The Medium
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 46 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 21 | 27 | 37 | 59 |
| 1440p QHD | 27 | 34 | 47 | 76 |
| 1080p Full HD | 32 | 40 | 56 | 90 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Medium with AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + AMD Radeon 8050S, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and AMD Radeon 8050S combination presents a fascinating case study in integrated graphics performance within a demanding horror title. The data reveals a system that is capable of delivering playable frame rates, but only when settings and resolution are carefully managed. This analysis breaks down the measured performance to understand where this combo excels and where its limitations become apparent.
Settings Recommendations
The measured FPS data across all resolutions and presets tells a clear story about the optimal way to experience The Medium on this hardware. The most striking observation is the dramatic performance cliff that occurs when moving from the Low preset to the Medium preset. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 90 FPS, which is exceptionally smooth. However, selecting Medium drops the average to 56 FPS, a significant 37.8% reduction. This pattern repeats at 2560x1440, where Low yields 76 FPS and Medium falls to 47 FPS, and even at 3840x2160, where Low achieves 59 FPS but Medium drops to 37 FPS.
Given this data, the Low preset offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance for a consistently smooth experience. The 90 FPS at 1080p Low is the highest measured average in the entire dataset, indicating that this is the only configuration where the hardware is not severely taxed. While the Medium preset provides a visual upgrade, the frame rate drop is substantial enough to push the experience from fluid to merely playable, particularly at higher resolutions. For players prioritizing a stable frame rate, the Low preset is the clear recommendation. The High and Ultra presets are only viable for players who prioritize visual detail over gameplay smoothness, as their average FPS numbers fall into ranges that may feel sluggish for a horror game requiring precise timing.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 is a 16-core, 32-thread processor based on the Zen 5 architecture, with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. In synthetic benchmarks, this CPU demonstrates immense multi-threaded capability, scoring 35,314 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 20,992 in Geekbench multi-core. Its single-thread performance is also strong, with scores of 2,044 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 2,464 in Geekbench single-core. The CPU's percentile ranking of 95 against all CPUs indicates that it is a top-tier processor for general compute tasks.
However, the game performance data suggests that the CPU is not the primary bottleneck in The Medium. The fact that FPS scales significantly with resolution and settings points towards the GPU being the limiting factor. For instance, at 1080p Low, the system achieves 90 FPS, but at 4K Low, it drops to 59 FPS, a 34.4% reduction. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see a less pronounced difference between resolutions, as the CPU workload would remain relatively constant. The CPU's high core count and clock speeds are more than sufficient to feed the Radeon 8050S at lower resolutions. The data implies that this processor has ample headroom, and its role in this specific game is to ensure that the integrated GPU is never starved of data, which it does successfully at 1080p Low.
FAQ
*Q: What is the highest average frame rate this combo can achieve in The Medium?*
A: The highest measured average is 90 FPS, which is achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.
*Q: Is the AMD Radeon 8050S capable of running The Medium at 4K resolution?*
A: Yes, it can run at 3840x2160, but performance is limited. The Low preset averages 59 FPS, while the Medium preset averages 37 FPS. The High and Ultra presets fall below 30 FPS, with averages of 27 FPS and 21 FPS, respectively.
Q: How does the performance at 1440p compare to 1080p?
A: Moving from 1920x1080 to 2560x1440 results in a performance decrease across all settings. For example, at Low settings, the average FPS drops from 90 to 76. At Medium settings, it drops from 56 to 47, and at High settings, it drops from 40 to 34.
Q: Which settings preset provides the most significant performance jump?
A: The most substantial change occurs when switching from Low to Medium settings. At 1080p, this change reduces the average FPS from 90 to 56, a drop of 34 FPS. This is a much larger gap than between other consecutive presets.
Q: What is the frame time consistency like for this combo?
A: The data includes minimum and maximum FPS only for the Medium preset. At 1920x1080, the FPS ranges from 48 to 64, with an average of 56. At 2560x1440, it ranges from 40 to 54, and at 3840x2160, it ranges from 32 to 43. This indicates a somewhat variable frame rate, though not excessively stutter-prone.
Q: How does this combo's overall performance rank against other tested systems?
A: In the benchmark database, this specific combination of CPU and GPU ranks 2135 out of 2911 tested combos for The Medium. This places it in the lower portion of the ranking, indicating that it is an entry-level performer for this title.
How This Combo Ranks
The comboRankInGame for this CPU and GPU pairing is 2135 out of 2911 tested combinations. This percentile position, roughly in the 26.6th percentile, suggests that the majority of tested systems outperform this one in The Medium. This relatively low ranking is somewhat surprising given the individual component scores. The CPU, with its 95th percentile ranking, is a high-end part. The GPU, while not top-tier, still holds an 89th percentile ranking against all GPUs.
