The Technomancer

The Technomancer

AVERAGE FPS
136
excellent

This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 136 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 51 65 76 99
1440p QHD 92 118 138 180
1080p Full HD 141 180 211 275

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 99
3840x2160 Medium 76
3840x2160 High 65
3840x2160 Ultra 51
2560x1440 Low 180
2560x1440 Medium 138
2560x1440 High 118
2560x1440 Ultra 92
1920x1080 Low 275
1920x1080 Medium 211
1920x1080 High 180
1920x1080 Ultra 141

The Technomancer with AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, In-Depth Analysis

The Technomancer, a 2016 Action RPG, presents an interesting stress profile for modern hardware. With the AMD Ryzen 5 7600X paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, the measured frame rates across resolutions reveal a system that is heavily balanced toward GPU limitation at higher settings, but which scales in a way that exposes significant CPU headroom at lower resolutions. The data indicates that this combination is capable of delivering highly playable performance across the board, though the specific bottlenecks shift dramatically depending on the resolution and preset selected.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate data for this combination in The Technomancer shows a classic resolution scaling curve, but with unusual amplitude that points directly at the limiting component. At 1080p with Low settings, the system produces an average of 275 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops that to 180 FPS, a reduction of 95 FPS or roughly 34.5%. The jump to 4K Low further compresses performance to 99 FPS, which is a 45% drop from the 1440p figure. This steep decline with resolution is a strong indicator that the GPU is becoming the primary constraint as pixel count rises, but the sheer magnitude of the 1080p numbers suggests the CPU is still capable of pushing far more frames than the graphics card can render at higher resolutions.

Looking at the High preset, the scaling is more moderate but still reveals the same trend. The system hits 180 FPS at 1080p, falls to 118 FPS at 1440p (a 34.4% decrease), and then drops to 65 FPS at 4K (a 44.9% decrease from 1440p). The consistency of these percentage drops across Low and High presets indicates that the rendering load is scaling predictably with resolution, and that the CPU is not a limiting factor until the framerate ceiling is reached at lower resolutions. The fact that 1080p High (180 FPS) matches 1440p Low (180 FPS) exactly is a notable data point, suggesting that the system hits a performance plateau around that framerate where either the CPU or some other system bottleneck prevents higher output.

The Medium preset provides the only min/max frame data in the pack, which is useful for understanding frame pacing. At 1080p Medium, the average is 211 FPS with a minimum of 180 FPS and a maximum of 243 FPS. This shows a fairly wide spread of 63 FPS between the lowest and highest frames, indicating that while the average is high, there is significant variance in frame delivery. At 1440p Medium, the average drops to 138 FPS, with a minimum of 117 FPS and a maximum of 159 FPS, a spread of 42 FPS. At 4K Medium, the average falls to 76 FPS, with a minimum of 64 FPS and a maximum of 87 FPS, a spread of 23 FPS. This tightening of the frame range as resolution increases further confirms that the GPU is smoothing out the CPU's variable output by becoming the dominant bottleneck.

The Ultra preset shows the most dramatic scaling, which is expected given the increased graphical demands. At 1080p Ultra, the average is 141 FPS. This drops to 92 FPS at 1440p, a 34.7% reduction, and then plummets to 51 FPS at 4K, a 44.6% reduction from 1440p. The 4K Ultra result is the only sub-60 FPS average in the entire dataset, and the 51 FPS figure suggests that the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is being pushed to its absolute limits by the combination of high resolution and maximum settings. The data clearly shows that for 4K Ultra, the GPU is the sole limiting factor, as the CPU's performance headroom is irrelevant when the graphics card is struggling to maintain a playable framerate.

How This Combo Ranks

The benchmark database places this specific CPU and GPU combination at rank 396 out of 3696 tested combos for The Technomancer. This places it in the top 10.7% of all tested systems, which is a strong showing for a game that is not particularly known for being a advanced benchmark title. The percentile ranking of 79 for the CPU and 76 for the GPU out of all tested components suggests that both parts are above average in their respective categories, and their combined performance in this game reflects that.

The rank of 396 is significant because it indicates that while this combo performs well, there are still 395 other combinations that achieve higher frame rates in this specific title. This is likely due to the fact that The Technomancer, being an older title, may not fully utilize the modern architecture of the Ryzen 5 7600X or the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. The data suggests that the system is not hitting the absolute top tier of performance, but rather sits comfortably in the upper echelon, likely trading blows with systems that have faster GPUs but slower CPUs, or vice versa. The combo's rank demonstrates that it is a highly capable pairing for this game, delivering smooth performance at most settings, but it is not the ultimate combination for those seeking to max out every frame.

