Roblox

The Intel Core i7-14700F and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER combination delivers exceptional performance in Roblox, producing frame rates that far exceed the demands of typical displays. The data shows a system capable of triple-digit FPS at every tested setting and resolution, with the primary bottleneck shifting from the CPU to the GPU as resolution increases. This analysis breaks down the measured results, contextualizes them against other tested configurations, and provides actionable settings guidance based solely on the provided benchmark data.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core i7-14700F is a 20-core, 28-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename. It operates with a base clock of 2.10 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, featuring a 33 MB shared L3 cache. This CPU is designed for high multi-threaded throughput, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35122 and Geekbench multi-core score of 19620. However, Roblox is a sandbox game that often relies heavily on single-thread performance for its core game logic and physics simulation.

The i7-14700F's single-thread capabilities are robust, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4958 and a Geekbench single-core score of 2429. These figures place the CPU in the 91st percentile compared to all CPUs in the database, indicating it is far more powerful than the average processor. In the context of Roblox, this means the CPU can handle the game's simulation and scripting overhead with substantial headroom, allowing the GPU to operate without being starved of data.

The measured FPS data supports this interpretation. At 1080p Low settings, the system achieves 560 FPS, which is a clear indicator that the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU at very high rates. Even at 4K Ultra, where the GPU load is maximal, the average FPS of 138 suggests the CPU is not a limiting factor. The processor's Passmark single-thread score of 4257 further reinforces its strength in lightly-threaded workloads typical of this genre. While the CPU has 20 cores and 28 threads, Roblox generally does not scale perfectly across all of them, but the sheer per-core speed ensures fluid performance.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combination of the Intel Core i7-14700F and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER ranks 651st out of 3711 tested combos in Roblox. This places it in the top 17.5% of all configurations in the database, which is a strong result given the game's relatively modest hardware requirements. The rank reflects the balanced capabilities of this pairing, where both the CPU and GPU are high-end parts that complement each other well.

To contextualize this rank, the CPU's average benchmark score of 53620 places it near the top of its class. Its nearest rivals in the database include the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X, which has an average score of 53288 (0.6% lower), and the AMD EPYC 7313P, with an average score of 53206 (0.8% lower). This shows that the i7-14700F is slightly ahead of these competitors in raw CPU performance, though the differences are marginal.

On the GPU side, the RTX 4070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 43223, placing it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, which scores 43667 (1% higher), and the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB, which scores 43262 (0.1% lower). These small deltas indicate that the RTX 4070 SUPER's performance is tightly clustered with other high-end cards, making the combo's rank more dependent on the CPU-GPU balance than on any single component's dominance.

The 651st rank out of 3711 suggests that while many other combos are faster, the vast majority of tested systems are slower. This is a solid position for a mainstream high-end build, indicating it will deliver a premium experience in Roblox without being an outlier at the very top of the charts.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data reveals a clear scaling pattern across resolutions, which helps identify the limiting component at each setting level. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 560 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low, the FPS drops to 374, and at 4K Low, it falls to 211. This represents a 62.5% drop from 1080p to 4K at the Low preset. Similarly, at Ultra settings, the FPS goes from 365 at 1080p, to 244 at 1440p, and finally to 138 at 4K, a 62.2% reduction.

The consistent percentage drop across different settings indicates that the scaling is primarily driven by resolution, which increases the pixel count and thus the load on the GPU. The fact that the FPS does not plateau or show signs of CPU limitation at lower resolutions suggests that the i7-14700F has enough headroom to keep up with the GPU's output requests. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see a smaller FPS difference between 1080p and 1440p, as the CPU would cap the frame rate regardless of resolution.

The data instead shows a linear relationship between resolution and FPS, which is characteristic of a GPU-bound scenario. For instance, at 1080p Medium, the system hits 509 FPS, which drops to 340 at 1440p and 192 at 4K. The gradual decline indicates that the RTX 4070 SUPER's rendering capacity is the limiting factor, even though it is a very capable card. The CPU's role is to ensure that it can provide the necessary draw calls and physics calculations, which it does effectively given the high frame rates observed at all resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the system delivers the following average FPS: Low 560, Medium 509, High 450, and Ultra 365. The Medium preset also recorded minimum and maximum FPS of 433 and 586, respectively, indicating a stable frame time distribution.

