Rust

Rust

AVERAGE FPS
88
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 88 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 33 44 52 77
1440p QHD 56 74 88 130
1080p Full HD 82 107 127 190

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 77
3840x2160 Medium 52
3840x2160 High 44
3840x2160 Ultra 33
2560x1440 Low 130
2560x1440 Medium 88
2560x1440 High 74
2560x1440 Ultra 56
1920x1080 Low 190
1920x1080 Medium 127
1920x1080 High 107
1920x1080 Ultra 82

Rust with AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, In-Depth Analysis

The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT combination delivers a versatile 1080p and 1440p experience in Rust, with performance scaling predictably as resolution and settings increase. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy across the four tested presets, with the system demonstrating strong CPU headroom at lower resolutions before GPU limitations emerge at 4K. This pairing ranks in the 65th percentile of all tested combos for this title, indicating solid mid-pack performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Rust?

A: The data shows 2560x1440 as the optimal balance, delivering 74 FPS on High settings and 88 FPS on Medium. At 1920x1080, performance exceeds 100 FPS on every preset except Ultra, while 3840x2160 drops below 60 FPS on all settings except Low.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 5 7500X3D sits within 1% of its nearest competitors. It is 0.2% faster than the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, 0.5% faster than the Intel Core i9-13950HX, and 0.6% faster than the AMD Ryzen AI Max 385. The Intel Core i5-14600 leads it by 0.7%.

Q: What is the GPU's relative standing among its peers?

A: The RX 7700 XT ranks in the 67th percentile of all GPUs. It trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile by 0.5% and the RTX 4060 Mobile by 0.8%, while running 1.7% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 and 1.5% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080.

Q: How much of a performance gap exists between Low and Ultra settings at 1080p?

A: The difference is substantial. Low settings produce 190 FPS, while Ultra drops to 82 FPS. That is a 108 FPS reduction, or roughly 57% lower performance when moving from the lowest to the highest preset.

Q: Does the system maintain playable frame rates at 4K?

A: Only at Low settings. The 3840x2160 results show 77 FPS on Low, 52 FPS on Medium, 44 FPS on High, and 33 FPS on Ultra. The medium preset shows a minimum of 44 FPS and a maximum of 59 FPS.

Q: What is the combo's overall rank in the database for Rust?

A: This pairing ranks 1025th out of 2953 tested combinations, placing it in the upper-middle tier of all systems benchmarked for this game.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT brings 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's architecture is RDNA 3.0 built on a 5 nm process from TSMC, featuring 3456 shading units, 216 texture mapping units, and 96 raster operation pipelines. The chip contains 54 ray tracing cores and operates at a base clock of 1435 MHz, a game clock of 2171 MHz, and a boost clock of 2544 MHz.

These specifications directly influence Rust's performance across the measured presets. The memory bandwidth and 12 GB capacity provide sufficient headroom for the game's texture streaming and world rendering at 1080p and 1440p. At 4K, the GPU's compute throughput becomes the limiting factor, with even Medium settings at 3840x2160 producing only 52 FPS average. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p demonstrates how the GPU's shading units and ROPs handle increasing pixel and effect loads.

The RX 7700 XT's FP32 performance of 35.17 TFLOPS and pixel rate of 244.2 GPixel/s explain its strong showing at lower resolutions. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the system reaches 190 FPS, indicating the GPU is not the bottleneck in this scenario. Instead, the CPU's single-thread performance and cache architecture drive these high frame rates. Moving to Ultra at 1080p drops performance to 82 FPS, showing the GPU now carries more of the rendering load.

The GPU's 96 ROPs and 216 TMUs handle Rust's draw calls and texture filtering efficiently at 1440p, where High settings maintain 74 FPS. However, the 4K results reveal the GPU's limits. The 33 FPS at Ultra 4K versus 77 FPS at Low 4K shows a 44 FPS swing purely from settings changes, confirming that pixel throughput is the primary constraint at this resolution.

Resolution Scaling

The performance trajectory from 1080p to 4K reveals how this combo shifts between CPU and GPU boundaries. At 1920x1080 Low, the system produces 190 FPS, dropping to 130 FPS at 2560x1440 Low, and then to 77 FPS at 3840x2160 Low. This represents a 59% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a further 41% reduction from 1440p to 4K.

The High preset shows similar scaling but with lower absolute values. Starting at 107 FPS for 1080p, it falls to 74 FPS at 1440p and 44 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are consistent: roughly 31% between 1080p and 1440p, then 41% between 1440p and 4K. This pattern suggests the GPU is becoming progressively more dominant as resolution increases, with the CPU's influence waning.

Medium settings present the only preset with full min/max data across all resolutions. At 1080p, the average is 127 FPS with a range of 108 to 146 FPS. At 1440p, the average drops to 88 FPS with a range of 74 to 101 FPS. At 4K, the average falls to 52 FPS with a range of 44 to 59 FPS. The consistent minimum-to-maximum spread across resolutions indicates stable frame pacing rather than occasional stutter.

