at Ultra is 73.7 FPS, which is a 62.1% drop. This consistent pattern across all settings suggests that the RTX 4070's rendering capabilities, rather than the CPU's processing power, dictate the upper limits of performance.
Interestingly, the scaling between 1080p and 1440p is less severe than between 1440p and 4K. At High settings, the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 54.6 FPS (153.7 to 99.1), while the drop from 1440p to 4K is 43.5 FPS (99.1 to 55.6). This non-linear behavior indicates that the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute resources are being saturated more aggressively as pixel count increases, particularly at 4K where the 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth are pushed harder.
The data implies that at 1080p, the system is not fully GPU-limited at lower settings, as the 235 FPS Low result suggests the CPU can feed frames quickly. However, as resolution climbs, the GPU's workload expands proportionally, and the frame rate becomes entirely dependent on the RTX 4070's capabilities. The 4K Ultra result of 44.9 FPS shows this combination is not ideal for maximum fidelity at 4K, but the 4K High result of 55.6 FPS remains playable.
CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X brings 8 cores and 16 threads to this pairing, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. Its Zen 5 architecture on a 4 nm process provides substantial single-threaded and multi-threaded performance, as evidenced by its benchmark scores. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 31588 and single-core score of 4459 indicate strong processing capability, which correlates with the high frame rates observed at 1080p.
The CPU's 32 MB of shared L3 cache and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth support the game's data streaming needs, ensuring that frame pacing remains consistent even when the GPU is heavily loaded. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 9824 and max-thread score of 9771 show that the processor maintains high throughput across all cores, which is relevant for a game that can utilize multiple threads for physics and AI calculations.
The CPU's percentile ranking of 89 against all CPUs places it in the upper tier, and its nearest rivals show minimal performance deltas. The Intel Core i5-14500HX is only 0.2% ahead, while the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 is 0.6% behind, indicating that the 9700X is well-positioned among contemporary processors. In the context of The Technomancer's results, the CPU's role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions where GPU load is reduced, allowing the processor to push frame rates higher.
At 1080p Low, the 235 FPS result suggests the CPU is capable of driving the GPU to its maximum output without becoming a bottleneck. However, the fact that 1080p Ultra (118.6 FPS) is significantly lower than 1080p Low suggests that the GPU's workload at higher settings still dominates performance. The CPU's 65 W TDP and efficient design allow for sustained performance without thermal throttling, which is beneficial for maintaining consistent frame times in a demanding Action RPG.
GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 is the primary driver of this combo's gaming performance, with its 12 GB of GDDR6X memory and 192-bit bus providing a bandwidth of 504.2 GB/s. The GPU's boost clock of 2475 MHz and 5888 shading units deliver substantial compute throughput, as reflected in its 29.15 TFLOPS FP32 performance. These specifications directly influence the measured FPS across all resolution and settings combinations.
The GPU's 81st percentile ranking among all GPUs places it in the upper echelon, though its nearest rivals show interesting deltas. The AMD Radeon RX Vega 56 is 0.6% ahead in average score, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile is 2.2% ahead, indicating that desktop and mobile parts can compete closely. The RTX 4070's 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 3854 and Geekbench Vulkan score of 157352 suggest strong API-level performance that translates well to DirectX 12 games like The Technomancer.
The 4K results highlight the GPU's memory and compute limitations. At 4K Ultra, the 44.9 FPS average indicates that the 12 GB VRAM is being taxed heavily, and the 158.4 GPixel/s pixel rate is insufficient to maintain high frame rates at maximum quality. The 4K Low result of 83.8 FPS shows that reducing settings alleviates the GPU load, but the gap between Low and Ultra at 4K (38.9 FPS) demonstrates the significant impact of quality presets on GPU-bound performance.
The GPU's 200 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU requirement indicate it has ample power headroom, but the data shows it reaches its limit at 4K Ultra. The 21 Gbps effective memory speed and 1313 MHz memory clock provide sufficient bandwidth for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 4K results suggest that higher resolution textures and effects can overwhelm the memory subsystem.
FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain 60+ FPS?
A: The data shows that at 1440p, the High preset achieves 99.1 FPS, Medium reaches 116.3 FPS, and Low hits 152 FPS. At 4K, only Low settings (83.8 FPS) and Medium settings (65.3 FPS) exceed 60 FPS, while High (55.6 FPS) and Ultra (44.9 FPS) fall below that threshold.
Q: How does the Ryzen 7 9700X compare to its nearest CPU rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The 9700X's average benchmark score of 36029 is 0.2% behind the Intel Core i5-14500HX (35940) and 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 (35802). The Intel Core Ultra 9 185H is 0.4% ahead, while the Intel Core Ultra 5 225H is 0.8% ahead.
Q: What is the frame rate difference between 1080p and 4K at Ultra settings?
A: At 1080p Ultra, the combo achieves 118.6 FPS, while at 4K Ultra it drops to 44.9 FPS. This represents a 73.7 FPS decrease, or a 62.1% reduction in performance when moving from 1080p to 4K.