At 2560x1440, the average FPS figures are: Low 374, Medium 340, High 300, and Ultra 244. The Medium preset shows a minimum of 289 FPS and a maximum of 391 FPS. These numbers demonstrate that even at 1440p, the system maintains frame rates well above the 144 Hz refresh rate of most gaming monitors, ensuring a smooth experience.

At 3840x2160 (4K), the average FPS drops to: Low 211, Medium 192, High 170, and Ultra 138. The Medium preset at 4K recorded a minimum of 163 FPS and a maximum of 221 FPS. This shows that the system can handle 4K gaming comfortably, with even the most demanding Ultra preset staying above the 60 FPS threshold, albeit with less headroom.

The progression from Low to Ultra at each resolution shows a consistent performance penalty. At 1080p, moving from Low to Ultra costs 195 FPS (34.8% reduction). At 1440p, the cost is 130 FPS (34.8% reduction). At 4K, the cost is 73 FPS (34.6% reduction). This uniform percentage drop across resolutions indicates that the settings presets scale similarly, regardless of pixel count, which is typical for a GPU-bound workload.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the average FPS at 1440p with High settings?

A: At 2560x1440 with the High preset, the system achieves an average of 300 FPS, with no recorded minimum or maximum values in the data.

Q: How does the CPU's multi-threaded performance compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Intel Core i7-14700F has an average benchmark score of 53620, which is 0.6% higher than the AMD Ryzen 9 7900X's score of 53288, and 0.8% higher than the AMD EPYC 7313P's score of 53206.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 SUPER faster than the RTX 4090 Mobile?

A: No. The RTX 4070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 43223, which is 1% lower than the RTX 4090 Mobile's score of 43667, making the mobile part slightly faster in aggregate benchmarks.

Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded in the entire dataset?

A: The highest average FPS is 560, achieved at 1920x1080 with the Low settings preset.

Q: At what resolution and settings does the system drop below 150 FPS average?

A: The system averages 138 FPS at 3840x2160 with the Ultra preset, which is the only tested configuration below 150 FPS.

Q: What is the combo's rank among all tested combinations?

A: The combo ranks 651st out of 3711 tested combos, placing it in the top 17.5% of all configurations in the database.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings preset depends on the user's display resolution and refresh rate. At 1080p, all four presets deliver exceptionally high frame rates, with even the Ultra preset achieving 365 FPS. For users with a 144 Hz or 165 Hz monitor, the High preset at 450 FPS provides a significant margin of safety, ensuring no frame drops below the refresh rate. The Ultra preset at 365 FPS is also viable, but the visual difference between High and Ultra may not justify the 18.9% FPS reduction for most users.

At 1440p, the High preset delivers 300 FPS, which is still more than enough for high-refresh-rate displays up to 240 Hz. The Ultra preset at 244 FPS remains above the 240 Hz threshold, making it a viable choice for competitive players who prioritize visual fidelity without sacrificing smoothness. The Medium preset at 340 FPS offers the best balance for users with 360 Hz monitors, as it provides a substantial headroom above the refresh rate.

At 4K, the Medium preset at 192 FPS is the recommended choice for most users, as it offers a good balance between visual quality and performance, comfortably exceeding the 144 Hz mark. The High preset at 170 FPS is also excellent, but the Ultra preset at 138 FPS dips below 144 Hz, which may be noticeable on high-refresh-rate 4K panels. For users with a standard 60 Hz 4K display, the Ultra preset at 138 FPS is still overkill, but it provides the maximum visual fidelity. The data suggests that the Medium preset at 4K is the sweet spot, delivering 192 FPS with a minimum of 163 FPS, ensuring a consistent experience even in demanding scenes.