The scaling behavior points to a CPU-bound system at 1080p Low, where 190 FPS suggests the Ryzen 5 7500X3D's 96 MB of shared L3 cache and 4.50 GHz boost clock are doing heavy lifting. As resolution climbs, the RX 7700 XT takes over as the limiting component. The 4K Ultra result of 33 FPS versus 1080p Ultra's 82 FPS shows a 60% performance penalty, which aligns with the 4x pixel count increase from 1080p to 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D and AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT places 1025th out of 2953 tested combos in Rust. This rank in the 65th percentile of all systems indicates the pairing sits comfortably above average without reaching top-tier status. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking among all processors provides the foundation, while the GPU's 67th percentile standing tempers overall performance.

The CPU's benchmark scores support this positioning. Its multithread score of 25047 and single-thread score of 3494 place it near rivals like the Intel Core Ultra X9 388H, which averages 44466 versus the 7500X3D's 44573. The physics score of 2779 and floating point math score of 43594 show strong computational ability that benefits Rust's simulation and building mechanics.

The GPU's passmark G3D score of 22547 aligns with its nearest competitors. The RTX 5060 Mobile scores 22435, the RTX 4060 Mobile scores 22729, and the RTX 2080 scores 22895. This tight grouping means the RX 7700 XT performs within a 3% band of these alternatives, making the overall combo rank more dependent on CPU performance and driver optimization for Rust specifically.

The combination's rank improves at lower resolutions where the CPU's cache advantage matters more. The 190 FPS at 1080p Low demonstrates that this system can exceed the refresh rates of most monitors, making the GPU the secondary consideration at this resolution. At higher resolutions, the GPU's mid-pack standing drags the combo down relative to systems with more powerful graphics cards.

Settings Recommendations

For 1920x1080 displays, the data suggests High settings as the optimal choice. The 107 FPS average provides smooth gameplay while retaining visual fidelity. Medium settings at 127 FPS offer a 19% performance increase if competitive play takes priority. Low settings at 190 FPS maximize responsiveness but sacrifice visual quality. Ultra at 82 FPS remains playable but offers diminishing returns over High.

At 2560x1440, Medium settings provide the best experience with 88 FPS average. High settings drop to 74 FPS, which remains acceptable for most players. Low settings reach 130 FPS for competitive scenarios, while Ultra falls to 56 FPS, making it marginal for smooth play. The 1440p Medium preset's minimum of 74 FPS ensures consistent frame delivery without significant drops.

For 3840x2160, only Low settings deliver playable performance at 77 FPS. Medium falls to 52 FPS, which may be tolerable for slower-paced gameplay. High at 44 FPS and Ultra at 33 FPS are below the threshold for smooth interaction. Players with 4K displays should accept reduced visual settings or lower the resolution to 1440p for better results.

The measured data shows that Medium settings at 1440p offer the best balance of visual quality and performance for this combo. The 88 FPS average with a 74 FPS minimum provides a stable experience, while the 101 FPS maximum shows headroom for less demanding scenes. This configuration leverages the CPU's strength while keeping the GPU within its comfort zone.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system produces its highest frame rates across all presets. Low settings deliver 190 FPS average, representing the peak performance of this combo. Medium settings reach 127 FPS with a minimum of 108 FPS and maximum of 146 FPS. High settings maintain 107 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 82 FPS. The 108 FPS spread between Low and Ultra demonstrates the significant impact of settings on this resolution.

The 2560x1440 results show a proportional decline. Low settings achieve 130 FPS, Medium reaches 88 FPS with a range of 74 to 101 FPS, High produces 74 FPS, and Ultra drops to 56 FPS. The transition from 1080p to 1440p costs roughly 32% performance across all presets, with Low falling from 190 to 130 FPS and Ultra from 82 to 56 FPS.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the dominant constraint. Low settings deliver 77 FPS, Medium averages 52 FPS with a minimum of 44 FPS and maximum of 59 FPS, High produces 44 FPS, and Ultra manages only 33 FPS. The 4K Low result represents a 59% reduction from 1080p Low, while 4K Ultra shows a 60% reduction from 1080p Ultra.

The Medium preset is the only one with complete min/max data at all three resolutions. The frame ranges remain consistent relative to their averages: 108-146 at 1080p, 74-101 at 1440p, and 44-59 at 4K. This consistency suggests the combo maintains stable frame pacing regardless of resolution, with the minimum typically sitting about 15% below the average and the maximum about 15% above it.

The data indicates that this system excels at 1080p and handles 1440p well, with 4K playable only on reduced settings. The Ryzen 5 7500X3D's cache and clock speeds drive high minimum frame rates at lower resolutions, while the RX 7700 XT's 12 GB memory and 432.0 GB/s bandwidth manage Rust's world streaming effectively until 4K pixel counts overwhelm it.

Hardware Specifications

AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 4000 MHz
Boost Clock 4500 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket AMD Socket AM5
View Full CPU Details →

AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2544 MHz MHz
TDP 245 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D + AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT in Rust

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 77.0
3840x2160 Medium 52.0
3840x2160 High 44.0
3840x2160 Ultra 33.0
2560x1440 Low 130.0
2560x1440 Medium 88.0
2560x1440 High 74.0
2560x1440 Ultra 56.0
1920x1080 Low 190.0
1920x1080 Medium 127.0
1920x1080 High 107.0
1920x1080 Ultra 82.0

Rust with Ryzen 5 7500X3D + Other GPUs

See how Rust performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Rust with RX 7700 XT + Other CPUs

See how Rust performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with Ryzen 5 7500X3D + RX 7700 XT

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.