The Medium

The Medium

AVERAGE FPS
56
playable

This combination offers playable performance with an average of 56 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 26 32 45 73
1440p QHD 33 41 58 92
1080p Full HD 39 49 69 110

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 73
3840x2160 Medium 45
3840x2160 High 32
3840x2160 Ultra 26
2560x1440 Low 92
2560x1440 Medium 58
2560x1440 High 41
2560x1440 Ultra 33
1920x1080 Low 110
1920x1080 Medium 69
1920x1080 High 49
1920x1080 Ultra 39

The Medium with AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT presents a fascinating case study in The Medium, a game known for its demanding fixed-camera angles and dual-reality rendering. The benchmark data reveals a configuration that is clearly capable of delivering smooth gameplay, but one whose performance ceiling is heavily dictated by the graphics card, especially at higher resolutions. The measured frame rates show a classic pattern of GPU-bound scaling, with the CPU's substantial 12-core, 24-thread architecture providing a robust foundation that never appears to bottleneck the experience.

Resolution Scaling

The most striking observation from the data is the dramatic impact of resolution on average frame rates. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 110 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops this to 92 FPS, a 16% reduction. The jump to 4K Low results in a further decline to 73 FPS, which is a 21% drop from 1440p. This pattern indicates that even at the lowest graphical preset, the rendering load at 4K is substantial, and the GPU is the primary limiting factor.

This conclusion is reinforced by examining the scaling at higher presets. At Medium settings, the frame rate falls from 69 FPS at 1080p to 58 FPS at 1440p, and then to 45 FPS at 4K. The gap between 1080p and 4K at Medium settings is 24 FPS. However, the gap at Low settings is much larger at 37 FPS. This suggests that while the GPU struggles with the sheer pixel count at 4K, the increase in graphical fidelity from Low to Medium adds a relatively consistent performance cost across all resolutions.

The data implies that the RX 6700 XT is not powerful enough to maintain high refresh rates at 4K, regardless of the preset. The 4K High and Ultra results, at 32 FPS and 26 FPS respectively, are simply too low for a smooth experience. The scaling from 1080p High (49 FPS) to 1440p High (41 FPS) and then to 4K High (32 FPS) shows a linear degradation that is characteristic of a GPU bottleneck. The Ryzen 9 9900X, with its high boost clock of 5.60 GHz, has more than enough headroom to feed the GPU at all resolutions, meaning the performance ceiling is set by the Radeon card's pixel throughput and memory bandwidth.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to achieve a consistent 60+ FPS experience?

A: The data shows that 1080p is the only resolution where the system can consistently exceed 60 FPS. At 1080p Low, the average is 110 FPS, and at 1080p Medium, it is 69 FPS. At 1440p, only the Low preset (92 FPS) surpasses 60 FPS, suggesting that a 1080p Medium or Low preset is the most reliable for high refresh rate gaming.

Q: How does the 4K Medium preset compare to the 1440p Ultra preset in terms of performance?

A: The 4K Medium preset averages 45 FPS, while the 1440p Ultra preset averages 33 FPS. This is a notable finding; the lower resolution with higher settings is actually more demanding than a higher resolution with medium settings. This suggests that the Ultra preset's effects are computationally expensive, and the 4K Medium setting offers a better balance of visual fidelity and performance for this hardware.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU the limiting factor in this game?

A: The benchmark results strongly indicate the GPU is the bottleneck. For example, going from 1080p Low (110 FPS) to 4K Low (73 FPS) shows a massive performance drop that can only be attributed to the increased pixel workload on the GPU. The Ryzen 9 9900X, with its 12 cores and 5.60 GHz boost clock, has ample processing power to handle the game's logic and physics at all tested settings.

Q: What is the difference in performance between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p?

A: The difference is substantial. At 1080p, the Low preset averages 110 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages only 39 FPS. This represents a 71 FPS performance penalty for enabling the highest graphical settings, which is a 64% reduction in frame rate. This highlights the significant cost of the Ultra preset's visual enhancements.

