The Technomancer
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 70 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 28 | 34 | 41 | 49 |
| 1440p QHD | 46 | 61 | 74 | 91 |
| 1080p Full HD | 73 | 96 | 112 | 141 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Technomancer with AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The Technomancer is a demanding Action RPG that scales heavily with resolution, and the pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT shows a clear performance profile across the measured presets. The data reveals a system where the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, while the CPU provides ample headroom at lower settings. This combination delivers a playable experience at 1080p and 1440p, but struggles to maintain smooth framerates at 4K, particularly on higher graphical presets.
Resolution Scaling
The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and consistent across all settings, demonstrating the GPU-bound nature of this title at higher pixel counts. At High settings, the average framerate falls from 95.5 FPS at 1920x1080 to 60.7 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of roughly 36%. Pushing further to 3840x2160 yields just 33.5 FPS, which is a 65% decline from the 1080p result. This steep curve indicates that the RX 6600 XT is the limiting component, as the workload becomes exponentially heavier on the rendering hardware as pixel count rises.
The scaling pattern holds across other presets as well. At Low settings, the system achieves 140.9 FPS at 1080p, which drops to 91.4 FPS at 1440p and 48.5 FPS at 4K. Medium settings follow suit with 112.1 FPS at 1080p, 74.1 FPS at 1440p, and 41.1 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset shows the most dramatic falloff: 72.5 FPS at 1080p, 46.4 FPS at 1440p, and a barely playable 28.1 FPS at 4K. The consistent pattern across all four presets confirms that resolution is the dominant factor in performance, with the GPU's memory bandwidth and compute capabilities being stretched thin at 4K.
Notably, the gap between 1080p and 1440p is smaller than the gap between 1440p and 4K. For instance, at High settings, the jump from 1080p to 1440p costs 34.8 FPS, while the jump from 1440p to 4K costs 27.2 FPS. This suggests that the card handles the transition to 1440p relatively gracefully, but the 4K resolution pushes it past its comfortable operating range. The data indicates that 1440p is the practical ceiling for this combo if aiming for smooth gameplay, while 4K is reserved for less demanding presets or lower expectations.
Settings Recommendations
The measured rows provide a clear picture of which presets offer the best balance of visual quality and performance. At 1080p, the High preset delivers 95.5 FPS, which is comfortably above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. The Ultra preset drops to 72.5 FPS, still playable but with diminishing returns for the visual uplift. For most users at this resolution, High is the sweet spot, as it retains most of the visual fidelity while providing a substantial framerate buffer above Ultra.
At 1440p, the High preset produces 60.7 FPS, which is right at the edge of smoothness. The Medium preset offers 74.1 FPS, providing a safer margin for fluctuating scenes. The Low preset reaches 91.4 FPS, which may appeal to competitive players or those sensitive to framerate dips. Given that Ultra falls to 46.4 FPS, the recommendation is to use Medium or High at 1440p, depending on whether visual fidelity or framerate stability is the priority.
At 4K, the situation becomes more constrained. The Low preset achieves 48.5 FPS, which is the only setting that approaches playability. Medium drops to 41.1 FPS, and High falls to 33.5 FPS. Ultra at 28.1 FPS is effectively unplayable for action-oriented gameplay. The data suggests that 4K users should stick to Low settings if they want to maintain a playable framerate, or consider reducing the resolution to 1440p for a better experience. The benchmark results indicate that this GPU is not suited for high-fidelity 4K gaming in this title.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 7 9700X is a powerful processor with 8 cores and 16 threads, running at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.50 GHz. Its architecture, Zen 5 on the Granite Ridge codename, is built on a 4 nm process and features a 32 MB shared L3 cache. In synthetic benchmarks, the CPU scores 31588 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 4459 in single-core, indicating strong multi-threaded and single-threaded performance. The CPU's percentile ranking against all CPUs is 89, placing it in the top tier of processors.
Given the framerates observed in The Technomancer, the CPU does not appear to be a bottleneck. At 1080p with Low settings, the system reaches 140.9 FPS, which suggests the CPU can feed the GPU effectively. Even at 1080p Ultra, the 72.5 FPS result is likely GPU-limited rather than CPU-limited, as the processor's capabilities far exceed what this game demands at that resolution. The CPU's 16 threads provide ample headroom for background tasks and game logic, ensuring consistent framerates.
The nearest rivals to the Ryzen 7 9700X in terms of average benchmark score include the Intel Core i5-14500HX with a delta of 0.2% and the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 5845 with a delta of 0.6%. These differences are negligible in real-world gaming, and the 9700X's single-thread performance, evidenced by its 4654 Passmark single-thread score, ensures it can handle the game's core logic without issue. The data shows that the CPU is a non-factor in this game's performance, with the GPU being the sole determinant of framerate.
How This Combo Ranks
In the database of tested combinations, the AMD Ryzen 7 9700X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT ranks 1184 out of 1656 combos for The Technomancer. This places the combo in the lower half of all tested systems, reflecting the GPU's mid-range positioning rather than the CPU's high-end capabilities. The rank of 1184 suggests that while the CPU is potent, the GPU holds the combo back from competing with higher-tier configurations.
The GPU's percentile ranking against all GPUs is 71, indicating that it performs better than 71% of all tested graphics cards. However, its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti with a delta of 0.1% and the AMD Radeon R9 M395X with a delta of 0.4%. These comparisons show that the RX 6600 XT is closely matched with older high-end cards, which explains why the combo's overall rank is not higher. The RTX 3070 sits just 0.9% above the RX 6600 XT, highlighting how close the performance margins are in this segment.
The combo's rank of 1184 out of 1656 means that roughly 28% of tested combinations perform worse, while 72% perform better. This places the system in a position where it is suitable for 1080p and 1440p gaming but will struggle with 4K. The data indicates that users with this combo should focus on maximizing settings at lower resolutions rather than attempting to push 4K, as the GPU's limits become apparent at that resolution.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 23 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process. It features 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 256.0 GB/s. The GPU operates at a base clock of 1968 MHz and a boost clock of 2589 MHz, with 2048 shading units and 64 ROPs. Its FP32 performance is rated at 10.60 TFLOPS, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate. The GPU's TDP is 160 W, and it was launched with an MSRP of 379 USD.
The GPU's performance in The Technomancer is consistent with its 71st percentile ranking among all GPUs. At 1080p, the card delivers high framerates across all presets, from 140.9 FPS at Low to 72.5 FPS at Ultra. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but at 4K, the card's 256.0 GB/s bandwidth becomes a limiting factor, as evidenced by the steep drop to 33.5 FPS at High settings. The GPU's 128-bit memory bus is a known constraint for high-resolution textures, and the data reflects this bottleneck.
The GPU's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, performs nearly identically with a delta of 0.1%, which shows the RX 6600 XT's efficiency given its smaller die size and lower power draw. The RTX 3070, which is 0.9% faster, represents the next tier up, but the RX 6600 XT holds its own in this title. The data clearly shows that the GPU is the limiting component in this combo, and users looking to improve 4K performance would need to upgrade this card to see meaningful gains.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 9700X
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 9700X + AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT in The Technomancer
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 48.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 41.1 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 33.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 28.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 91.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 74.1 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 60.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 46.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 140.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 112.1 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 95.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 72.5 |
The Technomancer with Ryzen 7 9700X + Other GPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Technomancer with RX 6600 XT + Other CPUs
See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 9700X + RX 6600 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.