This discrepancy between component benchmarks and in-game ranking highlights the unique challenge of integrated graphics in a demanding title. The Radeon 8050S, despite being a capable iGPU, is fundamentally sharing system resources and thermal constraints with the CPU. The data suggests that for a game like The Medium, which likely has significant GPU demands, the 8050S cannot reach the performance levels of even mid-range dedicated graphics cards. The ranking of 2135 out of 2911 implies that for a smooth, high-fidelity experience, most users would need to consider a system with a dedicated GPU. This combo's strength is its versatility and efficiency, but raw gaming performance is not its primary attribute.
Resolution Scaling
The performance data across the three tested resolutions provides clear insight into the system's scaling behavior and its limiting component. From 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the average FPS decreases by a noticeable margin at every settings level. For example, at Low settings, the FPS drops from 90 to 76, a 15.6% decrease. At Medium settings, it drops from 56 to 47, a 16.1% decrease. This consistent percentage drop suggests that the GPU is the primary bottleneck, as the workload is scaling with the pixel count.
The scaling from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 is even more dramatic. At Low settings, the FPS drops from 76 to 59, a 22.4% decrease. At Medium settings, it drops from 47 to 37, a 21.3% decrease. The increasing percentage loss at higher resolutions confirms that the Radeon 8050S is being pushed to its absolute limits. If the CPU were the limiting factor, we would expect the frame rate to remain relatively stable or even improve at higher resolutions, as the CPU workload would be a smaller fraction of the total render time. Instead, the FPS scales inversely with resolution, which is a classic indicator of a GPU-bound scenario. The data strongly implies that the Radeon 8050S's rendering capabilities are the definitive constraint on performance in The Medium.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of this combo's performance across the tested spectrum.
At 1920x1080, the results are as follows:
- Low: Average FPS of 90. This is the highest performance tier for this combo.
- Medium: Average FPS of 56, with a minimum of 48 and a maximum of 64.
- High: Average FPS of 40.
- Ultra: Average FPS of 32.
At 2560x1440, the performance drops accordingly:
- Low: Average FPS of 76.
- Medium: Average FPS of 47, with a minimum of 40 and a maximum of 54.
- High: Average FPS of 34.
- Ultra: Average FPS of 27.
At 3840x2160, the hardware is heavily taxed:
- Low: Average FPS of 59.
- Medium: Average FPS of 37, with a minimum of 32 and a maximum of 43.
- High: Average FPS of 27.
- Ultra: Average FPS of 21.
This data reveals a clear pattern. The only configuration that consistently provides a smooth, high-refresh-rate experience is 1080p with Low settings. At 1440p, only the Low preset remains comfortably playable. At 4K, even the Low preset is borderline, with an average of 59 FPS. The High and Ultra presets are generally not suitable for gameplay at any resolution, as they consistently fall below 40 FPS.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon 8050S is the graphics powerhouse in this combo, and the data indicates it is the primary determinant of gaming performance. Its architecture is RDNA 3.5, and it features a boost clock of 2800 MHz. It has 2048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units. The GPU also includes 32 ray tracing cores, which are relevant for a game like The Medium that may utilize such effects. Its theoretical performance is rated at 11.47 TFLOPS for FP32 operations.
In terms of synthetic benchmarks, the Radeon 8050S scores 65,818 in Geekbench OpenCL and 58,398 in Geekbench Vulkan. It holds an 89th percentile ranking against all GPUs. Its nearest rivals in these benchmarks include the AMD Radeon Pro W6600M (0.3% faster), the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (2.5% slower), and the AMD Radeon RX 7600M (2.6% slower). This places its raw compute performance in the range of mid-range dedicated mobile GPUs from the previous generation.
However, the VRAM situation is critical. The 8050S uses "System Shared" memory, meaning its frame buffer is allocated from the system's main memory. This is a fundamental difference from a dedicated GPU with its own VRAM. The memory bandwidth is also listed as "System Dependent". While the CPU's memory bandwidth is a robust 256.0 GB/s, this is shared between the CPU and GPU. In a demanding game at high resolutions, the shared nature of the memory can become a performance bottleneck, as the GPU must compete with CPU processes for memory access. The measured FPS data, showing a significant drop at 4K, could be a symptom of this shared memory architecture limiting the effective bandwidth available to the GPU. The GPU's performance is ultimately constrained by this shared resource pool, which explains why it cannot maintain high frame rates at higher resolutions, even with a powerful CPU feeding it data.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395
AMD Radeon 8050S
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + AMD Radeon 8050S in The Medium
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 59.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 37.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 27.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 21.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 76.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 47.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 34.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 27.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 90.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 56.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 40.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 32.0 |
The Medium with Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + Other GPUs
See how The Medium performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Medium with 8050S + Other CPUs
See how The Medium performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen AI Max+ 395 + 8050S
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.