The proximity to the 396th rank out of such a large pool of combos also highlights the law of diminishing returns. The difference between the 396th and 100th combo is likely a small margin of a few FPS, while the difference between the 396th and the 3000th combo is substantial. The data indicates that this pairing is firmly in the "high-end" tier for this game, where the user experience is defined by high refresh rate monitors at 1080p and 1440p, and solid 4K performance at High settings. For a game released in 2016, this modern hardware combination is clearly overqualified for the task, which is reflected in its high rank and the high frame rates observed across most of the resolution and settings matrix.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combination depend heavily on the target resolution and refresh rate. For 1080p gaming, the data shows that the Ultra preset is the best choice for users with high refresh rate monitors. The 141 FPS average at 1080p Ultra is well above the 60 FPS threshold and is smooth enough for most displays. However, for users with 240Hz or higher refresh rate monitors, the Medium preset at 211 FPS or even the Low preset at 275 FPS would be necessary to fully utilize the display's capabilities. The 1080p High preset at 180 FPS is a solid middle ground, offering a 39 FPS improvement over Ultra while maintaining a higher level of visual fidelity than Medium.

At 1440p, the recommendation shifts toward the High preset. The 118 FPS average at 1440p High is an excellent balance of visual quality and performance, comfortably surpassing the 60 FPS mark and providing a smooth experience for most gamers. The Medium preset at 138 FPS is also viable, but the jump to High is only a 20 FPS cost for a significant visual upgrade. The Ultra preset at 92 FPS is still playable and would be the choice for those who prioritize image quality above all else, but the High preset offers a better experience for competitive or fast-paced gameplay. The Low preset at 180 FPS is unnecessary at this resolution unless the user has a 165Hz or higher refresh rate monitor and wants to maximize frame throughput.

For 4K gaming, the data strongly suggests that the High preset is the only viable option for a consistently smooth experience. The 65 FPS average at 4K High is just above the 60 FPS target, making it the recommended setting for 4K displays. The Medium preset at 76 FPS is also an option, but the visual fidelity drop may not be worth the 11 FPS gain. The Ultra preset at 51 FPS is below the 60 FPS threshold and would result in noticeable stuttering and a less responsive feel, making it unsuitable for most players. The Low preset at 99 FPS is the only way to hit high refresh rates at 4K, but the severe graphical downgrade makes it a poor trade-off. In summary, the data indicates that 1080p Ultra, 1440p High, and 4K High are the sweet spots for this hardware combination in The Technomancer.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average FPS achievable with this CPU and GPU combo?

A: The highest measured average is 275 FPS, which occurs at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset. This represents the absolute ceiling for this combination, likely limited by the CPU or other system components rather than the GPU.

Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in The Technomancer?

A: Yes, but with caveats. At 4K High settings, the system averages 65 FPS, which is playable. At 4K Medium, it averages 76 FPS. However, at 4K Ultra, the average drops to 51 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS standard for smooth gameplay, indicating the GPU is the limiting factor at that setting.

Q: How does the performance scale between 1080p and 1440p?

A: The performance drop is significant but consistent. At High settings, the average FPS falls from 180 at 1080p to 118 at 1440p, a 34.4% decrease. At Low settings, it falls from 275 to 180, a 34.5% decrease. This indicates a predictable scaling curve where the GPU load increases proportionally with pixel count.

Q: What is the best settings preset for a 144Hz monitor?

A: For a 144Hz monitor, the data recommends the High preset at 1440p, which yields 118 FPS. At 1080p, the Ultra preset at 141 FPS is also suitable for a 144Hz display. The High preset offers the best balance of visual fidelity and frame rate to keep the experience smooth and responsive.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the bottleneck in this game?

A: The bottleneck shifts based on settings. At 1080p Low, the system produces 275 FPS, indicating the GPU is not fully utilized and the CPU is likely the limit. At 4K Ultra, the system produces 51 FPS, showing the GPU is the definitive bottleneck, as the CPU's performance is irrelevant when the graphics card is maxed out.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 16 GB of VRAM affect performance?

A: The 16 GB frame buffer is more than sufficient for The Technomancer. The data shows no evidence of VRAM limitations, as performance scales consistently with resolution and settings, which would not be the case if memory capacity were exceeded. The GPU's memory bandwidth of 672.3 GB/s is the more relevant factor for this game's rendering load.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the dominant component in this pairing for The Technomancer, particularly at higher resolutions and settings. The GPU's 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus provides a substantial 672.3 GB/s of memory bandwidth, which is crucial for feeding the rendering pipeline at 4K resolutions. The data shows that at 4K Ultra, the GPU is clearly the limiting factor, as the frame rate drops to 51 FPS, which is a direct consequence of the graphics card's compute and memory bandwidth limits rather than any CPU constraint. The GPU's 8448 shading units and 264 texture mapping units are responsible for the pixel and texture processing, and the 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 performance is what drives the heavy shader work in the game's action sequences.

