The Medium
This combination offers playable performance with an average of 47 FPS, though you may want to lower settings for smoother gameplay.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 22 | 27 | 39 | 59 |
| 1440p QHD | 28 | 35 | 50 | 79 |
| 1080p Full HD | 35 | 40 | 58 | 91 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
The Medium with AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + AMD Radeon RX 7600, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and AMD Radeon RX 7600 combination delivers playable performance in The Medium only when settings are managed carefully, with the GPU acting as the primary bottleneck across all tested resolutions. The data shows a clear pattern: frame rates scale almost linearly with resolution, and the gap between Low and Ultra presets is substantial, indicating that the Radeon RX 7600's 8 GB VRAM and 128-bit memory bus are the limiting factors in this horror title.
Resolution Scaling
Resolution scaling in The Medium reveals a GPU-bound workload that punishes higher pixel counts. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves 91.2 FPS, but dropping to 1440p reduces that to 79 FPS, and 4K cuts it down to 59.2 FPS. This represents a 35.1% performance loss from 1080p to 4K at Low settings — a steep penalty that points directly at the graphics card rather than the CPU.
The scaling becomes even more dramatic at higher presets. At High settings, the frame rate falls from 40.4 FPS at 1080p to 35 FPS at 1440p, and then plummets to 26.8 FPS at 4K. Ultra settings tell a similar story: 35.2 FPS at 1080p, 28.3 FPS at 1440p, and just 21.5 FPS at 4K. The consistent ~20-25% drop between 1080p and 1440p, followed by another ~25-30% drop to 4K, indicates that the RX 7600's memory bandwidth and compute resources are being saturated as pixel count increases.
The pattern suggests that the CPU is not the limiting factor here. The Ryzen 5 2600, with its 6 cores and 12 threads, maintains relatively stable performance scaling, whereas the GPU's fill rate and bandwidth constraints become more pronounced at higher resolutions. The 4K Low result of 59.2 FPS is particularly telling — even at the lowest settings, the GPU cannot push past 60 FPS, confirming that the rendering pipeline is the bottleneck.
FAQ
*Q: Can this combo run The Medium at 4K?*
A: Yes, but only at Low settings, where it averages 59.2 FPS. Medium drops to 39.4 FPS, High to 26.8 FPS, and Ultra to 21.5 FPS — the latter three are below the 30 FPS threshold for comfortable play.
Q: What is the best resolution for this pairing?
A: 1080p is the sweet spot. The combo achieves 91.2 FPS at Low, 57.7 FPS at Medium, and 40.4 FPS at High, making it the only resolution where all presets except Ultra remain playable.
Q: How does the RX 7600 compare to its nearest rivals in this game?
A: The RX 7600 sits 0.6% behind the RX 7600 XT and 0.8% behind the RX 460 in average benchmark scores. It is 1.3% ahead of the RTX 3070 Mobile and 1.5% ahead of the Intel Arc B570, though these deltas are within noise for gaming performance.
Q: Is the Ryzen 5 2600 holding back the RX 7600?
A: The data does not indicate CPU limitation. The Ryzen 5 2600 scores 11,186 in Cinebench R23 multi-core and 1,579 in single-core, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs. The frame rate scaling patterns suggest the GPU is the constraint.
Q: What settings should I avoid entirely?
A: Ultra settings are not viable. At 1080p, Ultra yields only 35.2 FPS, and at 4K it drops to 21.5 FPS. The jump from High to Ultra costs roughly 13% performance with no corresponding benefit in the measured data.
Q: Does the 8 GB VRAM cause issues?
A: The 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth appears sufficient for the tested presets, but the steep performance drops at 4K suggest the memory subsystem is under strain at higher resolutions and settings.
Settings Recommendations
The optimal experience for this combo is 1080p with Medium settings, delivering 57.7 FPS. This strikes the best balance between visual quality and smoothness, as the data shows a 43.6% improvement over High settings (40.4 FPS) while remaining well above the 30 FPS minimum for playable frame rates.
For users prioritizing frame rate over visuals, 1080p Low at 91.2 FPS is the clear choice, offering nearly double the performance of Medium. However, the jump from Low to Medium costs 33.5 FPS (36.7% reduction), which suggests Medium is the reasonable ceiling for this hardware.
At 1440p, only Low settings (79 FPS) provide a comfortable experience. Medium drops to 49.5 FPS, which is borderline, and High falls to 35 FPS. 4K should be reserved for Low settings only, where the 59.2 FPS result is surprisingly strong but still below the 60 FPS target.
The Ultra preset is not recommended at any resolution. The 35.2 FPS at 1080p and 21.5 FPS at 4K indicate that this preset requires more GPU headroom than the RX 7600 can provide. High settings at 1080p are acceptable for users who prefer visual fidelity over smoothness, but Medium is the best overall compromise.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo produces a wide spread across presets. Low settings deliver 91.2 FPS, Medium drops to 57.7 FPS, High reaches 40.4 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 35.2 FPS. The 55.9 FPS gap between Low and Ultra represents a 61.3% performance swing, demonstrating the significant cost of higher quality settings.
At 2560x1440, the same pattern holds with lower absolute numbers. Low achieves 79 FPS, Medium falls to 49.5 FPS, High manages 35 FPS, and Ultra drops to 28.3 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 1440p costs between 12.2 FPS (Low) and 6.9 FPS (Ultra), with the percentage penalty ranging from 13.4% at Low to 19.6% at Ultra.