Q: Does the combo's performance rank change significantly across the tested resolutions?

A: The performance rank is a single metric for the game overall. The combo ranks 1941 out of 3724 tested configurations. While the resolution scaling data shows the GPU's limits, the overall rank reflects its combined capability. The system is in the 52nd percentile of all tested combos, indicating a mid-pack performance level for this specific title.

Q: Can the system maintain a playable frame rate at 4K?

A: Yes, but only on the Low preset, which averages 73 FPS. The Medium preset at 4K averages 45 FPS, which may be playable for some, but the High (32 FPS) and Ultra (26 FPS) presets are not suitable for a smooth experience. The data suggests that 4K gaming with this combo is best limited to the Low settings preset.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 9 9900X is a formidable processor on paper, featuring 12 cores and 24 threads based on the Zen 5 architecture. Its high base clock of 4.40 GHz and boost clock of 5.60 GHz, combined with a large 64 MB L3 cache, provide exceptional processing power. In synthetic benchmarks, it scores 32,172 in Cinebench R23 multicore and 3010 in Geekbench single-core, placing it in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs. This performance headroom is crucial for a game like The Medium, which must manage complex scene transitions and dual-world rendering.

However, the measured FPS data suggests that the CPU's role is largely supportive in this specific configuration. The performance scaling between resolutions is almost entirely dictated by the GPU. For instance, at 1080p High, the system achieves 49 FPS, but at 4K High, it drops to 32 FPS. This 17 FPS difference is a result of the GPU working harder, not the CPU struggling. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see similar frame rates across different resolutions at the same settings, as the CPU workload would remain constant.

The data indicates the 9900X is more than adequate for the task. The fact that the system can push 110 FPS at 1080p Low shows that the CPU can handle high frame rate scenarios without becoming a limiting factor. Its nearest rivals, such as the Intel Core i9-14900, show a -1.1% difference in average benchmark score, confirming its top-tier status. The CPU's 24 threads ensure that any background tasks or game engine threads are handled efficiently, allowing the RX 6700 XT to operate at its full potential.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The benchmark data provides a complete picture of performance across three resolutions and four quality presets.

1920x1080: The system performs best here. At Low settings, it achieves a very high average of 110 FPS. The Medium preset is also very smooth, with an average of 69 FPS and a minimum of 58 FPS. High settings yield a respectable 49 FPS average. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, dropping the average to 39 FPS, which is a significant step down from High.

2560x1440: Performance takes a noticeable hit at this resolution. The Low preset remains highly playable at 92 FPS. Medium settings average 58 FPS, with a minimum of 49 FPS, which is right on the edge of smooth gameplay. The High preset drops to 41 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to 33 FPS, making these settings less desirable for a fluid experience.

3840x2160: 4K is clearly the most challenging resolution for this hardware. The Low preset is the only one that maintains a high frame rate, averaging 73 FPS. The Medium preset averages 45 FPS, which is playable but not ideal. High and Ultra presets are not recommended for serious gameplay, with averages of 32 FPS and 26 FPS respectively, which are below the threshold for a smooth, responsive experience.

The data shows a clear hierarchy: 1080p is the sweet spot for high refresh rates, 1440p is viable for medium settings, and 4K is only practical with the lowest graphical settings. The minimum FPS data points for Medium settings (58 at 1080p, 49 at 1440p, 39 at 4K) show that frame pacing remains stable, without severe stutters, even under load.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is the decisive component in this configuration. With its 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, it provides a memory bandwidth of 384.0 GB/s. Its boost clock of 2581 MHz and 2560 shading units define its raw compute power. In synthetic benchmarks like 3DMark Steel Nomad, it scores 2435, and its Passmark G3D score is 19786, placing it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. This is a solid mid-to-high-range card, but it is not designed for 4K ultra settings in demanding titles.