Q: Is the RTX 4070's VRAM capacity sufficient for 4K gaming?
A: The 12 GB GDDR6X memory provides 504.2 GB/s bandwidth, and the measured results show that 4K High (55.6 FPS) and 4K Medium (65.3 FPS) are playable. However, 4K Ultra (44.9 FPS) suggests the memory and compute resources are stressed at maximum settings.
Q: How does the RTX 4070 rank against other GPUs in the benchmark database?
A: The RTX 4070 holds an 81st percentile ranking among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon RX Vega 56, is 0.6% ahead in average score, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A is 1.9% ahead and the AMD Radeon RX 5300M is 2.5% behind.
Q: What is the CPU's single-threaded performance as indicated by benchmarks?
A: The Ryzen 7 9700X achieves a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4459, a Geekbench single-core score of 3353, and a 3DMark single-thread score of 1280. These results indicate strong per-core performance that supports high frame rates in games.
How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos
This specific combination of AMD Ryzen 7 9700X and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 ranks 403rd out of 1656 tested combos in The Technomancer, placing it in the top 24.3% of all configurations tested. This ranking is notably lower than what the individual component percentiles might suggest, as the CPU ranks in the 89th percentile and the GPU in the 81st percentile, which would imply a higher combined ranking.
The discrepancy between component percentiles and the combo rank suggests that The Technomancer may not fully utilize the CPU's capabilities, or that the GPU's performance at 4K drags down the overall assessment. The game's 2016 release date means it may not leverage the latest multi-threading optimizations, making the CPU's 8-core, 16-thread configuration less impactful than in more modern titles.
The combo's position in the middle of the upper quartile indicates that while this pairing is capable, there are 402 other combinations that deliver better performance in this specific game. This could be due to the GPU's end-of-life status, as the RTX 4070 is marked as production ended, and newer GPUs may offer better performance per dollar. The 4K Ultra result of 44.9 FPS is particularly weak, suggesting that the combo struggles at the highest settings where the GPU's 12 GB VRAM and compute resources are insufficient.
Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend heavily on the target resolution. At 1080p, the Ultra preset delivers 118.6 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold and provides the best visual quality without sacrificing smoothness. The High preset at 1080p offers 153.7 FPS, which may be preferable for players with high-refresh-rate monitors, but Ultra provides the best balance of fidelity and performance.
At 1440p, the High preset (99.1 FPS) is the recommended choice, as it maintains a high frame rate while offering significantly better visuals than Medium (116.3 FPS) or Low (152 FPS). The Ultra preset at 1440p drops to 77.7 FPS, which is still playable but represents a 21.4 FPS reduction from High for incremental visual gains that may not be noticeable in an Action RPG.
For 4K gaming, the data suggests that Medium settings (65.3 FPS) provide the best experience, as they stay above 60 FPS while offering better quality than Low (83.8 FPS). The High preset at 4K (55.6 FPS) is borderline, and Ultra (44.9 FPS) is not recommended for smooth gameplay. The gap between Medium and High at 4K is only 9.7 FPS, but the visual improvement may justify the trade-off for players who prioritize graphics over absolute smoothness.
Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers
1080p (1920x1080):
- Low: 235 FPS
- Medium: 177.2 FPS
- High: 153.7 FPS
- Ultra: 118.6 FPS
The 1080p results show a clear hierarchy, with Low settings providing the highest frame rate at 235 FPS. The progression from Low to Medium (57.8 FPS drop), Medium to High (23.5 FPS drop), and High to Ultra (35.1 FPS drop) indicates that each quality tier has a measurable impact on performance.
1440p (2560x1440):
- Low: 152 FPS
- Medium: 116.3 FPS
- High: 99.1 FPS
- Ultra: 77.7 FPS
At 1440p, the frame rates scale similarly but with lower absolute values. The difference between Low and Medium is 35.7 FPS, between Medium and High is 17.2 FPS, and between High and Ultra is 21.4 FPS. The 1440p Low result of 152 FPS is lower than the 1080p High result of 153.7 FPS, showing that resolution has a greater impact than settings in some cases.
4K (3840x2160):
- Low: 83.8 FPS
- Medium: 65.3 FPS
- High: 55.6 FPS
- Ultra: 44.9 FPS
The 4K results demonstrate the GPU's limitations most clearly. The Low preset achieves 83.8 FPS, which is the only setting above 60 FPS at this resolution. The Medium preset (65.3 FPS) is marginally playable, while High (55.6 FPS) and Ultra (44.9 FPS) fall below the smoothness threshold. The total spread at 4K is 38.9 FPS, compared to 116.4 FPS at 1080p, indicating that the GPU's performance ceiling becomes the dominant factor at higher resolutions.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 in The Technomancer
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 83.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 65.3 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 55.6 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 44.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 152.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 116.3 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 99.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 77.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 235.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 177.2 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 153.7 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 118.6 |
The Technomancer with Ryzen 7 9700X + Other GPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Technomancer with RTX 4070 + Other CPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9700X + RTX 4070
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.