Rust

# Rust Performance Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER

This combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 with 8 cores and 16 threads paired with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER produces a mid-range gaming experience in Rust, ranking 1530th out of 1717 tested combinations in this title. The CPU sits at the 84th percentile among all processors, while the GPU ranks at the 55th percentile among all graphics cards, suggesting a system where the graphics card is the primary constraint in most scenarios. The measured frame rates across resolutions and settings presets reveal a configuration that can handle 1080p gaming comfortably at lower presets but struggles at higher resolutions, with the gap between Low and Ultra settings widening dramatically as pixel count increases.

How This Combo Ranks

At position 1530 out of 1717 tested combinations, this pairing sits in the lower 11% of all tested configurations for Rust. The ranking reflects a fundamental imbalance: the Ryzen 7 5700 is a capable 8-core Zen 3 processor with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20655 and single-core score of 2916, placing it 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i9-9900K and 0.8% ahead of both the Intel Core i7-12700H and i7-1370P in average benchmark scores. The GTX 1660 SUPER, however, trails its nearest rivals by small margins — it sits 0.2% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics, and 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT.

This creates a scenario where the CPU has substantial headroom that the GPU cannot exploit. The Ryzen 7 5700's 3DMark scores — 6628 with 16 threads and 901 single-thread — indicate strong multi-threaded capability that Rust's simulation-heavy gameplay can utilize, but the GTX 1660 SUPER's 5.027 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 6 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus become the limiting factor. The percentile gap between CPU (84th) and GPU (55th) of 29 points quantifies this imbalance clearly.

FAQ

Q: Is this combination better suited for 1080p or 1440p gaming in Rust?

A: The data shows 1080p is the practical resolution for this pairing. At 1080p Low settings, the system achieves 103.8 FPS, while at 1440p Low it drops to 74.6 FPS. The 4K Low result of 42.2 FPS confirms that higher resolutions require substantial settings compromises.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5700 compare to its closest competing processors?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700's average benchmark score of 27220 places it 0.7% above the Intel Core i9-9900K (27043) and 0.8% above both the Intel Core i7-12700H (27006) and Intel Core i7-1370P (26991). Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20655 demonstrates strong sustained performance.

Q: What is the GPU's standing relative to its nearest competitors?

A: The GTX 1660 SUPER's average benchmark score of 14286 places it 0.2% behind the AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 and Intel Iris Xe MAX Graphics, and 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon Vega 11. Its PassMark G3D score of 12699 reflects its mid-range positioning.

Q: What frame rate can be expected at 1080p Medium settings?

A: The measured average at 1920x1080 with Medium settings is 70.8 FPS, which sits between the Low preset's 103.8 FPS and the High preset's 58.3 FPS. This Medium result offers a balanced experience for the hardware.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its single-threaded performance?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700 scores 20655 in Cinebench R23 multi-core versus 2916 in single-core, a ratio of approximately 7.1:1. Its 3DMark scores show 6628 with 16 threads versus 901 single-thread, confirming strong scaling across its 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: Is 4K gaming viable with this hardware in Rust?

A: At 3840x2160, the best result is 42.2 FPS on Low settings. Medium produces 27.7 FPS, High drops to 24.3 FPS, and Ultra falls to 17.3 FPS. These figures indicate 4K is only marginally playable at the lowest preset.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a system heavily constrained by the GPU. At Low settings, moving from 1920x1080 (103.8 FPS) to 2560x1440 (74.6 FPS) represents a 28.1% performance drop, while the further move to 3840x2160 (42.2 FPS) costs another 43.4%. This progressive degradation pattern is characteristic of GPU-bound scenarios, as the rendering load scales with pixel count.

The settings presets amplify this effect. At Ultra settings, the 1080p result of 49.2 FPS falls to 28.4 FPS at 1440p (a 42.3% drop) and then to 17.3 FPS at 4K (a 39.1% additional drop). The High preset shows similar behavior: 58.3 FPS at 1080p, 38.5 FPS at 1440p (34% drop), and 24.3 FPS at 4K (36.9% drop). The consistent ~35-45% drops per resolution step across all presets indicate the GTX 1660 SUPER's pixel throughput is the limiting factor.

The CPU's capability is evident in the Low preset results, where the 8-core Ryzen 7 5700 maintains playable frame rates even at higher resolutions. However, the GPU's 85.68 GPixel/s pixel rate and 157.1 GTexel/s texture rate become bottlenecks as resolution increases. The 6 GB memory capacity also likely contributes to the steep drop at 4K, where texture memory requirements exceed what the GTX 1660 SUPER can efficiently manage.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system delivers 103.8 FPS on Low, 70.8 FPS on Medium, 58.3 FPS on High, and 49.2 FPS on Ultra settings. The spread of 54.6 FPS between Low and Ultra shows significant settings headroom at this resolution. The step from Low to Medium costs 33.0 FPS (31.8%), while Medium to High costs 12.5 FPS (17.7%), and High to Ultra costs 9.1 FPS (15.6%). This diminishing returns pattern suggests Medium or High provides the best balance.

Moving to 2560x1440, the results show 74.6 FPS on Low, 47.7 FPS on Medium, 38.5 FPS on High, and 28.4 FPS on Ultra. The relative performance drop from 1080p is consistent across presets: Low loses 28.1%, Medium loses 32.6%, High loses 34.0%, and Ultra loses 42.3%. This increasing percentage loss at higher settings reinforces GPU-bound behavior.

At 3840x2160, the system manages 42.2 FPS on Low, 27.7 FPS on Medium, 24.3 FPS on High, and 17.3 FPS on Ultra. The 4K results show the GPU struggling, with even the Low preset barely reaching playable territory. The Medium, High, and Ultra presets at 4K all fall below 30 FPS, making them impractical for smooth gameplay. The gap between Low and Medium at 4K is 14.5 FPS, while High to Ultra is only 7.0 FPS, indicating the GPU is saturated and settings changes have reduced impact.

Settings Recommendations

For 1080p gaming, the Low preset at 103.8 FPS provides the smoothest experience, but the Medium preset at 70.8 FPS offers a better balance of visual quality and performance. The High preset at 58.3 FPS remains playable, while Ultra at 49.2 FPS may be acceptable for players prioritizing visuals over frame rate. Given Rust's competitive survival gameplay, Medium appears to be the sweet spot for most users at this resolution.

At 1440p, the Low preset's 74.6 FPS is the only setting that maintains consistently high frame rates. Medium at 47.7 FPS is workable for less demanding play, while High at 38.5 FPS and Ultra at 28.4 FPS fall below ideal thresholds for fast-paced action. Users with 1440p displays should prioritize the Low or Medium presets to preserve responsiveness.

The 4K results show that this hardware cannot deliver satisfactory performance at this resolution. The Low preset's 42.2 FPS is borderline playable, but the Medium preset's 27.7 FPS and below are unsuitable. For 4K gaming, users would need to accept significant visual compromises or upgrade the graphics card. The data suggests this combination is best deployed at 1080p with Medium to High settings, where the CPU's strength compensates for GPU limitations and delivers a consistent experience.