The Medium
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 48 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 24 | 26 | 38 | 61 |
| 1440p QHD | 27 | 35 | 48 | 78 |
| 1080p Full HD | 33 | 44 | 59 | 98 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Medium with Intel Core i7-13700K + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT, In-Depth Analysis
The Medium presents an interesting stress profile for the Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT. The measured frame rates across resolutions reveal a system that is heavily constrained by the graphics card at higher settings, yet the CPU's substantial headroom becomes visible at lower presets. The data indicates this combo ranks 1122 out of 1689 tested combinations, placing it in the lower third of the database. This position suggests that while the hardware is capable, the specific demands of this horror title create bottlenecks that neither component can fully overcome at maximum fidelity.
Resolution Scaling
The frame rate drop from 1080p to 4K is dramatic and tells a clear story about which component is driving performance. At Low settings, the transition from 1920x1080 (98 FPS) to 3840x2160 (60.7 FPS) represents a 38% reduction in average frame rate. This scaling is relatively gentle, indicating that at Low settings the system still has enough headroom to absorb the increased pixel count without collapsing.
Moving to Medium settings, the scaling becomes more punishing. The 1080p result of 58.5 FPS falls to 37.6 FPS at 4K, a 36% drop. The pattern continues at High settings, where 44.2 FPS at 1080p drops to 26.4 FPS at 4K, a 40% reduction. The Ultra preset shows the most extreme scaling: 33 FPS at 1080p plummets to 23.7 FPS at 4K, a 28% decline that still leaves the game barely playable.
The limiting component here is clearly the GPU. The Radeon RX 7600 XT, with its 128-bit memory bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, struggles to feed the increasing pixel workloads. The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory is plentiful, but the bandwidth constraint becomes the bottleneck as resolution rises. The CPU, with its 16 cores and 24 threads, is not the limiting factor in these scenarios. The data suggests that at 4K Ultra, the GPU is working at its absolute limit, producing just 23.7 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination ranks 1122 out of 1689 tested combos in The Medium, placing it in the 33rd percentile of all systems tested. This is a modest ranking that reflects the GPU's mid-range positioning rather than the CPU's high-end capabilities. The Core i7-13700K itself sits in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 47282. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-13700KF (deltaPct -0.1), AMD EPYC 4364P (deltaPct 0.3), Intel Core i9-12900F (deltaPct 0.4), and AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (deltaPct -0.5). These margins are microscopic, indicating the CPU is performing exactly as expected.
The GPU's percentile is far lower at 63, with an average benchmark score of 20146. Its nearest rivals are the AMD Radeon RX 460 (deltaPct 0.3), AMD Radeon RX 7600 (deltaPct -0.6), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER (deltaPct 1.9), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (deltaPct -1.9). The fact that the RX 7600 XT is within 2% of the RTX 2060 SUPER in average score, despite being several generations newer, highlights the performance ceiling of this particular GPU configuration.
The ranking gap between CPU and GPU percentiles (93 vs 63) is telling. In a game like The Medium, which relies heavily on fixed camera angles and pre-rendered environments, the GPU's raw throughput matters more than CPU compute. The combo rank of 1122 suggests that many other combinations offer better balance for this specific title, likely with GPUs that have wider memory buses or higher memory clocks.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i7-13700K brings substantial processing power to this pairing. With 16 cores, 24 threads, and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, it is a formidable processor for gaming and productivity alike. The Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process, delivers strong single-threaded performance as evidenced by its 3DMark single-thread score of 1136 and Geekbench single-core score of 2850.
In The Medium, the CPU's role appears to be providing consistent frame pacing rather than pushing raw FPS higher. The game's horror genre relies on atmospheric tension and detailed environments, which benefit from the CPU's ability to manage complex scene graphs and AI routines. The 30 MB of shared L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, reducing latency in scenarios with many simultaneous entities.
The 3DMark 16-thread score of 10717 and max-thread score of 12412 indicate strong multi-threaded capabilities. However, the measured FPS data shows that even at 1080p Low, the system reaches 98 FPS, which is not a CPU-bound result. The GPU is still the limiting factor. The CPU's PassMark multithread score of 45887 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 39000 suggest it could handle far more demanding workloads without breaking a sweat.
The data implies that the CPU is waiting for the GPU to catch up at most settings. Only at 4K Ultra, where the GPU is clearly overwhelmed, might the CPU's performance characteristics have any meaningful impact on the experience. The 125 W TDP and unlocked multiplier suggest this processor has headroom for overclocking, but the benchmark results indicate that such tuning would not meaningfully change The Medium's frame rates.
FAQ
Q: Why is the 4K Ultra performance so low at 23.7 FPS?
A: The GPU's 128-bit memory bus and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth cannot sustain the pixel throughput required at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. The 16 GB VRAM is sufficient, but the bandwidth limitation creates a hard ceiling.
Q: How does the CPU's performance compare to its closest rivals?
A: The Core i7-13700K scores 47282 on average, which is within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (47527) and 0.4% of the Intel Core i9-12900F (47081). These differences are negligible in real-world gaming.