At 3840x2160, the results are marginal for most presets. Low produces 59.2 FPS, Medium drops to 39.4 FPS, High falls to 26.8 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 21.5 FPS. The 4K to 1080p scaling shows a 32 FPS difference at Low (35.1% loss) and a 13.7 FPS difference at Ultra (39.0% loss), indicating that higher presets suffer disproportionately at 4K.
The data reveals that the RX 7600 is capable of handling this game at Low and Medium settings across all resolutions, but only Low is consistently above 30 FPS at 4K. The 1440p Medium result of 49.5 FPS is the highest preset that clears the 30 FPS threshold at non-1080p resolutions.
GPU Role
The AMD Radeon RX 7600, built on the RDNA 3.0 architecture with the Navi 33 chip, is the decisive component in this pairing. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus provides 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which proves sufficient for 1080p but marginal for 4K. The GPU's clock speeds — 1720 MHz base and 2655 MHz boost — allow it to reach 21.75 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, yet the measured frame rates show that raw compute is not the limiting factor.
The RX 7600's 2048 shading units and 64 ROPs produce a pixel rate of 169.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 339.8 GTexel/s. These specification-driven figures align with the observed performance scaling: the GPU can handle 1080p Low with ease (91.2 FPS), but the 4K Ultra result of 21.5 FPS suggests that the memory bandwidth and pixel throughput are saturated at higher workloads.
The GPU's benchmark results place it in the 63rd percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 20,258. Its nearest rival, the RX 7600 XT, is only 0.6% faster, while the RX 460 is 0.8% faster — a surprising result given the generational gap. The RTX 3070 Mobile trails by 1.3% and the Arc B570 by 1.5%, indicating that the RX 7600 is competitive within its class but not exceptional.
The 165 W TDP and dual-slot design suggest a mid-range power envelope, but the measured FPS data shows that this GPU is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming rather than 4K. The 21.5 FPS at 4K Ultra is a clear indicator that the RX 7600 lacks the memory bandwidth and fill rate for high-fidelity 4K gaming in The Medium.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600, a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the Zen+ architecture, provides adequate compute for this game but is not the primary performance driver. Its 3.40 GHz base clock and 3.90 GHz boost clock deliver a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11,186 and a single-core score of 1,579, placing it in the 77th percentile of all CPUs.
The CPU's 16 MB of shared L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 46.9 GB/s bandwidth are sufficient for gaming workloads. The PassMark multi-thread score of 13,160 and single-thread score of 2,239 indicate that the Ryzen 5 2600 can handle the game's logic and physics without bottlenecking the GPU at 1080p.
However, the data shows that the CPU is not the limiting factor in this combo. If the processor were the bottleneck, frame rates would remain relatively constant across resolutions. Instead, the measured FPS drops by 35.1% from 1080p to 4K at Low settings, and by 39.0% at Ultra, confirming that the GPU is the constraint.
The Ryzen 5 2600's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i5-1345U (-0.4% delta), AMD Ryzen 5 7530U (+0.6%), Intel Core i5-11600KF (-0.6%), and Intel Core i7-10700F (+0.7%). These deltas are all within 1%, meaning the CPU's performance class is tightly clustered and unlikely to cause significant frame rate differences in The Medium.
The processor's 65 W TDP and AM4 socket compatibility make it a power-efficient choice, but the benchmark results suggest that upgrading the GPU would yield greater performance gains than upgrading the CPU for this specific game.
How This Combo Ranks
This combination of AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and AMD Radeon RX 7600 ranks 1,157th out of 1,689 tested combos in The Medium, placing it in the 31.5th percentile of all configurations. This rank reflects the GPU's mid-range positioning rather than the CPU's performance, as the Ryzen 5 2600's 77th percentile CPU ranking is higher than the combo's overall rank.
The gap between the CPU's percentile (77th) and the combo's rank suggests that the RX 7600, at the 63rd percentile of GPUs, is the weak link. The measured FPS data supports this interpretation: at 1080p Low, the combo achieves 91.2 FPS, which is strong, but at 4K Ultra it falls to 21.5 FPS, indicating that the GPU cannot sustain high-fidelity workloads.
Compared to other tested combos, this pairing is positioned for 1080p gaming. The 1440p Medium result of 49.5 FPS is playable but not exceptional, and 4K is only viable at Low settings. The 1,157th rank out of 1,689 combos means that roughly two-thirds of tested configurations outperform this pairing, but the RX 7600's competitive position against its nearest rivals — all within 1.5% — suggests that the GPU is not a weak performer.
The combo's strength lies in its balance: the Ryzen 5 2600 provides sufficient CPU power to avoid bottlenecking the RX 7600 at lower resolutions, while the GPU delivers playable frame rates at 1080p and 1440p. The 4K results, however, are a clear limitation that pushes this combo into the lower half of the rankings for users targeting high-resolution gaming. For 1080p users, this rank undervalues the actual experience, as the 91.2 FPS Low and 57.7 FPS Medium results are respectable for the hardware class.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
AMD Radeon RX 7600
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + AMD Radeon RX 7600 in The Medium
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 59.2 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 39.4 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 26.8 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 21.5 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 79.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 49.5 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 35.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 28.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 91.2 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 57.7 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 40.4 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 35.2 |
The Medium with Ryzen 5 2600 + Other GPUs
See how The Medium performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
The Medium with RX 7600 + Other CPUs
See how The Medium performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 2600 + RX 7600
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.