Rust

The data for Rust on this Intel Core i5-13400F and AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX combination reveals a system that is heavily influenced by graphics settings and resolution. The measured frame rates show a wide performance envelope, from a demanding 46.1 FPS at 4K Ultra to a fluid 211.7 FPS at 1080p Low. This suggests that the pairing is capable of a broad range of experiences, but the specific in-game preset will dictate whether the output is playable, smooth, or competitive. The benchmark results indicate a clear hierarchy where lower settings unlock significantly higher frame rates, particularly at higher resolutions.

FAQ

Q: What is the best average FPS this combo achieves in Rust?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 211.7, which occurs at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the CPU perform in multi-threaded workloads relative to its closest rivals?

A: The Intel Core i5-13400F has an average benchmark score of 25236. This places it 0.1% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13620H and 0.5% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9474F, while being 0.5% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D.

Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration for this game?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX features 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 384-bit bus, providing 960.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the game run at 60 FPS at 4K with any settings?

A: Yes, at 3840x2160 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 108.8 FPS. With Medium settings, it reaches 73.1 FPS, and High settings yield 59.4 FPS.

Q: What is the combo's overall rank among tested systems for Rust?

A: The combination ranks 199th out of 1717 tested combos in the database.

Q: What is the difference in average FPS between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, Low settings produce an average of 211.7 FPS, while Ultra settings produce 111.2 FPS, a difference of 100.5 FPS.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX is the primary driver of graphical performance in this setup. With a 24 GB GDDR6 memory pool and a 384-bit bus, the card has substantial resources for high-resolution textures and complex scenes. The memory operates at 2500 MHz with 20 Gbps effective speed, and the bandwidth of 960.0 GB/s is a key factor in feeding the 6144 shading units. The GPU's boost clock is rated at 2498 MHz, with a game clock of 2365 MHz. These specifications allow the card to handle the demands of Rust, which is reflected in the measured data.

The GPU's strength is evident in the scaling between settings. At 2560x1440, increasing from Low to High settings reduces the average FPS from 182.2 to 100.7. This is a significant drop, but the card still delivers playable frame rates. However, the most demanding preset, Ultra, brings the average down to 78.4 FPS at this resolution. At 4K, the card's limits are more apparent; even High settings only achieve 59.4 FPS. This indicates that while the GPU can push high frame rates at lower settings, the Ultra preset at high resolutions imposes a load that prevents it from maintaining a high refresh rate. The data suggests the RX 7900 XTX is a formidable part, but its performance is heavily modulated by the chosen settings.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the user's resolution and performance goals. For a 1920x1080 display, all presets deliver playable frame rates. However, the data shows that Medium settings at 176.3 FPS provide a substantial improvement over Ultra at 111.2 FPS, without the visual degradation of Low. For high-refresh-rate monitors, Low settings at 211.7 FPS would be the recommended choice for maximum smoothness.

At 2560x1440, the recommendation shifts. High settings produce an average of 100.7 FPS, which is an excellent balance for most users. Medium settings at 122.6 FPS are also viable for those prioritizing frame rate, while Ultra at 78.4 FPS is still smooth enough for many. For 3840x2160, the choices are more constrained. High settings at 59.4 FPS are borderline for a 60Hz display, while Medium at 73.1 FPS offers a safer margin. Low settings at 108.8 FPS provide a high-frame-rate experience but sacrifice visual fidelity. The data implies that Medium is the best balance for 4K, as it provides a clear improvement over High without the significant visual compromise of Low.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a detailed view of performance across resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the average FPS ranges from 211.7 on Low to 111.2 on Ultra. Medium settings achieve 176.3 FPS, and High settings achieve 149 FPS. This shows a clear progression where each step up in settings costs a meaningful number of frames.

At 2560x1440, the trend continues but with lower absolute numbers. The average FPS is 182.2 on Low, 122.6 on Medium, 100.7 on High, and 78.4 on Ultra. The difference between Low and Medium here is 59.6 FPS, a larger gap than at 1080p, suggesting the GPU is becoming a more limiting factor. Moving to 3840x2160, the Low setting produces 108.8 FPS, which is a significant drop from the 182.2 FPS at 1440p. Medium at 4K gives 73.1 FPS, High gives 59.4 FPS, and Ultra drops to 46.1 FPS. The data shows that at 4K, the Ultra preset is the only one that falls below 60 FPS, making it unsuitable for a standard 60Hz refresh rate.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Intel Core i5-13400F and the AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX ranks 199th out of 1717 tested combos in Rust. This places it in the top 11.6% of all tested systems, indicating a high-performance pairing. While the rank is strong, it is not at the very top, which suggests that other combinations of more powerful CPUs and GPUs can achieve higher frame rates. The data implies that this combo is a solid high-end performer, but it is not the absolute best for this specific game.

The GPU's percentile ranking of 85th among all GPUs and the CPU's percentile of 82nd among all CPUs both point to a well-matched system. The fact that the combo rank is higher than either individual component's percentile suggests that the pairing is particularly effective for Rust. This could be due to a balanced workload where neither component is a severe bottleneck, allowing the system to perform efficiently.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-13400F provides the computational foundation for this system. It has 10 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. This configuration is well-suited for modern games that can utilize multiple threads. The CPU's benchmark scores, such as a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21279 and a single-core score of 3004, show strong multithreaded and single-threaded performance. The 3DMark 16-thread score of 7314 is particularly relevant for gaming, as it reflects the CPU's ability to handle the demands of a game like Rust.

The CPU's role in Rust is likely significant, as the game is known for its complex simulation and server-side calculations. The data shows that at 1080p with Low settings, the FPS reaches 211.7, which is a very high number. This suggests that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at lower resolutions where the GPU is not the bottleneck. The L3 cache of 20 MB also aids in reducing memory latency, which can be beneficial for game performance. The CPU's performance relative to its nearest rivals is nearly identical, with a delta of less than 1% compared to the Intel Core i7-13620H, AMD Ryzen 5 5600X3D, and AMD EPYC 9474F.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS data reveals how the system's performance scales with resolution. From 1920x1080 to 2560x1440, the average FPS drops by 29.5 FPS on Low settings (from 211.7 to 182.2), by 53.7 FPS on Medium (from 176.3 to 122.6), by 48.3 FPS on High (from 149 to 100.7), and by 32.8 FPS on Ultra (from 111.2 to 78.4). This indicates that the GPU is the limiting component at higher resolutions, as the frame rate drops are substantial.

The scaling from 2560x1440 to 3840x2160 is even more pronounced. The average FPS drops by 73.4 FPS on Low (from 182.2 to 108.8), by 49.5 FPS on Medium (from 122.6 to 73.1), by 41.3 FPS on High (from 100.7 to 59.4), and by 32.3 FPS on Ultra (from 78.4 to 46.1). These significant drops at 4K confirm that the GPU is the primary bottleneck at this resolution. The fact that the FPS drop from 1440p to 4K is larger than the drop from 1080p to 1440p suggests that the GPU workload is scaling super-linearly with pixel count. This analysis implies that the CPU is sufficient for this game at all tested resolutions, and the RX 7900 XTX's performance is the main variable that determines the final frame rate.