Q: Is the GPU's performance competitive with other cards in its class?
A: The RX 7600 XT averages 20146, which is 1.9% ahead of the RTX 2060 SUPER (19774) but 1.9% behind the RTX 3070 Mobile (20534). The delta from the standard RX 7600 is only 0.6%, indicating minimal benefit from the XT variant.
Q: What resolution provides the most balanced experience?
A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the system achieves 47.6 FPS, which is nearly the 50 FPS threshold for smooth play. This represents the best compromise between visual quality and performance.
Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU in this game?
A: No. The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K shows consistent drops that track with GPU workload. The CPU's 93rd percentile ranking versus the GPU's 63rd percentile indicates the GPU is the limiting component at all tested settings.
Q: How does the combo rank compare to the component rankings?
A: The combo ranks 1122 out of 1689 (33rd percentile), while the CPU sits at 93rd percentile and the GPU at 63rd percentile. This discrepancy shows that the combination underperforms relative to the CPU's capabilities.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the performance anchor in this configuration, for better and worse. Its Navi 33 chip with RDNA 3.0 architecture and 6 nm process from TSMC delivers 22.57 TFLOPS of FP32 compute. The 2048 shading units and 64 ROPs are adequate for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but the 128-bit memory bus limits high-resolution performance.
The 16 GB of GDDR6 memory at 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) provides 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This is the key specification that explains the measured FPS results. At 1080p Low, the GPU can push 98 FPS, but at 4K Ultra, it manages only 23.7 FPS. The memory bandwidth simply cannot scale with the pixel count.
The GPU's boost clock of 2755 MHz and game clock of 2470 MHz are respectable for the RDNA 3.0 architecture. However, the PassMark G3D score of 17132 and 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2348 place it firmly in the mid-range segment. The Geekbench OpenCL score of 83114 and Vulkan score of 88301 show balanced compute performance across APIs.
The 190 W TDP and 204 mm length make this a compact, efficient card. The PCIe 4.0 x8 interface provides sufficient bandwidth for most scenarios, though the x8 link could theoretically limit performance in bandwidth-heavy titles. The data suggests that The Medium is such a title, as the FPS drops from Medium to High settings are substantial at every resolution.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data provides clear guidance for optimal settings. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset delivers 58.5 FPS, which is comfortably above the playable threshold. High settings at 1080p yield 44.2 FPS, which is still playable but with more noticeable drops. Ultra at 1080p drops to 33 FPS, which is below the ideal threshold for a game that relies on atmosphere and timing.
At 2560x1440, the Medium preset produces 47.6 FPS, which is borderline playable. High settings at this resolution drop to 35.3 FPS, which may be acceptable for slower-paced horror gameplay but not ideal. Low settings at 1440p reach 78.2 FPS, but this sacrifices too much visual quality for such a cinematic game.
For 3840x2160, the Low preset achieves 60.7 FPS, which is playable but visually compromised. Medium at 4K yields 37.6 FPS, which is marginal. High and Ultra at 4K produce 26.4 and 23.7 FPS respectively, which are not recommended for any playable experience.
The best experience per the measured rows is 1920x1080 with Medium settings, delivering 58.5 FPS. This provides a balance of visual fidelity and smoothness that suits The Medium's horror style. For users with 1440p displays, Medium settings at 47.6 FPS is the recommended compromise, though those sensitive to frame pacing may prefer Low settings at 78.2 FPS.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the full range of settings produces a clear hierarchy. Low settings achieve 98 FPS, providing maximum headroom. Medium settings drop to 58.5 FPS, which is still smooth. High settings produce 44.2 FPS, and Ultra falls to 33 FPS. The 65 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at this resolution shows the GPU's performance envelope.
At 2560x1440, the same pattern emerges but with lower absolute numbers. Low settings reach 78.2 FPS, Medium drops to 47.6 FPS, High falls to 35.3 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 26.9 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is significant at every setting, with Low losing 20 FPS and Ultra losing 6 FPS.
At 3840x2160, the GPU's limitations become severe. Low settings manage 60.7 FPS, which is surprisingly playable. Medium drops to 37.6 FPS, High falls to 26.4 FPS, and Ultra reaches only 23.7 FPS. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is gentler than from 1080p to 1440p, suggesting the GPU is hitting a bandwidth ceiling rather than a compute ceiling.
The overall pattern across resolutions shows that the RX 7600 XT has roughly a 4x performance range between Low at 1080p and Ultra at 4K. The 16 GB VRAM never becomes a limiting factor, as even at 4K Ultra the game does not exhaust the memory pool. The bottleneck is consistently the 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, which caps performance regardless of the amount of available memory.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i7-13700K
AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i7-13700K + AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT in The Medium
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 60.7 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 37.6 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 26.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 23.7 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 78.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 47.6 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 35.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 26.9 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 98.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 58.5 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 44.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 33.0 |
The Medium with ii7-13700K + Other GPUs
See how The Medium performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Medium with RX 7600 XT + Other CPUs
See how The Medium performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii7-13700K + RX 7600 XT
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.