The GPU's clock speeds, with a base of 2340 MHz and a boost of 2610 MHz, allow it to maintain high throughput under load. The measured FPS data shows that the GPU's performance scales predictably with resolution, with the 4K High preset at 65 FPS being a 44.9% drop from the 1440p High preset at 118 FPS. This scaling is typical of a GPU-bound scenario, where the graphics card's rendering capabilities are the primary determinant of frame rate. The GPU's 76th percentile ranking against all tested GPUs indicates that it is a strong performer, but the data suggests that for The Technomancer, a more powerful GPU would be needed to achieve 60+ FPS at 4K Ultra. The GPU's 96 ROPs are also relevant, as they handle the final pixel output, and the 250.6 GPixel/s pixel rate is a factor in the fill-rate requirements at high resolutions.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's role is further emphasized by the frame time data from the Medium preset. At 1080p, the min FPS of 180 and max FPS of 243 show a wide variance, which can be attributed to the GPU handling varying scene complexity. As resolution increases to 4K, the variance narrows to a 23 FPS spread (64-87), indicating that the GPU is working at a more consistent, saturated level. This behavior confirms that the GPU is the component that dictates the absolute frame rate ceiling at any given resolution, and its performance in this game is strong enough for high-refresh 1080p and 1440p, and smooth 4K at High settings.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 7600X plays a supporting role in this combination, but its performance is critical for achieving the high frame rates seen at lower resolutions. With 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 4 architecture, the CPU provides the processing power needed to feed the GPU with draw calls and game logic. The CPU's 4.70 GHz base clock and 5.30 GHz boost clock are high, which is beneficial for single-threaded game engines like the one likely used in The Technomancer. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the system achieves 275 FPS, which is likely the maximum output the CPU can deliver before it becomes the bottleneck. This is supported by the fact that the 1080p High preset also hits 180 FPS, which is identical to the 1440p Low preset, suggesting a CPU-imposed limit around that performance level.

The CPU's cache hierarchy, with a 32 MB shared L3 cache, helps reduce memory latency and improve data access for the game's assets. The dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 83.2 GB/s bandwidth provides the necessary data throughput to keep the CPU fed, though it is unlikely to be a limiting factor in this older title. The CPU's benchmark scores, such as the Cinebench R23 multicore score of 15236 and single-core score of 1965, indicate that it has substantial processing power. However, the game's performance is more dependent on the GPU at higher resolutions, as evidenced by the 4K results where the CPU's role becomes less significant. The 79th percentile ranking of the CPU against all tested CPUs shows that it is a well-above-average processor, and its nearest rivals, such as the AMD Ryzen 7 5700X and Intel Core i5-12600K, have nearly identical average scores, with deltas of 0.2% and -0.3% for the Ryzen 5 8500GE.

The CPU's performance is most evident in the frame rate consistency at lower resolutions. The 1080p Medium preset shows a minimum FPS of 180, which is the same as the 1440p Low average, reinforcing the idea that the CPU is capable of maintaining a high minimum frame rate, but the GPU's workload dictates the maximum. The Ryzen 5 7600X's 105W TDP and 5 nm process node make it an efficient processor, but for this game, its role is to ensure that the GPU is never starved for data. The data indicates that the CPU is not a bottleneck in The Technomancer except at the very highest frame rates, where its single-thread performance becomes the limiting factor. Overall, the CPU provides a solid foundation for the GPU to operate at its full potential, but it is the GPU that ultimately defines the gaming experience in this title.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 7600X

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 4700 MHz
Boost Clock 5300 MHz
TDP 105W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

VRAM 16 GB GDDR6X
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2610 MHz MHz
TDP 285 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7600X + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in The Technomancer

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 99.0
3840x2160 Medium 76.0
3840x2160 High 65.0
3840x2160 Ultra 51.0
2560x1440 Low 180.0
2560x1440 Medium 138.0
2560x1440 High 118.0
2560x1440 Ultra 92.0
1920x1080 Low 275.0
1920x1080 Medium 211.0
1920x1080 High 180.0
1920x1080 Ultra 141.0

The Technomancer with Ryzen 5 7600X + Other GPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

The Technomancer with RTX 4070 Ti SUPER + Other CPUs

See how The Technomancer performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 7600X + RTX 4070 Ti SUPER

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.