The game's performance is heavily influenced by the GPU's capabilities. The transition from 1080p to 4K at the same settings shows a clear GPU bottleneck. For example, at Medium settings, the frame rate drops from 69 FPS to 45 FPS, a 35% reduction. This is a direct consequence of the GPU having to render four times the number of pixels. The VRAM usage also scales with resolution, and while 12 GB is generally sufficient, the card's compute power is the limiting factor.

The GPU's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090, which has a -0.5% difference in average benchmark score, indicating the RX 6700 XT performs on par with that high-end card in synthetic tests. However, in The Medium, the 4K results (26-32 FPS on High/Ultra) suggest that the card's 13.21 TFLOPS of FP32 performance is insufficient for maxed-out 4K gaming. The card is better suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it can leverage its high clock speeds and 192-bit memory bus to deliver excellent frame rates.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend on the target resolution. For a 60+ FPS experience, the 1080p Medium preset is the best choice, delivering an average of 69 FPS with a minimum of 58 FPS. This provides a significant visual upgrade over the Low preset while maintaining smooth gameplay. The 1080p High preset, at 49 FPS, is a good choice for those who prioritize visuals over a locked 60 FPS.

At 1440p, the Low preset is the only one that offers a high refresh rate experience, averaging 92 FPS. However, for a balanced experience, the Medium preset is viable, averaging 58 FPS. This is playable, though it may not be suitable for competitive or fast-paced action. The High and Ultra presets at 1440p are not recommended due to their 41 FPS and 33 FPS averages, which are below the smoothness threshold.

At 4K, the Low preset is the only playable option, with an average of 73 FPS. This shows that the hardware can handle 4K, but only with significant graphical compromises. The Medium preset at 4K, with 45 FPS, is a borderline experience. The data suggests that for the best overall experience, users should target 1080p with Medium or High settings, or 1440p with Low or Medium settings. The Ultra preset is consistently the most demanding and offers the worst performance-to-quality trade-off across all resolutions.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 9 9900X and RX 6700 XT ranks 1941 out of 3724 tested combos in The Medium. This places the system in the 52nd percentile, meaning it performs better than about half of all tested configurations. This is a respectable ranking, but it is not at the top tier. The ranking reflects the system's overall performance across all tested settings and resolutions.

This mid-pack ranking is logical given the hardware. The CPU is a top-tier component, ranking in the 92nd percentile of all CPUs, which suggests it is not holding the system back. However, the GPU, while strong, is not a flagship model. The RX 6700 XT's performance, which is on par with an RTX 3090 in synthetic benchmarks, is still not enough to push the system into the upper echelons of the rankings for a game as demanding as The Medium. The 4K Ultra result of 26 FPS is a clear indicator of the system's limits.

The ranking suggests that while this combo is very capable for 1080p and 1440p gaming, it does not excel at 4K. The data implies that to achieve a higher rank in this specific game, a more powerful GPU would be necessary. The high rank of the CPU, however, ensures that the system is future-proof for GPU upgrades, as the processor will not be a bottleneck for more powerful graphics cards. The 1941st rank is a fair representation of a system that pairs a top-tier CPU with a mid-to-high-tier GPU, resulting in solid but not spectacular performance in this horror title.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 9 9900X

Cores / Threads 12 / 24
Base Clock 4400 MHz
Boost Clock 5600 MHz
TDP 120W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2581 MHz MHz
TDP 230 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 9 9900X + AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT in The Medium

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 73.0
3840x2160 Medium 45.0
3840x2160 High 32.0
3840x2160 Ultra 26.0
2560x1440 Low 92.0
2560x1440 Medium 58.0
2560x1440 High 41.0
2560x1440 Ultra 33.0
1920x1080 Low 110.0
1920x1080 Medium 69.0
1920x1080 High 49.0
1920x1080 Ultra 39.0

The Medium with Ryzen 9 9900X + Other GPUs

See how The Medium performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

The Medium with RX 6700 XT + Other CPUs

See how The Medium performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 9 9900X + RX 6700 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.